I have this SQL that returns the correct amount of rows which should be 2:
Select Distinct A.File_Name, A.File_Desc, A.file_location,
A.location_date, A.downloaded_date, A.downloaded_id, A.file_size,
A.days_to_request, B.File_Name, B.Act_Date, B.date_loaded
from SDT_LOG A Inner Join ACTIVITY_LOG B
On A.file_name = B.file_name
and A.downloaded_date = B.date_loaded
I need to add another field in the Select query which is B.Act_Code. When I do, I get 2 extra rows. I do not know how to make these rows distinct.
The A table's structure is along with sample data for 1st record:
CODE Example of
Name Type 1st record.
---- ------- --------------
FILE_NAME VARCHAR2(50) STLMK.txt
FILE_DESC VARCHAR2(50) NON-RESIDENT
FILE_LOCATION VARCHAR2(50) L:\NonResFiles
YEAR NUMBER(4) 2008
LOCATION_DATE DATE 10/10/2007
DOWNLOADED_DATE DATE 09/04/2008 9:17:00 AM
DOWNLOADED_ID VARCHAR2(50) Cindy
FILE_SIZE CHAR(10) 16212
DAYS_TO_REQUEST NUMBER(3) 60
The B table's structure is along with sample data for 1st record:
CODE Example of
Name Type 1st record
---- ------ -----------
FILE_NAME VARCHAR2(50) STLMK.txt
ACT_CODE CHAR(2) D
ACT_DATE DATE 10/10/2007
ACTIVITY_ID VARCHAR2(50) downloaded on
DATE_LOADED DATE 09/04/2008 9:17:00 AM
The second record of activity would all be the same except Cindy would be "Jason", act_code would be an "S", activity_id would be "sent on" and then of course the dates would be changed to whenever the new information was saved within the system.
I am getting something like this (shortened of course):
CODEFile_name Downloaded_ID Act_Code
STLMK.txt Cindy D
STLMK.txt Cindy S
STLMK.txt Jason D
STLMK.txt Jason S
There should only be one row for Cindy with a D act_code and one row for Jason with an S act_code. For some reason, Cindy and Jason each get a row with the different act_code. I'm retrieving 4 rows instead of two when I use B.Act_Code in the SQL statement.
Cindy should have the D Act_Code because she downloaded that file name and Jason should have the S because he sent that file to someone else. Every time a file's activity changes, it is entered into the system so we can keep track of where the files are.
Cindy should have the D Act_Code because she downloaded that file name and Jason should have the S because he sent that file to someone else. Every time a file's activity changes, it is entered into the system so we can keep track of where the files are.
Also, I get the 2 extra rows when I add activity_id field to the select.
I have this SQL that returns the correct amount of rows which should be 2:
Select Distinct A.File_Name, A.File_Desc, A.file_location, A.location_date, A.downloaded_date, A.downloaded_id, A.file_size, A.days_to_request, B.File_Name, B.Act_Date, B.date_loaded from SDT_LOG A Inner Join ACTIVITY_LOG B On A.file_name = B.file_name and A.downloaded_date = B.date_loaded
I need to add another field in the Select query which is B.Act_Code. When I do, I get 2 extra rows. I do not know how to make these rows distinct.
The A table's structure is along with sample data for 1st record: Example of Name Type 1st record. ---- ------- -------------- FILE_NAME VARCHAR2(50) STLMK.txt FILE_DESC VARCHAR2(50) NON-RESIDENT FILE_LOCATION VARCHAR2(50) L:NonResFiles YEAR NUMBER(4) 2008 LOCATION_DATE DATE 10/10/2007 DOWNLOADED_DATE DATE 09/04/2008 9:17:00 AM DOWNLOADED_ID VARCHAR2(50) Cindy FILE_SIZE CHAR(10) 16212 DAYS_TO_REQUEST NUMBER(3) 60
The B table's structure is along with sample data for 1st record: Example of Name Type 1st record ---- ------ ----------- FILE_NAME VARCHAR2(50) STLMK.txt ACT_CODE CHAR(2) D ACT_DATE DATE 10/10/2007 ACTIVITY_ID VARCHAR2(50) downloaded on DATE_LOADED DATE 09/04/2008 9:17:00 AM
The second record of activity would all be the same except Cindy would be "Jason", act_code would be an "S", activity_id would be "sent on" and then of course the dates would be changed to whenever the new information was saved within the system.
I am getting something like this (shortened of course):
File_name Downloaded_ID Act_Code
STLMK.txt Cindy D STLMK.txt Cindy S STLMK.txt Jason D STLMK.txt Jason S
There should only be one row for Cindy with a D act_code and one row for Jason with an S act_code. For some reason, Cindy and Jason each get a row with the different act_code. I'm retrieving 4 rows instead of two when I use B.Act_Code in the SQL statement.
Cindy should have the D Act_Code because she downloaded that file name and Jason should have the S because he sent that file to someone else. Every time a file's activity changes, it is entered into the system so we can keep track of where the files are. Cindy should have the D Act_Code because she downloaded that file name and Jason should have the S because he sent that file to someone else. Every time a file's activity changes, it is entered into the system so we can keep track of where the files are.
Also, I get the 2 extra rows when I add activity_id field to the select.I use Oracle 10.
INSERT INTO TEST_TBL VALUES( 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000 ) ;
Expected result
A1 1000 A2 2000 A3 3000 A4 4000
A1, A2, A3, A4 are hard coded fixed values.
I could have done this but not a good idea in case table TEST_TBL is not a single row table but an inline query on 1,00,00,000 records with summary functions. In my table I've a summary query instead of single row table.
SELECT 'A1', COL1 FROM TEST_TBL UNION ALL SELECT 'A2', COL2 FROM TEST_TBL UNION ALL SELECT 'A3', COL3 FROM TEST_TBL UNION ALL SELECT 'A4', COL4 FROM TEST_TBL
insert into table1(field1,field2)values('A','1'); insert into table1(field1,field2)values('A','1'); insert into table1(field1,field2)values('A','1'); insert into table1(field1,field2)values('B','2'); insert into table1(field1,field2)values('B','2'); insert into table1(field1,field2)values('B','1'); insert into table1(field1,field2)values('B','1'); SELECT field1 FROM table1 WHERE field2=all(select '1' from dual) FIELD1
view the below select statement..why it's adding extra zero's...
select to_timestamp('2001-05-22 12:00:18.600','YYYY-MM-DD HH:MI:SS.ff3AM') from dual output: 5/22/2001 12:00:18.600000000 PM ---why it's adding extra zeors's my output should be as " 5/22/2001 12:00:18.600 PM"
I need to copy records from a working table to a history table. I have the following sql statement
insert into test.history (equip_ID, state, manufacturer, install_year, capacity, group_ID, Test_status) select (equip_ID, state, manufacturer, install_year, capacity, group_ID, Test_status from test.info_AP
Table test.history has one more field in it called test_year. I need to fill this field when I do the insert. Can't use an after update trigger as the field is currently set to not allow nulls.
Once I add an extra column to link the two tables the number of rows is reduced by one, however when I try to get this extra record I find none matching the same criteria that led to reducing the records.
SQL> SELECT count(*) 2 FROM N_CONTRACT NC, N_WITHDRAWAL_REQUEST NWR 3 WHERE NC.fk_temP_withdrawal_req_serial = NWR.SERIAL_NUMBER; COUNT(*) ---------- 2243 [code]...
it gets these three characters at the start of the line l_hdr_evnt = 
So i saved header_evnt.txt as UTF-8, and used utl_file.fopen_nchar, utl_file.get_line_nchar, which got rid of first two characters, but still has ¿. How to get rid of that?
I am modifying a stored proc that i wrote a couple of years ago. The change is that i want certain inputs to accept strings of characters (comma delimited) so they can be parsed and processed in the proc. The problem is, when i pass very little data (about 50 characters) It fails saying the character sting buffer is to small.
I have setup the input as a type of a column that is a clob and i have also tried using just vahrchar2 (with no size set).
I am calling a function in front end, from front end i am passing space, now i want to trim space in parameter itself, it's psssible, assume the below is the function defination, i want to trim the p_region_name parameter like this trim(p_region_name), is this possible?
FUNCTION add_country_region_column ( p_s_country_code_iso_2 IN varchar2_table_type, p_type IN d_country.c1_type%TYPE, p_name IN d_country.c1_name%TYPE, p_desc IN d_country.c1_desc%TYPE,
I have one issue while loading the value through sql*loader the last column data is SG1 and when its loaded , it is length of this columns is showing 4 char. Unable to understand, how to find this extra space. Though used TRIM but does not work.
I have a problem with my Oracle 9i SQL Query and I'm struggling to get it done.
I have three tables namely Student, Lease and Room and want to retrieve data from these three tables.
I want the Student name, the Lease details and the Room No from these tables.
The problem with my SQL query is that I get all the information from the tables except from the Room table, where in the column it show Room_No but the values are not displayed, the query is given below.
First data data block contains a list item and a text item based on the selection of the list item and the value in the text item i need to retrieve more than one row in another data block whose NUMBER OF RECORDS DISPLAYED property are set to 10.
I have a Button in the first data block. So in the WHEN BUTTON PRESSED trigger i wrote SELECT INTO clause which is raising "exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows".Then i used a cursor in the WHEN-BUTTON-PRESSED trigger in the first block to fetch row by row and assign it to the items in second block. But i am able to retrieve only one record in the second block.
ID AMOUNT ID_TYPE APPROVE_FLAG A1 2 A N B1 100 B N A2 3 A N A3 100 A Y
The Select Query should be..All the records should be considered and if the (amount is greater than 50 and approve_flag is N )then except that records all records should be considered.The output should be 3 rows; 2nd row (B1) should not come. writing a select statement for the above conditions.
create table test_circular_data(c1 varchar2(10),c2 varchar2(10)); insert into test_circular_data values ('c1','l2'); insert into test_circular_data values ('c1','l3'); insert into test_circular_data values ('c3','l3'); insert into test_circular_data values ('c4','l3');
commit;
There is a circular relation between columns c1 and c2, so what I'm trying to retrieve is something like that :
c1--> l2 --> l3 --> c3 --> c4
The steps to get that result is :
1.- c1 related to l2 : c1-->l2 2.- c1 related to l3 : c1-->l2-->l3 3.- l3 in the list and related to c3 : c1-->l2-->l3-->c3 4.- l3 in the list and related to c4 : c1-->l2-->l3-->c3-->c4
I have two blocks on which I am having relation based on booking number and employee code. As I am doing a query, booking number is getting fetched in employee code's field and employee code is getting fetched in booking number's feild. Because of this, I am not able to update the form. It is giving me error unable to update record unique contraint voilated for primary key which is quite obivious. But why the data could get shuffled in each others field though during inserting its going properly.
I have a requirement like to retrieve past 6 months data and i have used below query.
select count(1) from event where trunc(start_datae) between trunc(sydate)-180 and trunc(sysdate);it is giving the results but am not sure whether it is giving correct data or not.If ran the above query it is taking more time to execute.
Is the above approach is correct? Is there any difference between trunc(sysdate)-180 and trunc(sysdate-180) ?
I have a table of N records with: Name SeqNo ID Col4 ... ColX
where Name and ID are non-unique, and SeqNo is a monotonic non-consecutive sequence 0 .. N that is unique within ID..I'd like to generate the following 'groups': For each record where SeqNo = 0, sorted by Name, create the 'group where ID is the same, ordered by SeqNo irrespective of the
values of any of the other columns. For instance, if the table contained:
I got my desired results by brute-forcing via four sub-queries:
Sub-query 1 - Generate the sorted Names with SeqNo = 0 Sub-query 2 - Expand above with the additional columns, maintaining original order Sub-query 3 - For each of the records from sub-query 2, generate the 'dependents' having the same ID and SeqNo != 0 Sub-query 4 - Expand above with the additional columns, maintaining original order of sub-query 1 Main query - Create UNION of 2 and 4, sorting by original order and SeqNo
if there were not a simpler approach - after all, this must be a fairly common issue when generating BOMs.
What i want is I want the data which account is having more than 5 subaccounts within the last one month. Also need data with other date criteria like last 100 days if more than10 sub accounts. need single query.
Having more than 8lacks in my database. i wrote the query but it is taking much time and didnt give the data even after 14 hours.
My query is : select * from table a where account in (select account from table b where b.subaccount=a.subaccount and b.date>=sysdate-35 group by b.account having count(b.subaccount)>5) union select * from table a where account in (select account from table b where b.subaccount=a.subaccount and b.date>=sysdate-100 group by b.account having count(b.subaccount)>10)
how to retrieve the Subaccounts which satisfies my requirements.
I'm writing a procedure that takes a table name as a parameter and I would like to print out the column name with the supporting row entry for each row. I know the logic I'd like to use, but how do you query the metadata to return the column names and store them.
I want if the user write for example in text box 'AM TK' the query display the resualt which has am alone tk alone, and that has both. I know that i should use the Like with % but i do not know how to write it in the set property. I have wrote
set_block_property('Employee_Other',default_where,'Upper(name) like '''||UPPER(:key_search.person_name)||'''') ;
This will bring the resualt just if the user write am tk. How i can modify it to return value as i explained above.
