Can we execute more than one insert statements at a time (eg 10) in database and givecommit at the end of insert statements or else give a commit one by one after each insert statements ?
I have an export dumpfile and when I am importing it in the new database I want to see all the SQL statements including "CREATE", "ALTER", and "INSERT". I am able to see CREATE and ALTER by using the option SHOW=Y in my import statement (IMP) but not able to see the INSERT commands.
Is there any way I can see INSERT statements as well.
I used bulk collect and for all statements to select and insert the data in temp table.The select SQl is returning one row. But its not inserting this row into temp table.Its not throwing any exceptions. Used ref cursor because the select statement is going for every cursor.
here modified the code and provided only one cursor.
Create Or Replace Procedure Sales_Hist_Update_Bkp Is Type Type_Name Is Record( Sku_Item_Key Ordm_Int.Dwi_Rtl_Sls_Retrn_Line_Bkp.Sku_Item_Key%Type, Locationno Ordm_Int.Dwi_Rtl_Sls_Retrn_Line_Bkp.Locationno%Type, Bsns_Unit_Key Ordm_Int.Dwi_Rtl_Sls_Retrn_Line_Bkp.Bsns_Unit_Key%Type, Act_Item_Cost_Amt Ordm_Int.Dwi_Rtl_Sls_Retrn_Line_Bkp.Item_Cost_Amt%Type, Act_Rglr_Unit_Price_Amt Ordm_Int.Dwi_Rtl_Sls_Retrn_Line_Bkp.Rglr_Unit_Price_Amt%Type, [code]...
Insert statements from Java are processing very slow i.e 1L records taking 15Mins on every row commit ( Batch insert is not applicable that's why they are committing on every row). - Only 1 index
Need to create Sproc(loop) to insert data..We have 2 table:
- BE Table Name Null Type ---------------------- -------- -------------- BID NOT NULL NUMBER(10) BUSINESSENTITYTYPEID NOT NULL NUMBER(10) PARENTID NUMBER(10) VERSION NOT NULL NUMBER(10) FULLNAME VARCHAR2(255) PHONE VARCHAR2(255) FAX VARCHAR2(255) [code]....
Whenever the BE table is read it gives more than 80K records from cust_id=1 and so on and becomes a bit slow ..
Now, when we copy the records from BE to CUSTPAYMETHOD (assume 30k). Next time when we read the table it should show us the customerid from 3001based on New Customer's(user created) Customerid.
CUSTID column is logically linked with BID column (FK not enforced) We don't have to pass parameter as we know the cust_id=1,flag for suspended='Y' and Eff_date between date1 and date2..We have accept from/to Period.Probably a loop to insert...This particular SP will run in all env and the id is going to be different how we are going to handle this...
We want to have a procedure. This is to purge BE table.
1) Insert a new parameter CUST_PMNT_MTHD_RETENTION_PERIOD into system_parameter table(which is only a parameter table) -- this can be done outside of Proc.
2)Create a new Customer(user id) through the Customer application and then find out the custID for the new customer -- this can be done outside of Proc.
SP should be for:
- Store Proc will Update the CustID in the CustPayMethod table to the new customer ID (that was created) when the EFFECTIVESTARTDATE older than CUST_PMNT_MTHD_RETENTION_PERIOD(from system_parameter table) days and suspended=’Y’.
- Copy records with custid=1(anonymous user) and startdata older than retention_period and suspended='Y' to Table CUSTPAYMETHOD
Eventually,delete the record from BE table.BusinessEntity(parent) table is information about customer and customerpaymentmethod(child) table is about payment mode(how payment is made by customer).
Assume If BID=1 then we can find Cust_id=1(which can have many records as the payment mode may change because the customer pay by different mode(credit,debit etc).We have to use loop and commit every 200 or 500 records.
FIrst we have to update the table with new cust_id and then insert...
How to create this pl/sql process to add elements to a nested table or varray within a loop. Here's the scenario: I have an apex package that has some pl/sql processes and some stored procedures. I am dealing with Inspection Areas. An Inspection Area has several sectors. I already have the loop that lists all the Inspection Areas and a loop inside that loop that lists all the sectors. There is an if statement that determines whether or not the sector name gets stored in the varray or table. I am not sure how to correctly do this and am not sure whether to use a nested table or varray. I've posted somewhat of a pseudo coded example below
If (you_belong_in_table) then variable := store_me_in_varray /* OR */ variable := array_type(sector.sector_name) i := i + 1; end if;
/* Now we output our varray or table */ start loop output(sector names one by one)
end loop I hope this makes sense. I more so just need the syntax to be able to continually added values to a table or varray while I'm already inside a loop; and also how to output those values end the end as well.
can we place insert statement in loop inside anonymous block?
CREATE TABLE DEP(DEPTID NUMBER(5) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,DNAME VARCHAR2(10),LOCID VARCHAR2(10)); DECLARE I NUMBER(5); BEGIN I := 0; LOOP INSERT INTO DEP VALUES(&DEPTID,'&DNAME',&LOCID); I := I+1; EXIT WHEN I = 5; END LOOP; END;
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE IND_MONITOR(P_tab VARCHAR2) is type ind_table is table of varchar2(20); p_ind ind_table; v_sql varchar2(2000); begin select index_name bulk collect into P_Ind from user_indexes where table_name=upper(P_tab); for i in 1..p_ind.count loop v_sql :='alter index '||p_ind(i)|| ' monitoring usage' execute immediate v_sql using p_ind(i); end loop; end;
I know, importing a *.CSV-table is easy using a few clicks with the GUI, but I want to know, how to import and create new tables, using the existing *. CSV-files, with SQL statements.
I have a column in a database that contains both numerical and char data. I would like to be able to do two different things (two different queries)
1. divide the numerical data in the column by 10 and leave the char data alone (just return it)
2. detect the numerical data in the column and treat is as a different value so I can run averages & counts on it while disregarding the char data
I'm not at all sure how to do number 2. I thought a CASE statement would work for number 1, but then I realized CASE doesn't like different datatypes:
select case when '1234' = 'checked' then 'checked' when '1234' = 'gen.nograde' then 'gen.nograde' when '1234' = null then null else '1234'/10 end as "GRADE" from dual
From database server, I need to monitor the details about the sql statements which are being currenlt running in client machines.
I tried with V_$SQLTEXT view where I can only see the SQL statements, hash value,address,SQL_id. but I'm not able to get the user name,name the client machine .
find out these details?.Which Data Dictionary i need to use ?.
I have a question regarding the SQL statements embedded behind the Self Service Pages in Oracle Applications.
Taking an example of Oracle E-business Suite, Is there a way to check what SQL statement is hard coded or embedded in a particular required Self Service Page?
I'm in a bit of a pickle with some SQL syntax, and while my Oracle-fu is weak, an associate with SQL skills is also stuck. I am developing a database for my department that is backed by Oracle Enterprise 11g and the front end is ChemAxon (basically, chemistry database software). The short of it is that I have one large table with every compound from different groups. Each row has a flag (column PI) on it that indicates which group it belongs to (let us say 'Smith' and 'Jones' for example). The software can apply row-level filtering which will basically only show the rows that a particular username are allowed to see.
I have a FLAG_TABLE table, which contains two columns: USERNAME and FLAG. An example set up is this:
USERNAME FLAG ------------- ---------- smith_minion Smith jones_minion Jones jones_minion Smith
The software automatically applies a SQL filter that begins with:
SELECT DISTINCT CHEMAXON.STRUCTURES."ID" FROM CHEMAXON.STRUCTURES WHERE
I can set up filtering to work dandy, such that when smith_minion logs in, he can only see rows with the Smith flag (or jones_minion can see both Jones and Smith) by using the filter:
STRUCTURES.PI IS NULL or STRUCTURES.PI IN(SELECT ALL FLAG from FLAG_TABLE where USERNAME = '__IJC_USERNAME__')
('__IJC_USERNAME__' is how the third party software passes the logged in username into SQL)
But we have a new problem: there also exists a master user (chemaxon) who needs to see every row no matter what the flag. The row filtering is applied no matter who logs on, so we need to set up the SQL filter to basically say "If chemaxon, then select all rows, otherwise, select rows based on the username". This is proving a problem as the select statement must be prefaced with SELECT DISTINCT CHEMAXON.STRUCTURES."ID" FROM CHEMAXON.STRUCTURES WHERE.
I've tried using DECODE in a few capacities, but I am always thwarted. My last attempt was:
STRUCTURES.PI IS NULL or STRUCTURES.PI IN (DECODE('__IJC_USERNAME__','chemaxon',(!='something'),(SELECT ALL FLAG from FLAG_TABLE where USERNAME = __IJC_USERNAME__));
But this throws a ORA-00936 missing expression error, with a * under the != portion (I test it by replacing '__IJC_USERNAME__' with 'CHEMAXON').
My teacher taught the lesson of DML statemnts, he told us how does merge works , but he did not give us any query for that,provide query for Merge and if possible then explain it too , I am using Oracle 10g Sql Plus.
DDL statements automatically end with COMMIT the user transactions in which they appear. Foe example:
------------------------------------------- create table mytable01 (i integer); insert into mytable01 select 1 from dual; create table mytable02 (i integer); -------------------------------------------
After all three statements are executed, data are committed in mytable01.
In the Oracle DB server SQL guide we read:
"DDL commands, such as TRUNCATE, will fail if there is any DML command active on the table. A transaction will block the DDL command until the DML command is terminated with a COMMIT or a ROLLBACK."
But I executed the following without any problem:
------------------------------------------- create table mytable (i integer); insert into mytable select 1 from dual; commit; update mytable set i = 2; alter table mytable add (j integer); -------------------------------------------
So where's the truth? Are DDL statements blocked when they refer to an active object accessed from a DML or not?
how to insert data in oracle table without writing insert statement in oracle 9i or above. i am not going to write insert all, merge, sqlloder and import data.
I have been out of work for 2+ years. Am about to start a job next week doing Oracle back end, Forms, and Reports development among other things. I was asked if I could take a look at 3 report requirements and give an estimate on how long it would take to correct errors in these reports. All I have is a user requirement document stating what the report is currently doing and what it should be doing, a partial screen print of an Oracle Form showing correct data, and a sample report page showing incorrect data.
I am finding it rather difficult to give an estimate without seeing tables, relations, code, etc. Is it me or does this seem nearly impossible?I do not have access to their system yet so cannot view the database or run select statements, run the report, etc. All I have are the documents I listed above.
Recently we have upgraded from 11.1 to 11.2 . But after upgrade SQL statements that are running fine in 11.1 was running for hours in 11.2. Statistics are collected 100%...
connect the following concepts/information I've been collecting. This is not my field but I'm interested in filling some of mine conceptual/technical gaps.
From a JDBC perspective, one of the benefits of Prepared (and so Callable) statements have over the regular ones is that the statement is "compiled"(*) once and then reused (performance gain).
(*) for SQL statements: building of parse tree and exec.plan
In which way can this notion be extrapolated to invocation of Oracle Stored Procedures through CallableStatements? (After clearing my doubts, I may end concluding that the only relevant feature of CallableStatements is their capacity to deal with stored procedure invocations)
According to procedure's precompiled execution plan SQL compilation implies execution plans generation PL/SQL compilation implies P-code generation and, SQL statements (from PLSQL code) are treated no differently by Oracle than SQL from Java or C/C++. These SQLs will be parsed and execution plans for those SQLs created. ... When the PL code executes the SQL statement, only then does the SQL engine receive the SQL, parse it, and create an execution plan for it.
Therefore, even when the stored procedure can be parsed and cached in SGA (through the OracleConnection.preparedCall("proc") invocation), the SQL statements won't be effectively compiled until they are executed, right? And going deeper, will those SQL statements be cached to be reused in future invocations of the containing stored procedure? Is this a characteristic of the regular stored procedure execution in Oracle? or is it due to the CallableStatement "origin"?