how can I select whole table in parts of 100 rows?
If I have primary key I can:
CODEstart=0;
end=100;
select * from table where ID>=start_point and ID<end;
start=end;
end=end+100;
and repeat:
CODEselect * from table where ID>=start_point and ID<end;
How can I do it without primary key? Is there another posibility to getting 100 number of rows? Maybe using rowid?
This is my table design:
REQUEST(R_ID,attr1,attr2)WIPS(R_ID,WIP,attr3,attr4)SHIPPING(WIP,attr5,attr6)
How do I limit my query to show the information from REQUEST but only where the all of the wips associated between REQUEST and WIPS are not in the SHIPPING table. For example, the SHIPPING table has all of the WIPS that have been shipped, I only want to show the REQUEST rows where all of the WIPS have not shipped.
I have a flat file as source wherein I am getting values like
Comp_id, Comp_name, ISIN, column_name, column_value
The structure is like this may contain multiple records like Comp_id, Comp_name, ISIN will be same, but column_name will contain the column_name to which its corresponding column_value needs to be populated to.
E.g. of Feed File -
Comp_id, Comp_name, column_name, column_value
1,HSBC,branch_name,HSBC-DELHI
1,HSBC,branch_add,24-Lajpat Nagar
1,HSBC,branch_phone,2322322
2,HSBC,branch_name,HSBC-MUMBAI
2,HSBC,branch_add,24Andheri
2,HSBC,branch_phone,4445221
2,HSBC,branch_postalcode,400023
Target table structure
Comp_id, Comp_name, branch_name, branch_add, branch_phone, branch_postalcode
I need to insert the above data to a table by selecting data from above scenario.
I am working on Pro*C and i have a requirement where i need to select all the rows from a table into a c - structure variable. Since i get to know the no of rows in the table which is getting selected only at run time, i need to create a pointer variable to the structure and i'll allocate the size to it based on the count of rows in the table using malloc or calloc.I tried allocating memory using calloc and it does not show any error. But when i when the exec select statement run it shows an error.
Statements i have used:
struct common *comp;
struct common_ind *comp_i;
comp = (struct common*) calloc(rowcount, sizeof(struct common));
comp_i = (struct common_ind*) calloc(rowcount, sizeof(struct common_ind));
exec sql at db1 select * into :comp indicator :comp_i from tab1;
Error i get :
Stop Error: -2112
Stop Error: -1012
Stop Error: -1012
i have a table displaying location, cost, inner_num and rownum ordered by the descending order of the cost.
the question is: display locations of the highest 10 costs. if the cost of 11th row is the same as 11th, then display 11 rows.
In sql plus How do I get the number of distinct rows of a certain value?
for example
select group_number from records group by group_number
How would I query for the total number of group_numbers in this query?
is there a way to find out how many rows a View has? Something similar to NUM_ROWS with regular tables perhaps? Or do I have to use Count(*)?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a column COL1 in table TAB1 which is varchar2. I want select only rows which has number and not alphanumeric value? I don't want to use regexp for this since
View 11 Replies View RelatedI need to load 2 trillion data from an external table to Oracle Heap table. I am using Direct Path insert for that. how to commit after inserting n number of rows.
View 8 Replies View RelatedCan we select table's rows of 5 to 15, like
select * from emp
where rowid <=5;
It is through an error when i used the below method.
select * from emp
where rowid >=5 and rowid <=15;
I have a table ABC with two columns NAME and SEQUENCE. The valid values of sequence are from 1..50. The table may not have all the Sequence number. For example following is the data in my table..
Quote:NAME SEQUENCE
------------------------
Jonh| 5
Amy| 1
Suresh| 3
I need a SQL to get the data like
Quote:NAME SEQUENCE
------------------------
Amy| 1
| 2
Suresh| 3
| 4
Jonh | 5
|6
|7
..
..
..
|50
Basically I want to have rows for the sequence numbers which are not present i my table. I thought of using the following query to generate a sequence and then join, but does not work.
select rownum from dual connect by rownum <=50
I tried something like
with temp as (select name, sequence from abc where supp_ref_order is not null order by sequence )
select rownum as num, temp.name from dual, temp connect by rownum <=50 where temp.sequence =num
To count the number of rows to the below table entries with certain conditions
my table
col1(varchar2(4000)) col2(varchar2(10))
3-1808116101 3-Standard
3-1808312141 3-Standard
3-1808312061 3-Standard
3-1807714441 2-Significant
3-1808284201 2-Significant
3-1808278361 2-Significant
3-1808284111 3-Standard
3-1807714261 3-Standard
3-1807128371 3-Standard
3-1807128351 3-Standard
3-1808301721 2-Significant
3-1808301701 3-Standard
3-1808322501 2-Significant
where conditions:
1)need to take the count of rows(col1).where col2 value is 3 or 2 .
2)value 3 or 2 is extracted and conditioned in the query
This is what I've been trying to do.
I have the following table:
FOOTBALL PLAYERS < ID, NAME, ATTRIBUTE>
100-JIM-TALL
101-BOB-STRONG
102-MARK-SMART
...etc
I want to form a query that regardless of the total returned records, I will be able to specify how many of each "kind" of players I want returned. There are several good reasons that it has to be one query and not many.
I have a query that returns 11 Million rows but not all of them can be displayed in SQLDeveloper or DBVisualizer because of limited memory or other type of issues. I need to copy the entire result set to excel for further calculations.
Is there any way that i can select N number of rows out of my actual result set.
For example:
a) A result set contains 10 Million rows in total.
b) I want to display first 5 Million rows by executing a query
c) Then I want to display the remaining 5 Million rows by executing the query again with any parameter changes.
So all I want is to extract the rows of my actual result set in two or more executions, depending on the number of rows.
I have a table:
Name
_____
Smith Street
Smith Street
John Street
Ed Street
Ed Street
Ed Street
and need to assign sequence numbers only when the record (Name) changes, e.g. :
Name Seq
_____ ____
Smith Street 1
Smith Street 1
John Street 2
Ed Street 3
Ed Street 3
Ed Street 3
I have experimented with row_number partition but then i just get the sequence returning to 1 when the name value changes.
If I grouped the records by Name I would like to have unique, sequential numbers: 1, 2, 3 but where there is the same name I would like the sequence to stop and the number to replicate?
DECLARE
l_query VARCHAR2(4000);
TYPE cursor_type IS REF CURSOR;
[Code].....
How can I get the total number of rows returned by the query?
I want to be able to check omething like c1.ROWS = 0
The query below returns 101 rows. If I replace the column list with an asterik the query returns 892 rows. I do not understand why.
--select *
select Ref_Consultant_CD
,Resident_CD
,ID
,Ref_Facility_CD
[code]......
how to update the middle of plenty rows in the middle of the columns
sample_data
id name state REGION LOC
1 v A.p 1 1
2 a
3 g K.A 0 3
4 y
5 i T.N 1 0
6 l M.P 0 1
7 c U.P
This is sample data,and i have this kind of large data and i need to fill the rows which are empty. In three columns state,region,loc with data like 0,web_intimation,1,
Consider tables A,B,C,D,E,F. all are having 100000++ records Tables B,C,D are dependent on table A (with foreign key constraint). When I am deleting records from all tables, table B,C,D are taking max 30-40 seconds while table A is taking 30-40 mins. All tables are having indexes.
Method I have used:
1. Created Temp table
2. then deleted all records from B,C,D,E,F for all records in temp table for limit of 500.
delete from B where exists (select 1 from temp where b.col1=temp.col1);
3. Why it is taking too much time for deleting records in table A.
Is there any thing that during deleting data from such master table, it is referring to all dependent tables even if dependent data is not present ?
I read the error description. In my case there is only one full backup at a time running, hence it does not make any sense.
RMAN>
connected to target database: OTATEST (DBID=3130218754)
RMAN-06900: WARNING: unable to generate V$RMAN_STATUS or V$RMAN_OUTPUT row
RMAN-06901: WARNING: disabling update of the V$RMAN_STATUS and V$RMAN_OUTPUT row
s
ORACLE error from target database:
ORA-19921: maximum number of 128 rows exceeded
SQL> select count(*) from V$RMAN_STATUS;
COUNT(*)
----------
560
SQL> select count(*) from V$RMAN_OUTPUT;
COUNT(*)
----------
32834
how to store total no of updated rows (number) in a variable after executing an updation query using script
View 2 Replies View Relatedgenerate the number of rows based on table field.
Sample code is given below.
CREATE TABLE T
(
docno VARCHAR2(10),
CODE VARCHAR2(8),
QTY NUMBER(3)
)
LOGGING
how to resolve the following issue ...
insert into GTT (select query) inserting less no. of rows than that returned by the query.
The global temporary table has ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS.
I need a generic query to generate total # of records for each table in a schema, total # of records that are not null for each column in the table, and total # of records that are null for each of those columns in those tables.
ex:
the output should look like this.
owner schema table_name total# recs in the table, column_name,
------ ------ ---------- ------------------------- -----------
# of records not null # of records null
---------------------- --------------------
I want to import only limited number of rows(say 100 rows from each table) from all tables but I want all proc/functions/packages etc to be imported.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen I build simple tabular form in APEX 4.2 it displayed 10 rows per page by default. When I changed that number in Number of Rows field to 15 nothing happens. Again only 10 rows per page were displayed. Next field on the right to Number of Rows is Number of Rows (Item). Tabular form works as expected when I use this field and define number of rows with hidden page item. So workaround issue (bug?) is easy. Is this some kind of bug or I miss something obvious?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am facing a problem in bulk insert using SELECT statement.My sql statement is like below.
strQuery :='INSERT INTO TAB3
(SELECT t1.c1,t2.c2
FROM TAB1 t1, TAB2 t2
WHERE t1.c1 = t2.c1
AND t1.c3 between 10 and 15 AND)' ....... some other conditions.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE strQuery...These SQL statements are inside a procedure. And this procedure is called from C#.The number of rows returned by the "SELECT" query is 70.
On the very first time call of this procedure, the number rows inserted using strQuery is 70. But in the next time call (in the same transaction) of the procedure, the number rows inserted is only 50.And further if we are repeating calling this procedure, it will insert sometimes 70 or 50 etc. It is showing some inconsistency.On my initial analysis it is found that, the default optimizer is "ALL_ROWS". When i changed the optimizer mode to "rule", this issue is not coming.I am using Oracle 10g R2 version.
In Report it is possible to set the maximum rows to fetch to be a number e.g. 1+.Is it possible to use a number that is selected from another query? When I try to do this i.e. I put in the field num_lines or :num_lines I just get invalid number
View 10 Replies View RelatedI need to read a huge number of rows, say in lakhs and then need to populate it in data block. Since it is having huge data am never able to run the form. it hangs after some time. when i test with few rows it is working. so no problem in coding.
View 4 Replies View RelatedORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows.
I receive this error because i tried to introduce the below coding in a post query of the block.
begin
select supplier_cd into :fin_ex_rev_head.vendor_code
from fin_ex_rev_receipts
where receipt_date
between :keyblock.receipt_date
[code].....