Performance Tuning :: WINDOW SORT - Reduce Time?
Nov 30, 2011In my insert query, Window sort takes longer time i.e. 93% of total execution time, How do i reduce this time? are there any tuning parameters availabe for this?
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Performance Tuning :: How To Reduce Index Creation Time
Aug 17, 2010Is there any way to reduce the index creation time. I have one table which has 7700000 records and every day this table get truncate and we create with create table as select statement and then create the 4 indexes and each index took 5 minutes so in totality it took 20 minutes in index creation.
View 2 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Fragmentation Can Reduce Performance In Query Times
Jun 16, 2010I have a question about database fragmentation.I know that fragmentation can reduce performance in query times. The blocks are distributed in many extents and scans process takes a long time. Oracle engine have to locate the address of the next extent..
I want to know if there is any system view in which you can check if your table or index has high fragmentation. If it's needed I will have to re-create, move or rebulid the table or index, but before I want to know if the degree of fragmentation is high.
Any useful script or query to do this, any interesting oracle system view?
Performance Tuning :: How To Reduce Clustering_factor Value
Jun 7, 2012how to reduce the clustering_factor's value which appears in the user_indexes view?
in my table ,its clustering factor's value is so high:
SQL> SELECT UI.clustering_factor,UI.num_rows,UI.index_type,UI.distinct_keys FROM USER_INDEXES UI WHERE UI.table_name = 'TAWB_AWB';
CLUSTERING_FACTOR NUM_ROWS INDEX_TYPE DISTINCT_KEYS
----------------- ---------- --------------------------- -------------
83609 187603 NORMAL 187603
and its block numbers is 5063
SQL> SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT DBMS_ROWID.rowid_block_number(ROWID)) BLOCK_NUM FROM TAWB_AWB A;
BLOCK_NUM
----------
5063
Performance Tuning :: How To Reduce Consistent Gets Of SQL
Jun 27, 2011How can I reduce the consistent gets of the sql:
select b.OFFER_ID,
b.OFFER_CODE,
b.OFFER_NAME,
b.OFFER_COMMENTS,
b.BAND_ID,
b.CAN_BE_BUY_ALONE,
b.PRICING_PLAN_ID,
b.PRIORITY,
b.STATE,
[code]...
I have already added the indexes for the outer sql to reduce the cost from 374 to 150. But the the consistent gets seems not reduce that much. I notice that the function will cost 6 consistents gets per execution. It seems it not very high. But if this function goes with the sql, it will cost a very high consistent gets, if I remove this function, the sql only cost 1903 consistents gets.
So what I am thinking there should be two ways to reduce the consistent gets..The first one is reduce the recursive call of the sql. The second is reduce the consistent gets of the function. (but it seems that the consistent gets in this function is very low, only 6.)
Performance Tuning :: How To Reduce Dml Locks
May 24, 2012After ran db health check, my database report gives the following details
dml_locks OK. dml_locks = 3396, transactions = 849.
Performance Tuning :: How To Reduce Cost Of Query
Mar 21, 2013I have Following wjich takes some minutes to executes i want to be tune so this query Executes fast.
Query :
SELECT a.CHDR_EXCH_CD ,TMHR_EXCH_TM_CD,'S' Sec_type,
round(SUM (Decode(csdt_Depo_Typ,'I',(Cal_Scheme_Rate(csdt_rsm_code,TO_DATE(:P_DT_FR,'DD-MM-RR'),csdt_stsc_cd,csdt_scp_qty)*csdt_scp_qty)-
(Cal_Scheme_Rate(csdt_rsm_code,TO_DATE(:P_DT_FR,'DD-MM-
[Code]...
Explain Plan Result :
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS
Cost: 1,669 Bytes: 67 Cardinality: 1
15 HASH GROUP BY
Bytes: 67 Cardinality: 1
14 CONCATENATION
[Code].....
After i see result , no 4 in explain plan result gives TABLE ACCESS FULL . i want to be indexing on that how to do this..
This table MG_COLL_SCP_DTL have index like this
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CSDT_PK ON MG_COLL_SCP_DTL
(CSDT_CHDR_TRANS_NUM, CSDT_PROD_TYP, CSDT_TRAN_SR_NO, CSDT_CHDR_CDTL_COLL_TYP, CSDT_CHDR_CDTL_COLL_TYP_CD,
CSDT_STSC_CD, CSDT_CHDR_CLNT_CD, CSDT_CHDR_CLNT_TM_CD)
[Code]....
How to Reduce cost ???
Performance Tuning :: How To Tune Order By Clause Without Changing Sort Area
May 1, 2008How to avoid sort operation by an order by clause without changing the sort area size.what hints or changes should be done in query so that order by clause work faster.
View 10 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Sql Taking More CPU Time?
Nov 23, 2010I have one query in my production which is taking more CPU time. when that statement executing the CUP is taking more than 90%
I am attaching the sql query and indexes on the table.
Performance Tuning :: Update XML Eating Up A Lot Of Time
Sep 26, 2012update xml eating up a lot of time is there any way to tune
SELECT UPDATEXML(:B3 , '/FCUBS_RES_ENV/FCUBS_BODY/FLD/FN[@TYPE="' || :B2 ||
'"]', :B1 )
FROM
DUAL
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 499 0.44 0.90 0 3 0 0
Fetch 499 1.49 2.87 0 0 0 499
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 999 1.93 3.77 0 3 0 499
real code
SELECT updatexml(l_xml,
'/FCUBS_RES_ENV/FCUBS_BODY/FLD/FN[@TYPE="' ||
upper(replace(cspkes_misc.fn_getparam(p_parent_list,
l_parent_list_clob,
'Y',
l_cnt,
'>'),
'-',
'_')) || '"]/text()',
l_fn_str)
INTO l_xml
FROM dual;
Performance Tuning :: Avg Time Taken By Execution Plan
Apr 12, 2013How can i check the avg time taken by an execution plan. Actually i have a very big query and it changes its execution plan very often, we would like to lock the best execution plan and to find it , i would like to know the Average Execution Time the query takes when it runs using different different execution plans.
View 7 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Time Calculation In AWR Report
Dec 12, 2011Till statspack we had
elapsed time = time spent on waits + time CPU was used
Total time during snaps = Elapsed time + (may be) time waited for CPU...In AWR is it possible to draw such equation? I can see that the AWR report has following elements
1) End Snap time - Begin Snap time
2) DB time - as mentioned at the top of AWR report
3) DB CPU - in "Top 5 Timed Foreground Events" (I assume this is 'CPU used by sesson timing' in statspack)
4) Total of time for all Statistics in "Time Model Statistics"
5) BUSY_TIME + IDLE_TIME - "Operating System Statistics"
Time between 2 snapshots? or what else? Also for which seconds to multiply to 'DB Time(s)' per second and 'DB CPU(s)' per second in Load Profile to get the db time and CPU time?
Performance Tuning :: Loading And Reading At Same Time
Feb 13, 2013For example, we have a table ACCOUNT (snowflake dimension containing other dimension keys) and I have many fact tables based on this dimension. Normally data warehouse load happens like first dimensions needs to be loaded and then facts. Our frequency of loads is 30 mins.
To increase the rate in which the data will be available in the facts (as its a financial application), am considering to have two batches one with dimension and another one with fact (came to this conclusion as there is no dependency like first dimensions to be loaded then only fact) just the update might get missed sometimes. But if I do that, when dimension gets loaded, it will be read in the facts in another session. Will this affect the performance ?
LOADING (insert/update) and selecting data from table at the same time. Will it affect the performance in any way.
Performance Tuning :: Database Time In AWR Report
Jul 9, 2012I understand that when data is read from the disk, I/O is done..And When computations are done then CPU is used..Then where the following equation fits?
DB Time = sum of database CPU time + waits
Is I/O considered as a part of CPU time?
Does this equation changes with SAN, OS caching?
Performance Tuning :: SQL Ordered By Elapsed Time
Feb 2, 2013Elapsed Time (s)CPU Time (s)Executions Elap per Exec (s) % Total DB TimeSQL IdSQL ModuleSQL Text
3,263 32 1 3263.49 2.79 3ta0ms19fvgds httpd.exe SELECT CASE WHEN COUNT >= 1...Elapsed
6,360 164 2 3180.17 5.44 51jx99dm0swv7 cpm_srvscript@ahcaxasmil1b (TNS V1-V3) SELECT /*+ CCL<PFT_GET_RP...
On AWR, I see two script that are out of ordinary, and I want to make sure that I interpret them correctly.
1) "Elap per Exec (s)" shows 3263.49 with 1 "Executions".
2) "Elap per Exec (s)" shows 3180.17 each execution with 2 "Executions".
Does this mean that this script ran for ~ 54 minutes (3263.49 / 60 seconds) for 1 "Execution" and ~ 53 minutes (3180.17 / 60 seconds) per each execution? I need to understand "Elapsed Time (s),CPU Time (s),Executions ,Elap per Exec (s), % Total DB Time" represent.
Performance Tuning :: Lot Of Time Being Taken To Delete Data From A Table
Apr 27, 2012I have a table which contains 8,21,177 amount of data totally.Now I am trying to delete around 4,84,000 of data from this table by using just one filter i.e. my query is something like below
DELETE /*+ parallel(resource,4) */ FROM resource where created_by = 'MIGN'
This is going to delete 4,84,000 rows of data . But my current issue is this is taking lots of time to delete the data . To be precise , its almost taking 25 hours to delete this data..The created_by column is indexed .
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2389236532
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 499 | 20459 | 39 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
| 1 | DELETE | RESOURCE | | | |
[code]....
Performance Tuning :: Lost Index From Second Execution Time?
Jul 11, 2013The problem was describe:
- First time to execute: Using all indexes on 2 tables
- Second time to execute: Using only indexes on first table, full table scan on the other
- Third time to execute: Do FTS on both of tables.
Now, I show the objects and relate information here:
The Tables:
system@dbwap> select count(*) from my_wap.news_relation;
COUNT(*)
----------
272708
system@dbwap> select count(*) from my_wap.news_content;
COUNT(*)
----------
95092
system@dbwap> desc my_wap.news_content;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------------------- -------- ----------------
ID NOT NULL NUMBER(11)
SUBJECT NOT NULL VARCHAR2(500)
TITLE VARCHAR2(4000)
STATE NUMBER(1)
IMGPATH VARCHAR2(500)
ALIGN VARCHAR2(10)
[Code]....
Performance Tuning :: Max And Delete Statement Talking Lot Of Time?
Apr 15, 2011Test1 table have around 385772300 rows. below delete and select statment talking lot of time.
Select stament taking more than 1 hrs.
SELECT TO_NUMBER(MAX(f.T3))
--INTO v_FISCAL_MONTH_ID
FROM Test1 f;
delete statment taking more than 2 hours
DELETE FROM TEST1 WHERE TRUNC(T10) < TRUNC(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-36));
CREATE TABLE Test1
(
[Code].....
Performance Tuning :: Snapshot Skipped In Between Scheduled Time?
Sep 11, 2013Yesterday, there were performance issue at server. So today, when i am generating report for that particular period, found snapshot id sequence is serially but with skipped hourly timed. Instead of generating report at 15:30, it generated at 16:30.
Enter value for num_days: 2
Listing the last 2 days of Completed Snapshots
Snap
Instance DB Name Snap Id Snap Started Level
------------ ------------ --------- ------------------ -----
tagidev TAGIDEV 2857 10 Sep 2013 00:30 1
2858 10 Sep 2013 01:30 1
2859 10 Sep 2013 02:30 1
2860 10 Sep 2013 03:30 1
2861 10 Sep 2013 04:30 1
2862 10 Sep 2013 05:31 1
[code]....
Below are the details at alert log -
Tue Sep 10 14:28:20 2013
Thread 1 cannot allocate new log, sequence 7029
Checkpoint not complete
Current log# 2 seq# 7028 mem# 0: E:APPORACLEORADATATAGIDEVREDO02.LOG
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 7029 (LGWR switch)
[code]....
1) why snap didn't started at 15:30?
2) since database just started at the scheduled time of AWR snap time. But generated at 16:32 instead of 16:30, though last services "SMCO" is started at 16:42. How it snap id generated for this particular time?
3) what does "kewastUnPackStats(): bad magic 1 (0x000000001B3CE48D, 0)" mean?
Performance Tuning :: Why Different Elapsed Time In Oracle9i And 10g For Same Query
May 5, 2011why different elapsed time in Oracle9i and oracle10g for the same query ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: SQL Ordered By Elapsed Time And SQL Module?
Feb 24, 2013Elapsed Time (s) CPU Time (s) Executions Elap per Exec (s) % Total DB Time SQL Id SQL Module SQL Text
2,423 1 3,919 0.62 1.83 gt49gg0fnc5x8 srv_dr@ahs (TNS V1-V3) UPDATE /*+ CCL<OENDB_FILE...
2,227 14 1 2227.16 1.68 bggfx8a04prj9 SQL*Plus select * from (select n.source...
.........
On [SQL ordered by Elapsed Time], [SQL Module] shows an indication that a SQL was executed by which process (i.e. srv_dr@ahs)outside of SQL*PLUS.If [SQL Modeule] shows as [SQL*Plus], does it mean the query was run in SQL*PLUS manually or directly?I have the SQL ID. How do I find out who, how, and exactly what time it was run?
Performance Tuning :: Delete Statement Is Taking More Time For Execution?
Mar 9, 2010In my code I am using delete statement which is taking too much time to execute.
Statement is as follow:
DELETE FROM TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION T
WHERE (ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT)
IN (SELECT ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT
FROM LOAD_TRADE_ORDER
WHERE IND_IS_BAD_RECORD='N');
Tables Used:
oTRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION Row count (329525880)
oLOAD_TRADE_ORDER Row count (29281)
Every column in "IN" clause and select clause is containing index on it
Every time no of rows which to be deleted is vary (May be in hundred ,thousand or hundred thousand )so that I am Unable to use "BITMAP" index on the table "LOAD_TRADE_ORDER" column "IND_IS_BAD_RECORD" though it is containing distinct record in it.
Even table "TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION" is containing "RANGE" PARTITION over it on the column "ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID". With this I am enclosing table scripts with Indexes and Partitions over it.
way for fast execution in of above delete statement?
Performance Tuning :: Query Running For A Long Time In Second Schema
Apr 27, 2012I have a Query(report) which is running in <5 mins in one Scheme, where as the same is running for a long time in second schema. I have identified that an Index is scanning for more than 2000 Millions of records in second Schema, but this is scanning only 440 Millions in First Schema and hence it is fast. I am expecting the same to be done in Second schema.
I have verified the following
All records in tables in 2 schemas are same.
All indexes are same
Analyzed the tables
Gathered Histogram on all the columns as per the first schema.
But now i still have the same problem, don't know what could be the problem.
Table_nameNum_RowsBlocks
PRPSL_LST_T5866107159
PRPSL_WKFLW_ACTVTY_T5829904030
ITEM_CHR_VAL_T5134340104049020
ITEM_RGN_ASSN_T8571220137215
Also attached 2 screen shots of OEM Plans..
Performance Tuning :: Elapsed Time Not Accounted In Tkprof File
Jan 13, 2011find the attached tkprof'ed file of session
I started the trace after the query started (upon user's complaint)
However even after tracing the session for more than 30 minutes I am not geeting where the 30 minutes are accounted in this file
Performance Tuning :: Elapsed Time In Trace File Output
Nov 16, 2011I executed a query which executed quickly (1.7 seconds) but since its output took time in displaying on the console the time shown by 'set timing on was 39.5 seconds
also I took trace (tkprof) for the same.My query is why the timings under 'Total Waited' (43.19 and 1.69) are not added to the elapsed time 1.83 seconds
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.06 0 10 0 0
Fetch 758 0.03 1.77 0 0 0 11345
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 760 0.03 1.83 0 10 0 11345
[code]....
Performance Tuning :: How To Find Out Queries That Are Executed In Particular Range Of Time
Sep 9, 2011here we have an scenario where we want to find out all the sql statements that are executed in a particular time. The sql statements are executed via our application. I tried in awr report but it shows only the sql query which has taken long time to execute. and i even tried in V$session and V$sqlarea. how to view the executed sql statements in a particular session/current session
View 3 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Cost Of Query Is Brought Down But Taking Same Time
Sep 1, 2010For an query, cost was 16Lakhs and was taking 30min, I brought down the cost to 1.5lakhs, but still it is taking 30min.
There were many outer joins and same table has been Used(FROM clause) 5 times in the query. I have introduced WITH clause, and brought down the cost.
Performance Tuning :: Hierarchical Queries - Run Jobs Within Stipulated Time Frame
Nov 17, 2011We have a big hierarchical query which is now running for a long time (around 6 hours. earlier it was running for 3 hours). We have to tune this query so that we run the jobs within a stipulated time frame.
The query below inserts around 42 million records in to the table WK_ACCT_WSTORE. I have attached in the text file.
Performance Tuning :: Servers Will Be Running SELECT Which Returns Zero Rows All Time
Feb 11, 2011Our application servers will be running a SELECT which returns zero rows all the time.This SELECT is put into a package and this package will be called by application servers very frequently which is causing unnecessary CPU.
Original query and plan
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_SET_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_ID, TARGET_VERSION
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS
WHERE SEGMENT_JOB_ID NOT IN
(SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS) 2 3 4 5 ;
[code]....
Which option will be better or do we have other options?They need to pass the column's with zero rows to a ref cursor.
Performance Tuning :: Select Query Taking Time Even After Using Parallel Hint?
Sep 25, 2013 select
serialnumber from product where productid in
(select /*+ full parallel(producttask 16) */productid from producttask where
startedtimestamp > to_date('2013-07-04 00:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and startedtimestamp < to_date('2013-07-05 00:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and producttasktypeid in
[code]....
Explain plan output:
Plan hash value: 2779236890
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name| Rows| Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time| Pstart| Pstop |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT || 1 | 29 | 9633M (8)|999:59:59 |||
|* 1 | FILTER |||| ||||
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE ALL || 738M| 19G| 6321K (1)| 21:04:17 | 1 | 6821 |
[code]....
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter( EXISTS (<not feasible>)
4 - filter("PRODUCTID"=:B1)
5 - filter(ROWNUM<100)
12 - access("MODELID"=:B1)
[code]....
Note: - SQL profile "SYS_SQLPROF_014153616b850002" used for this statement