We are getting an error as below when trying to load data into a table.
INSERT /*+ APPEND parallel(IA_SBSCR_DED_MAX,4) */ INTO EDW.IA_SBSCR_DED_MAX
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P000
ORA-26026: unique index EDW.XPKIA_SBSCR_DED_MAX_A initially in unusable state
The index has been rebuilt but we still have this issue.
I can see the error in alert log like
2437312:ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P009
2437313:ORA-01502: index 'POS.XIETBK_POS_FACT_TRAN_DATE' or partition of such index is in unusable state
and tried to rebuild the index and i got following error.
ORA-14086: a partitioned index may not be rebuilt as a whole.
The table size for the index is large. we need to rebuild the hole index.
I am facing the error "ORA-01502: index or partition of such index is in unusable state " while loading the text data using
sql loader with direct path (direct = Y ,rows = 10000) option. Table consists an composite non unique index. If I query the dba indexes for the effected index it shows the index status as VALID. There was no maintaince done on the effected table or index. I have tried loading the same data using conventional path but didn't found any issues for the same.
after merging two partitions into single partition (partition is by list) of a table ,when i analyzed the table it is giving this error : ORA-01502 INDEX TEST.PK_ID or partition of such index is in unusable state.
View 7 Replies View Relatedora 20000 index partition in an unusable state. what can i do
View 6 Replies View RelatedWe have been recommended to store data in CLOD data type.
Sample data: 1:2:2000000:20000:4455:000099:444:099999:....etc it will grow to a large number.
We want to create a Unique index, for functional reason. Is it advised to create a unique index on a CLOB datatype?
why i encountered the error that the index became unusable.
View 2 Replies View Relatedsplitting a table partition without making its primary key index ar any other indexes unusable.
I think it is possible to do so 10g onwards.
DB Details:
Oracle RDBMS 11.2.0.3, HP-Ux B.11.31, OLTP
Using Oracle 11g, below is the table, partitions, unique and non-unique local index:
CREATE TABLE DOCA( DOCA_ID NUMBER NOT NULL , DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID NUMBER NULL , ROW_PURGE_DATE DATE NULL ,)PARTITION BY RANGE(ROW_PURGE_DATE)INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))( PARTITION P2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/01/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')), PARTITION P200801 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/02/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')),) TABLESPACE T0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX XPKDOCA ON DOCA( DOCA_ID ASC, ROW_PURGE_DATE ASC)LOCALREVERSE TABLESPACE I0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ADD CONSTRAINT XPKDOCA PRIMARY KEY (DOCA_ID); CREATE INDEX XFKDOCA_DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ON DOCA( DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ASC)LOCALREVERSETABLESPACE I0;
I would like to know the difference between the performance of the unique and non-unique local indexes?.
I made an Index Unused while doing some update by using sql developer right click 'Make unusealbe'. Now I need make it as useable.
marking as Usable. I have checked in all_indexes state is show as 'UNUSABLE'.
I have made one application form where users need to enter some data. This data is getting inserted in four tables. As in for now the data is properly getting saved and retrieved only for one user at a time. But problem arrives when more than one users are simultaneously making an entry and saving the data at one time.Same number is getting generated for the users who are saving the data at one time which should not happen.
View 4 Replies View Relatedshall we stop inserting data into a table before it inserting using Trigger?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a running application where i have a table with pk defined on it and the pk clumn is inde in asc order by default. Can i alter the index in desc order as i always need to see the data in desc order.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have created one unique index on one column of my table. Now i would like to add one more column in the same index without dropping the index.
SQL > CREATE TABLE DEBUG_TABLE
2 (
3 SLNO NUMBER,
4 MESSAGE VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
5 CREATED_DATE DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE,
6 CREATED_TIME TIMESTAMP(6) DEFAULT SYSDATE
7 );
Table created.
SQL > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_debug1 ON debug_table (SLNO);
Index created.
SQL > ALTER INDEX index_debug1 ADD COLUMN MESSAGE;
ALTER INDEX index_debug1 ADD COLUMN MESSAGE
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02243: invalid ALTER INDEX or ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW option
SQL >
I've got a table which has no unique identifier for a row. I have a field for an ID value but somhow there are duplicate values in this field.
Now I want to create an unique index over this field but therefore I have to remove the duplicate values.
So what I need is an update statement, maybe in a for each loop, which updates the ID field in each row starting with 1 and increasing the value.
In Informix there is a rowid value which is automatically set by Informix. But I think there´s no correspondent function/value in Oracle....
I have a table which sees a lot of use for queries
CREATE TABLE CASE_STAGE
(
ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
STAGE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
CASE_PHASE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
"CURRENT" NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
--and other columns
)
ID is a primary key
CASE_PHASE_ID is a foreign key
"CURRENT" should only ever have values of 0 or 1. When it has a value of 1 it is unique for that CASE_PHASE_ID
What I have tried that doesn't work is
create unique index case_stage_F_IDX1 on case_stage("CURRENT", case_Phase_id) which gives me
ORA-01452: cannot CREATE UNIQUE INDEX; duplicate keys found
What is the correct syntax, something like ("CURRENT"=1,case_phase_id) seems right but fails with an error about a missing bracket. Do I need to use a CASE statement here?
11.2.0.1...How do I create an index on a view or any workaround that my view won't get duplicates?
SQL> create unique index indx01 on db_backup_details_vw(id);
create unique index indx01 on db_backup_details_vw(id)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01702: a view is not appropriate here
I have following records in table (T)
Idtype_cdNbrDt
1A1001/1/2013
2A101Null
3B100Null
4C100Null
5A100Null
Based on the type-cd, I need to create Unique index on Nbr & Dt columns
In above record set, I want to create Unique index on type_cd=A and not on B&C (Here i expect duplictes for a combination of Nbr & Dt)
Can we create Unique index on subset of record?
I have a table with a non-unique index consisting of three columns. The first column is not null while the remaining two are nullable. Queries using this index will chiefly be made in two ways.
1. Column one and two having values. Column three is null.
2. Column one and thre having values. Column two is null.
In both cases I expect range scan will be used since it's non-unique. In the first case the scan will be on values in column one and two. But what happens in case two. Will the range be on colum one, column two(being null) and cxolumn three? Or will it be on just column one since the second column is null? I have done some testing. I can see , using EXPLAN PLAN, that range scan is used in both cases. how the index is used?
Is there any other drawbacks with an index like this?
I'm having problem with my database, which contains more than 1 rows with a same value on a field that has uniqueness contraint.
Here is the log from sqlplus. When I select on RI field, it shows 2 rows. But when I select on SCNUM field, it shows only 1 row. This SCNUM has an unique index on it.
And it is still in VALID state
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> select ri, scnum from scratch1_p where ri in (536964983, 536955574);
select ri from scratch1_p where scnum='444393975';
RI SCNUM
---------- ----------
536955574 444393975
[code].....
Is there any hint to force "Index Unique Scan" over "Index Range Scan".
My query is generating different plans with the above two, and very slow when it uses "Index Range Scan".
What should be the order of columns while creating b-tree non-unique index.
Low cardinality first
or
Hight cardinality first
I have one indexed column in a table.for performance improval purpose i created index to that column .
my doubt is..it may decrease the performance while inserting data into that column?
I am unable to add the rows even after using initially deferred deferrable constraint.
My Queries are as follows:-
SQL> create table chicken (cid int primary key,eid int);
Table created.
SQL> create table egg (eid int primary key,cid int);
Table created.
SQL> alter table egg add constraint eggREFchicken foreign key (cid) references chicken(cid) initially deferred deferrable;
Table altered.
SQL> alter table chicken add constraint chickenREFegg foreign key (eid) references egg(eid) initially deferred deferrable;
Table altered.
SQL> insert into egg values(1,2);
insert into egg values(1,2)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02291: integrity constraint (SCOTT.EGGREFCHICKEN) violated - parent key not found
why it is not inserting even after doing initially deferred deferrable. I am using SQL Plus to run Queries.
I want to know if there is any reflection on the standby database states when it's primary is down or not reachable? I want to use this information from standby node to determine if I can programmatically execute (dgmgrl) failover operation or not? This is considering that the broker configuration has no fast-start failover and no observer enabled/configured.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to add a new column in a table and insert data from another column of same table.
alter table POSITION add INT_MK_DATA_ID number(10,0) null;
update POSITION set INT_MK_DATA_ID = INST_MARKET_DATA_ID;
commit
As there are huge number of records in the POSITION table ...its taking for ever to execute this query.
I have two tables
table1
col1.....................................col2
primary key................ foreign key refer to col2 in tab2
table2
col1 ........................................... col2
foreign key refer to col1 in tab1 ............ primary key
now my question is how to insert data in to the two tables
I have a table in oracle sql developer showing years, IDs and attendance etc I'm wanting to create a report based on this table but have encountered a problem with the years.
The years currently run from 2006 to 2009 and the problem is that some of the IDs are only present for say 2007 and 2008, thus leaving nothing for 2006 and 09. This in turn creates problems in the report.
What i would like to do is in the table, for each ID that is missing any years, is to insert a single row with just the ID and year so that in the report it will show a blank instead of nothing at all. So for the above example i would have numbers for 2007 and 2008 and for 2006 and 2009 there would just be a space.
I am inserting XMLTYPE data using DBLINK I am getting the following error.
INSERT INTO APSP.SALES_HISTORY@APSP_LINK
SELECT * FROM KMBS.SALES_HISTORY
ORA-22804: remote operations not permitted on object tables or user-defined type columns
Source table structure
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
SC_NO NOT NULL NUMBER(25)
LT_DATE TIMESTAMP(6)
METHOD XMLTYPE
Target table structure(another DB)
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
SC_NO NOT NULL NUMBER(25)
LT_DATE TIMESTAMP(6)
METHOD XMLTYPE
how to insert XMLTYPE data using DBLINK.
create table stg1(x number, y number);
create table stg2(x number, y number);
create table stg(x number, y number);
I want to insert data from stg1, stg2 into stg
Instead of writing two insert statements, I want to write only one in a for loop to insert data into stg from stg1 and stg2
I tried this
begin
for i in 1..2 loop
insert into stg(x,y) select stgi.x, stgi.y from stgi;
end loop;
end;
it gives me table does not exist error:
so by stgi, i mean it should take stg1, stg2 etc