I've been tasked to parse tags from a string that look like the following:
{Date + XXX}
where XXX represents a numeric value. I have to replace this, including the brace characters with
SYSDATE + XXX
which will ultimately calculate SYSDATE plus the number of days suggested by XXX. The problem is that I am trying to use regexp_replace to achieve this goal but since XXX is completely arbitrary, I cannot search for it as a fixed value. So, ultimately, I would like to use a regular expression that ignores the numeric part of my search and only replaces the starting brace, the "Date + " part and the ending brace, leaving the numeric portion intact. I was trying to do something like the following
I am looking for the best fastest to process by searching string and replace values. I am process many rows like 200k,
search for strings starting with "S" or "M" and replace only those letters with NULL eg S8795371 becomes 8795371, and M4454332 becomes 4454332 however other string values shouldn't be affected only if it starts with S/M. i was thinking of using REGEXP_REPLACE and what is the best way to construct this statement?
Basically I need to use REGEXP_REPLACE in order to remove from a string certain oracle code pricislly those which are used on RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR from 20000 to 20999. We have an application here that handles those exceptions and each exception append each other so inside them we can find those ORA-20001: Some error. ]
So I was wondering if I can achieve that by using REGEXP_REPLACE. So which regexp I could use so that I can remove those oracode only!
I'm trying to eliminate duplicate string for more than 1 occurrences along with its delimiters, but couldn't get it working. Here is what I tried.
SQL> column str format a30 SQL> column replaced format a30 SQL> with x as 2 (select 'a#~#b#~#a#~#d' as str from dual union all 3 select 'a#~#b#~#c#~#a' as str from dual union all 4 select 'b#~#a#~#c#~#a' as str from dual) select str, regexp_replace(str, '[^a|#~#a]{2,}','',1,2) replaced from x; 5 6 7
Any alternative to filer the Initial using a single REGEXP_REPLACE ? Oracle version 10.2.xxxx
Currently using two REGEXP_REPLACEs. SELECT REGEXP_REPLACE( REGEXP_REPLACE('K I Rajuvan K I', '(([[:upper:]]{1,2})) ','') , '([[:upper:]]{1,2})$','') CITY FROM dual;
i have a query where i am using the max function to find the most recent record. What i want to do is use that query as part of an insert statement into a different table, however, i don't want to insert the column that i used the max function on. Is there anyway to use the max function without having the column it is being used on showing in the results?
I am creating an stored function which has to do some inserts in the meanwhile, and return after all the work has done, an UDT (2 or 3 columns of NUMBER datatype).
With this scenario I have an problem. The DML operations are not supported by and "SELECT * FROM Table(MyProc(args))". I have to use this "SELECT * FROM Table(MyProc(args))" because I need to pass the stored function results directly to an dataset.
Using a Stored Procedure it gives no errors, but the arguments must be passed like OUT params, and it is not what I want.
My question is: Is there any other way to get a result (UDT) of an Stored Function (that makes Inserts) into a DataSet?
I'm posting below test case in which I'm not able to understand output for LAST_VALUE function. I'm expecting maximum value for the salary in a department. Because I'm partitioning by department and ordering a partition as assending so being last value it should give me maximum value within a partition i.e. department in this case.
There is an 'emp' table with a column name as 'mgr' with datatype 'number'. following is the detailed description of the table:
SQL> desc emp;
Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------- -------- --------------------------- EMPNO NOT NULL NUMBER(4) ENAME VARCHAR2(10) JOB VARCHAR2(9) MGR NUMBER(4) HIREDATE DATE SAL NUMBER(7,2) COMM NUMBER(7,2) DEPTNO NUMBER(2)
Now when I run the 'select mgr from emp e;' query the output which I get is:
7902 7698 7698 7839 7698 7839 7839 7566
7698 7788 7698 7566 7782
Note: One value in between here is null, the required to me is that I want to print a character value 'President' in place of null .
I have two tables where I have to find the record for Max value of the column sap_pkid for every sap_id as in given table create script. This script is giving correct value but looking for a better way so that when data increses it doesn't hit the performance.
way where max can be avoided or a more tuned query .
I am creating a function to sum five numbers (less 1). Is it possible to have an array of numbers in an SQL function, and how would this be implemented?
Here is the screenshot of my output (I cannot embed links until 5 posts!): flic.kr/p/eaSHBP
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sumfivenumbers ( n1 NUMBER, n2 NUMBER, n3 NUMBER, n4 NUMBER, n5 NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER IS Sumnums NUMBER; BEGIN SELECT SUM(n1+n2+n3+n4+n5-1) INTO Sumnums FROM DUAL; DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(Sumnums); RETURN 1; END sumfivenumbers; / SELECT sumfivenumbers(5,5,5,5,5) AS "Five Numbers less 1" FROM DUAL;
I am trying to create a function that when called will add the salary and commission a certain way to return an employee's annual salary.Here's my code
create or replace function Get_Annual_Comp (Sal in number, Commission in number) return number as [code]...
When I run the query, I get the proper rows return; however, my function does no calculation. If I input random numbers, I get the proper value returned. What I want is for my function to return the salary and commission of the employee specified in my select's where clause to be calculated as an annual salary.
Any way to write a function to parse through a clob and extract certain values to insert into a table. I've written the following and it compiles but it doesn't work.
create or replace function all_fields (type_field VARchar2, domain_field VARchar2) return VARchar2 as typefield VARchar2(100) :=type_field; domainfield VARchar2(100) :=domain_field;
I am using lag function to display values like below:
order details date starttime ----------------- -------- -------------- main order 1 07/10/12 06:00am line 1 07/10/12 06:21am line 2 07/10/12 06:31am main order 2 07/11/12 07:00am line 1 07/11/12 07:01am line 2 07/11/12 07:02am
the data displays correctly when i use lag function except that the line 1 details are never getting displayed ie first line under every order does not get displayed? is using lag function in this case correct?
explain the flow what exactly is the below function do in detail.
FUNCTION Get_RmtUsr_rec_FUNC (p_MsgType IN VARCHAR2) RETURN RemoteUser_Rec_Type;FUNCTION Get_RmtUsr_rec_FUNC ( p_MsgType IN VARCHAR2) RETURN RemoteUser_Rec_Type IS
I have written a query which basically retrieves id and created date. IF i put MAX function it is returning id which have max created date. But if i use min function this query is not providing id with min created date,its not returning any rows.
SELECT To_char(OSH.osh_id), OSH.osh_created FROM tn_order_status_history osh, tn_order_status_type ost, tn_orderline_product op [code]..........
