SQL & PL/SQL :: Place Insert Statement In Loop Inside Anonymous Block?
Nov 25, 2012
can we place insert statement in loop inside anonymous block?
CREATE TABLE DEP(DEPTID NUMBER(5) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,DNAME VARCHAR2(10),LOCID VARCHAR2(10));
DECLARE
I NUMBER(5);
BEGIN
I := 0;
LOOP
INSERT INTO DEP VALUES(&DEPTID,'&DNAME',&LOCID);
I := I+1;
EXIT WHEN I = 5;
END LOOP;
END;
I am trying to create an anonymous PL/SQL block to output privilege information for each of the users listed in DBA_USERS In a loop. This is my block so far (not finished):
***User-Role Privilege report*** ----------------------------------- username: ANDREY , profile: DEFAULT SYSTEM privileges granted directly to the user(not through ROLE) : no_data_found
A problem I am encountering is that for some users I have no direct privileges that are not granted through roles, And when I have the expression v_qry (which is basically "'select grantee ||'',''|| privilege from DBA_SYS_PRIVS where grantee not in (select role from dba_roles) and grantee ='||'''' ||v_usr||''''") not initialized with values because the select statement retrieved 0 results, I have the process interfered by the no_data_found error/exception.
Questions: how I can preferrably simply, avoid/overcome my problem? Some way to make the loop go on in spite of no data found? maybe something similar to NVL?
DECLARE CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM tab WHERE ROWNUM < 5; [code]....
If I add another FETCH INTO statement in the while loop block ,I will get the output.why I am getting this error exactly and how another FETCH INTO is preventing it.
I am trying to run the following script but some how i am getting message: anonymous block completed. where i am doing wrong and also how can i display the values with their column names.
set serveroutput on size 1000000 Declare v_pr_nbr document.document_nbr%type:= ' ' ; cursor c1 is
For my task I tried to write a package that has sys_refcursor in it.It compiled well.Now I want to see the results of it and wrote a anonymous block which gave errors.
I made this script but I still don't quite understand if the syntax is correct. I just wanted to create a function and call it in an anonymous block. I then wanted it to use a variable as a parameter in an iteration and output the variable every iteration. It's done basically but I know it's not 100% right. The fibonacci function looks like its going to loop an infinite number of times if the parameter is greater than 2.
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE myPACKAGE AS CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fibonacci (n BINARY_DOUBLE) RETURN BINARY_DOUBLE IS BEGIN IF n <= 2 THEN RETURN 1; [code]........
One of our developers team member had created a Anonymous block program to do something in the Database, and he forgotten and terminated the session without confirming the program's status, whether it was fully ran or not.
Is there any way to check out the status of this, which happened yesterday?
SELECT SUM(salary) FROM employees WHERE department_id =60 O/P is : 28800But when i use the above query in anonymous block it gives me 684400 DECLARE v_sum_sal NUMBER;
[code]....
The above output statements gives me 684400 as output.. But the expected is 28800
I have a problem that i have hard coded the username.tablename in each select statement of all forms of my application. Now i want to use a dynamic variable in place of username in each select statement throughout the application. The example is:
select * from scott.emp and i want to write it as: select * from variable.emp
But at compilation of the form the compiler should know the above variable name.
I have tried to use following select statement but it does not work.
select user into :global.username from user_users
I think perhaps my problem would be solved with Dynamic SQL Statement but i have no experience by using this statement.
I have a dynamic query which i want to run till it return zero records.
I am using WHILE loop for that but it is giving compilation error:
The query is
execute immediate ' Delete from tbl_archive_trade_list where deal_id in ( select deal_id from tbl_archive_trade_list where trade_id in ( select trade_id from ' || main_trade_group_table || ' where tradegroup_id in ( select tradegroup_id from ' || main_trade_group_table || ' a , tbl_archive_trade_list b
[Code]...
I want to run this Query in While loop till the above command return 0 records.
I tried giving the above statement inside WHILE loop but it is failing.
Without the WHILE loop the above statement works fine and executed properly.
I have below peice of SQL,Im trying to form the P_attribute1 value by using the Loop index(i) but the P_attribute1 value which i assigned in declaration not displaying in the output.
DECLARE P_attribute1 VARCHAR2(100) := '110000027'; P_attribute VARCHAR2(100); l_cnt NUMBER := 10; v_buffer VARCHAR2(500); v_buffer1 VARCHAR2(500); BEGIN FOR i IN 1 .. l_cnt LOOP v_buffer := v_buffer || '' || 'P_attribute' || i || '' || '!'; END LOOP; dbms_output.put_line('v_buffer :' || v_buffer); END; v_buffer :P_attribute1!P_attribute2!P_attribute3!P_attribute4!P_attribute5!P_attribute6!P_attribute7!P_attribute8!P_attribute9!P_attribute10!
I have a select..bulk collect into clause which is inside a for loop as the query gets a parameter from the loop, Then, how to extend the collection rows for each iteration.
I have a multi record control block (basically a text item displaying 6 records) where user enters values and I want to process the values using pre-insert trigger.
I want to read value in each record and then do some tasks using a pre-insert trigger before I commit the values. To navigate between the records I was using first_record, next_record, clear_record built-ins but it gives errors like "40737-illegalrestricted procedure next_record in pre-insert trigger".
I can't understand the following cursor declaration (inside the DECLARE of a PL/SQL block)
CURSOR c_emps IS SELECT emp_large_ot(empno, ename, job, mgr,hiredate, sal, comm, deptno) FROM emp_large; emp_large_ot is an object type created as CREATE TYPE emp_large_ot AS OBJECT ( empno NUMBER , ename VARCHAR2(10) , job VARCHAR2(9)
[code]...
and emp_large is similar to the standard emp table
While writing a procedure I went into this problem. Whenever I write Query : Select * from dba_pending_transactions It works fine.
But whenever I use same Select Query inside PL-SQL block it gives error Table or view not exist. Dba_pending_transactions is view.
SQL> declare 2 v_count number(2); 3 begin 4 execute immediate 'select count(*) from dba_ending_transactions' into v_count; 5 dbms_output.put_line(v_count); 6 end; 7 / declare * ERROR at line 1: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist ORA-06512: at line 4
Same error I get when i use it inside a procedure.
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
I have one problem in trigger execution. I have a small plsql block in trigger and, I want to execute it as a dynamic way. but it is giving the error. Please find the trigger code. Here my intension is that, the column name used in trigger should be dynamic. In future, if I want to switch the column name, I have to do without modification in trigger. The error im getting is "ORA-01008: not all variables bound".
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER ETM_AR_IU AFTER UPDATE ON EXTERNAL_MAPPING REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD FOR EACH ROW
All the analysis till now on our system proves that our system is clearly I/O bound and db sequential read is the biggest culprit.
We have even identified the index which is being affected by sequential read. I am thinking of creating a new tablespace with 32K blocksize (currently all table spaces are 8k) and migrate this index to the new space. That way, Oracle will have to do less number of reads to get the required data.
But is there anything wrong in having just one tablespace with a differnt block size? Or is there anything that I have to be watchful about while doing it?
I have a DML Statement inside a procedure and i use a cursor variable to get the values checked as below . I have attached my procedure not completely but the declaration part and the DML statement part.
The issue is my procedure is not inserting the records at all. It selects the values and then inserts accoringly but its not selecting because of the cursor reference R_LOC.LOCATION_GID.
when i hard code the value in the DML statemnt for the R_LOC.LOCATION_GID, the rows are inserted as expected. So i guess the way the procedure executes the value is not correct.
Modifying my select part which uses cursor variable R_LOC.LOCATION_GID under Insert statement.
select d.servprov_gid, d.depot_gid, replace(d.appointment_time,'':'') appmt_time, d.'||v_day_to_use||' DayUsed from tesco_fresh_templates t, tesco_fresh_templates_d d, location_refnum r where t.set_id= d.set_id and d.depot_gid=r.location_gid AND D.SERVPROV_GID=''R_LOC.LOCATION_GID'' and r.location_refnum_qual_gid=''TESCO.IVS SCHEDULING'' and (r.location_refnum_value=''YES'' or r.location_refnum_value=''Y'') and t.default_set=''Y''
how to insert data in oracle table without writing insert statement in oracle 9i or above. i am not going to write insert all, merge, sqlloder and import data.
I can work with 'straight' query's etc., but now I want to make a query with a loop. I have made a simple one to demonstrate what I want but the real one is working is working by it self but I want to get it work with a loop.
This is the simpel version:
DECLARE
P_UID NUMBER; Max_UID NUMBER := 42220;
BEGIN
P_UID := 42210; LOOP select * from contract lc where lc.UIDCONTRACT = P_UID;
P_UID := P_UID + 1; EXIT WHEN P_UID > Max_UID; END LOOP; END;
The error I get is:
Line 10, column 9:
PLS-00428: an INTO clause is expected in this SELECT Statement.
So I know you can declare a variable and then CONTRACTID INTO v_contractID.
But if I have to put every field in a variable what is then the advantage of a loop. So I expect that I'm on the wrong road and not understand how this works.
i written this code i m facing ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 16408 bytes error
/* Formatted on 2011/11/26 11:52 (Formatter Plus v4.8. */ DECLARE row_id varchar2(50); v_batch_id temp.batch_id%TYPE; v_slab_id temp.slab_id%TYPE; flag NUMBER (2); num varchar2(50) := &row_id;