SQL & PL/SQL :: Join Two Tables - Condition Not Working?
Aug 16, 2010
I have two tables. i need to join the tables. The query is -
select v.c_venditore,v.s_venditore,v.t_diretto_indiretto,v.d_disattivazione,d.s_direzione from VENDITORE v,DIREZIONE d
where v.p_direzione=d.p_direzione order by v.s_venditore
In the table VENDITORE there are 2919 rows. I need to display all the rows. But the joining column p_direzione has some null values.I need to display the null also. But to join the two tables this is the only condition. How can i display all the rows.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 15, 2013
I have two permanent tables. I want to add the column DELTA_STROM from the table "Delta" into the table "TEST2". Here, the value of the field "POWER_DELTA" in the table "TEST2" depends on the field "Trade_Date".
If the time of the timestamp in table "Test2" is smaller than 12:40 than the value (DELTA_STROM from DELTA) of the day must be added into the field. If the time is huger than 12:40, the value of the next day must be added into the field "POWER_DELTA". All values for "Power_DELTA" for every day are in table "Delta" in the field "DELTA_STROM".
I just added the right values of "Power_Delta" into the table "TEST2" manually to give an understanding.
DATUM DELTA_STROM
-------- -----------
01.01.12 1.92
02.01.12 5.78
03.01.12 0.73
04.01.12 2.84
05.01.12 11.41
06.01.12 -2.76
07.01.12 0.43
08.01.12 1.25
09.01.12 -0.21
TRADE_DATE POWER_DELTA
---------------------------- -----------
02.01.12 11:21:41,720000000 5.78
02.01.12 12:44:01,236000000 0.73
02.01.12 14:05:01,845000000 0.73
02.01.12 16:21:01,345000000 0.73
02.01.12 17:25:41,470000000 0.73
03.01.12 10:31:01,376000000 0.73
03.01.12 11:55:11,798000000 0.73
03.01.12 16:32:47,612000000 2.84
04.01.12 08:24:01,486000000 2.84
04.01.12 12:24:21,189000000 2.84
04.01.12 17:46:21,123000000 11.41
CREATE TABLE "TEST2"
("TRADE_DATE" TIMESTAMP (6),
"POWER_DELTA" NUMBER
);
[Code]....
View 19 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2013
I have two tables : oa_membership_dtl(in this created_by field is varchar2(200 byte) ,oa_partner_usr_dtl(in this table partner_userid is number(8,0) i need to do join on above fields.
I am using following two queries:
select * from oa_membership_dtl membership
join oa_partner_usr_dtl partner_user
on to_char(partner_user.partner_userid,'9999')=membership.created_by
select * from oa_membership_dtl membership
join oa_partner_usr_dtl partner_user
on rtrim(ltrim(partner_user.partner_userid||' '))=rtrim(ltrim(membership.created_by))
by using first data is not fetched but 2nd is working fine , i am getting the matched records using 2nd query.
whats the diff between to_char and || symbol?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2012
create table ptab(pid number);
create table ctab(aphone varchar2(20));
drop table ctable
create table xtab(pid number,phone varchar2(20), tel1 varchar2(20), tel2 varchar2(20), tel3 varchar2(20))
insert into ptab values(1);
insert into ptab values(2);
insert into ptab values(3);
insert into ptab values(4);
[code]..
i have 3 tables, xtab, ctab and ptab
join condition
ptab.pid = xtab.pid
and
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
what I want the join between xtab and ctab is, aphone should match with phone, and then tel1, then tel2, and then tel3, (if phone, tel1, tel2, tel3 are not null in that order only), if aphone matches with any of these,then just print that particular pid, important point is, aphone should be checked against phone, tel1, tel2, tel3 that order only
so the results should simply print
pid
1
2
3
4
5 should not be printed here because for pid 5 in xtab, none of the phone numbers match with aphone of ctab
I tried this:
select
DECODE (ctab.aphone,
xtab.phone, 1,
xtab.tel1, 1,
xtab.tel2, 1,
[code]...
but i cannot join ctab and ptab, i dont want to use intersect etc, because we are looking at millions of rows here
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2010
Suppose I have two tables
Transaction
TXN_ID:integer
TXN_DATE:date
Return_Transaction
RET_TXN_ID:integer
TXN_ID:integer
RET_TXN_DATE:date
[code]....
Transaction may have returned transactions. We use outer join to join the tables using TXN_ID. We have a report that shows the following data...The report use the following basic query to check all transactions with returned transactions information...Quote:
SELECT t.txn_id,
t.txn_date,
rt.ret_txn_id
FROM TRANSACTION t,
return_transaction rt
WHERE t.txn_id = rt.txn_id (+)
Result
TXN_ID, TXN_DATE, RET_TXN_ID
100, 2010/03/10, 500
102, 2010/03/11, 501
If user want to check all transactions with no returned transactions, a where clause is appended to the query
Quote:
SELECT t.txn_id,
t.txn_date
FROM TRANSACTION t,
return_transaction rt
WHERE t.txn_id = rt.txn_id (+)
AND Nvl((SELECT 1
FROM return_transaction rt
WHERE t.txn_id = rt.txn_id),0) = 0
[code].....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2011
I Require to Update the Data in Join Condition. When Run the Query the Error display as ORA-00933: SQL Command Not Properly Ended.
Query:
Update a set a.Dr_Re = Nvl(b.Dr_Amt,0),
a.Cr_Re = Nvl(b.Cr_Amt,0)
FROM xxsc.xxsc_creditors_aging_brnwise a
join (Select Branch,Invoice_id,vendor_site_code,segment1,
case when (sum(nvl(dr_re,0)) - sum(nvl(cr_re,0)) > 0) then sum(nvl(dr_re,0)) - sum(nvl(cr_re,0))
Else 0 End DR_AMT,
[code]........
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2013
How to use outer join condition in my below query.In the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh I have more recordsin the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_BUILDS gob I have less number of records. I want all the records from
APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh including other conditions.I have tried goh.OFFER_NO=gob.OFFER_NO(+) but same result. [code]SELECT GOH.ORIG_SYSTEM, gsp.USER_NAME, goh.ORDER_NO, goh.OMEGA_ORDER_NUMBER, goh.ORDER_TYPE, gc.CUSTOMER_ID, gc.OMEGA_CUSTOMER_NUMBER, CASE WHEN gc.PRIVATE = 'N' THEN gc.CUSTOMER_NAME ELSE ''
[code]...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2012
i have a query that is not working properly. i am trying to join two tables and i have OR condition and outer join..i am getting error ORA-01719: outer join operator (+) not allowed in operand of OR or IN..my query is as follow
SELECT l.* FROM table1 l, table2 map
WHERE (NVL(l.id, '-99') = NVL(map.id(+), NVL(l.id, '-99'))
AND l.TYPE = 'TKE')
) OR
(NVL(l.id, '-99') = NVL(map.id(+), NVL(l.id, '-99'))
[code]....
)So basically in the query above i am saying that if type ='TKE' dont do the join on all the pos columns. if type is not TKE then do all the joins on all the pos columns etc.how can i rewrite query so that i can use OR and the outer JOIN in same query?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I have an outer join.
select *
from table a, table b
where
a.id = b.id (+) and
b.status = 'N';
I am not getting any results I want where the table b is null for table a due to the last condition. I would like the result to be like the one below.
Results:
Table a ID Table b ID Table b status
1 1 'N'
2 null null
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2011
I have encountered a weird (or maybe not weird at all but unexplainable from my point of view) behavior from Oracle. I have simplified the example as much as possible
This query returns 2 rows as expected:
with edited as
(select F101, e_id from (select 'Test' F101, -1 e_id from dual
union all select 'Test1' F101, -2 e_id from dual) input_clob),
distinct_intermediate_edited as
[code]...
But this one (with only one row in input_clob) returns one row (as expected) but with null on e_id (why?):
with edited as
(select F101, e_id from (select 'Test' F101, -1 e_id from dual) input_clob),
distinct_intermediate_edited as
(select e.f101, e.e_id
from edited e
[code]...
If I change the join condition with and nvl(e.E_id,0) = nvl(e_id,0) both cases work as I expect (e_id = -1 for second query) but I simply want an explication for this behavior.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2013
How to use outer join condition in my below query. In the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh I have more records in the table APPS_JP.GEDIS_ORDER_BUILDS gob I have less number of records.
I want all the records from APPS_JP.GEDIS_OFFER_HEADER goh including other conditions. I have tried goh.OFFER_NO=gob.OFFER_NO(+) but same result.
SELECT GOH.ORIG_SYSTEM,
gsp.USER_NAME,
goh.ORDER_NO,
goh.OMEGA_ORDER_NUMBER,
goh.ORDER_TYPE,
[code].......
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2010
I've created a query so I can easily compare two sets of data for two different instruments:
select a.CalId, a.AtName, a.NRef, a.VaLoat, a.ValTime, a.ValRing,
cvs.NRef, cvs.CalId, cvs.AtName, cvs.VaLoat, cvs.Valtime, cvs.ValRing
from CalcAttribute a, CalcAttribute cvs
where a.NRef like '438815' and cvs.NRef like '438813'
and a.CalId *= cvs.CalId
and a.AtName *= cvs.AtName
union
[Code]...
This works great - however I want to add an addtional condition, basically so it only returns where the two are not equal.
I thought I should just be able to add an extra:
and a.ValLoat *<> cvs.ValLoat
and a.ValLoat <>* cvs.ValLoat
But it doesnt seem to like this (Incorrect syntax near '<'.)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
For a hash join statement, is it beneficial to have the join condition objects in the index as well as the objects in the where clause?
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2011
I have two tables. By joining these two tables, I need to update a field in table1.
UPDATE table1
SET table1.FLAG = 'Fixed'
where table2.lastname = table1.lastname
and table2.status in ('fulltime','parttime')
I keep getting error 'table1.lastname' is invalid identifier.
I can't understand the error message. I made sure that the fields exist.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2011
Create a Report based on Join Conditions.
Eg.
1st Query : Select * from Emp
2nd Query : Select * from Dept
Join the Relation from 1st Query to Second Query
Apply following conditions:
a) if comm is null then hide the corresponding row
b) If sal is greater than average salary of there dept the display above average else display below average in the place holder column.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2008
I'm trying to create a relation from child block to the master block that I've created . Foreighn key is there from child to parent table.The error I get is below:
FRM-15004: Error while parsing join condition
The join condition is correct, but I'm still clueless as to what it could be.Is it a form bug?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2012
i want to update record that is fetched based on join condition on form
1. made a block manually :::: EMPSAL
2. Query DATA SOURCE NAME :::: EMP a, Sal b
3. Where Clause :::: a.empid = b.empid
4. DML DATA Target Type :::: Table
5. DML DATA Target Name :::: EMP a, Sal b
6. All Columns are marked a.empid, a.empname, b.sal, b.date etc
It does not allow me to update record.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2010
I receive a "FRM-15004 Error while parsing join condition" when attempting to create a relation between block1 (parent table) and block2 (child table). If I do a simple straight join the statement is accepted but if I use a Decode then it results in an error. How to successfully use a decode or a nvl in a join statement of a relation?
Results in Error:
block1.case_id = block2.case_id and
decode(block1.employee_id, null, block1.entity_id, block1.employee_id) =
decode(block2.employee_id, null, block2.entity_id, block2.employee_id)
This join is accepted but I would like to use a decode since a record can have either a employee_id or entity_id, not both
block1.case_id = block2.case_id and
block1.employee_id = block2.employee_id and
block1.entity_id = block2.entity_id
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2013
The attachment contains the table info. The condition is that when there are childer for the master ,the master record shd be negated . Excuse me if this very easy. Example -DEL HAS children so the record with DEL and DEL SHD not be in the result query. Example -RAG HAS NO children. so the MASTER record should be taken.
Input
COL1COL2COL3COL4
MASTERDELDELP1
MASTERDELJANP2
MASTERDELAGRP3
MASTERRAGRAGP1
MASTERCENAPTP2
MASTERRUGRUGP1
My expected output
COL1COL2COL3COL4
MASTERDELJANP2
MASTERDELAGRP3
MASTERRAGRAGP1
MASTERCENAPTP2
MASTERRUGRUGP1
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2010
I have a piece of code that joined the same table onto itself twice in order to get the previous, current and future year's into columns in the same output.
Up until recently this has been working fine but the most recent data has just been uploaded into the table and now it comes up with an error.
On the second (left outer) join it now says that the column is ambiguously defined (ORA-00918). It doesn't matter which order the joins are in it is always the second join that the error pops up on.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2011
Using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
Here's a simplified version of the query I am having problems with:
SELECT
assoc.association_id
FROM mentor_initiative mi
LEFT JOIN program assoc_prog ON assoc_prog.program_id = -1
LEFT JOIN mentor_association assoc ON assoc.mentor_initiative_id = mi.mentor_initiative_id AND
NVL(assoc_prog.program_id, -1) = NVL(assoc.program_id, -1)
Note that there is no program with program id -1. So the assoc_prog left join will come up with nothing. I was thinking that since assoc_prog.program_id will be null, the second assoc left join would pick the row where assoc.program_id is null. However, the second left join doesn't join to any row.
In this query, it does join to an assoc row (I changed assoc_prog.program_id to NULL)
SELECT
assoc.association_id
FROM mentor_initiative mi
LEFT JOIN program assoc_prog ON assoc_prog.program_id = -1
LEFT JOIN mentor_association assoc ON assoc.mentor_initiative_id = mi.mentor_initiative_id AND NVL(NULL, -1) = NVL(assoc.program_id, -1)
I was thinking it would join to an assoc row in the first query though. How can I change the first query to have the desired effect of left joining to a row where assoc.program_id is null if assoc_prog.program_id is null?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2008
am not very experienced with SQL. I have two tables:
Class
-----
ID (int)
Teacher (nvarchar)
Subject (nvarchar)
Student
--------
ID (int)
ClassID (int)
Name (nvarchar)
I am trying to write a SQL query that will give me the total number of students in each class. I have tried the following:
SELECT
c.ID,
c.Teacher,
c.Subject
COUNT(s.ID)
FROM
Class c LEFT OUTER JOINT ON Student s c.ID=s.ClassID
Unfortunately, that gives me an error of:Column 'Class.Teacher' is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause.
I'm afraid if I place everything in a GROUP BY clause, I will get some invalid results.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2011
I have problems with the query below. Left join and right join is working. Well actually it's not working correct I think but that's another story wich I will leave for another posting. But with full join I am getting error ORA-00932.The columns starting with id_ are of number datatype and the ones starting with dat_ are of type date.Oracle points out the last line to be faulty. If I make that line a comment it points out the preceeding line and so on.
SQL> /
and trunc(t.dat_trans) <= to_date(:sql_dat_avst_tom,'yyyymmdd')
*
ERROR at line 24:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected NUMBER got DATE
select k.id_pers k_id_pers, k.dat_avst
,t.id_pers t_id_pers, t.id_trans, t.dat_trans
from (
select ka.id_pers, ka.dat_avst, ka.dat_nasta_avst
[code]...
View 29 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2010
have two queries that will return same columns from two different set of tables ( column mapping has been taken care of). The return type is out ref cursor. (P_SUPPLY_REORDER )
Query 1-SO
-----------------------------------
select
so.SMO_NO,
so.SPLY_ORD_DT,
so.fk_CUST_ID as CUST_ID,
so.CUST_PO_NO,
so.ATTENTION_NAME,
[code].....
Query-2 Xcom
--------------------------------------
select
null as sMO_NO,
xso.created_date as SPLY_ORD_DT,
xso.fk_cust_id as cust_id,
cust.cust_po_no as cust_PO_NO
,(sta.SHIP_TO_ATTN_FIRST_NAME||''||sta.SHIP_TO_ATTN_LAST_NAME) as attention_name,
xsol.CARTONS_ORDERED as SPLY_ORD_QTY,
[code].......
Now the requirement is
One of four conditions are possible for each Supply Reorder Number:
. Both table queries return no records- Populate all the P_SUPPLY_REORDER output fields with nulls
. SUPPLY_ORDER returns a record, but XCOM_ORDER_HEADER returns no records
- Populate output fields with values from the join of SUPPLY_ORDER and SUPPLY_ORDER_LINE.
. SUPPLY_ORDER returns no records, but XCOM_ORDER_HEADER returns one record
- Populate output fields with values from the join of XCOM_ORDER_HEADER and XCOM_ORDER_LINES.
. SUPPLY_ORDER returns a record, and XCOM_ORDER_HEADER returns a record; find out the latest order by comapring max(SPLY_ORD_DT)
from SUPPLY_ORDER with max(CREATED_DATE) from XCOM_ORDER_HEADER.
- If the latest order is in SUPPLY_ORDER, then populate output fields with values from the join of SUPPLY_ORDER and SUPPLY_ORDER_LINE.
- If order dates are equal from both join results, then populate output fields with values from the join of SUPPLY_ORDER and SUPPLY_ORDER_LINE.
- If the latest order is in XCOM_ORDER_HEADER, then populate output fields with values from the join of XCOM_ORDER_HEADER and XCOM_ORDER_LINES.
Question is how can we switch over the queries to pull respective dataset based on these conditions ( checking that which table join is going to return a row and then based upon latest order if both tables return a row) and all this logic as part of single SQL statement that is returned as OUT Ref Cursor.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2013
i have a list of 500 tables. I want to delete data from those tables based on a condition. (Data before 2008 year needs to be deleted). Each table has a column based on which data needs to be deleted. Provide a code which does this efficiently and fast. Bulk collect is preferable.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2013
I have 2 tables SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB.
Now, I need to compare the data of the two tables column-wise.
Ideally the 2 tables should have the same security_alias values but in my case they do not as the two tables belong to 2 diff client models. There is however a main SECURITY_MASTERA and SECURITY_MASTERB tables which have the security_alias recorded and a primary_asset_id column value which can act as a link between SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB. But, I have not been able to figure out the exact query which will be ideal.
Attached are the table structures and the data it contains.
Note: I need to compare the Coupon and Freq column values of SEC_MASTER_HISTA and SEC_MASTER_HISTB.
View 23 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2010
how to join 2 tables to get the result I need.I have following 2 tables (all dummy data)
Table 1
org_iddd_1dd_2dd_3
K87973789865879876432465
J87879454321981234723454
Table 2
acc_numacc_nameacc_typevol_sales
789865 Abcn185765
879876 defd494854
432465 efgg5948545
789865 hijh685765
879876 klmj794854
432465 nopl9948545
I want to join the above tables to get the following result
org_idacc_numvol_sales
K8797378986585765
K8797487987694854
K87975432465948545
J8787978986585765
J8788087987694854
J87881432465948545
I have tried writing union queries and exists clause in where and seem to get nowhere with this.
View -1 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2011
Here is what I'm trying to do:
I have three tables:
TABLE1 TABLE2 TABLE3
NCI 1AB OPEN
NCI (NULL) (NULL)
INV (NULL) (NULL)
NCI 2AB REOPEN
What I want to do is to return all of the rows from TABLE1 that are NCI regardless, and if they are NCI, I want to return the corresponding records from TABLE2 and TABLE3.
If TABLE1 has a record of NCI but there are no corresponding records in TABLE2 or TABLE3, then of course the columns for TABLE2 and 3 would be blank.
I can get all of the NCI records from TABLE1 when I LEFT JOIN with TABLE2, but when I try to specify TABLE3 in the FROM statement, only the records that are NCI in TABLE1 AND have data in TABLE2 are returned, not just all records with NCI in TABLE1.
Let me know if I can further clarify.
I know that you do not have access to my tables, but here is an example of my code so that you may understand my quandary further:
SELECT l.sku AS "SKU",
l.loc AS "LOC",
l.qty AS "QTY",
o.ncikey AS "NCI",
r.description AS "NCI DESC",
o.qtyexpected AS "NCI QTY EXP",
o.qtyreceived AS "NCI QTY REC",
o.loc AS "NCI LOC",
o.status
[Code]...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2013
CREATE TABLE MTCH_TBL
(
S_PAID VARCHAR2(100),
S_SEC NUMBER,
H_PAID VARCHAR2(100),
H_SEC NUMBER
);
[code]....
My requirement is to match the records in MTCH_TBL and HIST_TBL on the basis of joining S_SEC(MTCH_TBL) with SEC_ALIAS(HIST_TBL) and INSTANCE (HIST_TBL) as 100 and choosing the record with max EFF_DATE from HIST_TBL.
I have come up with a query as:
select a.h_sec, a.s_paid, a.h_paid
FROM MTCH_TBL a,
HIST_TBL b
where a.S_SEC=b.sec_alias(+)
and b.instance(+)=100
and b.EFF_DATE =
[code]...
join using the EFF_DATE field also and get the expected results.My results are appearing as BLANK. However I need to produce the results as stated below:
Now, i need the results as:
H_SEC= 526
S_PAID= Q00
H_PAID = Q00
View 39 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2010
I am trying to write an Update that really frustrates me because it won't work for one reason or another.The situation is that I have two tables for customer information, t1 with the names of the customer and t2 with the address.These two can be joined via a client_id.
Now I have a third table t3 with the name and address of potential customers. I want to find out if some of them are already known to me so that I can update the client_id from table t1 or t2 into t3.
I have to join firstname, lastname from t3 to firstname, lastname from t1 and street, zip, city from t3 to street, zip, city from t2 and client_id from t1 to t2. Additional there is the problem that there can be more than one result so I have to update one of the found client_ids per name/address into t3.I am no expert to PL/SQL, I just know what SQL works in Access and that is:
UPDATE (t3 INNER JOIN t1
ON (t3.firstname= t1.firstname) AND (t3.lastname = t1.lastname)) INNER JOIN t2
ON (t3.city = t2.city) AND (t3.zip = t2.zip) AND (t3.street = t2.street) AND (t1.client_id = t2.client_id)
SET t3.client_id = t1.client_id;
View 2 Replies
View Related
