Performance Tuning :: Removing Nvl Function Then Query Executing In 2 Min Condition

Aug 10, 2011

when am trying to use nvl for one condition it is taking lot of time to execute but when am removing nvl function then the query executing in 2 min. condition is given below

(HOI2.ORG_INFORMATION1)=nvl(TO_CHAR(:p_set_of_books_id) , HOI2.ORG_INFORMATION1)

but when am using the same condition as below the querry executing in 2 min

(HOI2.ORG_INFORMATION1)=TO_CHAR(:p_set_of_books_id)

my query given below

(SELECT cust.customer_number cust_no, cust.customer_name customer,
cnv.item_no, SUM(wd.shipped_quantity) shp_qty_nos,
0 rtn_qty_nos,
ROUND(SUM(cnv.cnf * wd.shipped_quantity), 3) shp_qty_tons,
0 rtn_qty_tons, 0 net_shp_qty_nos, 0 net_shp_qty_tons
[code]...

View 30 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Performance Tuning :: Table Rebuild Should Be Done After Removing Most Of Its Data?

Oct 23, 2012

We are on Oracle 10.2.0.4 on Solaris 10. There is a table in my production db that has 872944 number of rows. Most of its data is now unnecessary, we need to retain, based on a date column in the table just last one month's data and delete rest of the data. So after that the table will have just 3000 rows.

However as the table was huge earlier(872k rows prior to delete) , does the delete of data release its oracle blocks and does the size of the table reduce? If not, will it rebuild the table online (online redefinition) so that the query that does a full scan on this table goes faster?

I checked using an example table that just delete of data does not remove the oracle blocks - they remain in the user_tables for that table and cost of full table scan remains same. We have a query that does the full table scan so I am thinking that after this delete I should do an online table re-definition , is that the right decision?

View 4 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Change Execution Plan Of Currently Executing Statement

Feb 8, 2011

refer following sql statements and code

Session 1
create table tab1 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null;
alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
declare
x number;
begin
for i in 1..4
loop

[code]....

Session 2

after "starting" the above pl/sql block from Session 1, I keep on querying tab2 from Session 2 And as soon as 2 records are inserted in tab2, I create index from Session 2

select * from tab2;
select * from tab2;
select * from tab2;
N
----------
1
2
create index i on tab1(object_id);

As I have tested from a single session (just before this test) such index is used for the sql statement

select count(1) into x from tab1 where object_id=2331;

However when I checked the trace file I am not geeting results as expected

I am expecting 4 execution plans - 2 FTS and 2 Index Access scans and for this I am issuing following command

tkprof dst1_ora_7369.trc dst1_ora_7369.txt aggregate=no sys=no

But unfortunately I am getting following output

SELECT COUNT(1)
FROM
TAB1 WHERE OBJECT_ID=2331
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0
Execute 4 0.00 0.00 0 2 0 0

[code]....

1) Why I am unable to see 4 execution plans - 2 with FTS and 2 with Index access when I mentioned 'aggregate=no'?

2) Whether the index i will be used for last 2 iterations after first 2 iterations of FTS?

If answer to above question 2) is 'No'

By which method I can force an ongoing sql statement in loop to take different execution path? Of course I can't hard parse sql in 'that' current session Will flushing Shared pool work in above case?

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Parallel Operations Not Executing With Expected Degree

Apr 2, 2012

I am executing a sql statement which is doing FTS in parallel mode The server has 8 cpus and threads_per_cpu is 2

The v$sql shows PX_SERVERS_EXECUTIONS as 8

select PX_SERVERS_EXECUTIONS, sql_text from v$sql where sql_id='0q0nk5117yth2'
8, select /*+ full(a) parallel(a)....

however the px_sessions shows 17 sessions (16 parallel session + 1 parent session (where sid = qcsid) Now in px_sessions, these 16 parallel session are divided in 2 server sets 1 and 2 and values for degree and required degree are 8 and 16 respectively

However, all the time, only 8 sessions which belong to server set = 1, were active though its state was waiting with event "PX Deq Credit: send blkd"

The other session which belong to server set = 2 were never active and always had waint event ='PX Deq: Execution Msg'

what could be the reason that 16 parallel session could not be started though I am the only person using the server, there aren't any batch jobs, dbms_jobs,even archivelogs (not a prod system)?

Note that paralel_max_servers setting is 16

Another issue being the duing start of the query approximately 100-115 blocks were read for the query (checked from longops) however after 60-70% blocks are read the number of blocks read / seconds falls down to 10-20 blocks / second across all parallel sessions.

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Join Condition In Index?

Mar 14, 2012

For a hash join statement, is it beneficial to have the join condition objects in the index as well as the objects in the where clause?

View 19 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Removing Duplicate Rows When Condition Is Matched

Mar 17, 2010

My requirement if id, join_date, join_time, result of table1 is matched with table2 at least one time then if repeating rows associated with the id should not come.Here is the test case.

create table table1
( id number , join_date varchar2(8), join_time varchar2(6), status varchar2(10));
create table table2
( id number , join_date varchar2(8), join_time varchar2(6), status varchar2(10));

insert into table1 values (01, '20010101', '0500', 'PASS');
insert into table1 values (01, '20010102', '0501', 'FAIL');
insert into table1 values (02, '20010103', '0502', 'PASS');
insert into table1 values (03, '20010104', '0503', 'FAIL');
insert into table1 values (04, '20010105', '0504', 'PASS');
insert into table1 values (05, '20010106', '0505', 'FAIL');
[code]...

I have tried the below mentioned query, whether any better query is there than this because in real-time data have 2 millions of record in table 1 and 60 thousand in table2.

select distinct a.id, a.join_date, a.join_time, a.status
from table1 a, table2 b
where a.id = b.id
and (a.id, a.join_date, a.join_time, a.status) not in (select b.id, b.join_date, b.join_time, b.status
from table2 b)
and a.id = (
select distinct a.id
[code]....

View 20 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Fragmentation Can Reduce Performance In Query Times

Jun 16, 2010

I have a question about database fragmentation.I know that fragmentation can reduce performance in query times. The blocks are distributed in many extents and scans process takes a long time. Oracle engine have to locate the address of the next extent..

I want to know if there is any system view in which you can check if your table or index has high fragmentation. If it's needed I will have to re-create, move or rebulid the table or index, but before I want to know if the degree of fragmentation is high.

Any useful script or query to do this, any interesting oracle system view?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Query Performance Gain Using Statistics?

Aug 9, 2010

Somewhere I read that we should not use hints in Oracle production environments, but we can use hints in the development environment and on achieving the desired execution plan we can adjust the 'statistics' to follow that plan without hints.

Q1. If it is true what statistics do we adjust for influencing the execution plan and how?

For example, I have the following simple query:

select e.empid, e.ename, d.dname
from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno=d.deptno;

emp.empid, emp.deptno and dep.deptno columns have indexes and the tables have the standard structure as found in the basic oracle examples.

If I look at the execution plan of the above query then I see that the driving table is empand the driven table is dept.Also the type of join that is taking place is 'Nested Loop'.

Questions: With respect to the above query,
Q 2. If I want to make dept the driving table and emp the driven table then how can I adjust the statistics to achieve that?
Q 3. If I want to use hash join instead of a nested loop join then then how can I adjust the statistics to achieve that?

I can put the ordered and the use_hash hint to effect this but again I have heard that altering statistics is a more robust way to control an execution plan as compared to hints.

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Getting Alternative To REPLACE Function?

Jun 12, 2010

I have a table with:

1 million rows
average row length 200 bytes
50 columns
and this update statement
UPDATE mytable SET varchar2_4000_column = replace(replace(replace...300 times)

It looks at every row in the table (no WHERE clause) and does these 300 replace operations on this column for each row. Each replace replaces with a null so effectively it is removing strings. Much of the time these strings are not in the column.

This update statement takes 25 minutes and it is 98% CPU and 2% USER_IO time.

I figure that is what is taking all the time since it is a CPU bound statement. if rows in this table are persistent over time then tag rows with a flag to show which ones have already been processed and skip these next time around.

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Sub Queries With Function Call?

May 24, 2011

I am stuck with a query which is taking a lot of time to execute. Below is the pseudo code of the same:

SELECT TAB_ALIAS1.COL1,TAB_ALIAS1.COL2,TAB_ALIAS1.COL3
FROM TABLE1 TAB_ALIAS1
WHERE TAB_ALIAS1.COL4 = <INPUT PARAMETER1>
AND TRUNC(TAB_ALIAS1.ELAP_TIME) =
(
SELECT MAX(ELAP_TIME)

[code]....

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Function Based Index Is Not Being Used

Feb 22, 2012

I have a table which has 4M records

This table has a query where one of the condition is
AND STATUS <> 'C'

Now the data is as following

select count(*) record_count, status from new_business group by status;

record_countstatus
4298025C
15N
13Q
122S

I want to know if following index would be useful in this case while the condition in where clause is

"AND STATUS <> 'C'"

create index nb_index_1 on new_business(case when status in('N','Q','S') then 1 else NULL end);
Or
create index nb_index_1 on new_business(case when status ='N' then 'N' when status='Q' then 'Q' when status='S' then 'S' else NULL end);

I tried it on a sample table but the index is simply not picked up even when hinted following are the db level settings

query_rewrite_enabled string TRUE
query_rewrite_integrity string enforced

I tried it 'query_rewrite_integrity' with 'trusted' as well .

View 7 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Determine Memory Usage For A Function

Jul 24, 2013

determine if a function is worth pinning in memory? I want to come up with a percentage, implying that if the function is already im memory 80%+ of the time then it is not worth it.

View 5 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Select Partition Table With Non-partition Key Condition?

Jun 26, 2010

I have a table that partitioned into six partitions. each partitions placed in different table space and every two table space placed it on a different hardisk

when I will do query select with the non-partition keys condition, how the search process ? whether the sequence (scan sequentially from partition 1 to partition 6) or partition in a hardisk is accessed at the same time with other partition in other hardisk. ( in the image, partition 1,4 accessed at the same time with partition 2,5 and 3,6)

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Function - Insert Around 900000 Records In Name_compress Table?

Apr 12, 2013

I have created below function to remove specific words/special characters from string. This function is producing expected result. Using this function i need to insert around 900000 records in name_compress table. Insert is taking around 7 mins, how we can tune this function so that insert will be executed within 1-2 mins.

Function -

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION NAME_FN(IN_STRING1 VARCHAR2)
RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
V_OUTPUT VARCHAR2(300);
V_OUTPUT1 VARCHAR2(300);
V_OUTPUT2 VARCHAR2(300);
V_OUTPUT3 VARCHAR2(300);

[code]...

View 11 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Show Right IO Of Query

Jun 21, 2011

I use oracle 11g r2

i have created a table for objects

create table table_t
(Record_no number,
t_no number,
position SDO_GEOMETRY
, occupation_time number);

and inserted many values (examples below )

INSERT INTO tra VALUES
(2,
20503,
SDO_GEOMETRY
(2001,
NULL,
SDO_POINT_TYPE (1387, 0, NULL),
NULL,
NULL),
23037
)
/

and( position) indexed as Rtree spatial index

now when i run spatial query such as

SELECT * FROM tra t WHERE
SDO_FILTER(t.position, MDSYS.SDO_GEOMETRY(2001,NULL,NULL, MDSYS.SDO_ELEM_INFO_ARRAY(1,1003,3),
MDSYS.SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY(0,0,9000,0)), 'querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE' and t.position.sdo_point.X=1;

i do not know how many IO accrued ?

i tried set autotrace on

but the physical read is 0 , this is not possible because i have more than 100000 objects there and all indexed as R-tree

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Query Doing FTS On A Big Table

Jun 24, 2011

Below query is taking a long time...

select gam.SOL_ID,COUNT(gam.FORACID) from gam,smt where
gam.ACID=smt.ACID and gam.ACID NOT IN(select ACID from imt) and
gam.SCHM_TYPE in('SBA','CCA','CAA','ODA') and GAM.ACCT_CLS_FLG='N' and
gam.SOL_ID IN(select SOL_ID from IMT) group by gam.SOL_ID
/

attached is the explain plan.

in which index on IMT table is not used. And the query is doing a FTS on IMT table. What needs to be done to avoid FTS on IMT table.

View 10 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: When To Use Sub-query And When To Use Join

Dec 14, 2010

In SQL, almost all the thing which are possible with join is possible with sub-query also and vice-a-versa.

So when should I use sub-query and when should I go for join?

View 9 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Query With High Cpu Usage?

Jan 13, 2009

Is there any way to tune the following query using lot of CPU:-select description,time_stamp,user_id from bhi_tracking where description like 'Multilateral:%'The explain plan for this is query is:-

---------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 178K| 6609K| 129K|
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| BHI_TRACKING | 178K| 6609K| 129K|
----------------------------------------------------------------

Bhi_tracking is used for reporting purpose and contain millions of records.Generally we keep one year data in this table and delete the remaining.Can I drop the table after taking export and then import it back or can i truncatethe table and then insert the rows into it to enhancethe performance.

View 14 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Same Query Using Different Execution Plans?

Dec 26, 2011

I am executing the query below:

INSERT INTO temp_vendor(vendor_record_seq_no,checksum,rownumber,transaction_type,iu_flag)
SELECT /*+ USE_NL ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 ) leading ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 , tvd) */ vd1.vendor_record_seq_no, tvr.checksum, tvr.rownumber, tvr.transaction_type, 'U'
FROM vendor_data vd1,
vendor_data vd2,
vendor_data vd3,
(SELECT rownumber,

[code]....

It is taking different approaches (execution plans) while executing for same set of parameters. Due to which sometimes it executes successfully, but sometimes it fills all TEMP space and get failed. I am pasting both the execution plan (different from expalin plan) below:

I. Successfull Execution Plan:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | | | 65612 (100)| | | |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 6121 | 65612 (1)| 00:13:08 | | |

[code]....

II. Failed with TEMP space Execution Plan:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | INSERT STATEMENT | | | | 1967 (100)| | | |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | | | |
| 2 | SORT GROUP BY | | 1 | 8233 | 1967 (3)| 00:00:24 | | |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 8233 | 1966 (3)| 00:00:24 | | |

[code]....

View 8 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Pin Sql Query In Shared Pool?

Jun 25, 2010

We are facing performance issues on our production instance 10g(10.2.0.4) 32-bit OELinux 5.3 2GB SGA. The performance is mainly related to one of the table which is sized about 32Gb. We have rebuild the indexes as well but problemstill persist. We are considering to pin SQL statement in shared pool which is hitting the same table frequently. But as far what we have find, is that we can only pin procedures or function in shared pool. True/false?If we can, then how to pin SQL statement in shared pool?If we can not, then is there any other way?

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Run Query With Different Plan_hash Value Then In GV$SQL_PLAN?

Nov 27, 2012

A change(running a statistics collection package) was made, and now a query is running impossibly slow, disabling use of an application function.

This is cause by an sql , which's sql_id is know to me: 4zty77fkf907j when I run

select * from GV$SQL_PLAN_STATISTICS where SQL_ID = '4zty77fkf907j'

I get that the plan hash value is 3405747833.

I ran SELECT Q.PARSING_SCHEMA_NAME

,Q.SQL_ID,ROUND(Q.ELAPSED_TIME / Q.EXECUTIONS)/1000000 AS AVG_USECS
,Q.CHILD_NUMBER
,Q.HASH_VALUE
,Q.PLAN_HASH_VALUE
,'''' || REPLACE(Q.SQL_FULLTEXT

[code]....

and seen that the result was 2 rows(for 2 RAC nodes), with a figure of hundreds of seconds of execution, meaning - bad plan.

when I run

select * from dba_hist_sql_plan where sql_id='4zty77fkf907j'

I get plan hash value of 3390684693. I assume this might be a "good plan"

For a start, how can I hint my query to use that "good plan" before I use stored outlines to implement it?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Reduce Cost Of Query

Mar 21, 2013

I have Following wjich takes some minutes to executes i want to be tune so this query Executes fast.

Query :

SELECT a.CHDR_EXCH_CD ,TMHR_EXCH_TM_CD,'S' Sec_type,
round(SUM (Decode(csdt_Depo_Typ,'I',(Cal_Scheme_Rate(csdt_rsm_code,TO_DATE(:P_DT_FR,'DD-MM-RR'),csdt_stsc_cd,csdt_scp_qty)*csdt_scp_qty)-
(Cal_Scheme_Rate(csdt_rsm_code,TO_DATE(:P_DT_FR,'DD-MM-

[Code]...

Explain Plan Result :

Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWS
Cost: 1,669 Bytes: 67 Cardinality: 1
15 HASH GROUP BY
Bytes: 67 Cardinality: 1
14 CONCATENATION

[Code].....

After i see result , no 4 in explain plan result gives TABLE ACCESS FULL . i want to be indexing on that how to do this..

This table MG_COLL_SCP_DTL have index like this

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX CSDT_PK ON MG_COLL_SCP_DTL
(CSDT_CHDR_TRANS_NUM, CSDT_PROD_TYP, CSDT_TRAN_SR_NO, CSDT_CHDR_CDTL_COLL_TYP, CSDT_CHDR_CDTL_COLL_TYP_CD,
CSDT_STSC_CD, CSDT_CHDR_CLNT_CD, CSDT_CHDR_CLNT_TM_CD)

[Code]....

How to Reduce cost ???

View 4 Replies View Related

Function To Find Business Days Between Two Dates - Query Tuning

Mar 17, 2011

I have a query that uses a function to find the business days between two dates.It sums the total number of days between two dates per employee to find the total days for the past 30, 90, or 365 days.

The problem is that the query takes 21 second to return the last 30 days.Over 70 second to return the last 90 days and over 140 second to return the last 365 days.Do you know how I could tune the query to return faster? Below is the query for the last 30 days:

select dwt_emp_id, SUM((SELECT GET_BDAYS(DWT_DATE,DWT_CREATE_DATE) FROM DUAL))
from dwt_dvt_work_time where dwt_create_date > sysdate - 30
and dwt_hours > 4 and dwt_usr_uid_created_by <> -1 group by dwt_emp_id order by dwt_emp_id

Here's the function:
CREATE FUNCTION get_bdays (d1 IN DATE, d2 IN DATE)
RETURN NUMBER
IS total_days NUMBER(11,2);
holiday_days NUMBER(11,2);
[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Same Query With Different Explain Plan In Two Database?

Aug 17, 2012

I am facing a weird situation wherein the explain plan of same sql in SIT and PROD is different.In fact the explain plan is very costly in Prod.Also the DB version of both SIT and PROD is same.

Below is the sql and corresponding explain plan in Prod and SIT respectively.

Query:
SELECT seq,CCN,ProcessorPart,root_item,comp_path,Item,comp_item,comp_item_type,
lag(comp_item_type,1,'PART') over(PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl)Nxt_comp_item_type,lvl,bom_qty,
ROUND(CASE min(abs(bom_qty)) OVER (PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl)
WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE 1 END * EXP (SUM (LN (nullif(abs(bom_qty),0))) OVER (PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl))) Ulti_qty,
'AMER'

[code]...

The tables referred in above query is small tables containing arnd 10k records.The above tables are partitioned on Region and not indexed.

Explain Plan in Prod: COST CARDINALITY BYTES

SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS165173613539322883634804
SORT UNIQUE236360
UNION-ALL
PARTITION LIST SINGLE117240

[code]...

Explain Plan in SIT: COST CARDINALITY BYTES

SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS3211689
SORT UNIQUE347240
UNION-ALL
PARTITION LIST SINGLE172120

[code]...

I am not able to attribute why there is a huge change in Cost between SIT and Prod.Apparently the Job is going for 3-5 hours which used to get completed within 20mins in SIT.

View 5 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Insert Into Table Slows Down Query

Sep 23, 2010

When i run a script that does a select from a single table (table has 33521868 records)the query is executed in about .094 seconds. I use the exact same query to insert into a temporary table and the query takes 10 minutes and more.

What should I be doing to speed up this process. Also tried using hints and it does not speed up the insert.

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Query Sql Server Faster Than Oracle?

Feb 21, 2013

I have a query optimized as to it indexes and others runs immediately when the answer is few records in SQL Server such as Oracle, however when the result is large eg 20,000 records all data access times are very diferent. The query returns many fields (about 20) and some of them are of type Varchar 250 and some of 2000 I understand here may be the problem, but not is because for similar results (20,000 records) sql run in 2 seconds and Oracle but it responds little to have full data takes around 30 seconds. The problem is really in bringing information to all these fields since if the inquiry it also but only returning a numeric field is done in 2 seconds. Tests I've done them both through ODBC, in the Toad as in the own Oracle console on the server, so it is not problem Driver or flow of data through the network, I would like to think that this is some of the settings I think there is as much difference between Oracle and Sql. The databases are ORACLE 10 and SQL Server 2008.

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Query Using Row Num In Where Clause With Millions Of Records

Dec 8, 2010

There is a table in Database with millions of records and a query --- Select rowid, ANI, DNIS, message from tbl_sms_talkies where rownum<=:"SYS_B_0" ---- using the high CPU and also this query having high number of executions.

View 10 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Alternate Query Instead Of Querying Table Twice?

Nov 11, 2012

The Item data for individual cycles is as below.

Item_tbl
ItemRundate StddateStatus
P103-Nov-1203-Nov-12A
P104-Nov-1204-Nov-12D
P2 04-Nov-1203-Nov-12A

The requirement is I have to get the details of all data of previous Active cycle(status A) when the Item became disabled(status = D) for Input date.

In above case,since for Item P1 and on cycle date 04-Nov-12,status is D,I have to consider the previous active cycle which is 03-Nov-12. Based on above std date,the data is queried from another table to get all the Items. Item P2 should not be considered in above case.

Below is the code which I have written which considers the rundate as Input parameter.

-- To get the Items disabled for Input date
with Itemdisabled as
(
select item,stddate maxcycledate
from Item_tbl
where rundate = stddate

[code]....

In above case,I'm querying the Item_tbl twice once for getting the disabled Items and once for getting the Previous cycle which is active.

Is there any way to query above only once and get the required results using Lag/Lead functions etc.

View 5 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Find Top Query Running On A Table

Feb 19, 2012

How do i find a particular SQL or a set of SQL's which are excuted against a table (user identified table) that is either a very frequently executed query against that table or high impact SQL against that table? I am currently looking through the AWR reports to go through all the queries but i was wondering if there are any dictionary views where we can find this info from?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Why Different Elapsed Time In Oracle9i And 10g For Same Query

May 5, 2011

why different elapsed time in Oracle9i and oracle10g for the same query ?

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved