Reports & Discoverer :: Single Data Group Should Work For Multiple Type Of Conditions?
Jan 8, 2011
Actually I have one query which contains two parameters from_Date and To_date.
if user pass the values for the parameter like 1-dec-2010 to 30-dec-2010 query will works fine and it fetches the values according to the query selected. but now I am going to add one more parameter, the value is 01-apr-2010 now my query should run for 01-apr-2010 to 30-dec-2010.
Here my question is how should I make this scenario with only one query and at the same time the query should work for to scenarios.
I have a report with 2 groups Gheader and Glines.The report looks at PO headers and lines. I want to create a data link from the the 2 queries based on the line id in po_lines_all.However I only want to select this in the lines query so I do not get repeating records at the header query.
Report have one parameter para name depatwhen i go to generate pdf it will ask me which dept if i pick 10 then they generate one pdf if i pick All Dept then they generate again one pdf i need seperate pdf like 10,20,30,40 generate four pdf files
I have a report with 4 groups one above the other and there is data such that each group has certain number of records for a particular value. Now what I want is, to have a page break after each set of data for all the groups. Can this be achieved using format triggers ?
I have a Group report based on one group.For eg..there is machine (Group) and it has detail records .The problem is there are certain specific machine on which i want sorting to be done the rest will be not sorted.
machine WX Details not be sorted machine sh4 Details to be sorted machine sh5 Details to be sorted machine AN1 Details not to be sorted
I encountering while giving ORDER BY CLASS at report query.
View was created from Master and Detail table with simple join after this i created group above report with order by ID (Varchar2 , Values like 0010101001) but in report it order ruffly( not ascending or descending but randomly) .
I have a report w/ master group and detail group and at the report level I would like to display a text based on a value of a field in the detail group. I created a column placeholder at the report level and then assigned it a field value in the detail group. I wanted to show my text based on this value, but it did not work.
I have developed one report but need one formatting suggestion. There is one field called "DESCRIPTION", I want the value of this field to be displayed in a single line. Now the big values are wrapped into multiple line.
Now,
DISPLAY ---------------- This is a Oracle Report.
I want, DISPLAY ------------------------ This is a Oracle Report.
I putted in a table "conditions" some rules (if conditions) and I want to read and execute those conditions in another table "list_parameters" in pl/sql procedure.
conditions : ID||||||||||||||RULE 1-----------(param1 = F) 2-----------(param2 is null) .....
I have been asked to see why a sister company cannot access multiple business areas through a single responsibility. At present, if they log in through a GL responsibility they can see all GL folders, items and the returned data. If they then go to the AP business area, they can see the folders and items, but when they run a report they get an error message 'Query returned no data' - but if they run the same query using an AP responsibility they get the correct results. I have looked at their user set up, and it seems fine i.e. has access to all business areas and required priveledges.
I am adding a parameter to the parameter form of existing reports based on a select statement and has two columns. That part is fine. However, Oracle reports is adding a dash between the two values. Still fine, but I am also adding a UNION with ALL in case the user wants to run the report for all values. In the Parameter form it looks like this:
ALL - RBC - 111 RRG - 234 TEB - 445
How do I get rid of the dash for "ALL" since I did not physically add it? Below is my select statement for the parameter I created:
SELECT code, code_num FROM codes WHERE code_num <> 0 UNION SELECT 'ALL', ' ' FROM dual ORDER BY 1;
I am generating a report/invoice. I want to print three copies of one report, one copy for consumer and one copy for bank and one copy for my official use. All three copies should have proper table,
I am using: Desktop / Discoverer 4.1 / Windows XP.
I am attempting to add a new calculated column and have had some success with the CASE function but need to add additional criteria.
What I have that works is:
SUM(CASE WHEN Expenditure Type = 'Supplier Rebates' THEN Total Spend Plus Commit ELSE 0 END)
What I need to add are a few additional criteria. I attempted and failed with a few variants of this:
SUM(CASE WHEN Expenditure Type = 'Supplier Rebates' AND Capitalizable = 'Y' AND Task Owing Company = '534' OR '915' THEN Total Spend Plus Commit ELSE 0 END)
The three criteria points that I am looking to includea are:
•Expenditure Type = 'Supplier Rebates' •Capitalizable = 'Y' •Task Owing Company = '534' OR '915'
I am new to the forum as well as SQL programing and I need to have the following criteria writen in my WHERE so all three of these criterias are included in the same report (perhaps, each will have its own section).
When running my query in sql developer, I have to execute the command apps.fnd_global.apps_initialize(user_id, resp_id, resp_appl_id) in order to show the result of my query. Without this, the query returns nothing. The problem is I am using this query as a custom query for my Discoverer report and my report does not show any record.
with tmp_tbl as (select 'H1' as hh_id, 'C1' as cust_id, 2 as f_rnk, 'F' as gender, to_date('20130102','YYYYMMDD') as purch_dt, to_date('20100203','YYYYMMDD') first_dt from dual union select 'H1' as hh_id, 'C2' as cust_id, 1 as f_rnk, 'M' as gender, to_date('20130102','YYYYMMDD') as purch_dt, to_date('20100303','YYYYMMDD') first_dt from dual union select 'H1' as hh_id, 'C3' as cust_id, cast(null as number) as f_rnk, 'U' as gender, to_date('20130103','YYYYMMDD') as purch_dt, [code].....
Now i need to rank each cust_id in each hh_id based on below conditions.
1) If atleaset one cust_id in hh_id has f_rnk then gender 'F' with highest f_rnk (more then one F with same f_rnk then the one with oldest first_dt), if no 'F' then gender 'U' with highest f_rnk ((more then one F with same f_rnk then the one with oldest first_dt)), if no 'F' and 'U' then consider 'M' (more then one M with same f_rnk then the one with oldest first_dt).
2) If the above is not met (no cust_id in hh_id has f_rnk populated) then i've to rank based on purch_dt. Gender 'F' with recent purch_dt (if more than one F in household with same purch_dt then the one with oldest first_dt), if no 'F' then gender 'U' with recent purch_dt (if more than one U in household with same purch_dt then one with oldest first_dt), if no 'F' and 'U' then consider 'M' (more than one M in household with same purch_dt then the one with oldest first_dt).
3) If the above criteria is also not met, then rank based on gender_cd. Gender 'F' will have first preference then 'U' and then 'M'.
My output :
HH_ID CUST_ID F_RNK GENDER PURCH_DT FIRST_DT F_RNK_RANK PURCH_RANK GENDER_ONLY_RANK ----- ------- ---------- ------ ----------- ----------- ------------ ------------ ----------------- H1 C1 2 F 1/2/2013 2/3/2010 1 H1 C2 1 M 1/2/2013 3/3/2010 2 H1 C3 U 1/3/2013 4/3/2010 3 H2 C4 F 4/3/2013 10/2/2009 2 H2 C5 M 5/5/2013 8/8/2010 1 H3 C6 F 5/6/2008 1 H3 C6 M 7/8/2010 2
I've tried below query with one condition, but it's giving f_rnk_rank for all records. How can i include multiple conditions in the rank function.
with tmp_tbl as (select 'H1' as hh_id, 'C1' as cust_id, 2 as f_rnk, 'F' as gender, to_date('20130102','YYYYMMDD') as purch_dt, to_date('20100203','YYYYMMDD') first_dt from dual union select 'H1' as hh_id, 'C2' as cust_id, 1 as f_rnk, 'M' as gender, to_date('20130102','YYYYMMDD') as purch_dt, to_date('20100303','YYYYMMDD') first_dt from dual union select 'H1' as hh_id, 'C3' as cust_id, cast(null as number) as f_rnk, 'U' as gender, to_date('20130103','YYYYMMDD') as purch_dt, s hh_id, 'C5' as cust_id, [code]....
I want to print two record of emp table in same line number in tabular format report.
For example if i have emp table and I want to print empno,ename,sal columm only,In tabular format report, Two record should print per line. so If emp table have 14 record report should be printed on 7 rows.
so the output in print preview should be like this
EMPNO ENAME SAL EMPNO ENAME SAL ------ ---------- ---------------------------------------------- 7369 SMITH 800 7499 ALLEN 1600 7521 WARD 1250 7566 JONES 2975 7654 MARTIN 1250 7698 BLAKE 2850 . . . .
I studied a document about lexical parameter in that it says "Lexical parameters are used to substitute multiple values at run time and are identified by a preceding '&'. Lexical s can consist of as little a one line where clause to an entire select statement"
Select * from emp, deptno &where.
and i know about substitution variables using & is this are same (lexical and substitution) or different.
I have a requirement where i need to retain latest 3 records based on creation date for each customer_id and delete the older records. The customer_ id or contract_number data in the test table are not unique.
Sample Table Script:
CREATE TABLE TEST ( CUSTOMER_ID VARCHAR2(120 BYTE) NOT NULL, CONTRACT_NUMBER VARCHAR2(120 BYTE) NOT NULL, CREATION_DATE DATE NOT NULL ); [code]...
Scenario 1 Query should check for priority record(25), if the start_date and end_date of that priority record is the max in that group, records will not have any split.output will be the same.
DC Store St Date End date Priority 955 3 1/1/2010 12/31/9999 25 966 3 4/5/2011 10/10/2011 50 977 3 10/12/2011 12/12/2012 100
output
DC store St Date End date Priority Rank 955 3 1/1/2010 12/31/9999 25 1 966 3 4/5/2011 10/10/2011 50 2 977 3 10/12/2011 12/12/2012 100 3
Scenario 2 If priority record is not covering the max range, then split the records as shown below,
1. during the time period 1/1/2011 & 4/30/2011 there were no other DC for that store so rank would be 1
2. the next range would be 5/1/2011 to 6/29/2011 we have 2 records in service so the record with low priortiy would be ranked 1 and second priority would be ranked 2
3. similarly, for 6/30/2011 to 10/1/2011 we have 3 records in service and it will be ranked accordingly on the priority.
DC Store St Date End date Priority 966 3 6/30/2011 10/1/2011 25 955 3 5/1/2011 11/30/2011 50 977 3 1/1/2011 12/31/2011 100
output
DC store St Date End date Priority Rank 977 3 1/1/2011 4/30/2011 100 1 955 3 5/1/2011 6/29/2011 50 1 977 3 5/1/2011 6/29/2011 100 2
[code]....
Scenario 3 This works similar to scenario 2
DC Store St Date End date Priority 966 3 2/1/2011 12/31/2011 25 955 3 1/1/2011 12/31/2012 50 977 3 5/1/2011 06/31/2011 100
output
DC store St Date End date Priority Rank 955 3 1/1/2011 1/31/2011 50 1 966 3 2/1/2011 12/31/2011 25 1 955 3 2/1/2011 12/31/2011 50 2 977 3 5/1/2011 6/30/2011 100 3 955 3 1/1/2012 12/31/2012 50 1
Note: Number of records in the input can vary and ther can be duplicates in the date interval
I have a doubt that can we make a report on sum of the salary record wise and grouped by dept number?
like as shown BELOW
Dept No Dept Name 10 Accounting Employee ID Name Salary Sum Salary 7782 CLARK 2450 2450 7934 MILLER 1300 3750 7839 KING 5000 8750 Dept No Dept Name 20 Research Employee ID Name Salary Sum Salary 7369 SMITH 800 800 7788 SCOTT 3000 3800 7902 FORD 3000 6800 Dept No Dept Name 30 Sales Employee ID Name Salary Sum Salary 7844 TUNER 1500 1500 7499 ALLEN 1600 3100 7521 WARD 1250 4350 7900 JAMES 950 5300
emp table Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- ------------------ EMPNO NOT NULL NUMBER(4) ENAME VARCHAR2(10) JOB VARCHAR2(9) MGR NUMBER(4) HIREDATE DATE SAL NUMBER(7,2) COMM NUMBER(7,2) DEPTNO NUMBER(2)
dept table
Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- -------------------------- DEPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER DNAME VARCHAR2(15) LOC VARCHAR2(15)
