I've a table where I've to select the greatest value from each row.
create table find_max ( colA number, colB number, colC number ); insert all into find_max values (8,12,13) into find_max values (-1,-22,3) into find_max values (1,null,13) into find_max values (-1,-2,-3) into find_max values (-1,0,-10) select * from dual; the desired format of output is: three fields for colA, colB, colC and max_value max_value for 1st row is 13, 2nd is 3, 3rd is 13, 4th is -1,5th is 0.
how can I find the max_value without using any built in functions??
i want to replace 4 digit number in a given string with the same number incremented by 10000.
That mean in the given sting 1201 should be replace by 11201 (Icremented BY 10000).
Input String:
<query><matchAll>true</matchAll><row><columnId>1201</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>Like</op><val>North America - Houston</val></row><row><columnId>1212</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>!=</op><val>Agreement Date Mismatch</val></row><row><columnId>1212</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>!=</op><val>Facility Type Mismatch</val></row><row><columnId>1224</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>Like</op><val>y</val></row></query>
Required output :
<query><matchAll>true</matchAll><row><columnId>11201</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>Like</op><val>North America - Houston</val></row><row><columnId>11212</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>!=</op><val>Agreement Date Mismatch</val></row><row><columnId>11212</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>!=</op><val>Facility Type Mismatch</val></row><row><columnId>11224</columnId><dataType>31</dataType><op>Like</op><val>y</val></row></query>
setting up the query/correcting the syntax below so that it calculates the 'number of days difference' between whatever the 'Biggest Date' field value is and whatever the 'current date' is using the 'sysdate'. So far, I've only managed to get the query to calculate the number of days difference (days past due) between the 'need date' and 'estimated delivery date'.
CODESELECT To_Date(need_date, 'YYYYMMDD') Need_Dt, To_Date(Case when estimated_delivery > ' ' THEN estimated_delivery ELSE need_date END, 'YYYYMMDD') Biggest_Date, To_Date(need_date, 'YYYYMMDD') - To_Date(Case when estimated_delivery > ' ' THEN estimated_delivery ELSE need_date END, 'YYYYMMDD') Date_Diff
FROM tableT
WHERE need_date <= (Case when estimated_delivery > ' ' THEN estimated_delivery ELSE need_date END)
If I run the following query I got 997 records by using GROUP BY.
SELECT c.ins_no, b.pd_date,a.project_id, a.tech_no FROM mis.tranche_balance a, FMSRPT.fund_reporting_period b, ods.proj_info_lookup c, ods.institution d WHERE a.su_date = b.pd_date AND a.project_id = c.project_id AND c.ins_no = d.ins_no AND d.sif_code LIKE 'P%' AND d.sif_code <> 'P-DA' AND a.date_stamp >='01-JAN-2011' AND pd_date='31-MAR-2011' GROUP BY c.ins_no, b.pd_date, a.project_id, a.tech_no;
I want to show the extra columns a.date_stamp and a.su_date in the out put so that I have used PARTITION BY in the second query but I got 1079 records.
If I have a "smart" key in a database, say one for which each byte of the key is meaningful, is it generally a good idea to string together a number of LIKEs with ORs? For example, if I want to select people where the last two bytes of that smart code are in a certain list and write:
where smart_key LIKE '%02' or smart_key LIKE '%03' or smart_key LIKE '%07' or smart_key LIKE '%19' or smart_key LIKE '%23' or smart_key LIKE '%30' or smart_key LIKE '%33' or smart_key LIKE '%34' or smart_key LIKE '%41' etc.
Say I string a lot of those together, with 40 or 50 ORs. Right off the bat is it fair to say that's a bad query for Oracle, or do substrings of this sort generally perform well?
I am currently working on a Data Dictionary project where we need to run a few rules against the give data sources to see if they all comply together.
One of the rule is to check if the no. is negative or not. So for that what I tried to do was to check if first the field is number or not and then check on if it is negative or not.
This is the code I am currently trying on and is not looking good.
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL WHERE decode(DECODE( TRANSLATE('-123.45','-0.123456789',''), NULL, 1,0), 1,substr('-123.45',1,1) ,' ' ) = '-'
I wanna convert the amount of money from number to string such as 144.5 to be one hundred forty four point five is there any function or i have to write my function? How could i put new line in the string?
for example if i have 'SAB Bank' || 'Riyadh'
but i want SAB bank to be displayed in line and Riyadh in line.
The code which I am working on consists of an incoming dynamic string which be in the form of binary digits. The max size of the string will be 12 digits. For example, the string can be '111011000001', '000000000000', '111111011111', etc.
I need to find the number of occurences of '111' in the incoming string. Say in the 1st example, result will be 1, in the 2nd example result will be 0, and in the third example, the result will be 3.
I have been trying to capture the string length and replacing the variables '111' to find the number of occurences, but it isn't giving me the result that I want. This is what I have tried
SQL> conn hr/hr Connected. SQL> show user USER is "HR"
[Code]....
I searched the forum and found a similar topic, and following that guideline, I even tried dividing the string with the length of the pattern. It works in some scenarios (the first and second examples mentioned below), while it fails in some scenarios (third example mentioned below)
SQL> select (length('11101110111') - length(replace('11101110111','111','')))/length('111') as occurences from dual;
OCCURENCES ---------- 3
SQL> select (length('110111110111') - length(replace('110111110111','111','')))/length('111') as occurences from dual;
OCCURENCES ---------- 2
SQL> select (length('111111111111') - length(replace('111111111111','111','')))/length('111') as occurences from dual;
i want display a string like this using a select statement in oracle 10g.i have tried but not yet done.
example: ----------- from 'ABCDEFGH' to 'ACEG' removing 'BDFH' from the source string 'ABCDEFGH'
i giving here the example you can take any valid string i want the result like the above example and also in a dynamic manner means we can give string to a select statement in run time.can it is possible in a select statement only.
I'm trying to map a database (with a stupid schema) into an ontology. That's why I need to do such a stupid query (as you will see). Here is the structure of the table:
CodonUs { ID STRING PRIMARY KEY, GCT FLOAT, GCC FLOAT, GTC FLOAT, and so on for all possible triplets
What I would like to do is to have a query that joins the organisme table on the ID and extract the name of the triplet (thus, the name of the column) and the exact value:
SELECT ID, 'GCT' AS Codon, Codon
FROM organisme JOIN codonUs ON Abbrev = ID
The result set should be something like:
ID of the organisme | Name of the triplet | Value of the triplet
If i try to find length of the string with more than 4000 char in SQL Developer it throws error "ORA-01704: string literal too long". if anything i need to SET in preference.
select length('string with more than 4000 char) from dual;
I have a quite complex view that selects from approx 10 long tables (approx 4M records each) and build one "customer sentence" pre customer id. I will be always getting just one row from this view, eg. select * from my_view where party_id = XYZ. I'll NEVER EVER select the whole view.
The problem is that running a query: select * from my_view where party_id = XYZ takes really long time, while putting the party_id = XYZ condition directly into the view executes in 0.0 seconds.
After putting a ORDERED FIRST_ROWS(1) hint into a view the execution plans seems to be the same (or very similar) for both queries. Unfortunately, I can not transfer anything but screenshot from the environmnet - therefore I paste the exec plans as screenshots only - pls follow the link: [URL]...
View DDL: create or replace view my_view as select /*+ ORDERED FIRST_ROWS(1) */ pt.party_id pt.party_id as id_klienta_mdm, pt.master_reference_no as id_klienta_ref_mdm,
I have created a function that is used for splitting a comma separated string & give the output in tabular form.here is the function
Here I have used CLOB as my input string will be huge(greater than max limit of varchar2)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE SPLIT_TBL_CLOB AS TABLE OF CLOB; CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION CSVTOSTRING_CLOB ( P_LIST CLOB, P_DEL VARCHAR2 := ',' ) RETURN SPLIT_TBL_CLOB PIPELINED
[code]....
But here I am facing 2 problems.
1. The function is not accepting a large string & I am getting the error
I have a column COL1 in table TAB1 which is varchar2. I want select only rows which has number and not alphanumeric value? I don't want to use regexp for this since