I have a table called pf_stock_txns which just stores all of a clients transactions
If I do select distinct(client_id) from pf_stock_txns then I get back a unqiue list of all clients.
However, I need a query that will give me the first transaction for every unqiue client.
Is it possible for me as a DBA to find IP address of the client who ran a specific transaction or query in past?
Oracle server version I'm using is 11g.
am using oracle 10g
and i want to retrieve IP address for client who do the transaction
and i try to using some selects like select terminal from v4session but it return the IP for application server
so i think to use commands ipconfig
how can i call windows commands by oracle
I want to use SSIS,when i use oracle 10g as a data source to SQL Server 2008 as Destination, it gives error ora-01017 invalid username/password logon denied, i did normal oracle installation and give full privileges(sysdba or sysoper) to the user(sys,system...),when i check connection it shows test connection succeeded but when click on next it gives above error.
View 3 Replies View RelatedUsing Oracle 11g, below is the table, partitions, unique and non-unique local index:
CREATE TABLE DOCA( DOCA_ID NUMBER NOT NULL , DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID NUMBER NULL , ROW_PURGE_DATE DATE NULL ,)PARTITION BY RANGE(ROW_PURGE_DATE)INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))( PARTITION P2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/01/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')), PARTITION P200801 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/02/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')),) TABLESPACE T0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX XPKDOCA ON DOCA( DOCA_ID ASC, ROW_PURGE_DATE ASC)LOCALREVERSE TABLESPACE I0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ADD CONSTRAINT XPKDOCA PRIMARY KEY (DOCA_ID); CREATE INDEX XFKDOCA_DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ON DOCA( DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ASC)LOCALREVERSETABLESPACE I0;
I would like to know the difference between the performance of the unique and non-unique local indexes?.
Having PL/SQL procedure and calling sys dba procedure to alter rollback segment to online and after that to set the transaction to this rollback. The rollback altered to online but transaction still running on available rollback and not the one I was meant to. The user have executing grant on the sys dba procedure.
View 21 Replies View Relatedwhat is autonomous transaction
View 8 Replies View Relatedapplication was not starting due to some pending transaction in database.Pending transactions were rolled back by DBA team.To avoid such situations what I thought was, having a job that will call a procedure that will monitor table status everyday and will send the mail. Now that job is working fine for no pending transactions in DBA_PENDING_TRANSACTIONS.
But now I am in doubt if someday there are PENDING TRANSACTIONs in the table DBA_PENDING_TRANSACTIONS, will SELECT * FROM DBA_ PENDING_ TRANSACTIONs query will work as normal or this whole process of monitoring table and sending mail will work fine?
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE10.2.0.4.0Production
TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
We are running a code through informatica and are frequently getting the ORA-08007. The error and the code causing it are mentioned below. (The '?' implies a variable which is supplied by informatica). The source is a flat file.
ORA-08007: Further changes to this block by this transaction not allowed
UPDATE table_20
SET capxuser = ?,
capxtimestamp = ?,
capxaction = ?,
[code]...
1. Tried initially by reducing the commit interval to commit at 100 rows. But still getting the same error.
2. DBA has installed the patch # 6790768. But it still fails.
I hv a situation where a webservice interacts with the database.
Here the webservice will first make a request to database for some operation but i dont want the database to commit changes in first request itself. A response will be sent to webservice further a second request will be sent to database for committing the changes. So can that be done?
I want Query on this table. EXAMPLE TABLE:
SENDER RECEIVER AMOUNT
A B 1000
B C 2000
A D 3000
C A 3000
B A 4000
A B 5000
A B 1000
B C 2000
C A 3000
B A 4000
A B 5000
A C 10000
Dynamically I am giving user name A. I want to retrieve the data how much money user B taken from user A and how much money user B given to A lly for C and D.
CONDITION: I want to retrieve the records of 2 way transaction that means user A sent money to user B and user B must sent money to user A. I don't want one way transaction records i.e user A sent money to D but user A didn't get money from user D like this records.
OUTPUT LIKE:
USER MONEY_TAKEN_FROM_A MONEY_GIVEN_TO_A
B 12000 8000
C 10000 6000
procedure1
inser...
update....
delete...
insert...
update..
delete..
end procedure1;
i want save the transaction for specific stmt how do i do it
Query in format Query@DB_Link is sometimes dropping transactions. Move it to a package on target dababase "B" called from DATABASE "A" via package.procedure(varaibles);
Is that all I need to do to get the transaction to always go? I tried a commit in the package body, with repeated attempts if it fails. Btu when I use commit, the package doesn't work. (Compiles fine) Why would the commit fail?
My goal is to make that the transaction succeeds.Code for what I tried below. the COMMIT is commented out - if I uncomment it, the transaction fails. I have done this before calling an oracle SP from SQLServer and it worked
Comments:
The loop is to avoid an endless cycle..The concept is to perform the update, commit it, if the commit fails, rollback and try again.I'm not sure if I even need a loop, but I don't know if the unresolved transaction would get fixed by the remote DB, or dropped.
PROCEDURE BTC_UpdatePart
(
vPart_ID varchar2,
vEngineering_Mstr varchar2,
vCommodity_code varchar2,
vDef_orig_country varchar2,
vDescription varchar2,
[code]...
I have a job which runs the procedure below concurrently in 4 different sessions; It updates two tables.
PROCEDURE UPDATE_TAB_1_AND_TAB_2( traceIdTab IN pl_sql table,
individualIdTab IN pl_sql table,
fileSeqIdTab IN pl_sql table,
[Code].....
Each session is passed a sequence generated file ID; so the records processed in each session are completely different.
However, everytime this job runs, without failure, ONLY TWO sessions process concurrently, while the other two sessions are blocked. Once the first two have finished, then the remaining two sessions start work.
I have being monitoring the sessions on each run daily, and realized that the first two sessions processing are each holding a transaction exclusive lock on objects; hence blocking the other two sessions.
When I tried to find the objects that the two running sessions have a lock on, I cant seem to find anything by searching DBA_OBJECTS.object_id. However, when I look for the objects that are being waited on, its either a partitioned table or a partitioned index on either table_1 or table_2.
At first, I thought it was an ITL lock and after much analysis, I did not find anything which definitely pointed to an ITL lock. However, just to make sure, I increased the INITTRANS value from 2 to 5, but the problem did not go away.
At this point, I have applied all I know to understand the origin of the TX lock and how I can work around this situation, and decided to ask higher powers in Oracle for advise.
I am working with an oracle table that is populated by a trigger on another table.. So Table A is an audit of table B. The trigger also uses sysdate to populate a modification Date column on the Audit table.
I was using this modification Date column in a query interface to get changes that happened on the main table after a certain date/time.
The problem is that there is an application that uses transactions to write to table B and sometime this transaction may not be committed for over a minute so the modification Date is not a reliable way to query the table for changes after a certain time.
Is there a way to update the trigger/create a new one where the sysdate that gets written to the audit table is from when the transaction is committed, not when the transaction starts?
A Java program would call a sequence of 5 PLSQL procedures, and they all need to participates the Tranasction defined in Java.
What do I do for the transactions inside PLSQL to ensure all 5 pariticpate in the Java transaction? I suppose I just do not specify any COMMIT in the PLSQL, but that probably would not work as PLSQL would COMMIT by default after exiting the proc?
I have approximately 1200 transaction to be updated to a master table. There are other columns in the master table but only one column is being updated. I would like to use sqlloader if possible or any other efficient means. Those 1200 record is stored in an excel spreadsheet. The col1 of the excel spreadsheet have to match col1 of the master table inorder for update col2 from the excel spreadsheet. Here is an example of the data. My operation system is HPUX and database is Oracle 10g.
Master table
col1 col2 col3 col 4
4238 susan 56e
5879 h698c rich 12g
7091 joyce 34b
0876 mike 25n
7501 k956b robert 87c
9498 angela 67r
3645 doris 92y
excel spreadsheet
col1 col2
9498 a784r
3645 a784r
4238 a784r
7091 a784r
0876 a784r
There is a transaction table which becomes very slow after 3-4 months in spite on regular weekly analyze and index recreation.
But once we drop the constraint (PK) and recreate it again it becomes ok. The same doesn't happen even when we rebuild the index.
in oracle transaction table /temporary table /at the time of movement data insert
how to handle these table in merge no primary key
What is the syntax to write an insert statement which will commit the transaction by it self,not using an exclusive commit statement after wards.
View 2 Replies View RelatedConsider a situation:
There are two users 'A' and 'B'
account number of A: 001234
account number of B: 002678
Suppose, if A wants to transfer $1500 to B's account
update cust_acc
set balance = balance - 1500
where
account_no = '001234';
[code]....
Assume that, oracle crashes somewhere between first commit and second commit.In this case, A's total money is deducted by $1500..But $1500 is not yet transferred to B's account.How will oracle keep track of these information?
db 10.2.0.4
select * from DBA_2PC_PENDING shows pending transactions in prepared state.
How can I know the resources (e.g. tables) locked by these transactions?
what executable statements in PL/SQL mean? My objectives are:
1)Writing Executable Statements
2)Create PL/SQL executable blocks using DML and transaction control
I have to explain what exactly each is and what should come under it. what kind of statements and what should be covered under executable statements?
sql statement to query a transaction table that stores transactions of items bought from my organisation.The report i would like to generate is one that lists the items bought and this should be grouped month by month.
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe actual flow, works on this way:
The Procedure A extracts and filter some data from the DW, this data is stored on the Global Temporary Table. Another Procedure, named B, use the data from the Global Temporary Table and store it on a normal table using another procedure Named X that Merge the data from Global Temporary against the Normal Table (inserting if not exist and updating some fields if exist).
(X isn´t important on the new flow)
Now, i need to add some steps on the normal flow:
The Procedure A extracts and filter some data from the DW, this data is stored on the Global Temporary Table. Another Procedure, named B, use the data from the Global Temporary Table and store it on a normal table. Using the Data from Global Temporary Teble i must to Store some fields on another normal table, for this i use another Procedure named C that merge the data from Global Temporary Table against the data from normal table, and i must to commit at this point. X Merge the data from Global Temporary Table and the data from the Normal table con the procedure "C" against another Normal Table (inserting if not exist and updating if exist).
The issue that i´m expecting is that i can´t use "C" for merge and commit, because this truncate the data on the global temporary table. I can´t change the on commit delete rows option, because another procedures are using this Global Temporary Table on production.
Before you ask, i try using AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION on "C" and didn´t works because "C" can´t found data on the Global Temporary table ( i use a select count on "C" from Global Temporary), this is because The Autonomous_Transaction (i think). So, what i can do? I tried to trace the session Number on C and A and with the AT is the same ( so isn´t session change problem).
I need:Commit on the Procedure "C" without Truncating Global Temporary Table because i need this data for X.
How can we see the history of transactions on a table.
For eg, If I have a table called TEST123, I would like to know whatever SQLs fired on that table on today.
Is it possible to create autonomous transaction in anonymous block.
find the below code, when I am trying to execute I am getting error
CREATE TABLE EMP (EMPNO NUMBER(4) NOT NULL,
ENAME VARCHAR2(10),
JOB VARCHAR2(9),
MGR NUMBER(4),
HIREDATE DATE,
SAL NUMBER(7, 2),
[code].....
I need to identify a due date for a transaction (date) that should be completed within 15 working days from the date of the transaction date. For example, a request is submitted on Wednesday, December 29th 2010. This request should be then 'answered' on Thursday, January 20th 2011 at the latest.
I have a table that identify the status of every calendar day between 1960 to 2060; fields are: calendar day, calendar year, ..., day of week, week day flag, holiday flag.
In my example above, January 1st and 2nd are weekend days and Monday, January 3rd is an holiday.
How do I go getting all (calendar day + 15 working days) for all days of the year?
Submitting transaction / master data through API without exposing DB credentials...I am developing a scenario where I will submit transaction / master data like sales order / master item to Oracle apps (EBS) through MS Excel via API / interface table but like to provide only apps (EBS) user credentials rather then DB credentials so DB password could not expose to normal end user.
View 1 Replies View RelatedOur client is having requirements that data should be encrypted through-out the process (from transaction level to backup level).
Requirements are as below -
1) Data should be encrypted and can be access only through application (through front end).
2) Even if pl/sql, sql installed, developer user cannot able to fetch data from database.
3) Even DBA, should not have access to fetch the data from the database.
4) Only assigned DBA, should fetch details from database (provided he/she should have details of database as well as application's user / password).
5) It should be restricted by ip and user details (such as ip of application server with user/password of user).
6) Changes should be purely done from database level only.