nex lines showing SELECT DISTINCT return different rows when used with ORDER BY.
CREATE TABLE M1( ID_ NUMBER, A NUMBER, B NUMBER);
CREATE TABLE V1 ( A NUMBER, B2 NUMBER);
DELETE FROM M1;
DELETE FROM V1;
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (107, 5,1);
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (108, 11,1);
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (109, 17,1);
[code]....
I have a select statement that selects all columns from the join of 3 oracle views. I would like to change it to select only the distinct rows, not sure how to code this. Here is my sql statement:
select *
from myschema.view_1 acct
Left JOIN myschema.view_2 freq
[Code].....
I have 3 tables that I want to select all rows from and then order by the timestamp of when the row was inserted.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to get the super set(parent) record from a relational table. Following is the structure of the table,
create table relation (data_field1 number(20),data_field2 number(20),data_field3 number(20),
primary key (data_field1,data_field2,data_field3) );
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (-10,123,334);
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (200,123,334);
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (300,123,334);
insert into relation (data_field1, data_field2, data_field3) values (400,123,334);
[code].....
Here '-10' will be considered as parent(super set) for all other values. If i have records like below,
-10 200 300
100 200 300
123 200 300
521 201 300
Output should only contain two rows. A super set row and other distinct row(second column value is not equivalent to super set).
I have got the following error while executing below Query.
ORA-01791 'Not a SELECTed expression'
select distinct sgbstdn_levl_code
from sgbstdn,spriden
where spriden_pidm = sgbstdn_pidm
and spriden_id = '200076543'
order by sgbstdn_term_code_eff desc;
The above Query is not working with Distinct & Order By clause are present and by joining two tables. I need the distinct values of levels in Descending order of Terms.
If i inserted the values in table it gets inserting very few rows only.I dont know y it is?
View 15 Replies View RelatedI think this is easier than I think but all I want to do is count the distinct rows in a table.
WITH data AS
(SELECT 1 id1, 1 id2, 111 val1
FROM dual
UNION ALL
SELECT 1, 2, 222
FROM dual
UNION ALL
[Code]..
seems to get what I want
ID1VAL1CNT1
111114
212224
321114
422224
but can the count be done in a stand alone query such as??
SELECT DISTINCT id1,
val1,
COUNT(*) over() cnt1,
COUNT(*) over(PARTITION BY id1) cnt2
FROM data
ORDER BY id1, val1
NOT what I want
ID1VAL1CNT1CNT2
1111152
2122252
3211153
4222253
i need a Select * from tablename just 1 Row for each distinct ActionMode column value
CREATE TABLE INSTRUCTIONAUDITLOGSS
(
TNUM NUMBER(10) PK NOT NULL,
BATCHTNUM NUMBER(10),
ENTRYTYPE VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
USERGROUP VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
USERID VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
PRODUCT VARCHAR2(8 BYTE),
[code]...
in 10g report builder i have written this query
----------------------------------------------------
SELECT DISTINCT(A.TRANS_NUM)
, A.POST_CD
, A.TRANS_DT
, A.EFF_DT
, A.TRANS_TYPE
, ( SELECT DES FROM SMT_CODE_LIST WHERE CD = A.TRANS_TYPE) DTRANS_TYPE
, A.TIME_STAMP
[code]....
this query returns multiple row. how to get distinct row.
I have a table PRODUCT with following structure:
Productcode Productname Quantity
AF Ade Fgh 100
LO Ldo Ope 50
SK Ske Kro 47
....
There may be any number of records in the table. Now I need to print distinct products in different columns such as.
AF LO SK
100 50 47
There may be any number of products...I need to print all those products as different columns as shown above. How to write the Stored procedure for this?
I have a table in which I can see via which communication channel we have previously communicated with our customers on different dates.
customer_interaction_log (I removed the date column)
customer_id channel
------------------------
1 SMS
1SMS
1SMS
1Email
1Email
2SMS
My goal is to have a de-normalized summary table in which total communication volume for each distinct channel is displayed per customer.Briefly, I would like to reach the following output
customer_interaction_summary
customer_id sms_countemail_count
-----------------------------------
132
210 (or null)
When I run the sql below I am not able to de-normalize by customer id; counts are accurate.
SELECT distinct cil.customer_id,
(CASE channel WHEN 'SMS'
THEN (SELECT COUNT (channel) FROM customer_interaction_log cil1
where cil1.channel='SMS' and cil1.customer_id=cil.customer_id) END) SMS_COUNT,
(CASE channel WHEN 'Email'
THEN (SELECT COUNT (channel) FROM customer_interaction_log cil2
where cil2.channel='Email' and cil2.customer_id=cil.customer_id) END) EMAIL_COUNT
FROM customer_interaction_log cil;
Output:
customer_id sms_countemail_count
-----------------------------------
1 3
21
1 2
I am trying to have one row per customer, however as you can see above it is not the case.
CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER_INTERACTION_LOG (
CUSTOMER_ID NUMBER(2),
CHANNEL VARCHAR2(10 BYTE)
);
Insert into customer_interaction_log (CUSTOMER_ID, CHANNEL) Values (1, 'SMS');
Insert into customer_interaction_log (CUSTOMER_ID, CHANNEL) Values (1, 'SMS');
[code].....
I've read so many different pages on this topic but I can't seem to get my query the way it needs to be. Here's the query:
select admitnbr, lastname||', '||firstname||' '||finitial, hphone, mobile, wphone, med_rec, dob
from patients join schedule using (key_patien)
join adtmirro using (key_patien)
where appt_state = 'ON HOLD'
Because patients in my database can have multiple appointments "on hold" there are duplicates in the results. I only need 1 record per patient in order to forward this information into an automated dialer to contact that patient. I do NOT want to call the patient over and over again. Once will suffice. I'm trying to make a distinction on the column 'med_rec'. One row per 'med_rec' will be awesome but I can't find a way to create a distinct on that column.
SELECT DISTINCT a.emp_id, a.cal_id, TO_CHAR(a.ts_date, 'DD/MM/YYYY') tsdate, a.ts_date, 1 as days
FROM tmsh_timesheet a
INNER JOIN project b ON TO_CHAR(b.proj_id) = a.proj_id
INNER JOIN tmsh_ts_calendar c ON c.cal_id = a.cal_id
INNER JOIN (SELECT a.cal_id, a.emp_id, MAX(a.status) as status, a.create_dt, a.create_by FROM tmsh_stat_hist a
[Code]...
this query results
EMP_IDCAL_IDTSDATE
048283404/10/2010
048283502/11/2010
048283503/11/2010
048283504/11/2010
048283508/11/2010
i need the ts date to be in like this
04/10/2010
02/11/2010 - 04/11/2010
08/11/2010
Having production system: 11.2.0.1 on Windows Server x64
Test system: 9.2.0.1 on Windows XP
Problem preface: to get all unique CASEID which should be checked up by biometric system.What i should check - all CASEs for different PERSONs having same PHONEs at least among one phone type (1..4).Real table contains little bit more than 10 million records.I made test scripts.
Below the DDL for test table creation:
------------------------------------------
-- Create CASEINFO test table
------------------------------------------
DROP TABLE CASEINFO;
CREATE TABLE CASEINFO
[code]...
Below i've put SQL/DLL to make test data.number of records inserted 2 millions.
PERSON_COUNT := #/8;
------------------------------------------
-- fill CASEINFO with sample data
------------------------------------------
DECLARE
I INTEGER;
[code]...
Below SQL select to check the data in created table.
------------------------------------------
-- Check test data counters
------------------------------------------
SELECT 'TOTAL',count(*) from CASEINFO
UNION ALL
SELECT 'LEGAL',count(*) from CASEINFO where
[code]...
The PROBLEM is that i am experiencing HUGE perfomance problems on both test and production systems with that query:
select distinct b.caseid
from CASEINFO a, CASEINFO b
where (a.person<>b.person) and (a.sex=b.sex) and
(
(a.phone1=b.phone1) or
(a.phone1=b.phone2) or
(a.phone1=b.phone3) or
[code]...
This query takes almost 90 minutes to execute.And i do not know how to avoid this.Full SQL file to make test attached.
I am only able to extract only 4000 characters from the clob column "DESCRIPTION".how to get more characters or max for that column with the same query concept?
select distinct
o.id "Organization ID",
en.entity_id "Contact ID",
en.entity_cd "Note Entity Code",
ed.entity_name "Note Entity",
en.entity_id "Note Entity_id",
[code]....
I need to write a query in plsql to select records for first 3 distinct values of a single column (below example, ID )and all the rows for next 3 distinct values of the column and so on till the end of count of distinct values of a column.
eg:
ID name age
1 abc 10
1 def 20
2 ghi 10
2 jkl 20
2 mno 60
3 pqr 10
4 rst 10
4 tuv 10
5 vwx 10
6 xyz 10
6 hij 10
7 lmn 10
.
.
.
so on... (till some count)
Result should be
Query 1 should result --->
ID name age
1 abc 10
1 def 20
2 ghi 10
2 jkl 20
2 mno 60
3 pqr 10
query 2 should result -->
4 rst 10
4 tuv 10
5 vwx 10
6 xyz 10
6 hij 10
query 3 should result -->
7 lmn 10
.
.
9 .. ..
so on..
How to write a query for this inside a loop.
I am fetching records from many voluminous tables having multiple joins based on filter criteria filled from frond end application. As per the selected criteria, I want to have a pre-check if query would return more than 1000 rows then I have to show user a message saying that he should refine the search. Is there any performant way to query db and dynamically find record count and stops executions if it is going return more than the specified no of rows.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI need to return results for the following query only when there are two or more rows found by the following:
SELECT DISTINCT D.PUBLICATION,
D.ADI,
D.DISTRICT,
D.ACCOUNT,
D.ROUTE,
[code]......
Expected results would be:
1 145 CRF TUANR000 VM BILLETING 16-APR-10 5 5 23-APR-10 48623
1 145 CRF TUANR000 VM BILLETING 16-APR-10 5 4 23-APR-10 48629
I have a database in 10g in entreprise edition but i don't understand why the dba_feature_usage_statistics return no rows ? On some database when i look at dba_ feature_usage_statistics Protection Mode - Maximum Performance is used and active why?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIn a query which gets executed first:
Select clause or Order by clause? First the columns specified in the select clause are fetched and then ordered or is it the vice -versa? In a query if a psuedo-column rownum is selected, then if we use order by on the rownum column, what happens?
What would be the output of the following query and why?Which part of the query is first executed, is it select clause or order by clause?
select empno,ename,rownum from emp order by rownum desc;
I have a history table which has a new record written to it for every time static data is updated. What I want to do is return any record that has been changed on a daily basis returning both the new record and the previous record so you can see the 2 records one below the other and compare.I have written the below but it returns all records per account:
SELECT H.Timestamp,H.AccountNo FROM History H
where exists (select H2.AccountNo,count(*) from History H2
where H2.AccountNo = H.AccountNo
group by H2.AccountNo having count(*) > 1 )
Where H.Timestamp > '20111101'
order by H.AccountNo,H.Timestamp
can i have a pl/sql function that can return multiple rows
may be the syntax will be like
create or replace function multiple() returns ...
begin
select candidateid from tbl_candidateinfo;
..code to return the result of above statement to calling program..
end;
and functions will be called as
select candidateid from .. where candidateid in( select multiple());
I need a function that should return output of this query
SELECT b.branding_code, c.name_desc
FROM
development.brandings b, godot.company c
WHERE b.company_id = c.company_id;
This above function return 30 rows and I am not giving any input
Function using cursor,pipeline
If I return multiple rows says ex:100 rows then what will be data type for that return values.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have not found a solution for this, but it could be that I don't know what to search for.
I need to edit the following statement:
SELECT a.id||a.name||a.amount*2 as transaction
FROM a
WHERE a.amount IN (500, 1000)
To return:
TRANSACTION
------------------------------------
123SMITH1000
123SMITHADJUSTED AMOUNT PER X
456JONES2000
456JONESADJUSTED AMOUNT PER X
The returned rows need to be in this format to be executed in another database.
Can this be done?
I would like to know, if there is a solution under 10g for something like this
select case when "C" = 1
then
(select 1,2,3,4,5 from dual)
else
(select 6,7,8,9,0 from dual)
end
from dual,
(select 1 "C" from dual)
What I really need is the full result of (select 1,2,3,4,5 from dual) or (select 6,7,8,9,0 from dual) if a condition as a result of a different sql-statement is true or false. It doesn't matter if the solution uses "case when" or anything else.
Here is my query to fetch only 10 records from order by result set.
select *from (select * from EOE_POC.PRODUCT_TEST_REPORT where PRODUCT_CODE='214d' order by CREATE_DATE desc ) where ROWNUM <= 10
I am having problem binding it with java API . how to query this without using sub query ?
How to return multiple rows from the stored procedure in ORACLE..
View 2 Replies View RelatedEMP table
create table emp1 (empno number,deptname varchar2(30),deptno number,sal number);
insert into emp1 values (1,'Bank',10,1000);
insert into emp1 values (1,'Finance',20,400);
insert into emp1 values (2,'Finance',20,4000);
insert into emp1 values (3,'Account',30,3000);
commit;
select * from emp1;
actual output :
empno deptname deptno sal
1 Bank 10 1000
1 Finane 20 400
2 Finane 20 4000
3 Account 30 3000
Expected output :
empno deptname deptno sal
1 Bank 10 1000
2 Finane 20 4000
3 Account 30 3000
I am looking a output like above one. if any empno belongs to deptname Bank then give priority to that values else go to other dept like Finance but empno 1 should return only one row.i.e Bank dept only.
I have to return only one row based on dept values for one empno. how to do in sql or plsql?
I want my query to return the rows of the table where a column contains a specific values first in a certain order, and then return the rest of the rows alphabetized.
For Example:
Country
ALBANIA
ARGENTINA
AUSTRALIA
....
CANADA
....
USA
....
Now i want USA and CANADA on top in that order and then other in alphabetized order.