format of dtActivityStartDate/dtActivityFinishDate: 2010-09-17 14:50:51.150 Note: Both dtActivityStartDate/dtActivityFinishDate vcActivityName = Process Request usdFuncTimeCalc (vcActivityName,dtActivityStartDate, dtActivityFinishDate)
i need to calculate time elasped for that type of activity following are the rules:
(If Process Request is the activity) Working Days: Monday through Saturday Hours of Operation: 9AM 5PM
only working hours of day need to the counted like for example if it is sep 15 11 Am is dtActivityStartDate & Sep 17 is dtActivityFinishDate is 10 Am. then time elapsed is 11am to 5pm on sep 15 , 9 to 5 on sep 16 & 9 to 10 on sep 17 so total should be
6+ 8 + 1 = 15 hours + minutes. format of date time: 2010-09-17 14:50:51.150 vcActivityName = Process Request Don't worry about process request..
I am using the below sql query to calculate working hours. The problem which i am facing is that query is taking lot of time to calculate the working hours. reduce the execution time of this query or if there is any other way to calculate working hours
The following query take 63.499 sec
SELECT sql_calc_found_rows gstime, MAX(stoptime) AS mx, MIN(starttime) AS mn,
I need a similar function to determinate difference between two dates, but i need other business hours; Monday - Friday: 9:00 - 21:00 (this is OK)Saturday: 09:00 - 14:00 (and this is my problem, how to add this condition in this function)
I need to calculate first business day of a given month . Below is complete explanation
Business day=sould not include weekends and holidays.
In a table say ACTIVITY_XX I have all the month begin dates say 01-JAN-2010,01-FEB-2010,01-MAR-2010,01-APR-2010 and so on..and I have a HOLIDAY table where all the holidays are stored.
So using the above info I need to calculate the first business day for a given month. I guess this cannot be done by using a simple SQL query? I was wondering how could it be written using a PL/SQL function.
I'll be passing the month begin date as parameter..so the function should return the first business day for that month.
We need some transformation rules on Source employee table which comes from SAP and want to load in Target table.Basic idea is we need to calculate time when position was not held by sub owner so . . . Etc
I am trying to create a function that when called will add the salary and commission a certain way to return an employee's annual salary.Here's my code
create or replace function Get_Annual_Comp (Sal in number, Commission in number) return number as [code]...
When I run the query, I get the proper rows return; however, my function does no calculation. If I input random numbers, I get the proper value returned. What I want is for my function to return the salary and commission of the employee specified in my select's where clause to be calculated as an annual salary.
I have been asked to see why a sister company cannot access multiple business areas through a single responsibility. At present, if they log in through a GL responsibility they can see all GL folders, items and the returned data. If they then go to the AP business area, they can see the folders and items, but when they run a report they get an error message 'Query returned no data' - but if they run the same query using an AP responsibility they get the correct results. I have looked at their user set up, and it seems fine i.e. has access to all business areas and required priveledges.
Basically what I want is that I need to get desired result in such a way that, whenever Transaction type is Sales Order Issue, I want last TRANSACTION_COSTED_DATE of 'Intransit Shipment'
INVENTORY_ITEM_ID TRANSACTION_COSTED_DATE TRANSACTION_TYPE R 123 28-06-2012 21:36 Intransit Shipment 123 23-07-2012 01:25 Sales order issue 28-06-2012 21:36 123 30-07-2012 05:20 Sales order issue 28-06-2012 21:36
[Code]...
Lag with offset 1 doesn’t work as it will only go to previous row, What I want is that it should go to row above where transaction type is Intransit Shipment
I have a query that uses a function to find the business days between two dates.It sums the total number of days between two dates per employee to find the total days for the past 30, 90, or 365 days.
The problem is that the query takes 21 second to return the last 30 days.Over 70 second to return the last 90 days and over 140 second to return the last 365 days.Do you know how I could tune the query to return faster? Below is the query for the last 30 days:
select dwt_emp_id, SUM((SELECT GET_BDAYS(DWT_DATE,DWT_CREATE_DATE) FROM DUAL)) from dwt_dvt_work_time where dwt_create_date > sysdate - 30 and dwt_hours > 4 and dwt_usr_uid_created_by <> -1 group by dwt_emp_id order by dwt_emp_id
Here's the function: CREATE FUNCTION get_bdays (d1 IN DATE, d2 IN DATE) RETURN NUMBER IS total_days NUMBER(11,2); holiday_days NUMBER(11,2); [code]....
A function should accept two parameters: from_date and to_date which returns no.of Saturdays and Sundays between these dates and also show the dates of those weekends.
I am trying to find sum for one record for each partition but while taking that timestamp giving me bit trouble, i have tried to reproduce the table and some little data
CREATE TABLE TEST_COUNT (END_TIME DATE ,SUCCESSFUL_ROWS NUMBER ,FAILED_ROWS NUMBER ,TBL_NAME VARCHAR (4) ,PARTITION_NAME VARCHAR (240) )
I have to create the following table. The fields Trend_Date, Price and Trend are already given. I have to calculate the field permanently and to insert the value in this permanent table.
Fields:
The field price belong to the value of a product during the trade. The field trade_date belongs to the moment of the trade. The field trend belongs to the future behavior of the the price. Here, the price of the present moment is compared to the following price (possible characteristics: 'UP', 'DOWN', 'STABLE'). The field permanently belongs to the time (in seconds) how long the value of the field Trend_Date (depending on the price) is still true.
For example:
Row 1: The trend in row 1 is 'UP' and it has a price of '11'. Until row 3 this remains true (the price is greater or equal to 11). In this case, the difference between row 1 and row 3 are 9801 (rounded) seconds.
Row 2: The trend in row 2 is 'DOWN' and it has a price of '12'. This remains true till to the end (the price is never greater than 12) In this case, the difference between row 2 and row 11 are 97346 (rounded) seconds. To calculate the 97346 seconds the field has to consider that between row 2 and row 11 are two days. There will be no trade between 18:00 and 07:00 o'clock. This belongs to 7 hours for each days, in seconds (2*46800) 93600. -> 190945-93600 = 97346s
Row 6: The trend in row 6 is 'UP' and it has a price of '5'. This remains true till to the end (the price is never smaller than 5) In this case, the difference between row 6 and row 11 are 65729 (rounded) seconds. To calculate the 65729 seconds the field has to consider that between row 65729 and row 11 are one days. There will be no trade between 18:00 and 07:00 o'clock. This belongs to 7 hours for each days, in seconds (1*46800) 46800. -> 112528-46800 = 65729s
Row 9: The trend in row 9 is 'STABLE' and it has a price of '8'. Until row 10 this remains true (the price is equal to 8 ). In this case, the difference between row 9 and row 10 is 14418 (rounded) seconds.
Row 11: Is empty because there are no values to compare.
CREATE TABLE "ALLOCATEASSOCIATES" ( "PROJID" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL ENABLE, "ASSOCIATEID" NUMBER(*,0) NOT NULL ENABLE, "ALLOCATIONSTARTDATE" DATE, "ALLOCATIONPERCENT" NUMBER(*,0),
[code]...
Given that 1. An associate must be allocated to at-least and a maximum of 100% at any given point of time 2. User selects 2 dates between which inconsistency of allocation needs to be displayed
If the end user selects 1st Apr 2012 and July 31st 2012 between which reports needs to be generated, am looking for the following output
The Allocation_Inconsistency denotes that the associate has a deficit of allocation between the 2 dates. The associate with ID 2 has a deficit of 75% of allocation from 1st Apr 2012 till 15th Apr 2012. Similarly 25% deficit between 16th Apr 2012 and 15th June 2012 and so on so forth. However, there is no allocation deficit for the month of July as he is allocated 100% for this month and hence is not appearing in the expected output.
11.2.0.2 on Solaris..I have such a large post on a very basic space calculation.
We have several tablespaces starting with WLMCS in our DB..I just wanted to calculate the total space consumed in the disk by all these tablespace combined .When I queried DBA_DATA_FILES.MAXBYTES and DBA_DATA_FILES.USER_BYTES , I've noticed that ,
When AUTOEXTEND is NO: MAXBYTES is 0 for these datafiles . But USER_BYTES won't be 0 for these files
When AUTOEXTEND is YES: MAXBYTES will be a non-zero value for these datafiles . USER_BYTES won't be 0 either for these files-- Not including datafile names for better readability.
SYS > select tablespace_name, maxbytes/1024/1024, user_bytes/1024/1024, autoextensible from dba_data_files where tablespace_name like 'WLMCS%';
11 rows selected.To calculate the space consumed , I made 2 assumptions.Are the below 2 assumptions right?
Assumption 1. Whenever MAXBYTES = 0 , USER_BYTES should be considered for the space calculation.
Assumption 2. Whenever you have non-zero values for both MAXBYTES and USER_BYTES , MAXBYTES should be considered for the space calcuation.I did the calculation (adding up of) based on the above assumptions. Is this calcualtion Correct ?
-- Not including datafile names for better readability.
I have a large table and want to calculate just a few values. Therefore, I don't want to create a new table, I want to update the table. Here an example:
I want to calculate the VALUE_LAG with ID = 4 only (-> two values).
create table zTEST ( PRODUCT number, ID number, VALUE number, VALUE_L1 number );
[Code]..
I tried this, but obviously, windows functions are not allowed in the update statement.
update zTEST set VALUE_L1 = lag(VALUE) over (partition by PRODUCT, order by ID) where ID = 4
and want to check if there is an event in my EVENTS table that occurs in the same dd/mm/yyyy as the input, and can disturb the input event times. means:
input.event_start_time is between EVENTS.event_date and EVENTS.event_end_date and input.event_end_time is between EVENTS.event_date and EVENTS.event_end_date
but to compare only the hours here! (HH24:MI) because the date (dd/mm/yyyy) is checked before..
I don't know how to cut only the hours out of the date and compare them, and don't know how to write the whole function.
Here you can see that we have data for 27th Dec 2010 02,07,09 and 12 hours. I want a query which will show the full 24 hours data even if it doenst have any records. like the following,
i am using one query but not getting correct minutes.
here is my query:
v_Interval:= to_timestamp(v_temphrs,'HH24:MI:SS')-to_timestamp(v_outpunch1,'HH24:MI:SS'); v_TotalHrsMin1 := extract(hour from v_interval) * 60 + extract(minute from v_interval);
here v_interval datatype is "interval day to second" and v_temphrs datatype is varchar2 and value is : 12:00:00 and v_outpunch1 datatype is varchar2 and value is: 06:10:00 and v_totalHrsMin1 datatype is number.
here i should get value 370. but i am getting value 350.
SELECT audittimestamp + interval (SELECT EXTRACT(TIMEZONE_HOUR FROM systimestamp) FROM DUAL) hour from tab1I want to add Timezone_hour to my timestamp.
Recently we have upgraded from 11.1 to 11.2 . But after upgrade SQL statements that are running fine in 11.1 was running for hours in 11.2. Statistics are collected 100%...