determine if a function is worth pinning in memory? I want to come up with a percentage, implying that if the function is already im memory 80%+ of the time then it is not worth it.
View 5 Replieswe have 96GB Memory on the UNIX server and 85% of its usage shows oracle processes I want to determine which Oracle processes are taking most of the memory
SGA is around 36G
SGA_TARGET is 40G
PGA is around 4G
the total of around 40-45 GB of usage is understandable but what other oracle process are chewing up the remaining 30-40 GB on the server is not known
load averages: 7.35, 6.46, 6.15; up 248+11:33:21 12:25:03
2202 processes: 2196 sleeping, 1 zombie, 5 on cpu
CPU states: 83.8% idle, 10.5% user, 5.8% kernel, 0.0% iowait, 0.0% swap
Memory: 96G phys mem, 15G free mem, 128G total swap, 128G free swap
PID USERNAME LWP PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME CPU COMMAND
21720 oracle 258 0 0 40G 40G cpu/48 215:28 2.04% oracle
10709 oracle 1 0 2 1816K 1448K cpu/9 0:02 0.90% res_conf_email_
[code]......
We are using the 11g AMM feature and Memory_Target set to 96GB and total RAM on the Server is 128GB Now the top and free shows up only 200MB memory free on the system.
There are 2 process dbw0 and dbw1 which consumes the top memory and this is 30GB per dbw.
Why is the dbw process taking up so much memory when there is not much load on the database.
We are investigating performance of SQL executions on a database server and we suspect I/O on the server is an issue
For example one particular statement accesses one row during execution (index access) and still takes 2.4 seconds out of which it does I/O for 1.9 seconds
which of the following sections in the AWR will give us the correct information about the I/O, it is slow or not?
1)
Load Profile
Logical reads per second
Physical reads per second
2)
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
waits / time(s) for events like "db file sequential/scattered read"
average wait(ms) for events like "db file sequential/scattered read"
3)
Foreground Wait Events
db file sequential read
db file scattered read
4)
Wait Event Histogram
%of waits <1ms <2ms
Disk file operations I/O
db file sequential read
db file scattered read
5)
Wait Event Histogram Detail (64 msec to 2 sec)
Wait Event Histogram Detail (4 sec to 2 min)
6)
IOStat by Function summary
Buffer Cache Readsreads per sec
7)
File IO Stats
Which is the correct method to calculate actual data size in a table? becaue when I serach in google, I saw the below line.
"Oracle thumb rule says (actual space required for a table + 30 % space) will calculate the original space requirement for a table."
Method 1:
actual space = num_rows*avg_row_len
Method 2:
actual space = (Num of rows in a table) * (Avg_row_len) + ((Num of rows in a table) * (Avg_row_len)* 0.3)
My stats jobs failed last night with "ORA-01652 :Unable to extend TEMP" error.
Is there any way to check this history data, what other session was using TEMP tablespace extensively ?
Is there any way to tune the following query using lot of CPU:-select description,time_stamp,user_id from bhi_tracking where description like 'Multilateral:%'The explain plan for this is query is:-
---------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
----------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 178K| 6609K| 129K|
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| BHI_TRACKING | 178K| 6609K| 129K|
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bhi_tracking is used for reporting purpose and contain millions of records.Generally we keep one year data in this table and delete the remaining.Can I drop the table after taking export and then import it back or can i truncatethe table and then insert the rows into it to enhancethe performance.
Is their any query to find cpu usage & memory usage of all the queries currently running on DB?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI came across situation where a Nullable column is not using index for 'order by' clause. I added Not Null condition in the 'where' condition but it wasn't useful. I don't wanted to make composite index with not nullable column or with constant or modify column to 'Not Null'
So I carried out test cases and during which I found that in one case the sql statement does 'fast full scan' for data access but does not use index for 'order by' sorting
here are the steps
Initially I kept the column Nullable
SQL> create sequence s5;
Sequence created.
SQL> create table t5 as select s5.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a where rownum<1001;
Table created.
SQL> set pages 100
SQL> select column_name,nullable from user_tab_columns where table_name='T5';
SQL> create index i5 on t5(id);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T5',cascade=>true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
exit
SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
select *
from
t5 where id is not null order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.01 0.00 0 16 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=4771 us)
1000 TABLE ACCESS FULL T5 (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=1157 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 49.49 49.72
********************************************************************************
select /*+ index(t i5) */ *
from
t5 t where id is not null order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T5 (cr=150 pr=0 pw=0 time=5167 us)
1000 INDEX FULL SCAN I5 (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=3141 us)(object id 4673065)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 69 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 69 22.89 28.04
Now I modified the 'id' column to Not Null
SQL> alter table t5 modify id not null;
SQL> set pages 100
SQL> select column_name,nullable from user_tab_columns where table_name='T5';
COLUMN_NAME N
------------------------------ -
ID N
OWNER Y
OBJECT_NAME Y
SUBOBJECT_NAME Y
OBJECT_ID Y
DATA_OBJECT_ID Y
OBJECT_TYPE Y
CREATED Y
LAST_DDL_TIME Y
TIMESTAMP Y
STATUS Y
TEMPORARY Y
GENERATED Y
SECONDARY Y
14 rows selected.
select *
from
t5 order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.01 0 29 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.01 0.01 0 45 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=2398 us)
1000 TABLE ACCESS FULL T5 (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=1152 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 37.74 37.91
********************************************************************************
select /*+ index(t i5) */ *
from
t5 t order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T5 (cr=150 pr=0 pw=0 time=4166 us)
1000 INDEX FULL SCAN I5 (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=3142 us)(object id 4673065)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 8.28 8.45
select id
from
t5 order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=1342 us)
1000 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN I5 (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=1093 us)(object id 4673065)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 1.88 1.89
Questions are
1) Why adding 'where id is not null wasn't enough for the index to get used in 'order by'?
2) While we got 'fast full scan' why index wasn't used for 'order by' clause?
3) Do we need the indexed column in where clause for being used in 'order by clause' too?
4) Do we need 'order by' clause if we are selecting only the indexed column with sequence generated values?
I am using 11g version, and trying to understand the Memory Allocation.
1) The new feature Memory target parameters are dynamic? is in it? But when I set with the ALTER SYSTEM... it was not changed, then I had to restart the DB.
2) With the new 2 parameters (MEMORY_MAX_TARGET, MEMORY_TARGET), the SGA_MAX_SIZE parameter should be 0, right? But in my case, the SGA_MAX_SIZE value is automatically assigned.
I am aware that from 11g, memory_target is sufficient for memeory management between SGA and PGA.
what happens if MEMORY_TARGET set to non-zero and SGA_TARGET set to zero values in a 11g database? Does it enable automatic memory management within the SGA?
We regularly hit by ORA-4031 errors. Also, memory_target advisory (v$memory_target_advice) does not show any advisory information.
for eg:
memory_max_target = 500m
memory_target = 500m
and
sga_max_size=500m
sga_target=0
I have two tables with same columns(15 of them), I am trying to find difference between two tables using minus operator and then insert in stage table using below code
Issue is table1 has 50 million records
table2 is empty
so when first time when we execute this v_collection1,v_collection2 collection will have 50 million records in it which will go in memory, I think this is not good, because going in memory will eat memory and resources while sorting and other activities ?
After fetching records in collection we are inserting that in stage table and then COMMIT so i think that wont be good because committing 50 million will generate large amount of redo?
below is snippet of my code
DECLARE
type lst_collection1
IS
TABLE OF table1.col1%type INDEX BY binary_integer;
type lst_collection2
IS
[code].......
I have a question regarding memory parameters in oracle database 9.2.0.8, especially sga_max_size and db_cache_size. Database server has 32G of ram. Oracle parameter on server shmmax is set to 16G. Is reasonable to set sga_max_size to the same value, and db_cache_size to 80% of that size?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am trying to run a trace file with TKPROF. It throws an error :
MEMORY FAULT
The size of the trace file is 8MB. I tried with some other file trace files bigger in size (10MB) than the above file, it works fine. I tried seeing any permission right is required on that trace file is required for the tkprof to excute, but it has got the same permissions like the other trace files.
The problem is that it is not showing any error number or any other Error Description other than "MEMORY FAULT".
I have few queries on PGA memory management.Since these queries are based on 2-3 examples not exactly same by nature I am summarising it after my understanding for the same
As I understand many workareas can be allocated to a single sql statement and number and sizes of theses workareas is controlled internally by Oracle when Automatic Memory management (PGA_aggregate_target and workarea_size_policy=Auto are set) Since many sessions share the PGA memory, the amount of memory available to each session may vary and if less amount of memory is available for a session for sorting then TEMP tablespace is used
[1] Can we say paging happens and can be checked at this time?
[2] Is there a difference in handling memory while populating pl/sql tables?
As I have encountered ora-04030 while some our developers were populating pl/sql tables but never encountered this error for sorting, hash joins etc Though I don't remember the width of pl/sql table, I am sure the developer used 'LIMIT' clause during bulk collect and still faced the issue.
With a single session on the server, I noticed that the difference in values displayed issuing 'free' command in linux and output values from sesstat did not match at all while there wasn't any heavy OS process involved during the period. I was expecting 'used' and 'free' values displayed by free command (linux) will change and difference would be approximately equals 'before and after values of session pga memory.
[3] Isn't it expected to match?
[4] Can we say in dedicated server, at any moment of time, the SUM of 'session pga memory' represents all the memory used by Oracle SGA, at that point of time?
select sum(value)/1024/1024 "memory in MB" from v$sesstat where statistic#=20;
During one of the tests I got following output (divide value by 10 for my visibility and avoid formatting)
SQL> select a.name, to_char(b.value/10, '999,999,999') value
from v$statname a, v$mystat b
where a.statistic# = b.statistic#
and a.name like '%ga memory%'; 2 3 4
[code]...
The above query is showing above values even when the pl/sql block execution is completed 30 minutes back
[5] Do we call this as 'memory leak' where memory is not released even while some time has passed since session has done something?Of course I am not checking at OS level as mentioned in question [3] above the values won't match!
Still the output of free command for reference(After the pl/sql block executed)
SQL> !free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3016796 2999660 17136 0 4308 1173260
-/+ buffers/cache: 1822092 1194704
Swap: 1048568 636124 412444
--(After the pl/sql block executed)
SQL> select * from v$pgastat;
NAMEVALUEUNIT
aggregate PGA target parameter 524288000bytes
aggregate PGA auto target 456256512bytes
global memory bound 26214400bytes
total PGA inuse 17328128bytes
[code]...
[6] What could be the significance of negative values of 'session pga memory/max'?
Last We have an OLTP system and in the night we run batch processes in 2-4 sessions
Suppose I have 10 GB RAM and with PGA setting of 3.5 GB Now I want the batch process sessions to use max possible memory during nighttime and toggle the setting back in the morning
[7] With above settings (10 GB RAM and 3.5 GB PGA) how can I divide the memory among 4 sessions?
Shall I set 1) PGA_aggregate_target=0 2)Workarea_size_policy=manual 3) Sort_are_size 4) Hash_area_size
[8] What would be approx values for parameter 3 and 4? will it be straight 3.5 GB/ 4?
I have a confusion with MEMORY_TARGET and MEMORY_MAX_TARGET parameter. if i set SGA_TARGET, SGA_MAX_SIZE along with MEMORY_TARGET and MEMORY_MAX_TARGET then how oracle will manage the memory? Because as per my understanding if we set MEM
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are running Oracle Apps 11i on Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise SP2 (32 bit). After enabling /3GB switch parameter in Boot.ini file, the OS recognizes the 8GB RAM and consumes it upto 5.6GB during non-peak hours but as workload increases in evening when end users generate auto receipts the same memory usage ratio reaches upto 6GB resulting the OS gets hang and don't respond at all. Inspite of having 2GB free memory it doesn't consume it. We have to shut down it by pressing the power off button and restart it
The system configuration is as under:
HP ProLiant DL380 G6
Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz
8GB RAM (4 x 2 GB)
After the reboots each system was using around 30 GB of memory... now that it's been up for a week memory is up to 98GB used on each system. None of the systems are swapping.
Mem: 98999084k total, 97937116k used, 1061968k free, 774900k buffers
Swap: 16779884k total, 0k used, 16779884k free, 89510312k cached
I have a table with:
1 million rows
average row length 200 bytes
50 columns
and this update statement
UPDATE mytable SET varchar2_4000_column = replace(replace(replace...300 times)
It looks at every row in the table (no WHERE clause) and does these 300 replace operations on this column for each row. Each replace replaces with a null so effectively it is removing strings. Much of the time these strings are not in the column.
This update statement takes 25 minutes and it is 98% CPU and 2% USER_IO time.
I figure that is what is taking all the time since it is a CPU bound statement. if rows in this table are persistent over time then tag rows with a flag to show which ones have already been processed and skip these next time around.
I am stuck with a query which is taking a lot of time to execute. Below is the pseudo code of the same:
SELECT TAB_ALIAS1.COL1,TAB_ALIAS1.COL2,TAB_ALIAS1.COL3
FROM TABLE1 TAB_ALIAS1
WHERE TAB_ALIAS1.COL4 = <INPUT PARAMETER1>
AND TRUNC(TAB_ALIAS1.ELAP_TIME) =
(
SELECT MAX(ELAP_TIME)
[code]....
I have a table which has 4M records
This table has a query where one of the condition is
AND STATUS <> 'C'
Now the data is as following
select count(*) record_count, status from new_business group by status;
record_countstatus
4298025C
15N
13Q
122S
I want to know if following index would be useful in this case while the condition in where clause is
"AND STATUS <> 'C'"
create index nb_index_1 on new_business(case when status in('N','Q','S') then 1 else NULL end);
Or
create index nb_index_1 on new_business(case when status ='N' then 'N' when status='Q' then 'Q' when status='S' then 'S' else NULL end);
I tried it on a sample table but the index is simply not picked up even when hinted following are the db level settings
query_rewrite_enabled string TRUE
query_rewrite_integrity string enforced
I tried it 'query_rewrite_integrity' with 'trusted' as well .
when am trying to use nvl for one condition it is taking lot of time to execute but when am removing nvl function then the query executing in 2 min. condition is given below
(HOI2.ORG_INFORMATION1)=nvl(TO_CHAR(:p_set_of_books_id) , HOI2.ORG_INFORMATION1)
but when am using the same condition as below the querry executing in 2 min
(HOI2.ORG_INFORMATION1)=TO_CHAR(:p_set_of_books_id)
my query given below
(SELECT cust.customer_number cust_no, cust.customer_name customer,
cnv.item_no, SUM(wd.shipped_quantity) shp_qty_nos,
0 rtn_qty_nos,
ROUND(SUM(cnv.cnf * wd.shipped_quantity), 3) shp_qty_tons,
0 rtn_qty_tons, 0 net_shp_qty_nos, 0 net_shp_qty_tons
[code]...
I am running oracle linux 5.7 on VMware Workstation 9 and trying to install Grid 11gr2, during installation my system freezes and I see out of memory errors. Actually Java installer is eating up too much memory over 1gb. Is there a way ? I can limit memory usage by Java process to a certain extent ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have created below function to remove specific words/special characters from string. This function is producing expected result. Using this function i need to insert around 900000 records in name_compress table. Insert is taking around 7 mins, how we can tune this function so that insert will be executed within 1-2 mins.
Function -
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION NAME_FN(IN_STRING1 VARCHAR2)
RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
V_OUTPUT VARCHAR2(300);
V_OUTPUT1 VARCHAR2(300);
V_OUTPUT2 VARCHAR2(300);
V_OUTPUT3 VARCHAR2(300);
[code]...
I have a requirement to calculate the maximum number of concurrent calls from the following data:
Create_date connect_date_time disconnect_date_time duration ...
12/01/10 13:20:26 1263253551 1263254153 602
...
I have attempted to use the analytic function to keep a running total of the count of active calls based on the connect and disconnect times given for each record row.
e.g.
SELECT
count(*) calls,
avg(duration)/60 average_duration_mins,
max(duration)/60 max_duration_mins,
sum(duration)/60 total_mins,
(SUM(DURATION)/60)*0.04 total_cost_4c_per_min
[code]....
There is an 'emp' table with a column name as 'mgr' with datatype 'number'. following is the detailed description of the table:
SQL> desc emp;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------------
EMPNO NOT NULL NUMBER(4)
ENAME VARCHAR2(10)
JOB VARCHAR2(9)
MGR NUMBER(4)
HIREDATE DATE
SAL NUMBER(7,2)
COMM NUMBER(7,2)
DEPTNO NUMBER(2)
Now when I run the 'select mgr from emp e;' query the output which I get is:
7902
7698
7698
7839
7698
7839
7839
7566
7698
7788
7698
7566
7782
Note: One value in between here is null, the required to me is that I want to print a character value 'President' in place of null .
I had a question on BFILENAME() :
first,
create or replace directory UTL_FILE_DIR as 'k:lob_test';
GRANT READ,WRITE ON DIRECTORY UTL_FILE_DIR TO user1;
and then ,I login use user : user1
create or replace package body p_utl_mail_attach_raw as
procedure send_single_user_attach_raw(........)
fil BFILE;
filenm VARCHAR2(50) := 'aaa.jpg'
begin
fil := BFILENAME('UTL_FILE_DIR', filenm);
end ;
this result it show :
UTL_FILE_DIR/aaa.jpg, exists=F, length=0, open=F
I have a requirement where the user input values will be passed as comma separated string to backend, which is queried against the table using instr. But the index present on the table is not using the index , due to the instr function.How can I create a index in such a way that The instr function uses it.
CREATE TABLE TEST_IDX
(
CCN VARCHAR2(10 CHAR),
SKU_NUM VARCHAR2(10 CHAR),
MOD VARCHAR2(10 CHAR),
SKU_STATUS VARCHAR2(2 CHAR),
RPT_FLAG VARCHAR2(2 CHAR),
CYCLE_AS_OF_DATE DATE,
SMP_IDENTIFIER NUMBER,
MEASURE_NAME VARCHAR2(100 CHAR)
);
CREATE INDEX TEST_IDX1 ON TEST_IDX
(CCN, SMP_IDENTIFIER, MOD, CYCLE_AS_OF_DATE, RPT_FLAG,
MEASURE_NAME);
The below query is going for full table scan due to this.
select * from test_idx where (INSTR (','||'E10000'||',', ',' || ccn || ',') <> 0 OR 'E10000' = 'DEFAULT')
and mod='90396' and rpt_flag='O' and smp_identifier=2
how to recreate the above index so that these queries uses this index.
Looking to understand the difference between instance tuning and database tuning.
What is the difference between these two tuning exercises? I understand that an instance is memory based structures (logical) where as database consists of physical structures.
However, how does one tune a database the physical structure? Does it have to do with file placements/block sizes etc. Would you agree that a lot of that is taken care by ASM now in 11g? What tools are required/available (third party as well as oracle supplied) for these types of tuning scenarios?
we are using windows server 2008 R2 and oracle database version 11.2.0.2
Have two points here : I/O performance and Out of memory issue
1.) ADDM Report recommended solution is to stripe all data files for to reduce "Wait class "User I/O" was consuming" But I am not sure It will improve more I/O performance(it will resolved the issue) and same issue we are getting on many servers.
ADDM Report Snipped:
Findings and Recommendations
----------------------------
Finding 1: I/O Throughput
Impact is .28 active sessions, 44.97% of total activity.
--------------------------------------------------------
The throughput of the I/O subsystem was significantly lower than expected.
Recommendation 1: Host Configuration
Estimated benefit is .28 active sessions, 44.97% of total activity.
[code]....
2.) Same issue we got in another server and we increased memory thrice but again we got same below error. Now we are getting same below error another server.
Alert log Snipped:=
Wed Jun 12 07:12:15 2013
Process startup failed, error stack:
Errors in file E:\APP\ORACLE\diag\rdbms\oemgc\oemgc\trace\oemgc_psp0_3316.trc:
ORA-27300: OS system dependent operation:CreateThread failed with status: 8
ORA-27301: OS failure message: Not enough storage is available to process this command.
ORA-27302: failure occurred at: ssthrddcr
[code]....