I have a running application where i have a table with pk defined on it and the pk clumn is inde in asc order by default. Can i alter the index in desc order as i always need to see the data in desc order.
View 7 Replies
Using Oracle 11g, below is the table, partitions, unique and non-unique local index:
CREATE TABLE DOCA( DOCA_ID NUMBER NOT NULL , DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID NUMBER NULL , ROW_PURGE_DATE DATE NULL ,)PARTITION BY RANGE(ROW_PURGE_DATE)INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))( PARTITION P2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/01/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')), PARTITION P200801 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/02/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')),) TABLESPACE T0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX XPKDOCA ON DOCA( DOCA_ID ASC, ROW_PURGE_DATE ASC)LOCALREVERSE TABLESPACE I0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ADD CONSTRAINT XPKDOCA PRIMARY KEY (DOCA_ID); CREATE INDEX XFKDOCA_DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ON DOCA( DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ASC)LOCALREVERSETABLESPACE I0;
I would like to know the difference between the performance of the unique and non-unique local indexes?.
I have created one unique index on one column of my table. Now i would like to add one more column in the same index without dropping the index.
SQL > CREATE TABLE DEBUG_TABLE
2 (
3 SLNO NUMBER,
4 MESSAGE VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
5 CREATED_DATE DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE,
6 CREATED_TIME TIMESTAMP(6) DEFAULT SYSDATE
7 );
Table created.
SQL > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_debug1 ON debug_table (SLNO);
Index created.
SQL > ALTER INDEX index_debug1 ADD COLUMN MESSAGE;
ALTER INDEX index_debug1 ADD COLUMN MESSAGE
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02243: invalid ALTER INDEX or ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW option
SQL >
I've got a table which has no unique identifier for a row. I have a field for an ID value but somhow there are duplicate values in this field.
Now I want to create an unique index over this field but therefore I have to remove the duplicate values.
So what I need is an update statement, maybe in a for each loop, which updates the ID field in each row starting with 1 and increasing the value.
In Informix there is a rowid value which is automatically set by Informix. But I think there´s no correspondent function/value in Oracle....
I have a table which sees a lot of use for queries
CREATE TABLE CASE_STAGE
(
ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
STAGE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
CASE_PHASE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
"CURRENT" NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
--and other columns
)
ID is a primary key
CASE_PHASE_ID is a foreign key
"CURRENT" should only ever have values of 0 or 1. When it has a value of 1 it is unique for that CASE_PHASE_ID
What I have tried that doesn't work is
create unique index case_stage_F_IDX1 on case_stage("CURRENT", case_Phase_id) which gives me
ORA-01452: cannot CREATE UNIQUE INDEX; duplicate keys found
What is the correct syntax, something like ("CURRENT"=1,case_phase_id) seems right but fails with an error about a missing bracket. Do I need to use a CASE statement here?
11.2.0.1...How do I create an index on a view or any workaround that my view won't get duplicates?
SQL> create unique index indx01 on db_backup_details_vw(id);
create unique index indx01 on db_backup_details_vw(id)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01702: a view is not appropriate here
I have following records in table (T)
Idtype_cdNbrDt
1A1001/1/2013
2A101Null
3B100Null
4C100Null
5A100Null
Based on the type-cd, I need to create Unique index on Nbr & Dt columns
In above record set, I want to create Unique index on type_cd=A and not on B&C (Here i expect duplictes for a combination of Nbr & Dt)
Can we create Unique index on subset of record?
I have a table with a non-unique index consisting of three columns. The first column is not null while the remaining two are nullable. Queries using this index will chiefly be made in two ways.
1. Column one and two having values. Column three is null.
2. Column one and thre having values. Column two is null.
In both cases I expect range scan will be used since it's non-unique. In the first case the scan will be on values in column one and two. But what happens in case two. Will the range be on colum one, column two(being null) and cxolumn three? Or will it be on just column one since the second column is null? I have done some testing. I can see , using EXPLAN PLAN, that range scan is used in both cases. how the index is used?
Is there any other drawbacks with an index like this?
I'm having problem with my database, which contains more than 1 rows with a same value on a field that has uniqueness contraint.
Here is the log from sqlplus. When I select on RI field, it shows 2 rows. But when I select on SCNUM field, it shows only 1 row. This SCNUM has an unique index on it.
And it is still in VALID state
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> select ri, scnum from scratch1_p where ri in (536964983, 536955574);
select ri from scratch1_p where scnum='444393975';
RI SCNUM
---------- ----------
536955574 444393975
[code].....
Is there any hint to force "Index Unique Scan" over "Index Range Scan".
My query is generating different plans with the above two, and very slow when it uses "Index Range Scan".
What should be the order of columns while creating b-tree non-unique index.
Low cardinality first
or
Hight cardinality first
We are getting an error as below when trying to load data into a table.
INSERT /*+ APPEND parallel(IA_SBSCR_DED_MAX,4) */ INTO EDW.IA_SBSCR_DED_MAX
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-26026: unique index EDW.XPKIA_SBSCR_DED_MAX_A initially in unusable state
The index has been rebuilt but we still have this issue.
We have been recommended to store data in CLOD data type.
Sample data: 1:2:2000000:20000:4455:000099:444:099999:....etc it will grow to a large number.
We want to create a Unique index, for functional reason. Is it advised to create a unique index on a CLOB datatype?
I am on 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition. We are using the new feature "Composite Domain Index" for a Domain index on a very large table (>250.000.000 rows). It really works with mixed queries. We added two number columns using FILTER BY.We have lots of DML on this table. Therefore, we are executing synchronize and optimize once the week. The synch behaves pretty normal. But "optimize_index" takes a very very long time to complete. I have switsched on 'logging' for the optimize process. The $I table takes some time but is finished normally. But the optimization of the $S table (that is the table created for the CDI feature) is running over 12 hours now - and far from being finished. From the logfile, I can see that it optimizes 1000 rows every 20 minutes. Here is the output of the logfile:
Oracle Text, 11.2.0.3.0
14:33:05 06/26/12 begin logging
14:33:05 06/26/12 event
14:33:05 06/26/12 process $N for optimize: SEQDEV.GEN_GES_DESCRIPTION_CTX_I
14:33:16 06/26/12
14:33:16 06/26/12
[code]....
I haven't found a recommendation from Oracle not to use "optimize_index" for Domain Indexes with CDI. But in my case, it would be much faster just to drop and recreate the Domain Index in question.
I have a huge table (about 60 gb) partition over range. The index on this table is global index created on 4 columns together. I have a query which is running very slowly. The explain plan is showing the use of this global index.Explain plan is not showing pstart and pend because the index is global.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a global index and I want to convert it to local index.Is there a way to recreate local index with out dropping the global index.
I can create a local index first and then drop the global index. But is there a way to create it with out dropping the global index, just convert it.
I am facing the error "ORA-01502: index or partition of such index is in unusable state " while loading the text data using
sql loader with direct path (direct = Y ,rows = 10000) option. Table consists an composite non unique index. If I query the dba indexes for the effected index it shows the index status as VALID. There was no maintaince done on the effected table or index. I have tried loading the same data using conventional path but didn't found any issues for the same.
I have a query which had a join:
a.c1=b.c1 and a.c2=@var
where @var is user supplied input at runtime...We had a index on a.c2 . The CBO would use this index to generate an opitimised query plan.We found some records from table "b" were dropping due to inner join. So we made a change in join. It'd be like
a.c1(+)=b.c1 and nvl(a.c2,@var)=@var
This query is no longer using the index, instead its doing a full table scan causing the query to slowdown.I have tried creating index on nvl(a.c2,'31-dec-9999')
But the CBO won't use it.Anyway to create index on this col so that full table scan can be avoided?
How to force an index if the table not using the index?
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe have occurrences of enq : TX - index contentions in the database. Using the SQL ID, we have identified the INSERT statement and the table which they are trying to insert.
This table has almost 25 different indexes, some of which are unique as well.I am wondering how to identify the actual index causing issue, out of these 25 indexes.
Is there any way to pin point to the name of index which is causing the lock?My plan is, once the index is identified, I would like to check the extents and inittrans and other attributes of this index to fix.
Can we create non-cluster index on a clustered index?
View 5 Replies View RelatedAny on give explanation for difference between Index and Clustered Index?
It will be great if i get explanation how memory allocation and Execution takes place.?
What is the difference between index rebuild and index rebuild online.
View 3 Replies View Relatedi am using one query which should return unique value. I have one table that has one column punch date datatype is date.
here value is stored in two rows that is
1. 24-10-12
2. 24-10-12
and my query is this:
SELECT distinct(PunchDate) FROM Trans_RawProcessDailyData ORDER BY PunchDate ASC;
but still getting two values.
Can a table conatin composite Alternate key which is not unique for each record in that table i.e combination of these columns have unique values which are repeated for one or more rows in that table.
View 8 Replies View RelatedFrom a step by step instructions I'm asked to put the following into sql*plus:
CREATE TABLE Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO VarCHAR2(10) NOT NULL,
title VARCHAR2(3),
fName VARCHAR2(30),
[code]...
Then the following:
INSERT INTO Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO, title, fName, lName, streetAddress, suburb, city, postCode, country, lecturerLevel, bankNO, bankName, salary, workLoad, researchArea)
VALUES
('1000', 'Dr', 'Johanna','Santoso',
'3 Robinson Av', 'Kew', 'Melbourne', '3080', 'Australia', 'C', '1000567237', 'CommBank', 65000.00,1.0, 'O-R DB');
and finally,
INSERT INTO Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO, title, fName, lName, streetAddress, suburb, city, postCode,country, lecturerLevel, BankNO,bankName, salary, workLoad, researchArea)
VALUES
('1000', 'Dr', 'Justine', 'Martin', '6 Algorithm AV', 'Montmorency', 'Melbourne', '3089', 'Australia', 'D', '1000123456', 'CommBank', 89000.00, 1.0, 'CBR');
when I try entering in the second one I get an error 'unique constraint violated'.So whats wrong exactly?
I have a simple question, but i can't resolve it.
I have a table like this :
ID_A | VALUE
-------------
A 1
A 2
B 1
B 2
B 3
C 1
C 3
D 1
I need to fid the unique ID that match perfectly VALUE = 1 or 2.
I tried SOME/ANY/ALL/IN
I have a table called pf_stock_txns which just stores all of a clients transactions
If I do select distinct(client_id) from pf_stock_txns then I get back a unqiue list of all clients.
However, I need a query that will give me the first transaction for every unqiue client.
I have data like this:
a1 a2 a3 a4
ABC ABC xx zz
ABC xx mm mm
fg ui ok pl
I want to give them unique codes like :
Code for column
a1 Code1
ABCC-1
ABCC-1
fg C-2
then column
a2 Code2
ABC C-1
xxC-3
uiC-4
then column
a3 Code3
xxC-3
mmC-5
okC-6
then column
a4 Code4
zzC-7
mmC-5
plC-8
I can add these `columns in the table Code1 , Code2 etc columns to update.
I need a "solution", guidance to a problem I have to solve. I have different letters with a value associate to it like
A:10, B:20, ..., G:250 and I have a Target to reach TARGET= 90
and I need to find among all letters I have which combination is equal or closest to my target.
A:10
B:20
C:20
D:20
E:30
F:40
G:250
IF there is more than one solution possible, the first found is perfect. With my example I can reach 90 with different combinations:
A+B+C+F
A+B+D+F
A+C+D+F
B+C+D+E
B+E+F
C+E+F
D+E+F
To complicate the things I have up to 10 different letters that need to combine to match my target. If there is no combination that exactly match my target, the closest higher combination is picked.
