I have a simple question, but i can't resolve it.
I have a table like this :
ID_A | VALUE
-------------
A 1
A 2
B 1
B 2
B 3
C 1
C 3
D 1
I need to fid the unique ID that match perfectly VALUE = 1 or 2.
I tried SOME/ANY/ALL/IN
Create a function which will indicate if a given record in a table is unique or not. Unique means the data is occurring only once in the entire table.
Function should be in this signature
function IS_UNIQUE (tableName in varchar2,tableAttribute in varchar2)
return number
.....
begin
//logic to check if given data is unique
return 0; //return 0 if data is unique
else
return 1; //return 1 if data is duplicate
end;
Once I run this query
select attribute1 from table1 where IS_UNIQUE(table1,attribute1)=0
All records of attribute1 which are unique need to be fetched. Similarly, select attribute1 from table1 where IS_UNIQUE(table1,attribute1)=1 should return all records of attribute1 which are duplicates.
In literal terms, I'm interested in two fields, I'll call them Field A and Field B. I want to find all situations where a single unique value of Field A has both values Z AND X in Field B (not either or, but both together).
To go into some detail -
I need to make a query that finds ONLY occurrences where one employee id has a certain set of values together (without going into specifics, I'll say PermissionA, PermissionB, PermissionC). I can easily make a query that returns all user id's and all permissions belonging to them, and I can use criteria to filter the results to Permission A B and C only so as to exclude other permissions from getting returned (since there are hundreds),
however my objective is to get ONLY results where the same employee ID has all of those permissions (not just any one or two of the three). However, I don't want to have any criteria that limits the employee ID (I want to search all employee id's, and get a list of those with permissions a and b and c, not just any combination thereof, but all of them). I'm currently able to organize the output using a pivot table by employee id > role,
so that I can easily look at each employee and the roles they have, but I want to undertake a project that will involve searching a much larger number of employees (a # that makes it impractical for me to look through the list, I need to have a query that limits the results to the combinations that I'm looking for, as in this example - permission a b and c together).
I have two tables as per attachement - TABLE_A has Vehicle details while TABLE_B has Address details:
I am trying to build a query in order to link the Vehicle Details with their Address Details.
I would require an SQL that links records in TABLE_A with records in TABLE_B when group_number are the same; however links with group_number '999' (for the same customer_number) if there are no exact matches.
SELECT A.*,B.*
FROM TABKE_A A, TABLE_B B
WHERE ((A.CUSTOMER_NUMBER = B.CUSTOMER_NUMBER AND A.GROUP_NUMBER = B.GROUP_NUMBER)
OR (A.CUSTOMER_NUMBER = B.CUSTOMER_NUMBER AND A.GROUP_NUMBER = '999'))
The only problem with such query is that record in TABLE_A with group_number '456' will return 2 times. One with address having group_number '456' and one with group_number '999'.
Select * from XXX where xxx.a in �123,456�-----> this values comes dynamic to my query.
Here xxx.a will contain values like 123 or 456 like that .
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0
==============================================
SQL> select * from books_cat;
ID CAT QRY
---------- -------------------- --------------------------------------------------
141 Oracle {Oracle} OR {RDBMS}
142 Russia {Russia} OR {Russian}
SQL> select id, file_desc from books;
[code]....
I am learning Oracle Text and created the above routine to check whether Russia/Russian appears in the OracleTextDeveloper.txt file (text version of the standard Oracle documentation - B28303-03).
Some more information: -
DBMS_METADATA.GET_DDL('INDEX','IDCTXR_BOOKS_CAT')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE INDEX "READER"."IDCTXR_BOOKS_CAT" ON "READER"."BOO
KS_CAT" ("QRY")
INDEXTYPE IS "CTXSYS"."CTXRULE"
SQL> select token_text, token_type from dr$idctxr_books_cat$i;
[code]....
i have three tables ot_cut_head,ot_cut_det and om_mc_master based on which fourth table ot_cut_opr and fifth table ot_cut_mc must get populated , Conditions are as follows
first one is based on job_no in ot_cut_head the selection criteria will be filtered,if the job number is like '%M' then type MISC will be chosen ,if job number is '%G' then GRAT TYPE will be picked from om_mc_master (Machine Master) and operations and machines based on this will be filtered.
Second all the cd_ps_desc will be taken from ot_cut_det and will be compared with om_mc_master to get their corresponding operation codes and machine codes , there can be 2 operations or 1 operation.
Finally if the match is found record will be inserted into ot_cut_opr and ot_cut_mc ,based on the criterias and what i want is the search criteria to be more flexible and if there are 2 operations 2 rows will be inserted and if one opeation is defined in om_mc_master ,then only one record will be inserted.
We have to make sure that if based on operation number stage will be populated ,if its first operation then stage will be 1 and if its second operation the stage will be 2.like previous operation also depends on them , the second operation will have the previous operation as first operation and so on.
CREATE TABLE om_mc_master ( mc_type VARCHAR2(12),mc_prof VARCHAR2(30),mc_prep_cd1 VARCHAR2(30),mc_mach_cd1 VARCHAR2
(30),mc_prep_cd2 VARCHAR2(30),mc_mach_cd2 VARCHAR2(30));
INSERT INTO OM_MC_MASTER VALUES ('MISC','TEE SCH','IR','HO','RE','HO');
insert into om_mc_master values('MISC','Vertical Brace','R','HM','I','HO');
insert into om_mc_master values('MISC','Pipe','IR','HO',NULL,NULL);
INSERT INTO OM_MC_MASTER VALUES ('GRAT','PL','RE','HO',NULL,NULL);
SQL> SELECT * FROM OM_MC_MASTER;
[code]....
Using Oracle 11g, below is the table, partitions, unique and non-unique local index:
CREATE TABLE DOCA( DOCA_ID NUMBER NOT NULL , DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID NUMBER NULL , ROW_PURGE_DATE DATE NULL ,)PARTITION BY RANGE(ROW_PURGE_DATE)INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))( PARTITION P2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/01/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')), PARTITION P200801 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/02/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')),) TABLESPACE T0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX XPKDOCA ON DOCA( DOCA_ID ASC, ROW_PURGE_DATE ASC)LOCALREVERSE TABLESPACE I0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ADD CONSTRAINT XPKDOCA PRIMARY KEY (DOCA_ID); CREATE INDEX XFKDOCA_DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ON DOCA( DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ASC)LOCALREVERSETABLESPACE I0;
I would like to know the difference between the performance of the unique and non-unique local indexes?.
i am using one query which should return unique value. I have one table that has one column punch date datatype is date.
here value is stored in two rows that is
1. 24-10-12
2. 24-10-12
and my query is this:
SELECT distinct(PunchDate) FROM Trans_RawProcessDailyData ORDER BY PunchDate ASC;
but still getting two values.
Can a table conatin composite Alternate key which is not unique for each record in that table i.e combination of these columns have unique values which are repeated for one or more rows in that table.
View 8 Replies View RelatedFrom a step by step instructions I'm asked to put the following into sql*plus:
CREATE TABLE Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO VarCHAR2(10) NOT NULL,
title VARCHAR2(3),
fName VARCHAR2(30),
[code]...
Then the following:
INSERT INTO Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO, title, fName, lName, streetAddress, suburb, city, postCode, country, lecturerLevel, bankNO, bankName, salary, workLoad, researchArea)
VALUES
('1000', 'Dr', 'Johanna','Santoso',
'3 Robinson Av', 'Kew', 'Melbourne', '3080', 'Australia', 'C', '1000567237', 'CommBank', 65000.00,1.0, 'O-R DB');
and finally,
INSERT INTO Lab2Lecturer
(staffNO, title, fName, lName, streetAddress, suburb, city, postCode,country, lecturerLevel, BankNO,bankName, salary, workLoad, researchArea)
VALUES
('1000', 'Dr', 'Justine', 'Martin', '6 Algorithm AV', 'Montmorency', 'Melbourne', '3089', 'Australia', 'D', '1000123456', 'CommBank', 89000.00, 1.0, 'CBR');
when I try entering in the second one I get an error 'unique constraint violated'.So whats wrong exactly?
I have a running application where i have a table with pk defined on it and the pk clumn is inde in asc order by default. Can i alter the index in desc order as i always need to see the data in desc order.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have created one unique index on one column of my table. Now i would like to add one more column in the same index without dropping the index.
SQL > CREATE TABLE DEBUG_TABLE
2 (
3 SLNO NUMBER,
4 MESSAGE VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
5 CREATED_DATE DATE DEFAULT SYSDATE,
6 CREATED_TIME TIMESTAMP(6) DEFAULT SYSDATE
7 );
Table created.
SQL > CREATE UNIQUE INDEX index_debug1 ON debug_table (SLNO);
Index created.
SQL > ALTER INDEX index_debug1 ADD COLUMN MESSAGE;
ALTER INDEX index_debug1 ADD COLUMN MESSAGE
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-02243: invalid ALTER INDEX or ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW option
SQL >
I have a table called pf_stock_txns which just stores all of a clients transactions
If I do select distinct(client_id) from pf_stock_txns then I get back a unqiue list of all clients.
However, I need a query that will give me the first transaction for every unqiue client.
I have data like this:
a1 a2 a3 a4
ABC ABC xx zz
ABC xx mm mm
fg ui ok pl
I want to give them unique codes like :
Code for column
a1 Code1
ABCC-1
ABCC-1
fg C-2
then column
a2 Code2
ABC C-1
xxC-3
uiC-4
then column
a3 Code3
xxC-3
mmC-5
okC-6
then column
a4 Code4
zzC-7
mmC-5
plC-8
I can add these `columns in the table Code1 , Code2 etc columns to update.
I've got a table which has no unique identifier for a row. I have a field for an ID value but somhow there are duplicate values in this field.
Now I want to create an unique index over this field but therefore I have to remove the duplicate values.
So what I need is an update statement, maybe in a for each loop, which updates the ID field in each row starting with 1 and increasing the value.
In Informix there is a rowid value which is automatically set by Informix. But I think there´s no correspondent function/value in Oracle....
I need a "solution", guidance to a problem I have to solve. I have different letters with a value associate to it like
A:10, B:20, ..., G:250 and I have a Target to reach TARGET= 90
and I need to find among all letters I have which combination is equal or closest to my target.
A:10
B:20
C:20
D:20
E:30
F:40
G:250
IF there is more than one solution possible, the first found is perfect. With my example I can reach 90 with different combinations:
A+B+C+F
A+B+D+F
A+C+D+F
B+C+D+E
B+E+F
C+E+F
D+E+F
To complicate the things I have up to 10 different letters that need to combine to match my target. If there is no combination that exactly match my target, the closest higher combination is picked.
Is there a way to generate a unique identifier(length 8), which can contain numbers (0-9) and letters(a-z) in pl/sql or sql ?
Note :- in oracle 9i.
I have a problem .I have a oracle table its column count more then 500 . I want unique values of each column and insert one table.
View 44 Replies View RelatedMy DB version is
BANNER
----------------------------------------------------------------
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
These error codes I'm getting in production.First of all, I've no duplicates present in that table for which this error has been raised.I've checked the index and related columns as well. NO DATA is there.So NO CHANCE for unique constraint violation.
SELECT * FROM ORDER_OCC_REQUISITION_X_REF WHERE LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST_ID IN(SELECT LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST_ID FROM LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST WHERE LAB_ORDER_OCC_ID = 7944858);
no rows selected
Now when I'm trying to insert one row inside this table I'm getting this error, as you are seeing no records for this occurrence_id.
SELECT * FROM USER_INDEXES WHERE INDEX_NAME = 'ORD_OCC_REQ_UQ_TEST_IX_04';
--ORDER_OCC_REQUISITION_X_REF (Table name)
--MERGE_DT, LAB_ORDER_OCC_TEST_ID, TEST_ID, ACTIVE_YN (columns for the index 'ORD_OCC_REQ_UQ_TEST_IX_04')
As you can see there is no data then this error should not be raised. Update procedure.
/*******************************************************************************************************************
* Name : UPDATE_REQUISITION_X_REF
* Description : This Procedure update ORDER_OCC_REQUISITION_X_REF table with requisition_id
* that was generated due to merge process.
* In parameters : IN_merge_id NUMBER The order_ref_no of the orders to be merged (comma seperated)
***********************************************************************************************************************/
PROCEDURE UPDATE_REQUISITION_X_REF ( IN_merge_id IN TT_ORD_REQUISITION_WORK_AREA.merge_id%TYPE)
IS
[Code]....
Oracle Database Version is 10g ( 10.2.0.4.0)
I have two table emp_perm & employee.
1) Table emp_perm is a lookup table with 2 columns, temp VARCHAR2 & perm VARCHAR2.
Table emp_perm have below data in it:-
temp perm
1064885 0349034
0099982 7399982
6476456 9170346
5252525 52525252)
Now table employee might have following combinations of rows.
Records for both Temps file (1064885) and perm file number (0349034) does exist in employee table, in this case Delete Temp File Number records i.e. 1064885 and keep Permanent File Number (0349034) records as it is.
Records for only temp file number(0099982) does exists and corresponding perm file(7399982) does not exists in employee table in this case convert these records i.e. update 0099982 with its perm file number 7399982 using lookup table emp_perm.
Records for only perm file number exists (9170346) and corresponding temp file number (6476456) does not then do not amend employee table, as we are interested in perm file numbers.
If file number does exist in lookup table in emp_perm and both of them are equal (5252525) then do not amend employee table as temp and per file number are same.
How to replace uniqueidentifier in PL/SQL ,I have query like this,
@EmployeeID uniqueidentifier = NULL.
I have contents like below:
BREAD,BISCUIT
BREAD,MILK,BISCUIT
COKE,MILK
MILK,SUGAR
Now combination from each row will be like below (Just for understanding):
BREAD,BISCUIT --> [COMBINATION] {BISCUIT} {BREAD} {BISCUIT,BREAD}
BREAD,MILK,BISCUIT --> [COMBINATION] {BISCUIT} {BREAD} {MILK} {BISCUIT,BREAD} {BISCUIT,MILK} {BREAD,MILK} {BISCUIT,BREAD,MILK}
COKE,MILK --> [COMBINATION] {COKE} {MILK} {COKE,MILK}
MILK,SUGAR --> [COMBINATION] {MILK} {SUGAR} {MILK,SUGAR}
Now the ultimate aim is to find unique combinations (even if the same combination is present in different rows, we have to consider it as one combination), along with its frequency, result will be like below:
BISCUIT [occurence in 2 transactions and total 4 transactions] = 2/4 = .5
BREAD [occurence in 2 transactions and total 4 transactions] = 2/4 = .5
COKE [occurence in 1 transactions and total 4 transactions] = 2/4 = .25
MILK = 3/4 = .75
[Code]....
writing query to find unique combination like above? What I have tried is as below:
create table test (row_no number, col_no number, item varchar2(50))
/
insert into test values (1,1,'BREAD');
insert into test values (1,2,'BISCUIT');
insert into test values (2,1,'BREAD');
[Code]....
But I am not able to form the exact query. let me know if this can't be done through a single query.
Our RMAN backup failed because of the error:
starting full resync of recovery catalog
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-00569: =============== ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===============
RMAN-00571: ===========================================================
RMAN-03002: failure of backup command at 08/22/2011 22:19:07
RMAN-03014: implicit resync of recovery catalog failed
RMAN-03009: failure of full resync command on default channel at 08/22/2011 22:19:07
ORA-00001: unique constraint (ODBA.DF_U2) violated
Searching metalink, its related to bug 6014994 and the proposed workaround is to delete the constraint:
Cause:
Dropping a datafile from a tablespace followed immediately by adding
another datafile to the same tablespace will cause this Unique Key violation.
Taking a RMAN debug trace will show the file# related to the error
This is reported as bug <<6014994>> Unpublished on Metalink and fixed in 11g
RMAN RESYNC catalog signals DF_U2 violated constraint when a file# is reused in
the same tablespace
Solution
WORKAROUND: Drop df_u2 constraint
where can I delete the constraint, is it possible to do in RMAN or in the target instance?
I've set up Oracle Streams replication between multiple N-way zones like this:
CODE------------------------------
Nway1 |Intersect| Nway2
DB1 --|-- DB3 --|-- DB5 DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4 - N-way1
| | | | | DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6 - N-way2
DB2 --|-- DB4 --|-- DB6 DB3, DB4 - intersection zone
| |
-------------------------------
Physically DB1 .... DBN connected sequentially, so I want to prevent segmentation if some DB is unaccessible, but at the same time fight unneeded redundancy which uses too much link bandwidth to send N-1 LCR-s to all members of a single N-way group (so I want to split one big N-way zone into smaller ones and sequentially connect them into chain - it significantly reduces load on link if N is big enough (>10)). Also I want to have 2 DB in intersection zone to prevent single point of failure.
This scheme has one drawback - if change originated on DB3 or DB4, then it will be propagated (more correctly - applied and captured again) to DB5 and DB6 by both DB1 and DB2 (and, as far as I know, I have no means in capture rules to detect state of DB2 from DB1 and vise versa), so on DB5 and DB6 I get:
CODEORA-00001: unique constraint (DUMMYUSR.UNIQUE_RECORDS) violated error
I've set up standard conflict handler for apply process:
CODE
declare
cols DBMS_UTILITY.NAME_ARRAY;
begin
cols(1) := 'no';
cols(2) := 'name';
cols(3) := 'ddate';
dbms_apply_adm.set_update_conflict_handler(
object_name => 'DUMMYUSR.DUMMYTBL',
method_name => 'DISCARD',
resolution_column => 'no',
column_list => cols
);
end;
but it seems that it does not handle uniqueness conflicts. What is the best way to handle uniqueness conflict (is there a better way than to write custom error handler) and how serious is the impact on insert performance of having unique constraint and corresponding error handler. (In real world I will have to deal with tables with metainformation and without any keys).
Also, how to proceed with no error or raise exception from apply error handler with error that caused this handler to run? In oracle docs I can find only example that modifies LCR and runs lcr.EXECUTE(TRUE), but what to do if I don't want to reexecute LCR, but merely check error code and propagate error if it is not ORA-00001?
I have a table which sees a lot of use for queries
CREATE TABLE CASE_STAGE
(
ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
STAGE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
CASE_PHASE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL,
"CURRENT" NUMBER(1) NOT NULL,
--and other columns
)
ID is a primary key
CASE_PHASE_ID is a foreign key
"CURRENT" should only ever have values of 0 or 1. When it has a value of 1 it is unique for that CASE_PHASE_ID
What I have tried that doesn't work is
create unique index case_stage_F_IDX1 on case_stage("CURRENT", case_Phase_id) which gives me
ORA-01452: cannot CREATE UNIQUE INDEX; duplicate keys found
What is the correct syntax, something like ("CURRENT"=1,case_phase_id) seems right but fails with an error about a missing bracket. Do I need to use a CASE statement here?
Let's say we have Table - A and we would like to replicate specific row transaction to Table B.
Here are the rows in *Table A*
Time: Lets say 15:00
A1 Just Updated @15:00
A2 Just inserted @15:01
A3
B1 - Daily Delete Row -i.e just deleted a while back - Non scheduled process --executed by application @15:02
B2 -
B3 - Daily Delete Row - i.e just deleted a while back -- Non Schduled process --executed by application @15:05
B4 - Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
B5 - Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
B6 -Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
Current Data in Table B (Before Replication)
@15:00
A1 (without updates)
A3
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
Expected rows in Table B (via replication/snapshot/materialized view / or any other method)
*Replication at 15:30*
Table B - Read Only
Expected rows after replication-
A1 -- Newly updated details
A2 -- Newly inserted row
A3
B1 - Daily delete row is expected to be replicated
B2
B3 - Daily delete row is expected to be replicated
***Note row B4 is not expected to be replicated to table B.
Questions:
1) How can we get updates, inserts and daily deletes replicated while ignore large purges?
2) How can large purge changes be reflected in replicated tables as well without deleting daily deletes?
I have faced an error as below:-
1 : 23000 : java.sql.BatchUpdateException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SDS1.PK_EXP_TXT) violated
1 : 23000 : java.sql.SQLException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SDS1.PK_EXP_TXT) violated
java.sql.BatchUpdateException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SDS1.PK_EXP_TXT) violated
at oracle.jdbc.driver.DatabaseError.throwBatchUpdateException(DatabaseError.java:367)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OraclePreparedStatement.executeBatch(OraclePreparedStatement.java:9119)
[Code] ......
After i check data in all_indexes table, i have found some old data which are belongs to 2008 and 2009. The sample as below:-
OWNER INDEX_NAME LAST_ANALYZED
SDS1PK_ACTION 31-OCT-09 07:04:49
SDS1AK_ACTION 31-OCT-09 07:04:49
SDS1PK_COND 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
SDS1AK_COND 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
SDS1COND_FK1 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
SDS1COND_FK2 31-OCT-09 07:04:50
is it the problem due to the old data not remove from the all_indexes table ?.. if YES is it I have to delete the old data manually from the all_indexes table ?
what is difference between primary key and unique+not null
View 12 Replies View RelatedI need a query to get the below.
Source :
select * from test;
LVL
1
2
3
1
2
3
4
Output:
LVLSEQ
11
21
31
12
22
32
42
I need above to uniquely identify the set of data.