I have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select x,y,z from mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while select x,y,z from mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
I have been given a task to produce an ad-hoc report based on the following conditions (I will give you the structure of the table and details in the table below the requirements)
Requirements: Adhoc Report for Audit on CIT Income Allocation 1. Select from the RETURNS table: •Id > 3600000 and •Prog_program_cd = '01' and
[code]...
3.If there are multiple entries from the same account and tax year, only retain the latest record: From the records selected in step 2, if there are multiple records with the same Acct_Id and Period_end_date, only retain the record with the most recent Status_date (i.e. MAX value on the date).
4. Using the results from step 3, link to the applicable RETURN_LINE_ITEMS table where: •RETURNS.Id = RETURN_LINE_ITEMS.Rtrn_Id
5. From the selected return on RETURN_LINE_ITEMS table, retrieve records where (value on Sch 000 Line 062 > 500,000) and (value on Sch 000 Line 066 < value on Sch 000 Line 062) : •Sched_nbr = '000', and Litm_line_item_nbr = '062', and Active_ind = 'Y', get Revise_val_amt as 'ab_taxable_income' •Sched_nbr = '000', and Litm_line_item_nbr = '066', and Active_ind = 'Y', get Revise_val_amt as 'amt_taxable_in_ab'
[code]...
So when you run the scripts above, the tables are created (I have tested it in TOAD) Now let's feed data into both the tables
select field1,field2,field3 from Table1 union select field1,field2,field3 from table2
In the query from table2 i am getting duplicate rows, HOW can i retrieve only distinct rows...Using distinct keyword did not work...if i have to post create and insert statements for this one...
I've read so many different pages on this topic but I can't seem to get my query the way it needs to be. Here's the query:
select admitnbr, lastname||', '||firstname||' '||finitial, hphone, mobile, wphone, med_rec, dob from patients join schedule using (key_patien) join adtmirro using (key_patien) where appt_state = 'ON HOLD'
Because patients in my database can have multiple appointments "on hold" there are duplicates in the results. I only need 1 record per patient in order to forward this information into an automated dialer to contact that patient. I do NOT want to call the patient over and over again. Once will suffice. I'm trying to make a distinction on the column 'med_rec'. One row per 'med_rec' will be awesome but I can't find a way to create a distinct on that column.
select distinct c.process_id a.role_id,a.email_address,c.process_name from role a, notification_role b, process c where a.role_id=b.role_id and b.process_id = c.process_id
I have a select statement that selects all columns from the join of 3 oracle views. I would like to change it to select only the distinct rows, not sure how to code this. Here is my sql statement:
select * from myschema.view_1 acct Left JOIN myschema.view_2 freq
Productcode Productname Quantity AF Ade Fgh 100 LO Ldo Ope 50 SK Ske Kro 47 ....
There may be any number of records in the table. Now I need to print distinct products in different columns such as.
AF LO SK 100 50 47
There may be any number of products...I need to print all those products as different columns as shown above. How to write the Stored procedure for this?
My goal is to have a de-normalized summary table in which total communication volume for each distinct channel is displayed per customer.Briefly, I would like to reach the following output
When I run the sql below I am not able to de-normalize by customer id; counts are accurate.
SELECT distinct cil.customer_id, (CASE channel WHEN 'SMS' THEN (SELECT COUNT (channel) FROM customer_interaction_log cil1 where cil1.channel='SMS' and cil1.customer_id=cil.customer_id) END) SMS_COUNT, (CASE channel WHEN 'Email' THEN (SELECT COUNT (channel) FROM customer_interaction_log cil2 where cil2.channel='Email' and cil2.customer_id=cil.customer_id) END) EMAIL_COUNT FROM customer_interaction_log cil;
select rl.org_rollup_skey from (select fc.org_skey as "FC_ORG_SKEY" from IA.HIST_FCT_FCST_SLS fc inner join IA.DIM_ORG do on fc.org_skey = do.org_skey where do.org_nam IN ('101', '485','486')) p INNER JOIN IA.DIM_ORG_HIER h ON p.fc_org_skey = h.desc_org_skey inner join IA.FCT_FCST_SLS_ORG_ROLLUP rl on h.GPRNT_ORG_SKEY = rl.org_rollup_skey
Above join is taking is running forever even as subquery
(select fc.org_skey as "FC_ORG_SKEY" from IA.HIST_FCT_FCST_SLS fc inner join IA.DIM_ORG do on fc.org_skey = do.org_skey where do.org_nam IN ('101', '485','486'))
returns no rows and this subquery give result in 10 seconds according to me Full query should not take more tha 20 secs.
I am trying to do a simple query where I need to return the rows from a table and treat each rown according to some rules.The query works fine, and returns all the rows, usually I have 2 rows returned. WHen I add to the query where ROWNUM = 1, I get the first row returned, but when I use when ROWNUM =2 OR ROWNUM >1, I always get null rows retured, even if I have rows in the database. Here is my query:
SELECT on_time INTO on_time2 FROM work.work_unit WHERE work_code = 1 AND emp_no = :entry_blk.p_emp_no AND work_date = :entry_blk.p_work_date WHERE ROWNUM = 2; --RETURN NULL
I changed it to the following format, but still I get the same results, only I get data when I say when rownum = 1, i get back the first record in the query
SELECT on_time INTO on_time2 FROM (SELECT on_time FROM work.work_unit WHERE work_code = 1 AND emp_no = :entry_blk.p_emp_no AND work_date = :entry_blk.p_work_date) WHERE ROWNUM = 2;
I can't move forward in my form until I figure out why this is not returning records
Our application servers will be running a SELECT which returns zero rows all the time.This SELECT is put into a package and this package will be called by application servers very frequently which is causing unnecessary CPU.
Original query and plan
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_SET_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_ID, TARGET_VERSION FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS WHERE SEGMENT_JOB_ID NOT IN (SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS) 2 3 4 5 ; [code]....
Which option will be better or do we have other options?They need to pass the column's with zero rows to a ref cursor.
We've got a query which returns one row, but uses an IN statement. The IN statement links to more than one row in the subquery. When we use a combination of DISTINCT and an ANALYTICAL sum, the sum total is multiplied by the number of rows in the sub query. Remove the DISTINCT and we get a single value.
A simplified example of the problem is below.
I can't see how a query which returns a single row then returns multiple values with the addition of a DISTINCT. Removing the analytical sum also provides a single row, but we need this in the actual query we're running. So it seems to be some combination of DISTINCT, ANALYTICAL SUM and IN query is causing multiple values to be returned.
CREATE TABLE go_test_distinct1 (gtd_value NUMBER); -- Three identical values -- To replicate the three identical values returned by
How to merge multiple rows into single row (but multiple columns) efficiently.
For example
IDVal IDDesc IdNum Id_Information_Type Attribute_1 Attribute_2 Attribute_3 Attribute_4 Attribute_5 23 asdc 1 Location USA NM ABQ Four Seasons 87106 23 asdc 1 Stats 2300 91.7 8.2 85432 23 asdc 1 Audit 1996 June 17 1200 65 affc 2 Location USA TX AUS Hilton 92305 65 affc 2 Stats 5510 42.7 46 9999 65 affc 2 Audit 1996 July 172 1100
where different attributes mean different thing for each Information_type. For example for Information_Type=Location
Attribute_1 means Country Attribute_2 means State and so on.
For example for Information_Type=Stats
Attribute_1 means Population Attribute_2 means American Ethnicity percentage and so on.
I want to create a view that shows like below:
IDVal IDDesc IDNum Country State City Hotel ZipCode Population American% Other% Area Audit Year AuditMonth Audit Type AuditTime 23 asdc 1 USA NM ABQ FourSeasons 87106 2300 91.7 46 85432 1996 June 17 1200 65 affc 2 USA TX AUS Hilton 92305 5510 42.7 46 9999 1996 July 172 1100
I am attempting to select back multiple values for a specific key on one row. See the example below. I have been able to use the sys_connect_by_path to combine the fields into one field but I am unable to assign them to fields of their own. See the example below
TABLE DETAILS: Policy id plan name 111 A Plan 111 B Plan 111 Z Plan 112 A Plan 112 Z Plan
My desired result is to be able to show the output as follows
Policy ID Plan_1 Plan_2 Plan_3 111 A Plan B Plan Z PLan 112 A Plan Z PLan
I am interested if there maybe exists any function that would return all source tables that are present in the given sql. For example function('select 'abc' from table_1, table2') would return a list containing 'table_1' and 'table_2'.
In my main query, There is a single row sub query which returns row with del_flag as N. Now in my table, there are 2 rows getting added from the incoming feed with del_flag as Y & N.
Here is my Table:
ID_1 DEL_F ID_2 ------------------------------- 16643162 Y 49696 16643162 N 16643162 16612344 Y 98888
So how can i write a single row sub-query which returns ID_2 value of a row with del_flag as N. If there is no row with DEL_F as N, it should return ID_2 value of row with DEL_F as Y.i have tried below query, but it showing the error.
select (case when min(del_f)='N' then to_number(ID_2) when min(del_f)='Y' then to_number(ID_2) end ) ID_2 from table where ID_1=?
Desired Output: ====== First Second Third 11 21 31
I have tried the below query SELECT DECODE (name,'Nexus', parameter) First, DECODE (name, 'GPlay', parameter) Second, DECODE (name, 'Demo', parameter) Third FROM (SELECT name, parameter FROM TableA where name in ('Nexus','GPlay','Demo'));
This gives me the output
First Second Third 11 <Empty> <empty> <empty> 21 <empty?> <empty?> <empty?> 31
Is there any way to get the output in single line.
Id Country city 1 US 2 US Boston 3 Boston 4 US Newyork 5 London 6 Japan Tokyo
Im looking for a query which returns results based on both city and country passed.
If i pass country US and city Boston it should return row2 with US and Boston row If i pass country null and city Boston it should return row3 If i pass country UK and city Boston it should return row3 If i pass country UK and city London it should return row5
i.e. If country/city combination exists in DB return that row Else city row should be returned.