Here is my query to fetch only 10 records from order by result set.
select *from (select * from EOE_POC.PRODUCT_TEST_REPORT where PRODUCT_CODE='214d' order by CREATE_DATE desc ) where ROWNUM <= 10
I am having problem binding it with java API . how to query this without using sub query ?
Consider this query
select deptno, wm_concat(student_name) from id_student group by deptno;
I want to change this query in such a way that only 3 students per dept are listed.
I have a dynamic query that is ending up getting larger than 32k and this query is the base of a ref cursor that would in turn return the results to the application. How can I solve this problem since the largest content of a pl sql variable or literal is 32k ( said by oracle ) ?
PROCEDURE sp_large_query (c1 OUT sys_refcursor)
IS
BEGIN
OPEN c1 FOR ' SELECT STATEMENT WITH MORE THAN 32K ';
END;
I have 3 tables that I want to select all rows from and then order by the timestamp of when the row was inserted.
View 7 Replies View Relatednex lines showing SELECT DISTINCT return different rows when used with ORDER BY.
CREATE TABLE M1( ID_ NUMBER, A NUMBER, B NUMBER);
CREATE TABLE V1 ( A NUMBER, B2 NUMBER);
DELETE FROM M1;
DELETE FROM V1;
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (107, 5,1);
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (108, 11,1);
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (109, 17,1);
[code]....
I Want to make a query to select finished goods product in sales having product code greater than 280 but i have face a problem that order by is not working because products column have character code as well as number. how to sort that column.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to write a query to sort the records in a particular order,
Say if I group the records by Dept number
Dept no Name
10A
10G
10f
20B
20K
30I
30M
30R
30Y
I need to write a query that will make this records listed like
Dept No Name
10A
20B
30I
10G
20K
30M
10F
20null
30R
10null
20null
30Y
I want added one new column in the below report which will shows only the items purchased on Cash basis but when i am running the query the column not showing any data.
The query is :
Select DISTINCT ou.name||' Spare Parts' ORG, oh.order_number, trx.trx_number, trx.trx_date, p.party_name CUSTOMER, l.ordered_item,
/* ( Select Distinct it.description From MTL_SYSTEM_ITEMS_B it Where it.inventory_item_ID = l.inventory_item_id and it.organization_id = o.organization_id) Item_Desc, */
l.ordered_quantity, l.line_number,
l.inventory_item_id, l.unit_list_price , ----
a.account_number CST_NO ,
oh.Attribute1 MODEL , oh.Attribute2 SERL_NO, oh.attribute3 PAYM_MODE ,
u.user_name Prep_By, oh.CUST_PO_NUMBER PO_NUM,
[code]......
if when you are querying a table in 11g and you use the order by clause and there is more than one occurrences with the same values in the order by, if the 11g default is different than from 10g.
For instance.
DECLARE MHBulk CURSOR FOR select invoice_nbr, customer_nbr, post_century, post_yymmdd, from CUSTOMERS where customer_nbr = 1234 order by post_century, post_yymmdd;
If you have more than one occurrence of the same customer_nbr, post_century, and post_yymmdd
it looks like the default order for how 11g retrieves the records is a bit different than the 10g default.
I have a query, running the query with order by and without orderby clasue casues big performance difference.
here without order by it takes 5 sec
.
SELECT
audit_number,
formatted_audit_number,
ag.sys_audit_id,
audit_begin_date,
audit_end_date,
[Code]....
here with order by it takes 2 min
SELECT
audit_number,
formatted_audit_number,
ag.sys_audit_id,
audit_begin_date,
audit_end_date,
auditee_name,
ein,
[Code]....
I have like 10,000 records.
i need to write a query in order to receive a new table.
select table_name,col1, null col2
from
(SELECT b.table_name, b.col1 col1, a.CountPrimaryKeys
from
(SELECT user_constraints.table_name,
COUNT(user_cons_columns.column_name) CountPrimaryKeys
[code].......
Below Query I understand is improper wrt syntax. Need to modify query to fetch correct result for me.
select * from tableA order by
case when a is not null then
a DESC
else
b DESC, c DESC END
Note: DESC or ASC is dynamic coming from java-code.
Does ascending index ensures that query without order by will have the result set sorted?
E.g. the query is
select * from table_t where odm_type='I' and odm_uid>nvl(OpUidParm,-1);
column odm_type has index created like this (default is ASC):
create index ODM_UID_I on table_t (ODM_UID);
Will such a query always return the first record having the minimal odm_uid in all Oracle versions?
I have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select
x,y,z
from
mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while
select
x,y,z
from
mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
Which step in the following plan is the first step of execution
I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"
Is that correct?
In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"
section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first
Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have below tables,
describe rpthead
Name Null Type
--------------------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE
RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25)
PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
describe rptbody
Name Null Type
------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240)
UPD_DATE DATE
The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.
SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE
FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead
WHERE
(
t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO
AND
t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss')
AND
rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647')
)
I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.
I have one issue with the converting columns into rows.
Employee table has manager , additional manager and some other columns. If the employee has additional manager, then i need those employee record with 2 rows : 1st row - manager with other data , 2nd row - additonal manager with other data .
Orginal data is like this:
EMPNO ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL COMM DEPTNO ADDTIONAL_MGR ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------------
7369 SMITH CLERK 7902 17-DEC-80 800 20 7698
[code]....
I have tried this , using UNION ALL method, But it is taking more time.
SQL> ED
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 SELECT DECODE (DUMMYTAB.NUM,'1',MGR, '2',addtional_mgr) MANAGER, empno, ename, job, hiredate, sal, comm, deptno
2 FROM emp E, (SELECT '1' NUM FROM DUAL UNION ALL SELECT '2' NUM FROM DUAL) DUMMYTAB
3* WHERE addtional_mgr IS NOT NULL
SQL> /
I have 2 tables with 3 common columns (Col1, col2,Primary). One common column name is primary (oracle key word).Around 2 lakhs rows to be updated and No indexes are used on these tables. I need to write an update query as shown below.
Emp table
Col1col2primay
100101y
103104n
201105y
100101y
Dept table
Col1col2primay
100101null
103104null
000656null
Update query Result
Col1col2primary
100101y
103104n
I have following table -
CREATE TABLE group_device
( group_id NUMBER (8) NOT NULL
, member_id NUMBER (4) NOT NULL
, device_id NUMBER (10) NOT NULL
, install_date DATE NOT NULL
, remove_date DATE
);
[Code]...
Current output does looks like below
10 1 123 23-MAY-12 28-MAY-12
10 1 456 28-MAY-12 01-JUN-12
10 1 789 01-JUN-12
10 2 999 04-MAY-12 17-MAY-12
10 4 1123 22-JAN-12 27-JAN-12
10 4 1456 27-JAN-12 28-JAN-12
Device_id - Replaced_device_id - remove_date :: For group_id=10
e.g. for member_id = 1, device_id=123 got replaced by device_id=456 on 28-May-12
device_id=456 got replaced by device_id=789 on 01-Jun-12
So output should look like this
10 123 456 28-May-12 -- Replaced
10 456 789 01-Jun-12 -- Replaced
10 789 -- Active
Similarly there will be many groups, so it should list based on group_id
I have seen lots of examples of using PIVOT to return an sql query where the rows have been converted to columns. All the examples I can find require you to have two columns with multiple rows, and also require you to know the data which is in one of columns to make titles for the new columns.
I need something a little different...I have a query using UNION which goes something along the lines of...
SELECT [get data from one place]
UNION
SELECT [get data from another place]
UNION
SELECT [get data from another place]
this returns the following...
a_val
-----
100
200
300
query to return something like this...
a_val1 a_val2 a_val3
------ ------ ------
100 200 300
The names of the columns don't really matter. And I dont want to create a new table in the database just for the result.
In sql plus How do I get the number of distinct rows of a certain value?
for example
select group_number from records group by group_number
How would I query for the total number of group_numbers in this query?
the query used is
SELECT LOC_CD,
TO_CHAR(DT,'fmMon RRRR'),
SUM(QTY) ,
GROUPING_ID(LOC_CD)
FROM WIP
WHERE LOC_CD IN (1,2,3,4)
GROUP BY ROLLUP(LOC_CD),
TO_CHAR(DT,'fmMon RRRR'),TRUNC(DT,'MM')
ORDER BY TRUNC(DT,'MM'),LOC_CD
This query result attached
The red coln is the total I want to place it in row-wise
Date loc_1 loc_2 loc_3 loc_4 Total
May 2012 4,554 6,644 11,198
June 2012 4,986 5,838 777 11,601
22,799
SQL> select * from t1;
NAME
----------
JACK
JOHN
JENN
SQL> select * from t2;
NAME
----------
JACK
PAUL
SQL> select a.name from t1 a, t2 b where a.name <> b.name
2 order by name;
NAME
----------
JACK
JENN
JENN
JOHN
JOHN
I would have expected to see the following:
name
-----
JOHN
JENN
PAUL
how to fix this query? In additon, is there a way to print the table name or some arrows (>>, <<) to show which table the values came from
I.e
name
=====
JOHN t1 or <<
JENN t1 or <<
PAUL t2 or >>
I need a single select query which converts all the rows into a single value . Below is my requirement :
Create table email_tbl(emailid varchar2(30));
insert into email_tbl('1@y.com');
insert into email_tbl('2@y.com');
insert into email_tbl('3@y.com');
insert into email_tbl('4@y.com');
Now , I need a single select query which gives me the below results.
1@y.com,2@y.com,3@y.com,4@y.com
I have done the above by using a cursors in the pl/sql objects.But want to achieve this with a single sql/query.
I have not found a solution for this, but it could be that I don't know what to search for.
I need to edit the following statement:
SELECT a.id||a.name||a.amount*2 as transaction
FROM a
WHERE a.amount IN (500, 1000)
To return:
TRANSACTION
------------------------------------
123SMITH1000
123SMITHADJUSTED AMOUNT PER X
456JONES2000
456JONESADJUSTED AMOUNT PER X
The returned rows need to be in this format to be executed in another database.
Can this be done?
Im using oracle 11g.
I have data in a table as below: Column names are type,month,percentage
TYPE MONTH PERCENTAGE
A1 JAN-2013 100
A2 JAN-2013 100
A3 JAN-2013 95
A4 JAN-2013 98
[Code]...
The desired output using a sql query is as below
TYPE JAN-2013 FEB-2013
A1 100 100
A2 100 99
A3 95 88
A4 98 67
A5 99 98
A6 90 95
A7 92 84
The "HAVING" statement from the query below removes all rows where the "name" field starts with "Port" and it removes all rows where count is less than 11. What I want is to removes all rows where the "name" field starts with "Port" and the count for that row is less than 11.
SELECT deviceEventClassId "Event ID", deviceAddress "Device Address", name "Event Name", deviceHostName "Device Host Name", count( concat(deviceEventClassId, deviceHostName, name)) "Count"
FROM events
WHERE (deviceVendor = "Bilbo" and
[code]...
i need a query to get dates for last 7 days and each dates should be in one row... but select sysdate from dual..gives one row...
Expected Output Dates: 01-oct-201330-sep-201329-sep-201328-sep-201327-sep-201326-sep-2013
I want to get rows by latest date for each group pf rows.
say my data is :
TYPE1 TYPE2 quantity DATE-ORDERED
sweets chocolate 10 05-FEB-2012
sweets chocolate 10 04-DEC-2012
sweets chocolate 10 08-FEB-2012
pastries chocolate 20 08-AUG-2012
[Code] ..........
I want to get results by latest date,
sweets chocolate 10 04-DEC-2012
pastries chocolate 20 08-AUG-2012
sweets vanilla 10 05-DEC-2012
pastries vanilla 20 05-NOV-2012
I have tried Queries with Max(DATE-ORDERED) and grouping it..its not showing me results because I don't have indexes in my data.
i have a select query with four table its generating around 650 rows. and i need to update these 650 rows only.
for example
update ps_po_lining b
set y.recv_req = 'N'
where recv_req in
[Code]....
this query runs but its updating 6000 rows. which is not right. we need to update what ever the select query is retrieving.