I am trying to create a function that when called will add the salary and commission a certain way to return an employee's annual salary.Here's my code
create or replace function Get_Annual_Comp
(Sal in number, Commission in number)
return number
as
[code]...
When I run the query, I get the proper rows return; however, my function does no calculation. If I input random numbers, I get the proper value returned. What I want is for my function to return the salary and commission of the employee specified in my select's where clause to be calculated as an annual salary.
I am using the below sql query to calculate working hours. The problem which i am facing is that query is taking lot of time to calculate the working hours. reduce the execution time of this query or if there is any other way to calculate working hours
The following query take 63.499 sec
SELECT sql_calc_found_rows gstime, MAX(stoptime) AS mx, MIN(starttime) AS mn,
Basically what I want is that I need to get desired result in such a way that, whenever Transaction type is Sales Order Issue, I want last TRANSACTION_COSTED_DATE of 'Intransit Shipment'
INVENTORY_ITEM_ID TRANSACTION_COSTED_DATE TRANSACTION_TYPE R 123 28-06-2012 21:36 Intransit Shipment 123 23-07-2012 01:25 Sales order issue 28-06-2012 21:36 123 30-07-2012 05:20 Sales order issue 28-06-2012 21:36
[Code]...
Lag with offset 1 doesn’t work as it will only go to previous row, What I want is that it should go to row above where transaction type is Intransit Shipment
A function should accept two parameters: from_date and to_date which returns no.of Saturdays and Sundays between these dates and also show the dates of those weekends.
I am trying to find sum for one record for each partition but while taking that timestamp giving me bit trouble, i have tried to reproduce the table and some little data
CREATE TABLE TEST_COUNT (END_TIME DATE ,SUCCESSFUL_ROWS NUMBER ,FAILED_ROWS NUMBER ,TBL_NAME VARCHAR (4) ,PARTITION_NAME VARCHAR (240) )
I have to create the following table. The fields Trend_Date, Price and Trend are already given. I have to calculate the field permanently and to insert the value in this permanent table.
Fields:
The field price belong to the value of a product during the trade. The field trade_date belongs to the moment of the trade. The field trend belongs to the future behavior of the the price. Here, the price of the present moment is compared to the following price (possible characteristics: 'UP', 'DOWN', 'STABLE'). The field permanently belongs to the time (in seconds) how long the value of the field Trend_Date (depending on the price) is still true.
For example:
Row 1: The trend in row 1 is 'UP' and it has a price of '11'. Until row 3 this remains true (the price is greater or equal to 11). In this case, the difference between row 1 and row 3 are 9801 (rounded) seconds.
Row 2: The trend in row 2 is 'DOWN' and it has a price of '12'. This remains true till to the end (the price is never greater than 12) In this case, the difference between row 2 and row 11 are 97346 (rounded) seconds. To calculate the 97346 seconds the field has to consider that between row 2 and row 11 are two days. There will be no trade between 18:00 and 07:00 o'clock. This belongs to 7 hours for each days, in seconds (2*46800) 93600. -> 190945-93600 = 97346s
Row 6: The trend in row 6 is 'UP' and it has a price of '5'. This remains true till to the end (the price is never smaller than 5) In this case, the difference between row 6 and row 11 are 65729 (rounded) seconds. To calculate the 65729 seconds the field has to consider that between row 65729 and row 11 are one days. There will be no trade between 18:00 and 07:00 o'clock. This belongs to 7 hours for each days, in seconds (1*46800) 46800. -> 112528-46800 = 65729s
Row 9: The trend in row 9 is 'STABLE' and it has a price of '8'. Until row 10 this remains true (the price is equal to 8 ). In this case, the difference between row 9 and row 10 is 14418 (rounded) seconds.
Row 11: Is empty because there are no values to compare.
CREATE TABLE "ALLOCATEASSOCIATES" ( "PROJID" VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL ENABLE, "ASSOCIATEID" NUMBER(*,0) NOT NULL ENABLE, "ALLOCATIONSTARTDATE" DATE, "ALLOCATIONPERCENT" NUMBER(*,0),
[code]...
Given that 1. An associate must be allocated to at-least and a maximum of 100% at any given point of time 2. User selects 2 dates between which inconsistency of allocation needs to be displayed
If the end user selects 1st Apr 2012 and July 31st 2012 between which reports needs to be generated, am looking for the following output
The Allocation_Inconsistency denotes that the associate has a deficit of allocation between the 2 dates. The associate with ID 2 has a deficit of 75% of allocation from 1st Apr 2012 till 15th Apr 2012. Similarly 25% deficit between 16th Apr 2012 and 15th June 2012 and so on so forth. However, there is no allocation deficit for the month of July as he is allocated 100% for this month and hence is not appearing in the expected output.
11.2.0.2 on Solaris..I have such a large post on a very basic space calculation.
We have several tablespaces starting with WLMCS in our DB..I just wanted to calculate the total space consumed in the disk by all these tablespace combined .When I queried DBA_DATA_FILES.MAXBYTES and DBA_DATA_FILES.USER_BYTES , I've noticed that ,
When AUTOEXTEND is NO: MAXBYTES is 0 for these datafiles . But USER_BYTES won't be 0 for these files
When AUTOEXTEND is YES: MAXBYTES will be a non-zero value for these datafiles . USER_BYTES won't be 0 either for these files-- Not including datafile names for better readability.
SYS > select tablespace_name, maxbytes/1024/1024, user_bytes/1024/1024, autoextensible from dba_data_files where tablespace_name like 'WLMCS%';
11 rows selected.To calculate the space consumed , I made 2 assumptions.Are the below 2 assumptions right?
Assumption 1. Whenever MAXBYTES = 0 , USER_BYTES should be considered for the space calculation.
Assumption 2. Whenever you have non-zero values for both MAXBYTES and USER_BYTES , MAXBYTES should be considered for the space calcuation.I did the calculation (adding up of) based on the above assumptions. Is this calcualtion Correct ?
-- Not including datafile names for better readability.
I have a large table and want to calculate just a few values. Therefore, I don't want to create a new table, I want to update the table. Here an example:
I want to calculate the VALUE_LAG with ID = 4 only (-> two values).
create table zTEST ( PRODUCT number, ID number, VALUE number, VALUE_L1 number );
[Code]..
I tried this, but obviously, windows functions are not allowed in the update statement.
update zTEST set VALUE_L1 = lag(VALUE) over (partition by PRODUCT, order by ID) where ID = 4
i have a query where i am using the max function to find the most recent record. What i want to do is use that query as part of an insert statement into a different table, however, i don't want to insert the column that i used the max function on. Is there anyway to use the max function without having the column it is being used on showing in the results?
I am creating an stored function which has to do some inserts in the meanwhile, and return after all the work has done, an UDT (2 or 3 columns of NUMBER datatype).
With this scenario I have an problem. The DML operations are not supported by and "SELECT * FROM Table(MyProc(args))". I have to use this "SELECT * FROM Table(MyProc(args))" because I need to pass the stored function results directly to an dataset.
Using a Stored Procedure it gives no errors, but the arguments must be passed like OUT params, and it is not what I want.
My question is: Is there any other way to get a result (UDT) of an Stored Function (that makes Inserts) into a DataSet?
I've been tasked to parse tags from a string that look like the following:
{Date + XXX}
where XXX represents a numeric value. I have to replace this, including the brace characters with
SYSDATE + XXX
which will ultimately calculate SYSDATE plus the number of days suggested by XXX. The problem is that I am trying to use regexp_replace to achieve this goal but since XXX is completely arbitrary, I cannot search for it as a fixed value. So, ultimately, I would like to use a regular expression that ignores the numeric part of my search and only replaces the starting brace, the "Date + " part and the ending brace, leaving the numeric portion intact. I was trying to do something like the following
I'm posting below test case in which I'm not able to understand output for LAST_VALUE function. I'm expecting maximum value for the salary in a department. Because I'm partitioning by department and ordering a partition as assending so being last value it should give me maximum value within a partition i.e. department in this case.
There is an 'emp' table with a column name as 'mgr' with datatype 'number'. following is the detailed description of the table:
SQL> desc emp;
Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- --------------------------- EMPNO NOT NULL NUMBER(4) ENAME VARCHAR2(10) JOB VARCHAR2(9) MGR NUMBER(4) HIREDATE DATE SAL NUMBER(7,2) COMM NUMBER(7,2) DEPTNO NUMBER(2)
Now when I run the 'select mgr from emp e;' query the output which I get is:
7902 7698 7698 7839 7698 7839 7839 7566
7698 7788 7698 7566 7782
Note: One value in between here is null, the required to me is that I want to print a character value 'President' in place of null .
I have two tables where I have to find the record for Max value of the column sap_pkid for every sap_id as in given table create script. This script is giving correct value but looking for a better way so that when data increses it doesn't hit the performance.
way where max can be avoided or a more tuned query .
I am creating a function to sum five numbers (less 1). Is it possible to have an array of numbers in an SQL function, and how would this be implemented?
Here is the screenshot of my output (I cannot embed links until 5 posts!): flic.kr/p/eaSHBP
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sumfivenumbers ( n1 NUMBER, n2 NUMBER, n3 NUMBER, n4 NUMBER, n5 NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER IS Sumnums NUMBER; BEGIN SELECT SUM(n1+n2+n3+n4+n5-1) INTO Sumnums FROM DUAL; DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(Sumnums); RETURN 1; END sumfivenumbers; / SELECT sumfivenumbers(5,5,5,5,5) AS "Five Numbers less 1" FROM DUAL;
