How do I loop through a Input parameter (varchar_table) and pass the input value to a select query.
Procedure Test
(
param1 IN dbms_sql.varchar2_table
)
[Code]....
1. How do I define temp_tbl and is it a best practice to use temporary table - if not what is the best method to do the same.
I execute the below code in TOAD.
DECLARE
CURSOR c1
IS
SELECT *
FROM tab
WHERE ROWNUM < 5;
[code]....
If I add another FETCH INTO statement in the while loop block ,I will get the output.why I am getting this error exactly and how another FETCH INTO is preventing it.
can we place insert statement in loop inside anonymous block?
CREATE TABLE DEP(DEPTID NUMBER(5) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,DNAME VARCHAR2(10),LOCID VARCHAR2(10));
DECLARE
I NUMBER(5);
BEGIN
I := 0;
LOOP
INSERT INTO DEP VALUES(&DEPTID,'&DNAME',&LOCID);
I := I+1;
EXIT WHEN I = 5;
END LOOP;
END;
I am trying to create an anonymous PL/SQL block to output privilege information for each of the users listed in DBA_USERS In a loop. This is my block so far (not finished):
declare
v_usr varchar2(30);
v_out_header varchar2(100);
[Code]....
The output is as follows:
***User-Role Privilege report***
-----------------------------------
username: ANDREY , profile: DEFAULT
SYSTEM privileges granted directly to the user(not through ROLE) :
no_data_found
A problem I am encountering is that for some users I have no direct privileges that are not granted through roles, And when I have the expression v_qry (which is basically "'select grantee ||'',''|| privilege from DBA_SYS_PRIVS where grantee not in (select role from dba_roles) and grantee ='||'''' ||v_usr||''''") not initialized with values because the select statement retrieved 0 results, I have the process interfered by the no_data_found error/exception.
Questions: how I can preferrably simply, avoid/overcome my problem? Some way to make the loop go on in spite of no data found? maybe something similar to NVL?
I wrote the following block :
set serveroutput on
declare
rec employees%rowtype;
cur SYS_REFCURSOR;
begin
open cur for 'select * from employees where rownum<:a' using 4;
for i in cur
[code]....
It gave errors if we execute is as such, but worked when I commented out the for loop and instead de-commented the simple loop. Does that mean that FOR cannot be used to loop through the records of a ref cursor ?
I'm working with Oracle 10g.
I have a table like this;
ID Amount Date
123 5000 Oct-07-2011
123 null Oct-09-2011
124 7000 Oct-14-2011
124 null Oct-17-2011
124 null Oct-24-2011
What I'm trying to do here is loop thruogh the records and update the amount that's null with the previous amount with the same ID.
here i m giving the code
DECLARE
TYPE SUBNO_TABLE_TYPE IS TABLE OF
TRANS_DEICMAIN1.SUBNO%TYPE
INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
SUBNO_TABLE SUBNO_TABLE_TYPE;
K NUMBER := 1;
S NUMBER := 1;
[code]...
HERE CHECK1 IS A CHECKBOX.WHEN I AM USING THIS CODE ONLY ONE RECORD IS SAVED AT A TIME INSTEAD OF SAVING ALL RECORDS.
My oracle version is oracle 9i
I need to commit after every 2000 records.Currently am using the below statement without using the loop.how to do this?
do i need to use rownum?
BEGIN
UPDATE
(SELECT A.SKU,M.TO_SKU,A.TO_STORE FROM
RT_TEMP_IN_CARTON A,
CD_SKU_CONV M
WHERE
[Code].....
I want to delete records from block in the form.could you explain where(in which trigger) should i write set_block_property.
View 9 Replies View Relatedis there any way other than this way to retrieve the number of record displayed in the block ?
last record ;
l := :system.cursor_record
I have 2 blocks, namely addsubject3rd and chosensubjects. I'm copying the selected records(this comes with checkboxes) from the 1st block to the second block. But what happened is that it copied all the records that are on the addsubject3rd. How can I copy only selected records(checkboxes) from addsubject3rd block to chosensubjects blocks?
View 5 Replies View Relatedi have a cursor which selects the codes based on the school records now i have a multi record block b1 the requirement is that if no of records selected in cusor is 10 then in block b1 10 records should be displayed and if it is 15 then 15 records should be displayed. Is there any way that i can set the no of records displayed in a block dynamically.The block b1 is non database block i am only using a create_record to populate the block.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am working on forms 6i.
I have datablock 'EMP', it's multi record block. I have a button 'CREATE', I have 'commit_form' in 'When button pressed' trigger, to commit records. It's working fine.
Now, i have a check box in the same block, i want to insert records which are checked only.
I am working in form 6i, EBS 11i. I have below requirement to achieve.
I have header data block A, line control block B. My requirement is, i know that in master detail block, if i press F11 in header block, it will clear the line block, like this, in my case if i press F11 in header data block A, i want to clear the line block B. Is there any way we can achieve this.
I have a Master block and a Detail Block. They are related using two columns, Document_ID and Page_no. I want to display all the records in master table with corresponding detail records beside them in single line. i.e., as shown below:
MasterItem1 DetailItem1 DetailItem2 DetailItem3
I created the relation between them and executed query. When I execute query in the form, I can find that all the Master Items are displayed in vertical records, but i can only see one record of detail fields. They are displayed as shown below:
mitem1-value1 ditem1value1 ditem1value2 ditem1value3
mitem1-value2
mitem1-value3
mitem1-value4
When the navigate down in master items, then the corresponding detail values are being shown on the same first record.
i want to retrieve records of empno from SCOTT.EMP talbe in form but without data block wizard using ..how .. and what logic will be in coding
DECLARE
TYPE EROC IS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(200) INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
E1 EROC;
NO_EMPNOVARCHAR2(2000);
[code]....
just caling here EMPNO and :v_empno is fields on form...
the following proble.The emp table is having 14 records.
SELECT * FROM emp ORDER BY empno;
EMPNOENAMESALDEPTNO
7369SMITH80020
7499ALLEN160030
7521WARD125030
[code]...
The emp table is having 10 records.
SELECT * FROM emp_10 ORDER BY empno;
EMPNOENAMESALDEPTNO
7369SMITH80020
7499ALLEN160030
7521WARD125030
7566JONES200020
[code]...
I have written the following PL/SQL block logic tofetch the records from the emp table and compare the records with emp_10 table to perform insert if the records are newelse to perform update the existed records in the emp_10 table.
DECLARE
CURSOR tranche_balance_cur
IS
SELECT empno,
ename,
sal,
[code]...
Execution scenario 1:
I have commented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records4
Updated Records10
As per the logic it's giving the correct output because the cursor is fetching 14 records in that already 10 records are existed in emp_10 tableand 4 are new records.so that it's showing the count for inserted records as 10 and updated records as 4.
Execution scenario 2:
I have uncommented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records13
Updated Records1
As per the logic it's not giving the correct output.
I tried with using TRIM function in the comparision logic to avoid spaces.
TRIM(emp_10.empno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.empno)
AND TRIM(emp_10.ename) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.ename)
AND TRIM(emp_10.sal) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.sal)
AND TRIM(emp_10.deptno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.deptno)
Version information:
Forms [32 Bit] Version 10.1.2.3.0 (Production)
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
When an user enters a value in a field of a Screen, I want to query up the next screen records based on that user input value in the previous screen.The previous screen is based on a control block i.e.
Q_EMP
items- Q_EMP.emp_id, Q_EMP.FY, Q_EMP.hire_flag.
I'm using Oracle forms 10g. In the form i have this multiple records under one block. After performing the query, all records are cannot be updated. And i have this buttons at the right side that will enable the certain item that can only be updated. My problem is i cannot enable the item in the first record,instead of first record all records in that item was enable.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI need to filter records in a datablock based on Yes or No criteria.So i created a listitem(INCLUDE_ZERO_QTY_ITEMS) for that and i am using following code in WHEN-LIST-CHANGED trigger.
BEGIN
IF :XGEC_SW_ITEM_LOAD_ITEM_DETS_V.INCLUDE_ZERO_QTY_ITEMS = 'Y'
THEN
GO_BLOCK ('XGEC_SW_ITEM_LOAD_ITEM_DETS_V');
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY ('XGEC_SW_ITEM_LOAD_ITEM_DETS_V',
default_where,
'1=1');
[code]....
I am able to filter the records but the list item is not displaying initial value and the value that i am selecting from poplist.
I am working in form 6i, EBS11i. I have a multi record data block, i am inserting checked records only using below logic.
ON-INSERT Trigger:
if checkbox_checked('block.checkbox') THEN
insert_record;
end if;
Requirement: Let us say, i have 4 records, i checked 2 records.. inserted them. Now if i want to insert other 2 unchecked records, it's not accepting, is it possible to insert records which are not checked after insertion.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE IND_MONITOR(P_tab VARCHAR2)
is
type ind_table is table of varchar2(20);
p_ind ind_table;
v_sql varchar2(2000);
begin
select index_name bulk collect into P_Ind from user_indexes where table_name=upper(P_tab);
for i in 1..p_ind.count loop
v_sql :='alter index '||p_ind(i)|| ' monitoring usage'
execute immediate v_sql using p_ind(i);
end loop;
end;
can i use forall instead of 'for loop ..end loop'
i have multi data block filed. and checkbox field which based on control block...My task is when i check checkbox only one field should enabled and my mouse goes to that field
e.g
item11 item21 item31 chkbox1
item12 item22 item32 chkbox2
Scenario like this :
My item field based on data block and checkbox based on control block,while i checked chkbox1 , only item31 on that current record should be enabled and i changed value only on that field
when i checked chkbox1 , my cursor goes to item31...not item32
i have a master detail form, In Master block we have one field cheque amount and in Detail block we have field receiveable amount invoice wise. if company paid us a cheque amount we will enter this amount in Master block field Cheque amount and in detail block there will be invoice wise receivable amounts. i want to distribute the cheque amount in detail block invoice wise for example
Cheque amount in master block = 291
Invoice wise receiveable amount is as follows
Invoice No , receivable amount , Received amount
10, 196 , 0
20 , 95 , 0
30 , 54 , 0
Result should be as follows:
Invoice No , receivable amount , Received amount
10, 196, 196
20 , 95 , 95
30 , 54, 0
Received amount field should be distributed according to the receivable amount when recevied amount = cheque amount then remaining will be 0.
i have an error with block corruption
Error: Corrupt block relative dba: 0x01c12a58 (file 7, block 76376)
What all the ,methods I can go for if we are working on a production environment with out any down time.
I can go for dbms repair package and restore and recover
I have a multi record control block (basically a text item displaying 6 records) where user enters values and I want to process the values using pre-insert trigger.
I want to read value in each record and then do some tasks using a pre-insert trigger before I commit the values. To navigate between the records I was using first_record, next_record, clear_record built-ins but it gives errors like "40737-illegalrestricted procedure next_record in pre-insert trigger".
I am trying to update records in the target table based on the records coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. Looking at the informatica session log I find that the informatica code is perfectly fine but its in the update part it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). find the TARGET TABLE query and the UPDATE query as below.
TARGET TABLE:
CREATE TABLE OPERATIONS.DENIAL_REGRET_FACT
(
CALENDAR_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
DAY_TIME_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
SITE_KEY NUMBER NOT NULL,
RESERVATION_AGENT_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL,
LOSS_CODE VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL,
PROP_ID VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL,
[code].....
I have written the following PL/SQL procedure to delete the records and count the number of records has been deleted.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE Del_emp IS
del_records NUMBER:=0;
BEGIN
DELETE
FROM candidate c
WHERE empid in
(select c.empid
from employee e,
candidate c
where e.empid = c.empid
and e.emp_stat = 'TERMINATED'
);
[code]....
I am running a query in our Clarity PPM database to return a list of all Support projects. This returns a simple list of project code and project name:
The query has the project resource tables associated with it, so I am able to list all resources allocated to the project. But for now i am only selecting a DISTINCT list of projects.
Query for anyone interested:
Select distinct
Project_code,
project_name
from
niku.nbi_project_current_facts nbip,
niku.odf_ca_project cst,
niku.prtask t,
[code]........
I have a separate query which returns a list of support resources.
select res.full_name, res.unique_name , dep.description
from niku.srm_resources res,
niku.pac_mnt_resources pac,
niku.departments dep
where res.unique_name = pac.resource_code
and pac.departcode = dep.departcode
and res.is_active = 1
and description like 'IMS%'
and UPPER(dep.description) like '%SUP%'
What I need to be able to do in the first query, is return only projects that do NOT have a resource that appears in the resource list in the second query.
(the res.unique_name field in the second query can be linked to the same in the first query)
Logically, the process would be:
1. Identify Support Project
2. Identify Resources allocated to the project team
3. Compare with List of Support Resources
4. If any Resources in that list do NOT appear on the project, then return project.
I have a list of strings ( like a,b ,c) that I want to loop againts. I will be creating string to execute them as dynamic sql.I could have put the string in a table and loop againt the table but this is a deployment script so I do not want to create any table.I can also do
DECLARE
cursor c is SELECT 'a' FROM dual UNION SELECT 'b' FROM dual ;
BEGIN
for i in c
loop
.......
end loop.
END;
But I have many strings to loop over. What is the best way to achieve it. Can i use collection to achieve this?