In my Project, there are many queries have join conditions between Number and Vrahchar2. Will it give any wrong results or Invalid Number exception even the varchar2 column always contains the number data?
Example:
Select * from Table_t1 t1, table_t2 t2
where t1.num_col = t2.var_col
-- Here var_col always hold only numaric data.
i write a select statement in proc that contains 44 columns.
when i precompile it. it is showing the error: implicit conversion of string literal to "char *" is deprecated.when i compile the same select with 40 columns it is not showing any error.
but for more than 40 columns (41-44) it is showing the above error.
novice to SQL (Oracle 10g)
Am trying to write code for sollowing scenario:
Have 3 tables
table1 (campaignid,promoflag)
table2 (campaignid,projectid,campaigndesc)
table3 (projectid,promoflag,projectstart,projectend)
I am to update table 1 promoflag with value from promoflag in table3
Update table1
set promoflag = table3.promoflag
I would like to make sure only appropriate record is updated therefore want to use where clause condition but the primary key for table1 and table3 are different, the only link can be found on table2.
I want to use condition where table1.campaignid=table2.campaignid and table2.projectid=table1.projectid
Have used the following without success:
Scenario 1
Update table1
SET promoflag = table3.promoflag
FROM table1
inner join table2 on table1.campaignid = table2.camapaignid
inner join table3 on table2.projectid = table3.projectID;
Error at line 1 ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
Scenario 2 with real table/column names
Update UA_CAMPAIGNEXTATTR
SET CFPROMOTABLE = LMUK_PROJECT_AUDIENCE_GRID.GRID_AUD_CFPROMOTABLE
FROM UA_CAMPAIGNEXTATTR,UA_CAMPAIGN,LMUK_PROJECT_AUDIENCE_GRID
WHERE
UA_CAMPAIGNEXTATTR.CAMPAIGNID = UA_CAMPAIGN.CAMPAIGNID
AND UA_CAMPAIGN.PROJECTID = LMUK_PROJECT_AUDIENCE_GRID.GRID_AUDIENCE_ID;
Error at line 2
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
It appears to get block with the 'FROM' statement (was underlined in red)
I need to be clear about what exactly difference when we put any condition in INNER JOIN and WHERE Clause. I tried both way and found same results. Even in Statistics Plan not much differences.
1. Here I am using location filter in Inner join condition -
"SELECT I.*, Gl * From Sc1.Item I Inner Join Sc1.Part P On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id And Gl.Location_Id In ( 1767, 1747,202,1625) Inner Join Sc1.Condition C On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0 And I.Condition_Id != 325
2. Here I am using location filter in Where clause
SELECT I.*, Gl * From Sc1.Item I Inner Join Sc1.Part P On P.Part_Id = I.Part_Id Inner Join Sc1.Location Gl On Gl.Location_Id = I.Location_Id Inner Join Sc1.Condition C On C.Condtion_Id = Gl.Condition_Id Where I.Inactive_Ind = 0 and I.LOCATION_ID in ( 1767, 1747,202,1625) And I.Condition_Id != 325.
SELECT
MAX(fndattdoc.LAST_UPDATE_DATE ) as LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
MAX(DECODE(fndcatusg.format,'H', st.short_text,NULL,st.short_text, NULL)) as COMMENTS,
MAX(fnddoc.description) as REASON
FROM fnd_attachment_functions fndattfn,
fnd_doc_category_usages fndcatusg,
fnd_documents_vl fnddoc,
fnd_attached_documents fndattdoc,
fnd_documents_short_text st,
fnd_document_categories_tl fl,
WSH_NEW_DELIVERIES DLVRY
[code]....
I have three tables, I have to merge those three tables, all three tables having same conditions and filter conditions(in each table one filter condition changed), I highlighted in the red difference the filter conditions in each table, finally my result should be 7 columns like
LAST_UPDATE_DATE, COMMENTS, REASON, CORRECTD_ACTUAL_DELIVERY_DATE, LAST_UPDATE_DATE, CORRECTD_PROMISE_DATE, LAST_UPDATE_DATE
I have a table datatype number (12,10) that I am reading out of. I am taking the value from this source table and inserting it into a destination table of datatype number (12,15).
I do not have the ability to alter the tables. How can i convert this number so i can insert. I am currently getting the error "ORA-01438: value larger than specified precision allowed for this column"
I am trying to use the to_number, but it not working. How can i format this number field so i can read it from source where i have number (12,10) and insert it successfully in a higher precision table of number(12,15)
I have coluum value like 00000000399. i need to convert the float like i mentioned
00000000399 should be loaded as 3.99
00000001197 should be loaded as 11.97
00000000003 should be loaded as 0.03
wat option i try to change the value
I have 2 tables.The column in table A is number and Column in table B is a varchar2 datatype.I have to use the Column of table B as a filter to column of Table A.Below is the example.
create table A(Col1 number);
Inert into A values(1);
Inert into A values(2);
Inert into A values(3);
Inert into A values(4);
Create table B(Col1 Varchar2(100));
Insert into b value ('1,2,3');
Select * from A where col1 in (select col1 from b)
Error: Invalid Number
Is there a way to convert the varchar to number.The varchar field have multiple characters (numbers) seperated by commas.
I want to change a table datatype from date to number where already existing data should get convert.any possibility of doing where i tried like this but no get changing. Even as Julian format is working a bit i want the data to come as GMT format
Scenarios where i tried are like this.
ALTER TABLE Contacts ADD ALERT_DATE1 NUMBER(20,0)
/
UPDATE Contacts SET ALERT_DATE1 = TO_NUMBER(ALERT_DATE)
/
ALTER TABLE Contacts DROP COLUMN ALERT_DATE
/
ALTER TABLE Contacts RENAME COLUMN ALERT_DATE1 TO ALERT_DATE
/
but second statement failing.
Julian fomat like
SELECT sysdate,
TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'J'),
TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'J'),'J')
FROM dual;
When I try to convert numeric values � number(19) p.s 111111111111111111, the to_char function returns �1111111111111110000� because the to_char functions doesn�t support precision bigger than 15.
Is there any way to solve it?
I have written a stored procedure that has started returning the error:
Error starting at line 1 in command:
call p_glpost('DSTUK', 'L', '2008-01-01', '2008-01-01', '2011-02-18', 1, 1, 1, 0, 'Hi there')
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
ORA-06512: at "CLARITY.P_GLPOST", line 173
06502. 00000 - "PL/SQL: numeric or value error%s"
I can't seem to find a tool that will let me step into the actual stored procedure line by line to see where the error occurs. It mentions line 173, which seems to be a red-herring, as line 173 is simply one of the 'END IF' lines within this block:
IF NVL(r_dist.transtype,'wild') = 'wild' THEN
NULL;
elsif r_wip.transtype = r_dist.transtype THEN
v_matchCount := v_matchCount+1;
elsif r_wip.transtype <> r_dist.transtype THEN
[code]......
Tell me if it is possible to trace through a SP, and which tool is best (I am trying to use Oracle SQL Developer).
I got a string in the form 1+2+4.If we write select 1+2+4 from dual;then we get o/p as 7.but the same thing iam trying to do in a bit of pl/sql program by passing the string 1+2+4 value to a number variable as below.
COUNT_TASK := TO_NUMBER(TASK6_STATUS);
TASK6_STATUS value is 1+2+4 (this thing i got by replacing the string and lots of stuff) but i need the result after adding these 3 numbers in the string. and i declare COUNT_TASK as NUMBER;and i am very well aware that it gives me the error ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
how to add these numbers in my program to get the result 7.
1 error has occurred ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
I get the above error when I try to compare the below dates in a Pl/sql process in APEX environment.
Is there a work around for it? or (to_char(V_SERVFROM,'mm/dd/yyyy')) != (to_char(:P29_SERVFROM,'mm/dd/yyyy'))
Actually I have one query which contains two parameters from_Date and To_date.
if user pass the values for the parameter like 1-dec-2010 to 30-dec-2010 query will works fine and it fetches the values according to the query selected. but now I am going to add one more parameter, the value is 01-apr-2010 now my query should run for 01-apr-2010 to 30-dec-2010.
Here my question is how should I make this scenario with only one query and at the same time the query should work for to scenarios.
my sql query has three tables in from clause so it has two join conditions and one where condition.
account_no is number data type and v_account_no is varchar2() data type
The where clause is :
"where account_no=to_number(v_account_no)" with this condition in my sql query has the cost 392
we just modify the where clause as where v_account_no=to_char(account_no) with this condition in the sql query has the cost 11.
what is impact of this data type conversion and difference between these two "to_number() and to_char()" in performance wise to reduce the cost of query?
got this Errormessage "ORA-12713: Character data loss in NCHAR/CHAR conversion" during a rman backupjob! How can I fixed it?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWhile importing dump to the new database, error occurred. Below are the errors -
ORA-02374: conversion error loading table "INS"."GENMST_FINANCIER_BRANCH"
ORA-12899: value too large for column TXT_IFSC_CODE (actual: 19, maximum: 15)
ORA-02372: data for row: TXT_IFSC_CODE : 0X'4644524C30303031353739A0A0A0A0'
[code]...
I would like to know, why such error occurred during the import.
I have written a purge package that would delete records older than 10 years. Since the data is huge, the purging was taking 14 hours plus. To improve performance, I disabled constraints , deleted records and then reanabled them. This was quite quick but the only problem is rollback. Say for some reason if enabling constraints fails there is no way to rollback as enabling and disabling constraints does an implicit rollback.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm working on a Java-based web application and we have unit tests that we use to test all our all code that interacts with the database or code that interacts with our DB code. The Spring framework allows us to perform some DML within a transaction before each test and then rollback the changes. For the most part, this works, however when I run the full suite of unit tests, it will randomly commit data to the database causing the rest of the tests to fail.
will Oracle's auditing let me see where this odd-ball commit is occurring? Is there another way for me to see when data is being committed?
This does not appear to be happening on any of the systems we've deployed, however this is a bit unsettling and would like to know why this is occurring so that we can prevent it from happening in production.
I've tried to use implicit cursor in my pl/sql program and i get an error as following:
DECLARE
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01422: exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows
ORA-06512: at line 17
Then,I tried to include an exception for it and the error is 'solved'.
DECLARE
d_call_id course.call_id%TYPE;
d_course_name course.course_name%TYPE;
d_term_desc term.term_desc%TYPE ;
d_f_first faculty.f_first%TYPE;
d_f_last faculty.f_last%TYPE;
d_day course_section.c_sec_day%TYPE;
d_time course_section.c_sec_time%TYPE;
d_bldg_code location.bldg_code%TYPE;
d_room location.room%TYPE;
[code]....
By actually the program are suppose to return the records instead or returning the error. I've included the table that i'm trying to retrieve the records from as well.
1) SQL Statements are not using IMPLICIT CURSORS.
2) Only the SQL statements of the PLSQL program create implicit cursors.
We all know that commit will do the following.
1. Save the Txn Permanently to the database.
2. Release the table locks and
3. Erase the save points.
TABLE NAME:
==========
create table TEST_PREC (NO NUMBER(4,2));
DECLARE
BEGIN
INSERT INTO TEST_PREC VALUES (12.34);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('the no of records before commit '||SQL%ROWCOUNT);
commit; /* What's happening inside commit */
[code]....
why the SQL%ROWCOUNT is set to zero after commit.
Does the commit, close the implicit cursor?
what are the main points that these examples are considered cursors? and why are they called explicit and implicit cursor.
explicit
for x in (select * from emp) loop
dbms_output.put_line('emp no: '||x.empno);
end loop;
implicit
select empno
into vEmpno
from empno
where empname = 'SCOTT';
for all we know that these are not clearly defined on the declaration area as cursor.
What is the difference between implicit cursor and explicit cursor in PL/SqL?
And what is ref cursor ?
difference between between these two constructs. Finally when i read the asktom.oracle.com , I was totally confused. The reason is thatTom says...we can retrieve more than one row in implicit cursor. If that would be case, what's the difference between these two cursors?? when to use?? My understanding was implicit cursors" ---> single-row queryExplicit cursors ---> multi-row query Experts
View 10 Replies View RelatedI have 2 tables as shown below. I have to join those tables and get data as in table 3. Condition is I have to get sum of scores for each student where category is 1 and active is Y.
Table1:
col1col2category
A 10 1
A 10 2
B 10 1
B 20 2
C 10 1
D 20 1
J 30 1
Table2:
colAcolBActive
A10Y
A20N
B30Y
B40N
Z35Y
Table3:
STUDENTSCORE
A20
B40
C10
D20
J30
Z35
query to show student name and sum of his score where category is 1 and active is Y. I am using Oracle 8i.
I have 2 tables, ITEM_T is the base table and RELATIVE_T is the relation table which establish the relationship between parent and child.
I want to give ZZZ child as input and I want get output in below format. I tried various method, but I am not able to get the below result.
Result:
ChildParent_1Parent_2
ZZZYYY XXX
ITEM_T
PK_IDITEM_ID
PK_1XXX
[Code]...
Expected Result:
When give input as ZZZ:
ChildParent_1Parent_2
ZZZ YYY XXX
join two oracle tables for fast fetch of data from table.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to export a data, which is a join of three tables.Will Export or dbms_datapump supports for above scenario.
Database: DB1
Tables: T1, T2 & T3
Select: t1.*,t2.*,t3.*
Join: t1.c1=t2.c1 and t2.c1=t3.c1
I have a editing database with an eversions table:
NAME OWNER
---------------------- --------------------------------
WR5936_DN6676 FRED
WR6739_DN7507 FRED
WR12744_DN13994 FRED
WR6739_DN7511 BARNEY
WR6801_DN7513 BARNEY
I have a process database with a pversions table:
SOID
----------------
5936
6739
12744
6739
I need to select from the editing.eversions table all the records that do not have a matching record in process.pversion. The eversion table is text, and has some additional crap surrounding the characters I want to use for creating a join.
