I am trying to merge into test table using a cursor. If the contract number in the test table matches with the contract number from the cursor then i need to update the creation_date else i need to insert values from the cursor into the test table.
MERGE INTO test
USING cursortest
ON (i.contract_number = test.contract_number)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
[code]......
My requirement is ..
SQL> CREATE TABLE EMP (EMPID VARCHAR2(100), U_EMPID VARCHAR2(100));
Table created.
SQL> INSERT INTO EMP VALUES ('DUMMY1','J0001');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO EMP VALUES ('DUMMY2','J1002');
1 row created.
SQL> INSERT INTO EMP VALUES ('DUMMY3','J1003');
1 row created.
SQL> SELECT * FROM EMP;
EMPID U_EMPID
------------------
DUMMY1 J0001
DUMMY2 J1002
DUMMY3 J1003
in this example empid is dummy empid (which will be issued for contractors), once the contractors are considered to be taken into payroll that u_empid will be updated by HR manually, we need to replace empid with u_empid. then data will become like this.
SQL> SELECT * FROM EMP;
EMPID U_EMPID
---------------------------
DUMMY1 J0001
DUMMY2 J1002
DUMMY3 J1003
J1001 NULL
J1002 NULL
J1003 NULL
now my requirement is there are approximately 60 child tables are there for EMP table, and EMPID is the foreign key for all of them with "on delete cascade" defined on those. Now first i need to create records in all the child tables with actual employee id's (which is u_empid). if the actual id is already exists then just need to update rest of the columns in that table except the EMPID.
Once the records are created with actual empid, then i will issue a delete command to remove dummy employee id's in emp table which will take care of deletion in child tables as well.
I was thinking of two options, one is go with Merge other is write a cursor and handle the update in exception block using when duplicate value on index feature.
i HAVE TWO TABLES
EMP_NAME_DETAILS
EMP_ID EMPNAME
EMP_ADD_DETAILS
EMP_ID EMPCITY
NOW I WANT TO MERGE/COMBINE THIS TWO TABLES INTO ONE FLAT TABLE SO MY REPORTS WILL RUN ONLY FROM ONE TABLE INSTEAD OF TWO.
MY DESIRED OUTPUT TABLE WOULD BE
EMP_ID EMPNAME EMPCITY
select * from a (6 column)
where wallet='01710000273'
select * from b (2 column)
where wallet='01710000273'
when I union these two tables it find two row for similar wallet, but i want to show these in one row. How will possible this?
Can i use table type in the using clause of merge statement ?
Attached is the code of the procedure
create or replace procedure fnd_sample as
cursor fnd_c is select * from fnd_columns;
type test_t is table of fnd_columns%rowtype;
[Code]....
(APPLICATION_ID,TABLE_ID,COLUMN_ID,COLUMN_NAME,USER_COLUMN_NAME,COLUMN_SEQUENCE,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,LAST_UPDATED_BY,CREATION_DATE,CREATED_BY,LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
COLUMN_TYPE,WIDTH,NULL_ALLOWED_FLAG,TRANSLATE_FLAG,FLEXFIELD_USAGE_CODE) values
(f.APPLICATION_ID,f.TABLE_ID,f.COLUMN_ID,f.COLUMN_NAME,f.USER_COLUMN_NAME,
f.COLUMN_SEQUENCE,f.LAST_UPDATE_DATE,f.LAST_UPDATED_BY,f.CREATION_DATE,f.CREATED_BY,
f.LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,f.COLUMN_TYPE,f.WIDTH,f.NULL_ALLOWED_FLAG,f.TRANSLATE_FLAG,f.FLEXFIELD_USAGE_CODE);
end loop;
exception
when others then
dbms_output.put_line(SQLERRM);
end;
/
I am getting an error saying that
/19 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
8/60 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
{code{
i want to apply merge stmt on single table.
CREATE TABLE TEST11(TNO NUMBER(5), TVAL VARCHAR2(100), TID VARCHAR2(10));
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(1,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(2,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(3,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(4,'VIJAYA','');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(5,'VIJAYA','');
[Code]....
My requiremen is if record is exists then i wan to update some value, if record not existes the i wan to insert new record
Can I have all the rows in a table updated at once in the merge statement?
MERGE INTO providermaster a
using
(
SELECT * FROM PROVIDERMASTER@INGEST) b
ON (b.MASTERPROVIDERID=a.MASTERPROVIDERID)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE ....... I want to update all the other rows at once..
I want to write a simple stored procedure and I want to keep it as simple as possible (no loop, the least amount of parameters ...etc.)
Basically, the procedure receives a Table Of Record as input parameters and needs to merge it with existing table, the table of record is of the rowtype of the existing table.
I have difficulties to merge these data. Below is what I tried
CREATE or REPLACE PACKAGE BIZ_xxx_MERGE
IS
TYPE xxx_ACTIVITE_Type IS TABLE OF MyTbl%RowType INDEX BY BINARY_INTEGER;
PROCEDURE MERGE_xxx_ACTIVITE_SP (
MyLP IN xxx_ACTIVITE_Type
);
END BIZ_xxx_MERGE;
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE BODY BIZ_xxx_MERGE AS
PROCEDURE MERGE_xxx_ACTIVITE_SP (
MyLP IN xxx_ACTIVITE_Type
) AS
BEGIN
MERGE INTO MyTbl
[code].........
I have two tables lets say TAB_A and TAB_B. I altered table B to include a new column from table A I wrote a merge statement as follows to merge the data
MERGE INTO TAB_AUSING TAB_BON (TAB_A.SECURITYPERSONKEY=TAB_B.SECURITYPERSONKEY)WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET TAB_A.PPYACCOUNT=TAB_B.PPYACCOUNT;
I know INSERT is for inserting new records UPDATE to my knowledge is to modify currently existing records (loosely) MERGE is one I rarely used, until this particular scenario. The code works perfectly fine, but I was wondering how could I write an update statement? Or in this scenario should I even be using an update statement?
I have a table with a BLOB column ;
I want read data from table and insert to another table with a cursor
My code is :
procedure read_data is
cursor get_data is
select id,image from picture1;
id1 number;
pic blob;
begin
open get_data;
[code]....
when I run form , error FRM-40734 occurred
error in line " fetch .... "
I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.
SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */
INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq
USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid,
detail_rerate_flag_code,
rerate_sel_key,
[code].....
I have a table with more than 200 columns. I would like to declare a cursor to query all the columns for each record (if c1%found then ....). As the table has more than 200 columns is it a good practice to declare a cursor
View 7 Replies View Relatedi am trying to fetch the cursor returned from a stored procedure and insert into a physical table. but i am unable to populate the table. below is how my code looks.
declare
p_out sysadm.CGF_PKG_REFCUR.rcDataCursor;
a table1.node%TYPE;
b table1.acct%TYPE;
c table1.descr%TYPE;
[code]......
In the above, stored_proc is the stored procedure from OLAP database. Above code i am executing is from EPM database.
p_out returns a result set of (select a,b,c from table2).
I am trying to get the result set from OLAP database and populate a table in the EPM database.
I want pass the tablename to cursor. The tablename will be a dyanamic one, as we have the data in different sources tables[multiple systems - all systems will provide the data dump to oracle] with same set of columns.
I have inserted all the tablenames in a parameter table and based on conditions daat should be fethced from each system.
I need to pass the tablename to the cursor to fetech the coloumn list from the table(the table that is passed as parametr).
My objective is to select the table names from all_tables table where the number of rows is greater than zero. Use this table name and choose a single record from those tables. Below is the code i am trying. but it throws me an error as
Quote:
ERROR at line 9:
ORA-06550: line 9, column 24:
PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06550: line 9, column 2:
PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
DECLARE
CURSOR c1 IS
SELECT owner
||'.'
||table_name table_name
[code]........
I am working on a POC. The goal is to do a
select * from function('input')
where the function dynamically returns different tables.
I have gotten to the point where I can return the cursor but I cannot format it as a table to use in the query. It return's it as XML. This is my function:
create or replace
FUNCTION CAMS_FUN_GEN_REPORTS(PARAM1 IN VARCHAR2) RETURN SYS_refCURSOR AS
BEGIN
DECLARE
p_recordset SYS_refCURSOR;
begin
OPEN p_recordset FOR 'SELECT * from STATS_FLAGGED_TOTALS_ME';
RETURN p_recordset;
END;
END CAMS_FUN_GEN_REPORTS;
This is my query:
select * from CAMS_FUN_GEN_REPORTS('')
So normally you would do this
select * from TABLE(CAMS_FUN_GEN_REPORTS('') as tabletype)
But I will never know the end result table as it will be dynamic so I have to find a way to cast the result of the function into a new table I can select on.
I have looked into pipe lining also but from what I can tell you still need to know the table definition. Which I can't know from the client side. The server will control the 'routing' and thus the end result of the select.
I want to create table by using the ref cursor results which is returned by the function / procedure. We need achieve this simple query .
View 17 Replies View Relatedexample to use temp table in function with only ref cursor.
I need to use for the reporting purpose.
I have made changes in my form
1st step:-
for Inserting records created below cursor, records are inserted and I can see on my screen (form) also.
DECLARE
CURSOR InvestIS
select * from Tempinvest;
BEGIN
OPEN Invest;
GO_BLOCK('ReturnReport');
last_record;
[code]......
2nd step:-
Updating records
I wan to update some columns in this table so I created a 2nd cursor to update records but this cursor is not working accordingly. my requirement is: before Update first of all Find inv_co_code & inv_fnd_code when find then update column Redunits
2nd Cursor
DECLARE
ddate date; refdate date; co_code number; co_name varchar2(50); fnd_code number; fnd_name varchar2(50); units number; amount number; stat varchar2(1);
CURSOR bnr IS
select Ddate,refdate,co_code,co_name,fnd_code,fnd_name,units,amount,stat from (
select inv_date DDate,Vdate RefDate,inv_co_code Co_code,inv_co_name Co_name,inv_fnd_code Fnd_code,inv_fnd_name Fnd_name,
inv_nofu Units,inv_amount Amount,Status Stat from (
------------- Bonus -------------------
select inv_date,vdate,inv_co_code,inv_co_name,inv_fnd_code,inv_fnd_name,inv_nofu,Inv_amount,inv_uprice,'B' Status from investment
where code is null and inv_date <= :dd1
---------------- Redemption --------------
Union All
select red_date,null,red_co_code,red_co_name,red_fnd_code,red_fnd_name,red_nofu,red_amount,red_uprice,'R' Status from redemption
where red_date <= :dd1
))
where co_code = 13 and fnd_code = 1
order by co_code,fnd_code,ddate ;
------------------------------------------
vddateddate%type;
vrefdate refdate%type;
vco_codeco_code%type;
vco_nameco_name%type;
[code].......
is there any query using which i can fetch the data from multiple table in a cursor. i dont want to use separate cursor.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe had an issue with a PL/SQL package taking hours to run as a concurrent program. Database version is 10.2.0.4.0, running on Linux x86 64-bit. A tkprof'd trace file revealed the problem SQL statement to be a cursor. This one SQL statement would run for 3+ hours. I copied the SQL statement and ran it in TOAD and it completed in seconds, returning the exact same result set. To resolve the issue in the PL/SQL package I created a global temp table and ran the exact same SQL statement as an INSERT into the global temp table.
Again, instead of hours, the SQL statement completes in seconds. If I revert the change, it goes back to taking hours. I've attached the relevant sections of the tkprof showing the two SQL statements (identical other than the insert in front of one) and the resulting explain plans and performance data. I've always been under the impression that a cursor was a better option than a temp table and I've never run into a situation where the same SQL statement runs so much longer when executed as a cursor.
Attached File(s)
SQL_As_Cursor.jpg ( 274.02K )
Number of downloads: 7
Explain_for_SQL_As_Cursor.jpg ( 189.43K )
Number of downloads: 4
SQL_as_Insert.jpg ( 277.38K )
Number of downloads: 4
Explain_for_SQL_As_Insert.jpg ( 180.66K )
Number of downloads: 2
I have strange problem when i try to return a ref cursor holding data from a select on a oracle global temporary table. If i iterate through the cursor , i can see the values but the function as such returns nothing through the ref cursor. I tried the temporary table as both delete on commit and preserve on commit
create or replace
PACKAGE BODY BILL AS
FUNCTION FILTERI RETURN BILL.refcursor IS
testcursor BILL.refcursor;
ttstatus INT;
iSuccess INT;
returns INT;
TruncatedSQL1 VARCHAR2(32767);
BEGIN
[code].........
I have a plsql block construct where i want to use for loop dynamically , the query which for cursor for for loop will accept the table name from parameter and join them to return the result. the resultant data will iterate in loop and do the execution.
DECLARE
--initialize variables here
v_date varchar2(10);
v_rebuild_index varchar2(250);
v_sql VARCHAR2(250);
p_table_name varchar2(250) := 'DS_ABSENCE';
p_source_table varchar2(30) := 'STG_ABSENCE';
p_source_owner varchar2(30) := 'STG_SAP';
v_for_sql varchar2(1000);
[code]....
I'm dealing with an ORA-1000 error in a Pro*C application where all the cursors are correctly closed (or so it seems to me).
Here is the code for a simple program which reproduces the problem:
Each cursor is opened in a PL/SQL package:
CREATE OR REPLACE PACKAGE emp_demo_pkg AS
TYPE emp_cur_type IS REF CURSOR;
PROCEDURE open_cur(curs IN OUT emp_cur_type, dept_num IN NUMBER);
END emp_demo_pkg;
[Code]....
While testing the initialization parameter open_cursors is set to 50.
It's my understanding that Oracle doesn't close the cursors until it needs the space for another cursor, which in my test case seems to happen when I enter a value of 50 or bigger for "number of loops". To see how oracle is reusing the cursors, while the test program is running I run SQL*Plus and query v$sesstat for the session that's running the test with the following sentence:
select name, value
from v$sesstat s, v$statname n
where s.statistic# = n.statistic#
and sid = 7
and name like '%cursor%';
Even before I enter a value for number of loops I can see that the session opened 4 cursors and closed 2 of them:
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 4
opened cursors current 2
Entering a value of 5 for number of loops yields
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 11 <----- 7+
opened cursors current 8 <----- 6+
With a value of 30
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 36 <----- 25+ (apparently, Oracle reused at least 5 cursors)
opened cursors current 33 <----- 25+
With a value of 47
NAME VALUE
---------------------------------------------------------------- ----------
opened cursors cumulative 53 <----- 17+
opened cursors current 50 <----- 17+
Now I reached the upper limit set by the initialization parameter open_cursors.
Entering a value of 48, I get the ORA-1000 error.
ORA-01000: maximum open cursors exceeded
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.EMP_DEMO
Since I open and close the cursor in the same loop iteration, I expect to find in every iterarion 1 explicit cursor and a number of implicit cursors (the PL/SQL call along with the so-called recursive cursors), but I don't expect the sum of all of them to be greater than 50. If my understanding is correct Oracle should be reusing the 50 cursors previously marked as "closeable", not raising the ORA-1000 error.
I am having a table with 4 columns as mentioned below
For a particular prod the value greater less than 5 should be rounded to 5 and value greater than 5 should be rounded to 10. And the rounded quantity should be adjusted with in a product starting with order by of rank with in a prod else leave it
Table1
Col1prodvalue1rank
1A21
2A62
3A53
4B61
5B32
6B73
7C41
8C22
9C13
10C74
Output
Col1prodvalue1rank
1A51
2A52
3A33
4B101
5B02
6B63
7C51
8C52
9C03
10C44
I have taken all the records in to a cursor. Once after rounding the request of 1st rank and adjusting the values of next rank is done. Trying to round the value for 2nd rank as done for 1st rank. Its not taking the recently updated value(i,e adjusted value in rounding of 1st rank).
This is because of using a cursor having a value which is of old value. Is there any way to handle such scenario's where cursor records gets dynamically updated when a table record is updated.
Is it possible to:
-define a cursor with bind variables
-get a cursor record from these cursor
-and pass the bind variable in the OPEN clause
Did'nt succeed as shown in the example.
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON SIZE 900000;
DECLARE
--works fine
CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES WHERE rownum<3;
--doesn't work
--CURSOR c1 IS SELECT * FROM USER_TABLES WHERE rownum<:1;
crec c1%rowtype;
BEGIN
--works fine
OPEN c1;
--isn't possible ?
--OPEN c1 USING 3;
[Code]....
just looking around to use the new feature available in oracle 11g to convert the dbms_sql numeric cursor to reference cursor, how to do it?
parse and execute the sql string first with dbms_sql and then convert it to ref cursor?
I want to return ref cursor based on explicit cursors
create table jumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into jumbo values(1,'jumbo');
create table mumbo(id number, name varchar2(20));
insert into mumbo values(1,'mumbo');
commit;
[Code].....
The above procedure has compilation errors when I am trying to open ref cursor
LINE/COL ERROR
-------- --------------------------------------------------------
20/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
20/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
32/24 PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
32/38 PL/SQL: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
SQL>
Can i user exist when cursor will using For Cursor .
View 15 Replies View Related run down of the implications of MERGE by ROWID in such a fashion:
CODE MERGE
INTO XXWT_AP_ACCRUALS_RECEIPT_F EXT
USING (
SELECT PO_DISTRIBUTION_ID,
[code]...
Can this lead to an "Unstable Set of Rows?". Is it possible for the ROWID's to change during the execution of this statement - meaning certain ROWIDs identified in the SELECT will not actually be updated when it comes to the MERGE operation?
Basically, is it sound practice to use ROWID to merge on - in cases where you dont have a WHEN NOT MATCHED condition?
