Self Join No Longer Working?
May 20, 2010
I have a piece of code that joined the same table onto itself twice in order to get the previous, current and future year's into columns in the same output.
Up until recently this has been working fine but the most recent data has just been uploaded into the table and now it comes up with an error.
On the second (left outer) join it now says that the column is ambiguously defined (ORA-00918). It doesn't matter which order the joins are in it is always the second join that the error pops up on.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 22, 2013
I have two tables : oa_membership_dtl(in this created_by field is varchar2(200 byte) ,oa_partner_usr_dtl(in this table partner_userid is number(8,0) i need to do join on above fields.
I am using following two queries:
select * from oa_membership_dtl membership
join oa_partner_usr_dtl partner_user
on to_char(partner_user.partner_userid,'9999')=membership.created_by
select * from oa_membership_dtl membership
join oa_partner_usr_dtl partner_user
on rtrim(ltrim(partner_user.partner_userid||' '))=rtrim(ltrim(membership.created_by))
by using first data is not fetched but 2nd is working fine , i am getting the matched records using 2nd query.
whats the diff between to_char and || symbol?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2011
Using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
Here's a simplified version of the query I am having problems with:
SELECT
assoc.association_id
FROM mentor_initiative mi
LEFT JOIN program assoc_prog ON assoc_prog.program_id = -1
LEFT JOIN mentor_association assoc ON assoc.mentor_initiative_id = mi.mentor_initiative_id AND
NVL(assoc_prog.program_id, -1) = NVL(assoc.program_id, -1)
Note that there is no program with program id -1. So the assoc_prog left join will come up with nothing. I was thinking that since assoc_prog.program_id will be null, the second assoc left join would pick the row where assoc.program_id is null. However, the second left join doesn't join to any row.
In this query, it does join to an assoc row (I changed assoc_prog.program_id to NULL)
SELECT
assoc.association_id
FROM mentor_initiative mi
LEFT JOIN program assoc_prog ON assoc_prog.program_id = -1
LEFT JOIN mentor_association assoc ON assoc.mentor_initiative_id = mi.mentor_initiative_id AND NVL(NULL, -1) = NVL(assoc.program_id, -1)
I was thinking it would join to an assoc row in the first query though. How can I change the first query to have the desired effect of left joining to a row where assoc.program_id is null if assoc_prog.program_id is null?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2008
am not very experienced with SQL. I have two tables:
Class
-----
ID (int)
Teacher (nvarchar)
Subject (nvarchar)
Student
--------
ID (int)
ClassID (int)
Name (nvarchar)
I am trying to write a SQL query that will give me the total number of students in each class. I have tried the following:
SELECT
c.ID,
c.Teacher,
c.Subject
COUNT(s.ID)
FROM
Class c LEFT OUTER JOINT ON Student s c.ID=s.ClassID
Unfortunately, that gives me an error of:Column 'Class.Teacher' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
I'm afraid if I place everything in a GROUP BY clause, I will get some invalid results.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2011
I have problems with the query below. Left join and right join is working. Well actually it's not working correct I think but that's another story wich I will leave for another posting. But with full join I am getting error ORA-00932.The columns starting with id_ are of number datatype and the ones starting with dat_ are of type date.Oracle points out the last line to be faulty. If I make that line a comment it points out the preceeding line and so on.
SQL> /
and trunc(t.dat_trans) <= to_date(:sql_dat_avst_tom,'yyyymmdd')
*
ERROR at line 24:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got DATE
select k.id_pers k_id_pers, k.dat_avst
,t.id_pers t_id_pers, t.id_trans, t.dat_trans
from (
select ka.id_pers, ka.dat_avst, ka.dat_nasta_avst
[code]...
View 29 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2010
I have two tables. i need to join the tables. The query is -
select v.c_venditore,v.s_venditore,v.t_diretto_indiretto,v.d_disattivazione,d.s_direzione from VENDITORE v,DIREZIONE d
where v.p_direzione=d.p_direzione order by v.s_venditore
In the table VENDITORE there are 2919 rows. I need to display all the rows. But the joining column p_direzione has some null values.I need to display the null also. But to join the two tables this is the only condition. How can i display all the rows.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2011
In our production environment some SP's are executing longer duration, but when same SP is executed from PLSQL Developer client it is executing vary quickly.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2011
I'm trying to select only codes from a column that are above a certain length. how would this be achieved? I've tried char_length(fieldname) > x in the where clause but i'm getting the error ORA-00904: "char_length" invalid identifier.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2011
I am facing a problem in my database that whenever I load any kind of database objects in a particular tablespace then it gives:-
ORA-08103: object no longer exists
If I load in any other tablespace, everything works fine. I am getting error while export/import, create a table etc. How can I resolve it. I was wondering that may be it is facing problem while writing to a particular datafile.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2013
Select query will run fine. But when will run full query (insert + select). we will get below error after 8-10Hrs. No rows insert on table but table is exist.
Oracle Database Version: 11.2.0.3
17:06:30 SQL> @PNLP.sql
17:06:46 128 /
insert into SN.I$_GLBL
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-08103: object no longer exists
[code]....
Note: PNLP.sql : Script contain insert + select statement:Select query don't have any issue but while running full query we are getting above error.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2010
Problem : print ref cursor gives error (ORA-08103: object no longer exists)/ and message "no rows selected" if ref cursor is based on GTT and commit is called in procedure.
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE gtt_RB
(
A number
)
/
CREATE TABLE t_RB
(
[code]....
now with commit ;
create or replace procedure p_RB ( p_in in number, c out sys_refcursor)
as
begin
update t1_RB set a = p_in ;
insert into gtt_RB(A) values (1);
[code]....
no rows selected
1/ Once values are selected in ref cursor why it does not shows result set outside ?
2/ Are ref cursors are binded with temp tables ?
3/ if 'YES' is that should be the same case with normal tables ?
4/ Commit is necessary preserve incremental value in t1_rb how we commit with using ref cursors ?
5/ Is it a Bug?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2011
Recently upgraded from Oracle 10.2.04 to 11g with a few bumps on the road most of which I've been able to resolve, but there's one that continues to confuse me.
Pretty vanilla INSERT statement in which the SELECT portion on its own runs in about 2 to 5 seconds (all results returned) on a facility by facility basis. When I try to combine this with an INSERT statement it ends up running for 12+ minutes per facility. The explain plan looks good and I've even tried emptying the target table prior to running the INSERT.
I've gathered schema/table statistics to no avail. I also tried using it as a CREATE TABLE AS statement and it still takes the 12 minutes per facility.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2010
I have a form reading record information from a flat file and inserting data into a number of varied tables. At the end of file (last line read) the form issues a commit to make all inserts/updates permanent.
There is a record that disappears in particular and this everytime I re-run the test. I mean than in Debug mode, I find it in the right table everytime I query that table until the moment the commit is issued in the code - which is definitely the opposite of what should happen. I understand that for some reason a rollback happens for that record (others are ok after the commit) but my point is that if for some constraint reasons, the record did not qualify, an error should have popped up right from the Insert that added that record, right? Then How comes I find it in the table up until the moment of the commit ?? ...is the deferrable constraint property a clue for digging further?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2011
i tried to apply a sql case statement in sql loader control file in " " the load succeed with 258 chars case or decode statement but when i add more cases it return sql loader 350 token longer than max
LOAD DATA
INFILE 'F:Vouvou20110613_102_951454.unl'
BADFILE 'F:Vouvou.pad'
DISCARDFILE 'F:Vouvou.dic'
replace
INTO TABLE vou_test_2
FIELDS TERMINATED BY '|'
TRAILING NULLCOLS
[code].......
the above one succeed when i edit the case statement as follow
ACCOUNT_2001 "CASE WHEN:ACCOUNTTYPE1='2001'THEN :REWARDAMOUNT1 WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE2='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT2
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE3='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT3
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE4='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT4
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE5='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT5
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE6='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT6
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE7='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT7
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE8='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT8
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE9='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT9
WHEN :ACCOUNTTYPE10='2001' THEN :REWARDAMOUNT10 END"
i got the Error sql loader 350 token longer than max allowable length of 258 chars .
note : i cant modify the table structure to shorten the column names .
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2010
I am trying to generate ddl for a baseline created in Oracle Enterprise Manager 10g Release 5 Grid Control 10.2.0.5.0. I used to be able to do this in a prior version of oem 10.2.0.4.0. Since the upgrade I am no longer able to view a baseline that has been generated successfully. I can also no longer generate ddl from a baseline capture. There are no errors ... it just seems to time out.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2011
I was a very contented software tester with SQLPlus skills when I had access to the classic version. I guess all things must come to an end as we have started seeing our systems under test migrate to 11g...and along comes the DOS prompt SQL*Plus.
Where I could previously ignore the cries that TOAD was better, I no longer have my right-click copy/paste option, and I don't know alot about the DOS prompt command line.
Our test lab administrator would like us to start working with SQL Developer for our testing needs...I am guessing because it installs automatically with the database. I read TOAD has a bit more functionality at this point(correct?)
What is better for a general database user with background of classic SQL Plus- the dos prompt SQL Plus or the more visual SQL developer?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2013
Below is the sample code working fine in 10g and not working now in 11g.
CREATE OR REPLACE AND RESOLVE JAVA SOURCE NAMED "PSTest" AS
import java.sql.SQLData;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.sql.SQLInput;
import java.sql.SQLOutput;
import java.util.List;
[code]....
we got the below error: ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected an IN argument at position 1 that is an instance of an Oracle type convertible to an instance of a user defined Java class got an Oracle type that could not be converted to a java class
Current Oracle version is Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bit and the version we are upgrading is Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2013
Lets say I have three tables t1 and t2 and t3.
SELECT * FROM T1;
Id
____
1
2
3
4
SELECT * FROM T2;
Id
____
1
SELECT * FROM T3;
Id
____
1
Now when data exists in T2 and T3, I want to return only the records in T1 that match the records in T2 and T3 which is basically a normal join
select t1.id from t1, t2,t3 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.id = t3.id
However when there are no records in T2 or T3, I want to return all records in T1 i.e 1,2,3,4
One way of doing that is using the not exists clause
select * from t1 where not exists ( select null from t2 where t2.Id != t1.id) and not exists ( select null from t3 where t1.Id != t3.id)
Is there a better way of doing this in sql ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2010
I have a query which had a join:
a.c1=b.c1 and a.c2=@var
where @var is user supplied input at runtime...We had a index on a.c2 . The CBO would use this index to generate an opitimised query plan.We found some records from table "b" were dropping due to inner join. So we made a change in join. It'd be like
a.c1(+)=b.c1 and nvl(a.c2,@var)=@var
This query is no longer using the index, instead its doing a full table scan causing the query to slowdown.I have tried creating index on nvl(a.c2,'31-dec-9999')
But the CBO won't use it.Anyway to create index on this col so that full table scan can be avoided?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2013
I create a data block on a table when I am inserting new record only one record have been saved. Last record no longer exist.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2009
i want to know the difference between Left outer join Vs. Right outer join? Its like which join is safer to use or is there any recommendations to use any join?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2012
I want to create a query with only the junction of these two queries:
- select id_utilizador,nbeneficiario,nome from adm_utilizadores a WHERE exists ( select 1 from adm_util_grupos b where
a.id_utilizador = b.id_utilizador and b.id_grupo = '1') ;
- SELECT b.*,rownum as row_num FROM ADM_UTILIZADORES b ORDER BY $sidx $sord
WHERE row_num BETWEEN $start AND $end";
Virtually want id_utilizador, nome, and nbeneficiario, I can get the first query, ordered me returning the first 10.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2011
I am new to sql..
I need to join 2 tables based on first match.. I cldnot use distinct on the result, as distinct work with entire row..
I cant use group by as well, since for group by hv to select all the columns which we need to display
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2013
I have 2 tables SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB.
Now, I need to compare the data of the two tables column-wise.
Ideally the 2 tables should have the same security_alias values but in my case they do not as the two tables belong to 2 diff client models. There is however a main SECURITY_MASTERA and SECURITY_MASTERB tables which have the security_alias recorded and a primary_asset_id column value which can act as a link between SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB. But, I have not been able to figure out the exact query which will be ideal.
Attached are the table structures and the data it contains.
Note: I need to compare the Coupon and Freq column values of SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB.
View 23 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2011
The existing format of the records are
MCF_ID MCF_PRDGRP MCF_BSCNME MCF_BSCSUP MCF_CRDNME Cno
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---
41956 1001 LIM KOK HWA Base LIM KOK HWA 101
41957 1102 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN 102
41958 1102 CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 103
41960 2007 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN 104
41961 2007 CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 105
41968 2108 WEE LIANG Base WEE LIANG 106
41969 2108 LOW KAH Sub LOW KAH 107
This should be modified as below.
MCF_ID MCF_PRDGRP MCF_BSCNME MCF_BSCSUP MCF_CRDNME Indicator Sub Name baseCno SubCno
------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- -------- ------ ------
41956 1001 LIM KOK HWA Base LIM KOK HWA 101
41957 1102 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 102 103
41960 2007 CHEN ZHEN Base CHEN ZHEN Sub CHEN HONGJIAN 104 105
41968 2108 WEE LIANG Base WEE LIANG 106
41969 2108 LOW KAH Sub LOW KAH 107
[Code]..
Throught this query, I get a extra record with null value in the Sub_name and Sub_Cno.update this query using a self join.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2011
im trying to update a column in the employee table with the value "YES". Im getting an error message saying im missing a SET statement from this code below:
update e
SET e.review='YES'
from employee
inner join rentals r
on e.employee_id=r.employee_id
inner join job j
on e.job_id=j.job_id
where r.plate ='FY06WNT'
and j.function !='MANAGER'
and j.function !='PRESIDENT';
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2010
drop table dev10 purge
/
drop table dev11 purge
/
drop table dev12 purge
/
create table dev10 as
select rownum c1, sys.dbms_random.string('U', 6) c2, trunc(sys.dbms_random.value(1, 7)) c3
from dual connect by rownum < 8
/
[Code]...
Now, Let us assume that, the record is
AAAAAA BBBBBB CCCCCC
DDDDDD EEEEEE FFFFFF
...
..
.
Now, we want dev12.c2 is 'FFFFFF' if dev11.c2 is 'BBBBBB', if we want to get this:
AAAAAA BBBBBB FFFFFF
DDDDDD EEEEEE FFFFFF
...
..
.
We can make this for SqlServer by coding:
UPDATE dev10
SET c3 = dev12.c1 FROM dev10 INNER JOIN dev11 ON dev11.c3 = dev10.c1 CROSS JOIN dev12
WHERE (dev11.c2 LIKE 'BBBBBB')
AND (dev12.c2 LIKE 'FFFFFF')
/
but, Oracle, what should we do new?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2011
This is my working query in ms access...
UPDATE Caxnode AS A INNER JOIN Caxnode AS B ON A.node_alias = B.node_alias SET A.partition_Type = 'LDOM', A.node_mode = 'LOGICAL', A.host_id = b.host_id, A.num_of_proc = b.num_of_proc WHERE (((A.node_mode)='virtual' Or (A.node_mode)='regular') AND ((B.partition_Type)='LDOM'));
This doesn't work in oracle, I googled and read that update doesnt work with inner join in oracle..
translate this query to work on oracle?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
Equi join (Inner join)
It is the simplest join or inner. An equijoin combines rows that have equivalent values for the specified columns.
SQL> select * from x;
NAME EMAIL EMPID
Sam email@removed 1060
Rose email@removed 1061
[code]....
don't consider above mentioned queries I got valuable outputs.
NAMEEMAIL EMPID NAME EMAIL EMPID
samemail@removed 1060 sam email@removed 1060
roseemail@removed 1061 rose email@removed 1061
sonaemail@removed 1062 sona email@removed 1062
Inner join shows matches only when they exist in both tables.so , i got records 1060,1061,1062
// Referencing columns used in a USING clause.
SQL> select x.name,x.email,x.empid from x
2 inner join y
3 using (empid);
select x.name,x.email,x.empid from x
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-25154: column part of USING clause cannot have qualifier
so query rewritten as
SQL> select x.name,x.email,empid from x
2 inner join y
3 using (empid);
NAME EMAIL EMPID
--------------- --------------- ----------
sam email@removed 1060
rose email@removed 1061
chris email@removed 1062
I mean see two different outputs.first output records twice displayed ... Yes i agree that is Inner join.second output records not displayed twice... common records only displayed once ,in x and y.
I think should n't use a table name or alias when referencing columns used in a USING clause... am i right ????
I want to know both are inner joins .how Oracle is determined both outputs ?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2012
what is Hash join?how it is different from inner join?what is the sign used for inner join?(eg: like the (+) sign used for outer join)?
View 1 Replies
View Related
