I have an application which deploys the data to Oracle database. It has more than 25 tables and many columns. It does not have any document explaining the deployment, so I am kind of doing reverse engineering here.
I need a script which will fetch the column name or at least table names which will match with either some string or number? I found few examples on net to find out number. But I am struggling to make it work for string.
I can not work on stored proc, as I do not have access to create that on server. So, any script will work.
I am using apex 4.1. I must hide phone number columns in my IR report, but at the same time the values of that columns should be available to search for using IR Search Field. is there a way to do this ?
if not, that means I have to :
1- Add a text filed P1_PHONE 2- edit my report query to something similar to > Select * from Table where :P1_phone in (mobile1,mobile2) or :p1_phone is null 3- add button to refresh the report.
but the item P1_PHONE should be on the header of the Report region. is there a way to do this. I am using theme 23 page template without sidebars Report template : Reports Region.
how to put the item P1_PHONE on the tab of the page. Just similar to the Search item of in the Application Builder.
I am trying to search a word which starts with 'FRA' in any columns and any tables.
I am unable to find what is generating a join datasets in the webservice from teh database as it is not apparent within the 100 tables.
I ahve looked into
Re: How to search in all rows and all columns? Re: SQL Search Query?
but none of these queries is working out for me as I am a user with no tables on its own but rather a user quering other tables.I think its a tweak on which dat a dictionary I can view
select distinct substr (table_name, 1, 14) "Table", substr (t.column_value.getstringval (), 1, 50) "Column/Value" from all_cons_columns, table (xmlsequence (dbms_xmlgen.getxmltype ('select ' || column_name || ' from ' || table_name || ' where upper(' || column_name || ') like upper(''%' || 'fra' || '%'')' ).extract ('ROWSET/ROW/*') ) ) t order by "Table";
running teh above query got me thsi error:
ORA-19202: Error occurred in XML processing ORA-00942: table or view does not exist ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_XMLGEN", line 288 ORA-06512: at line 1 19202. 00000 - "Error occurred in XML processing%s" *Cause: An error occurred when processing the XML function *Action: Check the given error message and fix the appropriate problem
in one of the data base some of the column values are TE. i wanted to serch in what are the tables this TE values are present. so m running the below function
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION find_in_schema(val VARCHAR2) RETURN VARCHAR2 IS v_old_table user_tab_columns.table_name%TYPE; v_where VARCHAR2(4000); v_first_col BOOLEAN := TRUE;
[code]....
but v_where := v_where || ' or ' || r.column_name || ' like ''%' || val || '%''' is giving me numaric or value error when i run as select find_in_schema('@TL') from dual; so how can i go ahed with the serch ?
DT1 is a column of date datatype and there is no index created on the table
I want to add the below lines in the sql
TO_CHAR(DT1,'YYYY') BETWEEN '2005' AND '2009'
Which one should I use in where condition to query and why?
1. TO_CHAR(DT1,'YYYY') BETWEEN '2005' AND '2009' 2. DT1 BETWEEN '01/01/2005' AND '31/12/2009' (as NLS date format will not change) 3. DT1 BETWEEN to_date('01/01/2005','dd/mm/yyyy') AND ('31/12/2009' ,'dd/mm/yyyy')
I have a requirement that i should list out all the table names which are all using timestamp datatype in a specified schema. Is there any way to find those table names by using any system tables.
We have a table in the client database that has two columns - column parent and column child. The whole hierarchy of DB table dependencies is held in this table.If Report 1 is dependent on Table A and Table A in turn is dependent on two tables Table M and Table N. Table N is dependent on table Z it will appear in the db table as,
Hierarchy Table Parent Child Report1Table A Table ATable M Table ATable N Table NTable Z
Requirement :
From the above structure, we need to build a table which will hold the complete hierarchy by breaking it into multiple columns.The o/p should look like this
-ParentChild 1Child 2 Child 3 -Report1Table ATable M -Report1Table ATable N Table Z
Child 1, Child 2, Child 3 ....and so on are columns.The number of tables and the no of hierarchical relationships are dynamic.
SQL Statements to create hierarchy table:
create table hierarchy (parent varchar2(20), child varchar2(20)); insert into hierarchy values ('Report1','Table A'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report1','Table B'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table A','Table M'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table B','Table N'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report2','Table P'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table M','Table X'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table N','Table Y'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report X','Table Z');
Approached already tried :
1) Using indentation : select lpad(' ',20*(level-1)) || to_char(child) P from hierarchy connect_by start with parent='Report1' connect by prior child=parent;
2)Using connect by path function : select * from (select parent,child,level,connect_by_isleaf as leaf, sys_connect_by_path(child,'/') as path from hierarchy start with parent='Report1' connect by prior child =parent) a where Leaf not in (0);
Both the approaches give the information but the hierarchy data appears in a single column.Ideally we would like data at each level to appear in a different column.
I want to do an import of a table from my old dump file.The same table is already there in the development box but few more columns are added to that table while testing so in the dump those columns are not available.
TABLE_EXISTS_ACTION=TRUNCATE The new table SQL> desc "TESTINVENTORY"."TTRANSACTION" Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- -------------------------------------------------------- TRANSACTIONIDNOT NULL CHAR(26) BRANCHCODE NOT NULL CHAR(3) EXTERNALSYSTEM NOT NULL CHAR(3) EXTRACTSYSTEM NOT NULL CHAR(3) OWNERBRANCHCODE NOT NULL CHAR(3) TRADEREFERENCE NOT NULL CHAR(20) [code]...
I have a table that has 2 columns of type nested table. Now in the purge process, when I try to truncate or drop a partition from this table, I get error that I can't do this (because table has nested tables). how I will be able to truncate/drop partition from this table? IF I change column types from nested table to varray type, will it work?
Also, is there any short method of moving existing data from a nested table column to a varray column (having same fields as nested table)?
if a table contains two columns and both are part of the primary key of that table (Kind of obvoius).
should i opt for a index organized tbale in this case ?Or should i opt for another running sequential colum which would serve as a primary key of this table and define the actual two columns of the system as unique keys.
there is a drawback if a most of the tables of a database contain composite primary keys?
I am trying to update columns of Table A with the columns of Table B. Both these tables have 60,000 rows each. I tried this operation using following 2 queries:
Query 1
Update TableA A set (A.col1,A.col2,A.col3)=(select B.col1,B.col2,B.col3 from TableB where A.CODE=B.CODE)
Query 2 Update TableA A set (A.col1,A.col2,A.col3)=(select B.col1,B.col2,B.col3 from TableB where A.CODE=B.CODE) where exists A.code = (select B.code from TableB B where A.code=B.code)
When i execute these two above queries, it keeps executing indefinitely.
Perhaps this is a common request : I have 2 tables:
Table A ------- ID Value 1 a 2 b 3 c
Table B ------- ID AnotherValue 1 x 2 y
I am hoping to append a column from Table B to Table A based on a simple sql join (e.g:
Table A
ID Value AnotherValue 1 a x 2 b y 3 c (null)
)
I would rather stay away from the standard update statement since it takes far to long and I'd prefer not to use create table as I don't want to duplicate any data...is this possible to do ? (e.g: just insert the columns into this table ?) - or if it's possible the performance overhead just wouldn't make it worth it ?
We have a table for reports. If user A submits a report ...and say the sequence # is 242. When this report goes to Admin ...he submits this request then in same table we add another row with say sequence # 245. THEN we update column called 'Asctd ID' for 242 and add 245 in there. and then update Asctd ID for 245 and add 242 in there.
(This table has many fields, one of which is report Name field)
Now i am running a query like this...
SELECT b.JOB_ID, a.DESC, TO_CHAR(a.CREATE_DATE,'MM/DD/YYYY'), DECODE(a.DLVRY_TYPE,'','PDF',a.DLVRY_TYPE), DECODE(a.FLG,'','N/A', a.FLG), ((TO_DATE(a.CREATE_DATE,'DD-MON-YY')) + 21) - TO_DATE(SYSDATE, 'DD-MON-YY'), c.STATUS_DESC, a.SIZE_NUM, b.PRVDR_ID, a.asctd_id, d.NM FROM REQUEST_DIM a, PROVIDER_DIM b, STATUS_DIM c, DIM d WHERE a.FLAG = 'P' and RTRIM(a.RPT_RQST_USER_ID) = 'TEST02' AND a.RPT_RQST_TYPE = 'D' AND a.RPT_RQST_ACTIVE_IND = 'A' and a.asctd_id is not null and a.RPT_RQST_ID = b.RPT_RQST_ID and b.JOB_ID = c.JOB_ID and b.PRVDR_ID = d.PRVDR_ID AND c.CREATE_DT = (SELECT MAX(d.CREATE_DT) FROM STATUS_DIM d WHERE d.RPT_RQST_ID = b.RPT_RQST_ID and d.JOB_ID = b.JOB_ID ) ORDER BY a.RPT_RQST_ID, a.CREATE_DATE
Now this query is run by the admin (job 245) ...it returns a bunch of stuff and also the name of the report that the admin gave this. But when admin sees this we want to be able to displace the report name that user A gave it (asctd ID 242). so the row 245 HAS a asctd ID 242. and there is a row 242 from which we can get the name easily. But i dont know if this is possible in ONE QUERY??
DECLARE JOBSFILE UTL_FILE.FILE_TYPE; CURSOR JOBSCUR IS SELECT * -- DDOCNAME,DDOCTITLE,DSECURITYGROUP,DDOCAUTHOR,DDOCTYPE,DINDATE,PRIMARYFILE,EXTRACTIONDATE,BATCH_ID FROM TARGET_UCM ; BEGIN JOBSFILE := UTL_FILE.FOPEN('FILES','JOBS.TXT','W'); UTL_FILE.PUT_LINE(JOBSFILE,'Action = insert'); FOR REC IN JOBSCUR [code]....
is there anyway to print the values of full table .i have used all column names to print .
I need to add values of one column values from a table to another table each value as a column. Below i am considering only for 3 values in real time i have more than 50 values
CREATE TABLE TEST_REG ( VAL VARCHAR2(1));
INSERT INTO TEST_REG VALUES ('A'); INSERT INTO TEST_REG VALUES ('B'); INSERT INTO TEST_REG VALUES ('C');
CREATE TABLE TEST_HOLD ( COL1 VARCHAR2(1),COL2 VARCHAR2(1),COL3 VARCHAR2(1)); -- in realtime i have 100 columns
I need to compare columns of two tables in oracle 10g. If columns of both tables match with each other, then i need to create new table dynamically with matched column name and datatype. For example, table1 contains name, ID, Phone_no and address table2 contains name, Id, address, area and pincode. now , i need to create table3 which will contains name, ID,address, Phone_no, area and pincode as columns( I mean matched columns should not be repeated in table3). how to do this..
just wanted to know if i create a table with 1000 columns, and use only few of them and remaining are for future use, will it affect the performance and storage?
I’m facing an issue in my current project where we have to run batch jobs and interfaces on the same master tables. These tables are huge (millions) and we get very poor response time.
We thought of partitioning the tables, but the problem is our batch jobs queries are based on dates (some run on monthly data, some runs on yearly data..) but interfaces uses primary keys.
I’m not sure on how to partition the tables in this situation, is there any way I can partition the tables in such a way that both batches and interfaces will get benefit out of it?
Our database infrastructure has a 3 Node RAC (each with 8 CPUs) and oracle 10g R2. We have almost 60gig of RAM allocated to oracle.
PS: We are not thinking about Mviews now because client wants to explore the partition option first.
I have 2 queries one which gives me unique records and second which I created using EXISTS to eliminate duplication.i.e. First query gives me 4 records but when I put the table which is in the EXISTS block in the normal join, it gives me 8 records.
But the issue is I want data from the query which I have put in the EXISTS block.
I have question related to LONG datatype. Actually from google and get to know that one table can have only one LONG datatype when i searched for reason . i got these resons:-
With 9i (I believe) and later versions, Oracle deprecates using the long datatype in favor of the lob (clob, nclob and blog) datatypes. It is only supported for backward compatibility.
Restriction:- It can not be used in create type as an attribute of the defined type.
It can not be used in where conditions.
There can be no indexes on long columns.
Regular Expression are not possible.
long can not be returned from a stored function.
SQL can not call functions that have an attribute of type long.
And even more restrictions.
So I want to know that is only reason because of that Oracle doesn't allow us to make two Column or is there any strong reason which make it more logical Like storing of data in Row blocks or some thing else.
I have created the following trigger whcich will track all the column changes and insert the row in log table. here i have some doubt while substituting the cursor value.
create or replace trigger historylog_trigger before update on log_dev_test for each row declare PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION; in_loamid number(10); in_col_name varchar2(10); in_old_val varchar2(100);
