In sql plus How do I get the number of distinct rows of a certain value?
for example
select group_number from records group by group_number
How would I query for the total number of group_numbers in this query?
I have a column COL1 in table TAB1 which is varchar2. I want select only rows which has number and not alphanumeric value? I don't want to use regexp for this since
View 11 Replies View RelatedThis is what I've been trying to do.
I have the following table:
FOOTBALL PLAYERS < ID, NAME, ATTRIBUTE>
100-JIM-TALL
101-BOB-STRONG
102-MARK-SMART
...etc
I want to form a query that regardless of the total returned records, I will be able to specify how many of each "kind" of players I want returned. There are several good reasons that it has to be one query and not many.
The query below returns 101 rows. If I replace the column list with an asterik the query returns 892 rows. I do not understand why.
--select *
select Ref_Consultant_CD
,Resident_CD
,ID
,Ref_Facility_CD
[code]......
I am facing a problem in bulk insert using SELECT statement.My sql statement is like below.
strQuery :='INSERT INTO TAB3
(SELECT t1.c1,t2.c2
FROM TAB1 t1, TAB2 t2
WHERE t1.c1 = t2.c1
AND t1.c3 between 10 and 15 AND)' ....... some other conditions.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE strQuery...These SQL statements are inside a procedure. And this procedure is called from C#.The number of rows returned by the "SELECT" query is 70.
On the very first time call of this procedure, the number rows inserted using strQuery is 70. But in the next time call (in the same transaction) of the procedure, the number rows inserted is only 50.And further if we are repeating calling this procedure, it will insert sometimes 70 or 50 etc. It is showing some inconsistency.On my initial analysis it is found that, the default optimizer is "ALL_ROWS". When i changed the optimizer mode to "rule", this issue is not coming.I am using Oracle 10g R2 version.
I am importing some data from Oracle into another database on a regular basis. It works fine for most of the queries but couple of queries don't work sometimes (random). I don't get any errors or any data.
We switched on the Oracle auditing to find out the queries being sent to oracle db. We can see all the queries in the Audit log. Is it possible to configure Auditing to get the "Number of Rows" returned by Select statements so that we can be sure that some data was returned.
DECLARE
l_query VARCHAR2(4000);
TYPE cursor_type IS REF CURSOR;
[Code].....
How can I get the total number of rows returned by the query?
I want to be able to check omething like c1.ROWS = 0
i have a select query with four table its generating around 650 rows. and i need to update these 650 rows only.
for example
update ps_po_lining b
set y.recv_req = 'N'
where recv_req in
[Code]....
this query runs but its updating 6000 rows. which is not right. we need to update what ever the select query is retrieving.
I need to get the super set(parent) record from a relational table. Following is the structure of the table,
create table relation (data_field1 number(20),data_field2 number(20),data_field3 number(20),
primary key (data_field1,data_field2,data_field3) );
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (-10,123,334);
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (200,123,334);
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (300,123,334);
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (400,123,334);
[code].....
Here '-10' will be considered as parent(super set) for all other values. If i have records like below,
-10 200 300
100 200 300
123 200 300
521 201 300
Output should only contain two rows. A super set row and other distinct row(second column value is not equivalent to super set).
I need a generic query to generate total # of records for each table in a schema, total # of records that are not null for each column in the table, and total # of records that are null for each of those columns in those tables.
ex:
the output should look like this.
owner schema table_name total# recs in the table, column_name,
------ ------ ---------- ------------------------- -----------
# of records not null # of records null
---------------------- --------------------
I need to view the rows of the result of a select query in table format in GUI application.I have used XMLELEMENT to somewhat match the scenario to display as ','(comma) separate values as b belwo
SELECT RTRIM (XMLAGG (XMLELEMENT (e, EMPNO || ',')).EXTRACT ('//text()'),
',')
AS empid,
RTRIM (XMLAGG (XMLELEMENT (e, ENAME || ',')).EXTRACT ('//text()'),
[code]...
But the case is I need to display the value in table format Horizontally as below
EMPIDemployee nameDEPID
778
278CLARK10
397MILLER
934KING
[code]...
I want to get top two rows based on ACCT_UNIT & order by status_date, if there is only one row on acct_unit, get one row. IF more than two rows available, want to get the top two rows based on status_date.
SELECT ACTIVE_STATUS, ACCT_UNIT, DESCRIPTION, DIRECTOR, DIRECTOR2, STATUS_DATE, OBJ_ID, STATUS_FLAG, SUR_KEY
FROM STSI
I have the following select query that works perfectly fine. Returns 25 rows based on the descending order of the price.But, I want add one more expression to this list of columns in this query (apart from customer_id).
the expression should look like Cust-01 for the first customer from the below query all the way to Cust-25 for the last customer.But how can I can generate 01 to 25 in oracle?
select customer_id from
(select customer_id from capitalPLAN
where member_status = 'MEMBER' AND customer_id NOT in ('156','201','1385','2125','3906','165')
order by price desc
)
where rownum <= 25
I have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select
x,y,z
from
mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while
select
x,y,z
from
mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
in my sql we can use limit to select first 4 rows in the table then next 4 rows ,can oracle do that ?
I have fifty rows inside the table
select * from student where rownum between 0 and 4 order by stuid ->it work
select * from student where rownum between 5 and 9 order by stuid -> did not work
what is the correct way to do it ?
I am trying to find records in table A that don't have any corresponding records in table B
select a.ID,a.templatenames from cbe a where not exists (select 1 from cbe_child b where a.ID=b.cbe_id)
Both tables have about 100 mil rows. And there is no Parent/Child relationship here, A.ID is a PK column.how can i write this select to perform better.
I am looking to simplify the below query,
DELETE FROM A WHERE A1 IN (SELECT ID FROM B WHERE BID=0) OR A2 IN (SELECT ID FROM B WHERE BID=0)
Since both the inner queries are same,I want to extract out to a local variable and then use it.
Say,
Array var = SELECT ID FROM B WHERE BID=0;
And then ,
DELETE FROM A WHERE A1 IN (var) OR A2 IN (var)
How to do this using SQLPLUS?
how can I select whole table in parts of 100 rows?
If I have primary key I can:
CODEstart=0;
end=100;
select * from table where ID>=start_point and ID<end;
start=end;
end=end+100;
and repeat:
CODEselect * from table where ID>=start_point and ID<end;
How can I do it without primary key? Is there another posibility to getting 100 number of rows? Maybe using rowid?
i have a table displaying location, cost, inner_num and rownum ordered by the descending order of the cost.
the question is: display locations of the highest 10 costs. if the cost of 11th row is the same as 11th, then display 11 rows.
Consider the following tables
MANAGERID
101
102
103
104
MANAGERID EMPID
101 ----------------24
101-----------------25
101 ----------------26
104 --------------- 27
write sql query to get the following output without using minus,union,intersect.
MANAGERID EMPID
101 ---------------------------------- 24
101------------------------------------25
101 -----------------------------------26
102 -----------------------------------N/A
103 -----------------------------------N/A
104 -----------------------------------27
My Table structure is
SL# Start_ts
1 7/31/2012 3:53:42.864070 AM
2 7/26/2012 2:13:58.280928 PM
3 7/25/2012 2:13:41.692569 PM
4 7/21/2012 2:13:26.821070 PM
5 7/18/2012 2:13:07.827278 PM
6 7/13/2012 2:05:35.023520 PM
Question
How to select last 10 days rows only (from sysdate)
Error
1) SQL> select * from Test where to_date(start_ts, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS') > to_date(sysdate, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')-10 ; (or)
2) SQL> select * from Test where to_date(start_ts, 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') > to_date(sysdate, 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')-10 ;
ORA-01858: a non-numeric character was found where a numeric was expected
[Code]...
I have been trying to find out how to write the following query:
Suppose the following table:
ID seq
24 1
24 2
24 3
67 1
67 2
67 3
67 4
67 5
13 1
13 2
I would like to retrieve the rows for every different ID with its max value. For one ID that would be:
select * from TABLE where seq in(
select max(seq) from TABLE where id=24)
How can i do this for all the rows??
is there a way to find out how many rows a View has? Something similar to NUM_ROWS with regular tables perhaps? Or do I have to use Count(*)?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need to load 2 trillion data from an external table to Oracle Heap table. I am using Direct Path insert for that. how to commit after inserting n number of rows.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCan we select table's rows of 5 to 15, like
select * from emp
where rowid <=5;
It is through an error when i used the below method.
select * from emp
where rowid >=5 and rowid <=15;
I have a table ABC with two columns NAME and SEQUENCE. The valid values of sequence are from 1..50. The table may not have all the Sequence number. For example following is the data in my table..
Quote:NAME SEQUENCE
------------------------
Jonh| 5
Amy| 1
Suresh| 3
I need a SQL to get the data like
Quote:NAME SEQUENCE
------------------------
Amy| 1
| 2
Suresh| 3
| 4
Jonh | 5
|6
|7
..
..
..
|50
Basically I want to have rows for the sequence numbers which are not present i my table. I thought of using the following query to generate a sequence and then join, but does not work.
select rownum from dual connect by rownum <=50
I tried something like
with temp as (select name, sequence from abc where supp_ref_order is not null order by sequence )
select rownum as num, temp.name from dual, temp connect by rownum <=50 where temp.sequence =num
To count the number of rows to the below table entries with certain conditions
my table
col1(varchar2(4000)) col2(varchar2(10))
3-1808116101 3-Standard
3-1808312141 3-Standard
3-1808312061 3-Standard
3-1807714441 2-Significant
3-1808284201 2-Significant
3-1808278361 2-Significant
3-1808284111 3-Standard
3-1807714261 3-Standard
3-1807128371 3-Standard
3-1807128351 3-Standard
3-1808301721 2-Significant
3-1808301701 3-Standard
3-1808322501 2-Significant
where conditions:
1)need to take the count of rows(col1).where col2 value is 3 or 2 .
2)value 3 or 2 is extracted and conditioned in the query
I've a table where I've to select the greatest value from each row.
create table find_max ( colA number, colB number, colC number );
insert all
into find_max values (8,12,13)
into find_max values (-1,-22,3)
into find_max values (1,null,13)
into find_max values (-1,-2,-3)
into find_max values (-1,0,-10)
select * from dual;
the desired format of output is:
three fields for colA, colB, colC and max_value
max_value for 1st row is 13, 2nd is 3, 3rd is 13, 4th is -1,5th is 0.
how can I find the max_value without using any built in functions??
Which part of the Posting Guidelines (
[URL]......)
did you NOT read & follow?
Was it the part about using SEARCH (
[URL]......
or GOOGLE (
[URL]......
before posting?
Is there a technique to getting a Top-N query to work as a sub-select in a larger query -or- is there another way to generate Top-N like results that works as a sub-select?
Background:
We have a large query that is being used to build an export from a legacy HR system to a new one. Amount the data needed in the export is the employees primary phone number.
The legacy HR system allows multiple phone numbers to be stored in a simple table structure:
SELECT emp_id, phone_type, phone_number
FROM employee_phones
emp_idphone_typephone_number
------- --------------- -------------------
46021CELL2222222222
46021HOME1111111111
46021WORK3333333333
The new HR system does allow for multiple phone numbers, however they need a primary phone number identified and stored with the employee master information. (Subsequent phone numbers get stored in alternate table.)
From a business perspective, we have decided that if they have a HOME phone in the legacy system that should be the primary in the new system, if no HOME phone, then WORK, if no WORK then CELL.
That can be represented as:
SELECT *
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = '46021'
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')
emp_idphone_typephone_number
------- --------------- -------------------
46021HOME1111111111
46021WORK2222222222
46021CELL3333333333
Or similarly with Top N concept:
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT *
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = '46021'
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results
WHERE ROWNUM = 1
emp_idphone_typephone_number
------- --------------- -------------------
46021HOME1111111111
Or really what I want in my export:
SELECT phone_number
FROM (SELECT phone_number
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = '46021'
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results
WHERE ROWNUM = 1
phone_number
-------------------
1111111111
However, when the Top-N query is added as a sub-select in a larger query using the employee id from the larger query (WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id), it fails saying that �export.emp_id� is not a valid id.
(SELECT phone_number
FROM (SELECT phone_number
FROM employee_people_phones
WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id
ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results
WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
1.Any way around this? Is it possible to put a Top-N (with a WHERE clause using data from the main query) in a sub-select?
2.Any alternatives (other than Top-N) to delivering a ROWNUM=1 result with a �custom� ORDER BY statement?
Other Notes: Yes, we know we could do two queries in the data conversion first deliver the bulk data to the target table, and then update with the phone numbers. However, for multiple reasons, that is less than desirable.