Table Has No Rows - Select Taking Time

Aug 23, 2010

We were trying to insert approx 76 million records worth of approx 4 GB in a table when the insert operation failed with the archive log error.

The database was hanged, we re-started the database and currently there are no records in the table but when we are firing a select

select count(*)
from table

It's taking approx 2 mins to come out with the result.

We checked and found that there are no locks on the table currently.

what do we need to do to get the performance back

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Oracle 11.2.0.3.0 - Select Query Taking Time

Jan 24, 2013

My oracle database version is 11.2.0.3.0 where i am having one schema in that schema i am having 3 same tables with same structure same data but with different name.

but problem is in first table when i perform select query it takes 5 sec, in another table it is taking 0 sec and in third table it is taking 10 sec.

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Select Query Taking Time Even After Using Parallel Hint?

Sep 25, 2013

select
serialnumber from product where productid in
(select /*+ full parallel(producttask 16) */productid from producttask where
startedtimestamp > to_date('2013-07-04 00:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and startedtimestamp < to_date('2013-07-05 00:00:00', 'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and producttasktypeid in

[code]....

Explain plan output:

Plan hash value: 2779236890
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name| Rows| Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time| Pstart| Pstop |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT || 1 | 29 | 9633M (8)|999:59:59 |||
|* 1 | FILTER |||| ||||
| 2 | PARTITION RANGE ALL || 738M| 19G| 6321K (1)| 21:04:17 | 1 | 6821 |

[code]....

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - filter( EXISTS (<not feasible>)
4 - filter("PRODUCTID"=:B1)
5 - filter(ROWNUM<100)
12 - access("MODELID"=:B1)

[code]....

Note: - SQL profile "SYS_SQLPROF_014153616b850002" used for this statement

View 2 Replies View Related

Drop Statement On Table Taking Long Time

Sep 20, 2010

We are firing a normal Drop command on our database and the database version is 10.2.0.4.The database is running on AIX v5.The command is taking more time than usual .

When i am monitoring the session i can see that a call is being made to procedure "aw_drop_proc".Could i ask you if this is something that is taking more time than usual.

We are not having any partitions on the nested tables .We have a pack of tables and we are dropping this pack through a procedure.The pack comprises of nested tables & normal tables.To drop a nested table it is taking around 6 seconds(Table with no rows) and a normal table(With no rows) it is taking 17 milli seconds.We have a partition on Normal table.

The same operation in windows is taking very less time when compared to AIX.

View 5 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Table Access By Index Rowid / Taking More Time

Sep 13, 2012

I've a query like

update tab1
  set col1 = ( select col2 from
                       tab2 
                where tab1.id = tab2.id) table 1 has arnd 10,000 rows

table 2 has arnd 1,700,000 rows and has a primary key on column id.This query is taking around 20 secs to execute. I checked the x-plan and most of time taken for table access by index rowid.I checked the stats for the tab2, its just three days old.

View 17 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Pipe Line Function Taking Time To Return Table Record

Mar 15, 2011

I want to use a function in join clause. so i go for pipelined function(using for loop to get record & 1 more loop to fetch in table type variable). i achieved what i required. but problem is it takes much time to fetch data. is there any other approach which returns table records without pipelined function.

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Servers Will Be Running SELECT Which Returns Zero Rows All Time

Feb 11, 2011

Our application servers will be running a SELECT which returns zero rows all the time.This SELECT is put into a package and this package will be called by application servers very frequently which is causing unnecessary CPU.

Original query and plan

SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_SET_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_ID, TARGET_VERSION
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS
WHERE SEGMENT_JOB_ID NOT IN
(SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS) 2 3 4 5 ;
[code]....

Which option will be better or do we have other options?They need to pass the column's with zero rows to a ref cursor.

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: CLOB Parameters Taking More Time

Mar 3, 2012

We are on a GRID DB and using Oracle 11g.

A external reporting application ( SQL SERVER REPORT SERVICES) sends in some comma separated parameter values, which has to be queried against a table with 6-10 million records.

Length of the comma separated value can go upto 5000-6000 in length based on user input in the front end application. This application sends this value in comma separated. i.e., like

'AA1-11101,AA2-34346,AA4-534399,.....' like this at a time the application can send upto 500 values each of length 10. i.e, maximum length can be upto 5000. I used CLOB to handle this because since the length can be 5000 and varchar2 can handle only 4000 long literals.

But the time taken by the CLOB to verify against the table using INSTR is more compared to VARCHAR2.

I found that VARCHAR2 does'nt take much time. Is it a good idea to have VARCHAR2 in the PLSQL procedure as parameter instead of CLOB, since PLSQL VARCHAR2 can handle upto 32000 long values.

View 10 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Get Which Query Is Taking Time While Executing

Mar 2, 2013

How to find time log for query or any procedure like start time and end time and total time.

So that I can tune that queries properly.

Also how can we find estimated query running time.?

View -1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To Find The Query Which Is Taking Most Time

Jul 4, 2011

I want to know how I can find which query is taking more time , for example some query's are run from unix, java and from toad,sqlplus. and one query is taking much more time to execute, so how i can get that query and all the details.

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Same Query Taking Different Time When Executed Through Different DBs?

Feb 19, 2013

I have a query which is executing fast in dev env,but very long time in qa env.What is the criteria when this behaviour occurs.Though qa is having more data than dev.But still it is taking long time for 1 rows also.When I am using the query rownum<=1.So What to check for this.

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Sql Taking More CPU Time?

Nov 23, 2010

I have one query in my production which is taking more CPU time. when that statement executing the CUP is taking more than 90%

I am attaching the sql query and indexes on the table.

View 4 Replies View Related

Forms :: Show_view Taking So Much Time In 10g

Mar 21, 2011

I have one big form where the first canvas (content) is taking nearly 20 seconds to display. this is in web mode using forms 10g.

i have tried using SHOW_VIEW(find_view('SAMPLE')) but still no improvement.

View 5 Replies View Related

How To Select 10 Rows From Mission Table

Sep 2, 2008

i want the 10 most recent mission date from mission table . i have tried using rownum but could not get it. TOP does not work

select * from
(select length(code_name) leng from missions
where length(code_name) >7
order by mission_date)
where rownum = 10
;

this does not work ::: no rows are selected and i do rownum = 1 then gives me one record and when i do rownum>=1 gives me all records

View 10 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Select Updated Rows From One Table

Jul 13, 2013

There are two tables like I posted below.I want a SQL query which selects all the rows from TABLE A which are not present in TABLE B. Also the select statement should pick all those rows which has updated value of COL_A2 in TABLE A.

TABLE A
COL_A1COL_A2

AAAMOBILE
BBBTABLET
CCCDESKTOP
DDDUNKNOWN

TABLE B
COL_B1COL_B2

AAAMOBILE
BBBUNKNOWN
CCCDESKTOP

The select statement should return following rows from TABLE A

COL_A1COL_A2
BBBTABLET
DDDUNKNOWN

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Select Rows From Table With Same Particular Field?

Aug 20, 2012

select the rows from a table with the same particular field in PL/SQL. Actually I don't want to write two loops one inserted into another.

View 7 Replies View Related

Block Of Procedure Taking Time To Execute

Feb 9, 2011

I have connected to the database from two sessions

Box 1 : i have executed a procedure.it took few seconds to get executed

Box 2 : I have executed a block of procedure.It is taking 1 min 40 secs to get executed.

why it is taking much time from Box2(for executing a block from procedure) , as the same code executed successfully in a procedure from Box 1.

View 2 Replies View Related

Forms :: 10.1.2.0.2 Taking More Time To Load On Some Machines

Mar 31, 2010

Some of my forms taking to much time while loading on some machines but same forms working fine on other machines with same configuration.

Forms, version: 10.1.2.0.2, Clients: Win_XP_Pro, App Server: Window 2003 Server, IE7, Jinit 1.3.1.26

View 3 Replies View Related

Select Query With Four Table Its Generating Around 650 Rows?

Feb 20, 2013

i have a select query with four table its generating around 650 rows. and i need to update these 650 rows only.

for example

update ps_po_lining b
set y.recv_req = 'N'
where recv_req in

[Code]....

this query runs but its updating 6000 rows. which is not right. we need to update what ever the select query is retrieving.

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Block To Select 2 Rows From Table And Execute Them

Aug 3, 2010

I have a table with name SQL_STATEMENTS and it has 1 column, Column name is STATEMENT_DESC

The contents of rows in Table above are:

select * from emp;
select * from dept;

Can I write a PLSQL block that can select these 2 rows from the table and execute them?

View 9 Replies View Related

IF EXISTS (Select) - Enter Into Table One Period At A Time?

Apr 21, 2011

I am trying to break down a row of data that has nine periods that I want to enter into a table one period at a time. I am trying to use "IF EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM TABLENAME WHERE FIELD1 IS NOT NULL) THEN" through all nine fields. It keeps returning lines that have a null column as well as not null columns. if there is a better way of doing this. Here is an example of what I am trying to do:

IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME WHERE LAST_DT9 IS NOT NULL) THEN
SELECT NUMBER, 1COL9, 2COL9, 3COL9, FIRST_DT9, LAST_DT9, 4COL9
FROM TABLE_NAME;
ELSE IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME WHERE LAST_DT8 IS NOT NULL) THEN

[code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Queries Taking Long Time After 11g Data Migration

Sep 14, 2010

I have upgraded oracle database from 9i to 11g using export and import utility. After migration we are facing performance issue in report generation, We have observed that First execution of report is taking very long time and when we generate the same report 2 -3 times there is considerable change in the execution time and it is more better than the first execution.

2 days back I have restarted the database and found the same issue. There are around 300 Reports and it is not possible to generate all the reports 2-3 times every time we restart the database.

View 5 Replies View Related

Log Applying Service Is Taking More Time In Physical Standby?

Sep 19, 2013

My Database version as followsOracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64biPL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionCORE  10.2.0.4.0  ProductionTNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionNLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production We have datagaurd setup as well - Huge archive logs are generating in our primary database - Archive logs are shipping to standby with no dealy - But applying the archive logs are taking more in our physical standby database -why it was taking more time  to apply archivlogs (sync) in standby ? - What could be possible reasons..? Note : Size of standby redo logs are same as redo log file of primary database - Also standby by redo one or more than online redo log primary. Since i need to report my higer leve stating this is cause for delay in applying archive logs.

View 32 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: How To View Rows In Table Format Using Select Query

May 28, 2012

I need to view the rows of the result of a select query in table format in GUI application.I have used XMLELEMENT to somewhat match the scenario to display as ','(comma) separate values as b belwo

SELECT RTRIM (XMLAGG (XMLELEMENT (e, EMPNO || ',')).EXTRACT ('//text()'),
',')
AS empid,
RTRIM (XMLAGG (XMLELEMENT (e, ENAME || ',')).EXTRACT ('//text()'),

[code]...

But the case is I need to display the value in table format Horizontally as below

EMPIDemployee nameDEPID
778
278CLARK10
397MILLER
934KING

[code]...

View 14 Replies View Related

Inserting Timesten Cache Is Taking More Time Than Insert In Db11gR2?

Jan 20, 2011

We are inserting data using JDBC (Java program) in Oracle 11gR2 DB and Timesten to oracle (using AWT cache group) . In reality insertion in oracle is faster than Timesten Cache DB.

Timesten version - TimesTen Release 11.2.1.7.0 (64 bit Linux/x86_64)

1. It is Client/Server Model.
2. Cpu has 4 core and we are using 3 core for insert the Data.
3. Perm and Temp size is big enough compare to Data Size
4. auto commit=0
5. durable commit=0
6. PassThrough=1
7. LogBufParallelism=3
8. LogPurge=1
9. LockWait = 0.1

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Delete Statement Is Taking More Time For Execution?

Mar 9, 2010

In my code I am using delete statement which is taking too much time to execute.

Statement is as follow:

DELETE FROM TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION T
WHERE (ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT)
IN (SELECT ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT
FROM LOAD_TRADE_ORDER
WHERE IND_IS_BAD_RECORD='N');

Tables Used:
oTRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION Row count (329525880)
oLOAD_TRADE_ORDER Row count (29281)

Every column in "IN" clause and select clause is containing index on it

Every time no of rows which to be deleted is vary (May be in hundred ,thousand or hundred thousand )so that I am Unable to use "BITMAP" index on the table "LOAD_TRADE_ORDER" column "IND_IS_BAD_RECORD" though it is containing distinct record in it.

Even table "TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION" is containing "RANGE" PARTITION over it on the column "ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID". With this I am enclosing table scripts with Indexes and Partitions over it.

way for fast execution in of above delete statement?

View 4 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Cost Of Query Is Brought Down But Taking Same Time

Sep 1, 2010

For an query, cost was 16Lakhs and was taking 30min, I brought down the cost to 1.5lakhs, but still it is taking 30min.

There were many outer joins and same table has been Used(FROM clause) 5 times in the query. I have introduced WITH clause, and brought down the cost.

View 7 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Normal Insert Proc - Bulk Collect Taking More Time

Feb 4, 2013

I am working on oracle 11g...I have one normal insert proc

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test2
AS
     BEGIN
     INSERT INTO first_table
     (citiversion, financialcollectionid,
     dataitemid, dataitemvalue,
 [code]....

I am processing 1 lakh rows.tell me the reason why bulk collect is taking more time. ? According to my knowledge it should take less time. do i need to check any parameter?

View 5 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Stored Procedure Taking Long Time When Updates In Loop

Feb 5, 2013

This is my stored procedure

I have below store procedure:

create or replace
PROCEDURE TESTPERFORMANCE (
o_statuscode OUT NUMBER,
o_statusdescription OUT VARCHAR2,
starttime out timestamp,
time_after_query_TESTJOB out timestamp,

[Code]...

This procedure is taking around 35 minutes when there are 35000 records to loop over (i.e cursor has 35000 records) and TESTJOBTRANSACTIONS table has 90000 records. How to reduce execution time.

View 12 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Insert Taking Significantly Longer Than Select?

May 23, 2011

Recently upgraded from Oracle 10.2.04 to 11g with a few bumps on the road most of which I've been able to resolve, but there's one that continues to confuse me.

Pretty vanilla INSERT statement in which the SELECT portion on its own runs in about 2 to 5 seconds (all results returned) on a facility by facility basis. When I try to combine this with an INSERT statement it ends up running for 12+ minutes per facility. The explain plan looks good and I've even tried emptying the target table prior to running the INSERT.

I've gathered schema/table statistics to no avail. I also tried using it as a CREATE TABLE AS statement and it still takes the 12 minutes per facility.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved