select rl.org_rollup_skey from (select fc.org_skey as "FC_ORG_SKEY" from IA.HIST_FCT_FCST_SLS fc
inner join IA.DIM_ORG do
on fc.org_skey = do.org_skey
where do.org_nam IN ('101', '485','486')) p
INNER JOIN IA.DIM_ORG_HIER h
ON p.fc_org_skey = h.desc_org_skey
inner join IA.FCT_FCST_SLS_ORG_ROLLUP rl
on h.GPRNT_ORG_SKEY = rl.org_rollup_skey
Above join is taking is running forever even as subquery
(select fc.org_skey as "FC_ORG_SKEY" from IA.HIST_FCT_FCST_SLS fc
inner join IA.DIM_ORG do
on fc.org_skey = do.org_skey
where do.org_nam IN ('101', '485','486'))
returns no rows and this subquery give result in 10 seconds according to me Full query should not take more tha 20 secs.
Our application servers will be running a SELECT which returns zero rows all the time.This SELECT is put into a package and this package will be called by application servers very frequently which is causing unnecessary CPU.
Original query and plan
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_SET_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_ID, TARGET_VERSION FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS WHERE SEGMENT_JOB_ID NOT IN (SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS) 2 3 4 5 ; [code]....
Which option will be better or do we have other options?They need to pass the column's with zero rows to a ref cursor.
We are using OCI call library to connect to Oracle database through one application. When we try to run this application through valgrind( a memory leak detection tool for linux) then, OCIServerAttach() call is failing to connect to db and it says that "ORA-1034 :Oracle not available"," Oracle instance may be down", etc. However, our oracle instance is running and database is open. When we run our application normally ( not through the tool) then everything is working fine.
I am trying to do a simple query where I need to return the rows from a table and treat each rown according to some rules.The query works fine, and returns all the rows, usually I have 2 rows returned. WHen I add to the query where ROWNUM = 1, I get the first row returned, but when I use when ROWNUM =2 OR ROWNUM >1, I always get null rows retured, even if I have rows in the database. Here is my query:
SELECT on_time INTO on_time2 FROM work.work_unit WHERE work_code = 1 AND emp_no = :entry_blk.p_emp_no AND work_date = :entry_blk.p_work_date WHERE ROWNUM = 2; --RETURN NULL
I changed it to the following format, but still I get the same results, only I get data when I say when rownum = 1, i get back the first record in the query
SELECT on_time INTO on_time2 FROM (SELECT on_time FROM work.work_unit WHERE work_code = 1 AND emp_no = :entry_blk.p_emp_no AND work_date = :entry_blk.p_work_date) WHERE ROWNUM = 2;
I can't move forward in my form until I figure out why this is not returning records
I have a session on a system here that has been stuck on a DELETE statement for a very long time and the session is pegging the CPU. Using TOAD here is the "current statement":
DELETE FROM WORKFLOW WHERE ID = :B1
ID is the primary key of the table.Here are some relevant stats, also from TOAD's session browser:
Elapsed time = 35507986900 CPU time = 35531815481 Buffer gets = 972040769 Disk reads = 951289273 Executions = 71462
I'm not sure I understand "executions" because from the information I have from the people who initiated this, this particular delete should only be occurring 30 times... maybe that stat means something other than what I think it does.I also ran a trace for 30 seconds using:
TKPROF: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Development on Wed Feb 27 04:04:50 2013 Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. [root@localhost trace]#
The resulting file is attached. Now the offending query in the tkprof, based on my interpretation, is the select from the CMTE00 table, which contains 2344482 rows and no index on the workflow_id column. The relationship between CMTE00 and WORKFLOW tables are 1 to 1. There is a foreign key on CMTE00 pointing to the primary key of WORKFLOW which is what I assume initiated this query - I assume this is oracle checking the referential integrity since our code is not executing that statement. Also of interest, prior to this delete statement, the corresponding entry in CMTE00 was deleted in the same transaction. Google searching "db scattered file read" lead me to one of your (Don - if you read this) articles and appears to indicate that individual blocks are being fetched off the disk and this is what is taking up all the time.
I have a select statement that selects all columns from the join of 3 oracle views. I would like to change it to select only the distinct rows, not sure how to code this. Here is my sql statement:
select * from myschema.view_1 acct Left JOIN myschema.view_2 freq
I need to join ISSUED_REMOVED Table with ITL Table. having each quantity each row.
Eg. If a unit Serial no '354879019900009' has a part (1015268) issued 8 times and then unissued 4 times so finally the part was issued 4 times. so I need 4 rows to show for each qty 1 for that part and unit serial number.
create table ISSUED_REMOVED_ITEM (REPAIRED_ITEM_ID, ISSUED_REMOVED_ITEM_ID, ISSUED_PART_ID, OPER_ID, ISSUED_REMOVED_QUANTITY) as select 122013187, 1323938, 1015268, 308, 2 from dual union all select 122013187, 1323939, 1015269, 308, 2 from dual union all select 122013187, 1323940, 1015268, 308, 2 from dual union all select
[code]....
-- The way I need to join the Issued_Removed Table
select * from ITL_TEST ITL left join issued_removed_item iri on iri.REPAIRED_ITEM_ID = ITL.ITEM_ID --ITL.ITEM_ID --rlsn2.item_id --126357561 and iri.oper_id = 308 --in ( 308, 309)
1 select s.reg_no,s.course_code, 2 s.section src_sec,a.section a_sec,a.att_date,a.att_flag 3 from attendance a ,src s 4 where a.semester_code=1 5 and a.semester_year=2013 6 and s.semester_code=1 [code]....
I need to delete all the registers where the table 1 does join with table 2 in 3 fields... for example:
delete taba1 t1 where t1.campo1 in ( select distinct(tr.campo1) from tabla1 tr, tabla2 t2 where t2.error = 0 tr.campo1 = t2.campo1 and tr.campo2 = t2.campo2
I have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select x,y,z from mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while select x,y,z from mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
UPDATE t_tt_hours a SET a.sak_request = ( SELECT b.sak_request FROM t_requests b, co c
[Code]...
The problem I am having is that it is updating all rows even when it is pulling back a null value for b.sak_request. I've tried adding b.sak_request is not null to the select statement like this:
UPDATE t_tt_hours a SET a.sak_request = ( SELECT b.sak_request FROM t_requests b, co c WHERE b.nam_eds_tracking_id = c.id_dir_track_eds
[Code]...
but it doesn't seem to make a difference. The reason I need to do this is that the difference between where it matches with a valid (non-null) value is 396 rows vs. 12,484 rows which is too time consuming to run on my page.
i want to know the difference between Left outer join Vs. Right outer join? Its like which join is safer to use or is there any recommendations to use any join?
I have to update a table by getting values from two other tables. While doing that the inner query returns more than one value. I am not sure how to implement the logic without returning more than one row in sub query.
My query: update buf_office_str o set o.manager_ident = (select sp.ident from se2_r_src_sourceperson sp , (select distinct director_name, team_name from buf_sales_dump )t where SP.SRCNAME = upper(substr(t.director_name,instr(t.director_name,' ')+1,length(t.director_name))||', '||substr(t.director_name,1,instr(t.director_name,' ')-1 ) ) and o.office_descr = t.team_name )
Basically the query gets the manager id from sp table where sp.srcname = t.team-name. The office_descr should be equal to the team_name.
This is the logic I am working towards:
For each office, i get the office_descr and get corresponding team_name. Match the team's director_name (from table t) with the sp.name and return the employee's id (sp.ident) for that office_descr. I need to update all 50 offices with corresponding managerid for that office in buf_office_str table.
Is it possible to get done in one update? Or, does this need a plsql proc to do this logic.
I am returning the ORA-01427 after running the query below. why I am returning the error and how to address it.
select b.value , b.name, p.value ...... (case when p.value <> 'G2' then null else (select c.oldvalue from ad_changelog c where c.record_id = b.c_bpartner_id and c.ad_table_id = 291 and c.ad_column_id = 4216 ) end) as oldtradeName from c_bpartner b, zz_receipt r, zz_recp_alloc a, m_product p, ad_user us where a.c_bpartner_id = b.c_bpartner_id and a.zz_receipt_id = r.zz_receipt_id and us.ad_user_id = r.createdby and p.m_product_id = a.m_product_id
Just trying to update a table in which the sales amount is inserted when the sales amount is null.
I have
UPDATE ph2_customer_temp SET sales_amount = ( SELECT sl.sales_amount FROM PH2_CUSTOMER_TEMP pct join sales_limit sl on substr(pct.site_code,1,2) = sl.state where pct.credit_limit is null )
I can't seem to wrap my head around this problem I'm having with a query. I need to update all rows in my ps_ntsr_gf_stufile tables with the concatenated values from the ps_classes_tbl table where a.CLASS_NBR = b.CLASS_NBR. I tried to limit it to emplid from the ps_stdnt_enrl table but no luck.
UPDATE ps_ntsr_gf_stufile a SET a.CLASS_NAME = (SELECT CONCAT('SUBJECT', 'CATALOG_NBR') FROM PS_CLASS_TBL b WHERE a.CLASS_NBR = b.CLASS_NBR AND a.STRM = '1118' AND a.INSTITUTION = 'NT752') WHERE a.EMPLID IN (SELECT distinct EMPLID FROM PS_STDNT_ENRL);
/* (SELECT A.TOTAL_ALLOCATED_AMT FROM CLS_ALLOCATION_HDR@LAMS_PROD A WHERE A.APPROVAL_DATE BETWEEN BCTH.TRAN_FROM_DATE AND BCTH.TRAN_TO_DATE AND A.CUSTOMER_ID=BCTH.CUSTOMER_ID AND ALLOCATION_ID IN (SELECT ALLOCATION_ID FROM CLS_ALLOCATION_DTL@LAMS_PROD B WHERE ENTITY_TYPE='REC' AND B.ALLOCATION_ID=A.ALLOCATION_ID AND ENTITY_ID IN (SELECT RECEIPT_NO FROM CLS_RECEIPT_DTL@LAMS_PROD C WHERE B.ENTITY_ID=C.RECEIPT_NO AND RECEIPT_STATUS='A'))AND ALLOCATION_STATUS='A')*/
when i am trying to run this query i am getting an error'single row subquery returns more than one row'.
My problem : I Wrote a package(a function), this function just return a varchar2 , but in this function I wrote a cursor , when I call this function in this manner :
I have written the below sql select loc,(select ename from emp where emp.deptno = dept.deptno) from dept
It results in the below error.
[Error] Execution (1: 13): ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row
I have modified the SQL and got the required output select em.ename,dep.loc from (select loc,deptno from dept) dep , (select ename,deptno from emp) em where dep.deptno=em.deptno(+)
I have written the below sql to fetch all loc for emp which got executed
SELECT ENAME, (SELECT LOC FROM DEPT WHERE DEPT.DEPTNO=EMP.DEPTNO) LOC FROM EMP
But as i need all locations irrespective of any emp in the locaton so i tried to put emp side (+) which resulted in error.
