I have 2 tables SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB.
Now, I need to compare the data of the two tables column-wise.
Ideally the 2 tables should have the same security_alias values but in my case they do not as the two tables belong to 2 diff client models. There is however a main SECURITY_MASTERA and SECURITY_MASTERB tables which have the security_alias recorded and a primary_asset_id column value which can act as a link between SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB. But, I have not been able to figure out the exact query which will be ideal.
Attached are the table structures and the data it contains.
Note: I need to compare the Coupon and Freq column values of SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB.
What I want to do is to return all of the rows from TABLE1 that are NCI regardless, and if they are NCI, I want to return the corresponding records from TABLE2 and TABLE3.
If TABLE1 has a record of NCI but there are no corresponding records in TABLE2 or TABLE3, then of course the columns for TABLE2 and 3 would be blank.
I can get all of the NCI records from TABLE1 when I LEFT JOIN with TABLE2, but when I try to specify TABLE3 in the FROM statement, only the records that are NCI in TABLE1 AND have data in TABLE2 are returned, not just all records with NCI in TABLE1.
Let me know if I can further clarify.
I know that you do not have access to my tables, but here is an example of my code so that you may understand my quandary further:
SELECT l.sku AS "SKU", l.loc AS "LOC", l.qty AS "QTY", o.ncikey AS "NCI", r.description AS "NCI DESC", o.qtyexpected AS "NCI QTY EXP", o.qtyreceived AS "NCI QTY REC", o.loc AS "NCI LOC", o.status
My requirement is to match the records in MTCH_TBL and HIST_TBL on the basis of joining S_SEC(MTCH_TBL) with SEC_ALIAS(HIST_TBL) and INSTANCE (HIST_TBL) as 100 and choosing the record with max EFF_DATE from HIST_TBL.
I have come up with a query as:
select a.h_sec, a.s_paid, a.h_paid FROM MTCH_TBL a, HIST_TBL b where a.S_SEC=b.sec_alias(+) and b.instance(+)=100 and b.EFF_DATE = [code]...
join using the EFF_DATE field also and get the expected results.My results are appearing as BLANK. However I need to produce the results as stated below:
I am trying to write an Update that really frustrates me because it won't work for one reason or another.The situation is that I have two tables for customer information, t1 with the names of the customer and t2 with the address.These two can be joined via a client_id.
Now I have a third table t3 with the name and address of potential customers. I want to find out if some of them are already known to me so that I can update the client_id from table t1 or t2 into t3.
I have to join firstname, lastname from t3 to firstname, lastname from t1 and street, zip, city from t3 to street, zip, city from t2 and client_id from t1 to t2. Additional there is the problem that there can be more than one result so I have to update one of the found client_ids per name/address into t3.I am no expert to PL/SQL, I just know what SQL works in Access and that is:
UPDATE (t3 INNER JOIN t1 ON (t3.firstname= t1.firstname) AND (t3.lastname = t1.lastname)) INNER JOIN t2 ON (t3.city = t2.city) AND (t3.zip = t2.zip) AND (t3.street = t2.street) AND (t1.client_id = t2.client_id) SET t3.client_id = t1.client_id;
I'm looking a way to easily join two tables on date value but right table has no all possible dates so I need t fill missing records with MAX(DT) values.
My tables looks like
CREATE TABLE CAL (DT DATE NOT NULL ); INSERT INTO CAL (DT
[code]......
And I was trying to merge them somehow to get following result (for all missing dates from SOME_DATA I want to get value corespond to maximum data not higher than cal.dt):
I'm wondering what part of this query is wrong because obviously I'm not getting the desired results.
select a.iss_id,C.ISSR_ID from ft_t_isid a left outer join ft_t_issu b on a.INSTR_ID=b.INSTR_ID left outer join ft_t_irid c on b.INSTR_ISSR_ID=c.INSTR_ISSR_ID and a.ISS_ID in ('CA13606ZDD20', 'CA780086AP98',
[Code]...
I know that the problem is in the joins. I expect to get 9 rows of result but I get a lot more and they are not even what I'm looking for.
CURSOR studgrade_cur IS SELECT g.stud_id, g.grade, subj_code, s.description FROM studgrades g JOIN subjects s ON(g.subj_code = s.subj_code) WHERE stud_id = :Studentprofile.student_id;
but i got an error, saying:
Quote:encountered the symbol JOIN when expecting one of the following:
,; for group having intersect minus order start union where connect
Is it not allowed to use JOIN statement in a cursor?
I am trying to insert records in multiple tables. I know how to view data using joinig, but unable to understand how to insert records in multiple tables using Joining. I searched it on net, but didn't find much. I have also tried to write a code, but it is not working, I have seen some examples on different websites where people are using SELECT in INSERT statement for joining. What is the correct Syntax to INSERT record in Multiple tables.
Insert into library_users, library_users_info (library_users.username, library_users.password, library_users_info.address, library_users_info.phone_no) VALUES (...)
I have two permanent tables. I want to add the column DELTA_STROM from the table "Delta" into the table "TEST2". Here, the value of the field "POWER_DELTA" in the table "TEST2" depends on the field "Trade_Date".
If the time of the timestamp in table "Test2" is smaller than 12:40 than the value (DELTA_STROM from DELTA) of the day must be added into the field. If the time is huger than 12:40, the value of the next day must be added into the field "POWER_DELTA". All values for "Power_DELTA" for every day are in table "Delta" in the field "DELTA_STROM".
I just added the right values of "Power_Delta" into the table "TEST2" manually to give an understanding.
I have to do the optimization of a query that has the following characteristics:
- Takes 3 hours to process - Performs the inner join with 30 tables - Produces an output of 280 million records with 450 fields
First of all it is not feasible to make 30 updates (one for each table) to 280 million records.
The best solution that I had found so far was to create 3 temporary tables, where each of them to do the join with 1/3 of the 30 tables, and in the end I make the join between the main table and these three tables temporary.
I know that you will ask (or maybe not) to the query and samples, but it is impossible to create 30 examples.
how to optimize this type of querys that perform the join with multiple tables and produce a large output with (too) many columns.
I saw a strange plan for one query in TESTING DB today. Although 2 tables are involved i dont see any join , NL/HJ/SMJ !! i am not facing any performance issue but curious to know what type of optimization oracle is doing here.
Query text and plan : SELECT FIRST_NAME FROM CAMPA.TABLE_A WHERE NAME_ID = (SELECT NAME_ID FROM CAMPA.TABLE_B WHERE ban=:b1); [code]....
I have 2 tables as shown below. I have to join those tables and get data as in table 3. Condition is I have to get sum of scores for each student where category is 1 and active is Y.
Table1: col1col2category A 10 1 A 10 2 B 10 1 B 20 2 C 10 1 D 20 1 J 30 1
Table2: colAcolBActive A10Y A20N B30Y B40N Z35Y
Table3: STUDENTSCORE A20 B40 C10 D20 J30 Z35
query to show student name and sum of his score where category is 1 and active is Y. I am using Oracle 8i.
Thing is how can I join those tables to get all the sales ID's that have at least two products one of which has got any number of messages and the other one hasn't got ANY any messages. So another words one sale entity that has both products with messages and at lease one with no message. Something like this
Sales 1 ID 123 Product1 ID 1234 for sale ID 123 Product2 ID 4321 for sale ID 123 Sales_message ID 098 for product ID 1234 'blabla' Sales_message ID 876 for product ID 1234 'albalb' AND NO MESSAGES FOR PRODUCT 4321
I have two tables. i need to join the tables. The query is -
select v.c_venditore,v.s_venditore,v.t_diretto_indiretto,v.d_disattivazione,d.s_direzione from VENDITORE v,DIREZIONE d where v.p_direzione=d.p_direzione order by v.s_venditore
In the table VENDITORE there are 2919 rows. I need to display all the rows. But the joining column p_direzione has some null values.I need to display the null also. But to join the two tables this is the only condition. How can i display all the rows.
I have 2 tables Table a(girlscoutid, item, quarter)Table b(girlscoutid, fname, lname) I want to get the names of ppl who did not sell any item/s for the
I have 8 tables and I want full outer join on these to get the output. The tables are very small having 10 rows at max and consists of only two columns (date and value).
As the title of this topic illustrates, i'm having trouble dumping relevant data from columns of different tables. I am using isql*plus. I have three tables appropriatly related. A 'course' table, 'student' and 'next_of_kin' tables. I have many students enrolled on various courses but only a hanfull of courses offer the module option 'Database Systems'. I have no 'module' table but i know the three course names which provide the module option. I intend on producing a report hich lists all students enrolled on the courses which provid the module option 'Database Systems'.
I have attempted the report but i keep getting a 'cartesian product' displaying all next_of_kin names instead of the appropriate. Also i am struggling to come up with the right WHERE statement to depict only the three courses which provide the module option 'Database Systems' as defined by 'courseNo' in both 'course' and 'student' tables.
Here is the most recent attempt:
--set echo off --set pagesize 24 --set feedback off --set linesize 78 col A format 99999999 heading 'Student No'
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE CourseList AS TABLE OF VARCHAR2(64); CREATE TABLE department ( courses CourseList) NESTED TABLE courses STORE AS courses_tab; INSERT INTO department (courses)VALUES (CourseList('1','2','3'));
[code]....
The query returns the correct data, CourseList that are not subset of any other CourseList of the table.
I am trying to convert this not exists in a left outer join query to check if the performance is better, but I don't know how to do it.
I was making some variations of this code :
select d1.courses c_1, d2.courses c_2 from department d1,department d2 where d1.courses<>d2.courses(+);
i want to know the difference between Left outer join Vs. Right outer join? Its like which join is safer to use or is there any recommendations to use any join?
problem on oracle 11gR2 where i have to import data from a source database to an existing table without truncate or drop the target table in the target database.
we have found something called table_exist_action=append in impdp.
I have to cleanup data from our tables (Production Environment) that contain millions of rows. The question is apart from the solution of the partitioned tables what alternative recommended solution suggests Oracle?
To delete these tables by using a cursor PL/SQL block or to import all the database and in the tables that we want to remove the old rows to use the QUERY option of the data pump utility.
I have used both ways and i have to admit that datapump solution is much much faster than the deletion that suffers from I/O disk.The question again is which method from these two is more reliable and less risky for the health of the database.
I came across an implementation where data from DB2 tables are moved to Oracle tables, for BI solutioning, using some oracle procedures called from MS SQL DTS packages which are scheduled jobs.Just being curious, can this be done using OWB or ODI rather than the above detour. I suppose there are some changes being done in those procedures before the data is being loaded into Oracle tables, can't this be done using OWB/ODI? Can it be scheduled too as jobs using OWB/ODI?
In our schema we have corresponding audit tables for most of the production tables
Ex Table name Audit Table EMP EMP_AU DEPT DEPT_AU
Audit tables will have all the columns of production table along with audit columns AUDIT_DATE , AUDIT_OPERATION There are few production tables which are not having audit tables.I need to write a script to identify
1) Production tables where corresponding audit table is missing
2) Where there is column difference (In case any column missing in audit table) between Production table and Audit table
I want to create a query with only the junction of these two queries:
- select id_utilizador,nbeneficiario,nome from adm_utilizadores a WHERE exists ( select 1 from adm_util_grupos b where a.id_utilizador = b.id_utilizador and b.id_grupo = '1') ;
- SELECT b.*,rownum as row_num FROM ADM_UTILIZADORES b ORDER BY $sidx $sord WHERE row_num BETWEEN $start AND $end";
Virtually want id_utilizador, nome, and nbeneficiario, I can get the first query, ordered me returning the first 10.
