Server Administration :: ORA-04030 - Split From Tablespace With Different Block Size Inside Same Database
Nov 26, 2011
i written this code i m facing ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 16408 bytes error
/* Formatted on 2011/11/26 11:52 (Formatter Plus v4.8. */
DECLARE
row_id varchar2(50);
v_batch_id temp.batch_id%TYPE;
v_slab_id temp.slab_id%TYPE;
flag NUMBER (2);
num varchar2(50) := &row_id;
All the analysis till now on our system proves that our system is clearly I/O bound and db sequential read is the biggest culprit.
We have even identified the index which is being affected by sequential read. I am thinking of creating a new tablespace with 32K blocksize (currently all table spaces are 8k) and migrate this index to the new space. That way, Oracle will have to do less number of reads to get the required data.
But is there anything wrong in having just one tablespace with a differnt block size? Or is there anything that I have to be watchful about while doing it?
As the undo segments are used in round robin fashion, Is it possible that with varying load (concurrent users, size and number of transactions), the size of Undo tablespace on a particular day is less than the Undo tablespace size few days back, by any chance?
As a basic understanding I know that Undo is preserved for read consistency and transaction, instance recovery So if there are lot of transaction on a database on 05 Feb and before that, but there aren't any transactions on 6,7,8,9, then on 10th Feb can we see the Undo tablespace size is less than that of 05 Feb?
In the following case when data belonging to table is not required for any queries, transactions, even then the undo size is not restored upon dropping the table.
As such for large operations and batch processes shall we keep undo tablespace with files as 'Autoextend' with 'Maxsize' as 'Unlimited'?
I want to increase the size of the tablespace but when i login as sysdba or admin user i can just see the 21 tables in the dba_tablespaces or user_tablespaces. I want to see the tablespaces related to the application.
we have a tablespace of size 900 GB where 90% of space is occupied by two tables having BLOB data and now i need to drop these two tables and then to recover the space, i need to resize the tablespace (datafiles).
I am using oracle 10g with sga_max_size =4GB and db block size 16k. Now i am creating a tablespace with block size 32 kb , whats value i select for the parameter db_32k_cache_size.
Is there any standard way to calculate the value of this parameter.
I found some of the tablesapces whose used% exceeded 80%.Based on this output i thought of increasing the datafile.But there are many tablespaces of DATA1 whose autoextensible column some are set to NO, and some are set to YES. I believe we dont need to bother about the tablespace whose Autoextensible column set to YES as Oracle will automatically manage until the Maxsize of it. But some tablesapce of DATA1 are set to NO. Should i recommend to add size for this DATA1 tablespace whose autoextensible are set to YES/NO or leave it as it is.
Please see the column below.
Quote: FILE_IDTABLESPACE_NAMESIZE(M)USED(M)FREE(M)MAX(M)AUTOEXTENSIBLE% USED 59DATA13276732741.1325.7532767YES100 60DATA13276732741.6925.1932767YES100 61DATA1327673274026.8832767YES100 76DATA13270032193.31506.560NO98 77DATA13270030858.51841.380NO94 78DATA13270029476.563223.310NO90
Here is my problem : I create a tablespace named ts_photos.I create then a table on this tablespace.Then I insert some blobs records.The space grows up to 2 Gb.
I perform a truncate statment. Then the space grows up to 4Gb.I re-insert the same records and the size stays in 4Gb.The database in in archivelog mode. How can I return to the initial size (2Gb of effective data) : should I drop the tablespace and recreate it?
The blocksize for my database is 4096, as i have heard that the minimum size of the datafile is decided by blocksize, but i want to know that how it is calculated as by giving the above syntax the other values will be default. I am trying the syntax in oracle 9.2.0.1.0 version.
I am facing this problem continuously from last 1 week on my production oracle database.I have performed all kind of changes on parameter but still am getting this error.
Oracle version -> 11g O/S -> windows server 2003 RAM -> 11 GB #########################INIT CONFIG################### convdb.__db_cache_size=536870912 convdb.__java_pool_size=10485760 convdb.__large_pool_size=4194304
I was about to move some tables from one table space to another but it seems it is not possible to move partitioned tables between table spaces of different block sizes.
So far the only option I have is to export and then import back the data.
know if there is any way to move a partitioned table between table spaces of different block size?
I have Oracle 11gR2 running on windows xp machine. Windows xp has total size of 150 GB and free space of 95 GB.
I checked the size of the database that I created. It showed the total size of the database as 2 GB and used space as 2 GB. If I want to increase the total size of the database to 50 GB, what should i do? Now which is the disk space size? Windows or Oracle?
I have checked the space of my tablespaces/datafiles in my database. I have 8 GB space left in my database server. I cant add more hard-disk as there is no slot left. We r planning to buy a new server with latest config.
My question is, how can we know upto what size our database can increase and when a datafile need to be added in advance. Sometimes even though datafiles have space left,it shows errors abt extents cannot be extended. We have coalesce the tablespaces and added a new datafile.
I am storing customer's snaps in a table ( column's data type as LONG RAW) using oracle forms Webutil. Now there are 250 snaps in the table. The file type of these snaps is JPG with the average size 30KB.
I made a backup using export utility before storing these snaps and the exported DMP file's size was 36MB. Now after storing these just 250 snaps of 30KB the DMP file's size is gone over 300MB.
i need to change column's datatype? or some where in oracle forms's image item. Because on window's file system the size of these files is just 8MB.
Our database size is 100GB and i removed few records from a table and rebuild the index.The size of Index reduced considerably after Index rebuild but now i see our database size increased to 115GB.I know online rebuild creates second index which is also removed after the build is finished then why the increase in database size?Is there a way so it shows up more space ?
select sum(bytes) from dba_segments where owner='abc' and segment_name='abc_index_1'; 8GB
ALTER INDEX abc_index_1 REBUILD ONLINE ;
select sum(bytes) from dba_segments where owner='abc' and segment_name='abc_index_1'; 2GB
If I have NO datafiles other than of the default block size, would I need to define a size for those other buffer pool? Is there any process that would benifit of these pools?
i have a tablespace which contains 121 datafile(max limit reached) as a dba what we have to do?
creating a new tablespace with a datafile and assign the users to the current tablespace which i created now.iif the above process is correct,after some time the tablespace which was filled up got freed up.now can i give the access to the users previous (i.e. freed up tablespace) and current tablespaces
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
My os version is
Linux damdat01 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 04:00:49 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
My database is OLP system.
My question is what are the advantages and disadvantages having one single tablespace versus multiple tablespace?
Easy to maintain when you have single tablespace. but hard to track the IO issues if you have one single tablespace.
We are working on migrating from 9.2.0.4 to 11.2 and we've set up a test machine so that we could test the install and the import (as well as test additional 11g features that we want to begin using).
So we created the database and created all of the tablespaces beforehand.
However, when we run the import, we get the errors like so:
Import: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production on Tue Oct 5 15:01:19 2010 Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options Export file created by EXPORT:V09.02.00 via conventional path
[code]....
First of all, the block size in our "newly" created tablespaces is 8192...and these are obviously trying to recreate the tablespaces with a block size of 2048.
1) Why is it not ignoring these create tablespace commands when those tablespaces already exist?
2) how in the world do we get around the block size issue? We've tried nearly everything we could find, but we've still not had any luck.
I create a range-list partition table using the subpartition template,and there is a default subpartition p_default,when i insert a row which provcode values is 6 into the table,and it belong to the default subpartition,how can i spilt it into a new subpartition such as p_6, and make the row belong to the subpartition p_6?
create table tb_hxl_user_split ( statedate date not null, provcode number not null, usernumber varchar2(13) not null, rem1 varchar2(1024), create_date date, create_by number, last_update_date date, last_update_by number [code]....
I read in few blog and they are saying, oracle11g allocate 60% of the memory to SGA and 40% of the memory to PGA when we enable MEMORY_ TARGET to non-zero.Here are few blogs. URL.....It is not working on that way(60:40) on my database.
Here is my DB version.
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production [code]....
I am not able to find 60%:40% concept in oracle document..so all the above blogs info are wrong?