SQL & PL/SQL :: SELECT Records In The Order They Were Inserted
Apr 12, 2011I would like to write a select statement on a table and I want the records to be retrieved in the order they were inserted.
View 17 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
PL/SQL :: To Commit After Every 10,000 Records Inserted
May 17, 2013What would be the best way to Commit after every 10 000 records inserted from one table to the other using the following script :
DECLARE
l_max_repa_id x_received_p.repa_id%TYPE;
l_max_rept_id x_received_p_trans.rept_id%TYPE;
BEGIN
SELECT MAX (repa_id)
INTO l_max_repa_id
[code].........
SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Know Recently Inserted Records In A Table
Jun 13, 2011We have a table, to which daily we insert 100 records. if we want to know recently or today inserted records from that table.
View 3 Replies View RelatedForms :: FRM 40102 Records Must Be Inserted Or Deleted First?
Jul 26, 2011How to avoid this error. FRM 40102 Records must be inserted or deleted first
i have used next_record.If i remove this it is working.but i need to use next_record built in.
PL/SQL :: Scheduling Jobs - Without Commit Records Are Getting Inserted
Nov 12, 2013Oracle DB Version - 11g XE I scheduled a job using dbms_scheduler which will insert a record into table T for each minute. I didnt mention COMMIT inside my procedure but records are being commited after each successful execution. How come it is possible. Here is my code.
SQL> create table t ( empno number, creation_date date);
Table created
SQL> create or replace procedure test_proc 2 is 3 4 begin 5 6 insert into t values (1,sysdate); 7 8 end; 9 /
Procedure created
[Code]....
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed
SQL> select * from t;
EMPNO CREATION_DATE---------- ------------- 1 11/12/2013 11 1 11/12/2013 11 1 11/12/2013 11 1 11/12/2013 11 1 11/12/2013 12 1 11/12/2013 12 1 11/12/2013 12 1 11/12/2013 12 1 11/12/2013 12
9 rows selected
PL/SQL :: Select Data Which Is Inserted At Same Time?
Mar 20, 2013I wanted to select data which is inserted on the same time.
Is that possible? I am trying with below query but facing isses.
SQL> SELECT a,b,c,d FROM tb;
no rows selected
SQL> SELECT a,b,c,d FROM (INSERT INTO tb VALUES(1,1,1,1));
SELECT a,b,c,d FROM (INSERT INTO tb VALUES(1,1,1,1))
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00903: invalid table name
SQL & PL/SQL :: Records Inserted In Tables For Database Driven Menu
May 16, 2012I have seen the below blog abut database driven menu in java. uRL..... look into the below tables and its data below.I have concerned inserting data in the tables and particularly about
ROLE_DETAILS,ROLE_MASTER and EM_MENUMAS data.
select
level lvl,
ID, NAME,
lpad(' ', level * 14, ' ') || NAME menu,
parent_NAME,nodetype, page_name from em_menumas
[code].....
PL/SQL :: Create Trigger If Any Insertion In TAB1 Then Records Get Inserted Into TAB2?
Oct 30, 2012i have requirement like this i don't know abt trigger
create trigger with the below:
Tables: TAB1 TAB2
Create a trigger, if any insertion in TAB1 then records should get inserted into TAB2
create a trigger, if any updation in TAB1 then record should get inserted into TAB2
Create a trigger, if any deletion in TAB1 then record should get inserted into TAB2
TAB1 and TAB2 can be any table.
Number Of Rows Inserted Is Different In Bulk Insert Using Select Statement
Jul 1, 2010I am facing a problem in bulk insert using SELECT statement.My sql statement is like below.
strQuery :='INSERT INTO TAB3
(SELECT t1.c1,t2.c2
FROM TAB1 t1, TAB2 t2
WHERE t1.c1 = t2.c1
AND t1.c3 between 10 and 15 AND)' ....... some other conditions.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE strQuery...These SQL statements are inside a procedure. And this procedure is called from C#.The number of rows returned by the "SELECT" query is 70.
On the very first time call of this procedure, the number rows inserted using strQuery is 70. But in the next time call (in the same transaction) of the procedure, the number rows inserted is only 50.And further if we are repeating calling this procedure, it will insert sometimes 70 or 50 etc. It is showing some inconsistency.On my initial analysis it is found that, the default optimizer is "ALL_ROWS". When i changed the optimizer mode to "rule", this issue is not coming.I am using Oracle 10g R2 version.
SQL & PL/SQL :: Order Records Just Same As Zip Codes?
Jun 10, 2010I am using oracle 10g.
I have a query which is used to get the contact details based on the zip code
select * from contacts where
primary_address_postalcode like '65084%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65011%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65034%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65078%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65050%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65037%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65329%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65072%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65081%' or
primary_address_postalcode like '65038%'
Result
userid name primary_address_postalcode
5 abc 65072
6 def 65038 -12343
1 xyz 65050
24 pqr 65011
32 test 65011-23455
54 itsme 65329
i want to order the records just same as the zip codes we are using in like (65084,65011,65034, 65078,65050, 65037, 65329,65072, 65081, 65038)
How can i get the result like below
expected result
userid name primary_address_postalcode
24 pqr 65011
32 test 65011-23455
1 xyz 65050
54 itsme 65329
5 abc 65072
6 def 65038-12343
Select Vs Order By
Nov 9, 2006In a query which gets executed first:
Select clause or Order by clause? First the columns specified in the select clause are fetched and then ordered or is it the vice -versa? In a query if a psuedo-column rownum is selected, then if we use order by on the rownum column, what happens?
What would be the output of the following query and why?Which part of the query is first executed, is it select clause or order by clause?
select empno,ename,rownum from emp order by rownum desc;
Query To Display Records In Particular Order
Feb 8, 2007I need to write a query to sort the records in a particular order,
Say if I group the records by Dept number
Dept no Name
10A
10G
10f
20B
20K
30I
30M
30R
30Y
I need to write a query that will make this records listed like
Dept No Name
10A
20B
30I
10G
20K
30M
10F
20null
30R
10null
20null
30Y
Select All Rows And Order By Timestamp
Dec 27, 2006I have 3 tables that I want to select all rows from and then order by the timestamp of when the row was inserted.
View 7 Replies View RelatedSQL & PL/SQL :: Select With Order In Self-reference Table?
Jun 25, 2012I have the following table:
CREATE TABLE test_A(member_id NUMBER(2) PRIMARY KEY, MEMBER_name VARCHAR2(20), MEMBER_parent NUMBER(2) DEFAULT NULL);
INSERT ALL
INTO test_A VALUES (1, 'mem1', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (2, 'mem2', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (3, 'mem3', NULL)
INTO test_A VALUES (4, 'mem4', 1)
INTO test_A VALUES (5, 'mem5', 1)
[code]....
As the actual data is huge, I need to know the best (least expensive) way to select each parent and then all its direct child ordered by member_id the output should look like:
1mem1(null)
4mem41
5mem51
6mem61
2mem2(null)
7mem72
8mem82
10mem102
3mem3(null)
9mem93
11mem113
Default In (order By) Select Query Different In 11g From 10g?
Nov 12, 2013 if when you are querying a table in 11g and you use the order by clause and there is more than one occurrences with the same values in the order by, if the 11g default is different than from 10g.
For instance.
DECLARE MHBulk CURSOR FOR select invoice_nbr, customer_nbr, post_century, post_yymmdd, from CUSTOMERS where customer_nbr = 1234 order by post_century, post_yymmdd;
If you have more than one occurrence of the same customer_nbr, post_century, and post_yymmdd
it looks like the default order for how 11g retrieves the records is a bit different than the 10g default.
SQL & PL/SQL :: Why Does SELECT DISTINCT Return Different Rows When Used With ORDER BY
Jan 4, 2013nex lines showing SELECT DISTINCT return different rows when used with ORDER BY.
CREATE TABLE M1( ID_ NUMBER, A NUMBER, B NUMBER);
CREATE TABLE V1 ( A NUMBER, B2 NUMBER);
DELETE FROM M1;
DELETE FROM V1;
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (107, 5,1);
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (108, 11,1);
INSERT INTO M1 (ID_, A,B) VALUES (109, 17,1);
[code]....
SQL & PL/SQL :: View Not Having ORDER BY Clause In SELECT Statement?
Jun 13, 2010currently i m going through some dumps for my OCA-11g prep.I came across one sentence :A view cannot have an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT statement.well this statement is false and the explanation given was :
Query operations containing ORDER BY clause are also permitted, so long as the ORDER BY clause appears outside the parentheses.
The following is an example of what I mean: CREATE VIEW my_view AS (SELECT*FROM emp) ORDER BYempno.
but when i tried running the query like this :CREATE VIEW my_view AS SELECT*FROM emp ORDER BYempno ,it worked w/o giving parentheses.
Reports & Discoverer :: ORDER BY Item Must Be Number Of A SELECT-list Expression
Sep 18, 2009When i'm sorting on a calculated field i'm getting the following error:
ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list expression
SQL & PL/SQL :: Select Records From Table
Jun 23, 2010I am dealing with a table containing millions of records. I have table loans_list table and he data looks similar to this..
LOAN_IDSEQUENCE_NUMCOMPLETE_DATE
1237000
1237005
1237010
5237010 6/23/2010 10:07:02 AM
5237000 6/23/2010 10:07:02 AM
12237000
I am trying to select only those loan_id from this table which contain all these 3 sequence_num = 7000,7005,7010 and containing null compelete date. I tried different way to write the query but can't think of efficient way of writing this query yet.
Since this table contain million of records, i dont prefer to call this table more than once in a query. I am just trying to avoid the longer time delay for the execution of this query..
SQL & PL/SQL :: Select Records By One Column?
May 7, 2012By select I got records (see table below) and I need to make select where result will be just one row with all values by payer_flag=Y.
There is a table:
CREATE TABLE XXX_MAPE_CC
(
CK_CUSTOMER_CODE VARCHAR2(24 BYTE),
[Code].....
And result should look like:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ck_customer_code | invoice_media | personal_no | cnt_active | cnt_deactive | payer_flag
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.107441.10 | electronic | 0 | 663 | 128 | Y
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL & PL/SQL :: Select N Records In Only One Partition?
Jun 16, 2011 this is the case:
Table 1
c1 c2
1 null
2 null
3 2
[code]...
I need to select n records where c2 is null but only from one partition.In example :
In P1 (1,2,3,4)
In P2 (5,6,7)
If n = 4 --> Must be retrieve 1,2,4 because 6 is in P2.
What I tried is
(select c1 from T1 where c1 is null and rownum<=4)but retrieve 1,2,4,6 and I only need the retrieved data from P1 partition.
PL/SQL :: Select Parent Records
Sep 3, 2012Is there any SQL query which can return first value. I have 1 table, 2 columns: NR; created_from_nr;
Data:
Nr=L1 created_from_nr=''
Nr=L2 created_from_nr=L1
Nr=L3 created_from_nr=L2
Nr=L4 created_from_nr=L3
How can I get Nr=L1 if I know L4, with one query ?
Performance Tuning :: Order Of Steps In Execution Path And Order Of Predicates In The Plan
Mar 20, 2012Which step in the following plan is the first step of execution
I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"
Is that correct?
In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"
section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first
Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Select Query Not Fetching Records In 11g?
May 10, 2013I have a Select query which is not fetching records in 11g (11.2.0.2.0) but working fine in 10g (10.2.0.4.0). The query is as below.
--CREATE TABLE t1 (col1 NUMBER, col2 VARCHAR2 (15 CHAR), flag varchar2(1))
--insert into t1(col1, col2, flag) values(1, 'a', 'Y');
--insert into t1(col1, col2, flag) values(2, 'b', 'N');
SELECT *
FROM t1 x
WHERE col1 = 1 AND col2 = 'a' -------------- condition1
AND 0 = -------------- condition2
NVL (
(SELECT COUNT (1)
FROM t1 y
WHERE y.flag = 'N'
AND x.col1 = y.col1
AND x.col2 = y.col2),0)--=0
When remove NVL function or change the condition by having AND NVL(SELECT) =0 the query working fine.
Select Records With Same Values Of Field?
Oct 9, 2007there are some data in the table que_history (seqnbr is the key), e.g.
SEQNBR DN SL_TIME
20070927003668 (024)2272 AD182040 2007-9-27 15:15:00
20070928001343 (024)2272 AD182040 2007-9-28 9:55:14
20070928001624 (024)2272 AD182040 2007-9-28 10:30:06
20070928000910 (024)25672 AD000002 2007-9-28 9:06:59
20070928001288 (024)25672 AD000002 2007-9-28 9:49:13
20070923003834 (024)2585 AD210076 2007-9-23 17:15:13
20070923003890 (024)2585 AD210076 2007-9-23 17:23:54
20071001001593 (024)2589 AD000018 2007-10-1 11:54:39
20071003002814 (024)2589 AD000018 2007-10-3 16:53:52
20070923003320 (024)8831 AD000110 2007-9-23 15:24:39
I wanted to use this SQL to get the records ( dn is the same and the sl_time's interval is 600minutes) .
select A.* from que_history A,que_history B
where A.dn=B.dn and A.seqnbr<>B.seqnbr
and (A.sl_time-B.sl_time)*24*60 between -600 and 600
order by A.dn;
but the result is not the right.
Forms :: How To Select Multiple Records
Feb 23, 2012I'd want to select multiple records in my multi-record block. I'd also want to do that with checkboxes. When the user clicks on a particular checkbox, that should be selected and whatever record the user wants to check it should be added to selected records.
View 39 Replies View RelatedSQL & PL/SQL :: Select Records Where Date Is Max From Tables
Oct 6, 2011 I've got 3 tables and I need to select records where date is max from these tables.
select * from the_table_1
----------------------------------
contract_key date_1 saldo
1234 30.9.2011 12:06:50 14,6638
select * from the_table_2
----------------------------------
contract_key date_1 saldo
1234 26.9.2011 11:04:02 5,6638
select * from the_table_2
----------------------------------
contract_key date_1 saldo
1234 29.9.2011 17:39:43 2,5438
how to do that ?
SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Select Only Records That Have Multiple Values For A Column
Nov 21, 2011I'm trying to select id's in a table that have 2 certain values for another column. Example below explains:
idCoupon Type
123Amount
123Percent
456Amount
789Percent
I would like to write a sql statement that would select all rows where id=123, because id 123 has both coupon types "Amount" and "Percent". So the result set of the sql statement would look like:
idCoupon Type
123Amount
123Percent
SQL & PL/SQL :: Inserting Multiple Records With CLOB Using Select
Oct 11, 2013I'm updating a large piece of legacy code that does the following type of insert:
INSERT INTO foo_temp
(id, varchar2_column)
SELECT id, varchar2_column
FROM foo;
We're changing varchar2_column to clob_column to accommodate text entries > 4000 characters. So I want to change the insert statement to something like:
INSERT INTO foo_temp
(id, clob_column)
SELECT id, clob_column
FROM foo;
This doesn't work, since clob_column stores the location of each text entry, rather than the actual content. But is there some way that I can achieve the insert with one call to a select statement, or do I need to select each individual record in foo, open the clob_column value, read it into a local variable and then write the content to the matching record in foo_temp?
PL/SQL :: Select Query - Return 0 When No Records Fetched
Jun 25, 2013I have a select query select userid from user_tbl where name='hhh';
I want to return 0 when no records are fetched and I want to handle both teh cases in a single query other than proc or function.