Drop Statement On Table Taking Long Time
Sep 20, 2010
We are firing a normal Drop command on our database and the database version is 10.2.0.4.The database is running on AIX v5.The command is taking more time than usual .
When i am monitoring the session i can see that a call is being made to procedure "aw_drop_proc".Could i ask you if this is something that is taking more time than usual.
We are not having any partitions on the nested tables .We have a pack of tables and we are dropping this pack through a procedure.The pack comprises of nested tables & normal tables.To drop a nested table it is taking around 6 seconds(Table with no rows) and a normal table(With no rows) it is taking 17 milli seconds.We have a partition on Normal table.
The same operation in windows is taking very less time when compared to AIX.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 14, 2010
I have upgraded oracle database from 9i to 11g using export and import utility. After migration we are facing performance issue in report generation, We have observed that First execution of report is taking very long time and when we generate the same report 2 -3 times there is considerable change in the execution time and it is more better than the first execution.
2 days back I have restarted the database and found the same issue. There are around 300 Reports and it is not possible to generate all the reports 2-3 times every time we restart the database.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
This is my stored procedure
I have below store procedure:
create or replace
PROCEDURE TESTPERFORMANCE (
o_statuscode OUT NUMBER,
o_statusdescription OUT VARCHAR2,
starttime out timestamp,
time_after_query_TESTJOB out timestamp,
[Code]...
This procedure is taking around 35 minutes when there are 35000 records to loop over (i.e cursor has 35000 records) and TESTJOBTRANSACTIONS table has 90000 records. How to reduce execution time.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2012
Expdp directory=xxx.dmp dumpfile=aaa.dmp logfile=xxx.log FULL=Y
: :: : : :: : : : ;
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
Total estimation using BLOCKS method: 24.87 MB
Processing object type SCHEMA_EXPORT/USER
[code]...
then my export hangs..... checked in alert log nothing found.and then killed the job and reran again but same....checked the status and it's saying EXECUTING.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2013
11.2.0.3 This is for a build. We are still in development. No risk of data loss. As part of the build, I drop the user,re-create it, re-create the objects. Allows us to test the build all the way through. Its our process. This user has some tables with several 1000 partitions. I ran a 10046 trace and oracle is using pl/sql to do loops to do DML against the data dictionary. Anyway to speed this up? I am going to turn off the recyclebin during the build and turn it back on. anything else I can do? Right now I just issue 'drop user cascade'. Part of is the weak hardware we have in the development/environment. Takes about 20 minutes just to run through this part of the script (the script has alot more pieces than this) and we do fairly frequent builds. I can't change the build process. My only option is to try to make this run a little faster.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2010
In my code I am using delete statement which is taking too much time to execute.
Statement is as follow:
DELETE FROM TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION T
WHERE (ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT)
IN (SELECT ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT
FROM LOAD_TRADE_ORDER
WHERE IND_IS_BAD_RECORD='N');
Tables Used:
oTRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION Row count (329525880)
oLOAD_TRADE_ORDER Row count (29281)
Every column in "IN" clause and select clause is containing index on it
Every time no of rows which to be deleted is vary (May be in hundred ,thousand or hundred thousand )so that I am Unable to use "BITMAP" index on the table "LOAD_TRADE_ORDER" column "IND_IS_BAD_RECORD" though it is containing distinct record in it.
Even table "TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION" is containing "RANGE" PARTITION over it on the column "ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID". With this I am enclosing table scripts with Indexes and Partitions over it.
way for fast execution in of above delete statement?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2013
We have data archive scripts, these scripts move data for a date range to a different table. so the script has two parts first copy data from original table to archive table; and second delete copied rows from the original table. The first part is executing very fast but the deletion is taking too long i.e. around 2-3 hours. The customer analysed the delete query and are saying the script is not using index and is going into full table scan. but the predicate itself is the primary key,More info below
CREATE TABLE "APP"."MON_TXNS" ( "ID_TXN" NUMBER(12,0) NOT NULL ENABLE, "BOL_IS_CANCELLED" VARCHAR2(1 BYTE) DEFAULT 'N' NOT NULL ENABLE, "ID_PAYER" NUMBER(12,0), "ID_PAYER_PI" NUMBER(12,0), "ID_PAYEE" NUMBER(12,0), "ID_PAYEE_PI" NUMBER(12,0), "ID_CURRENCY" CHAR(3 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE, "STR_TEXT" VARCHAR2(60 CHAR), "DAT_MERCHANT_TIMESTAMP" DATE, "STR_MERCHANT_ORDER_ID" VARCHAR2(30 BYTE), "DAT_EXPIRATION" DATE, "DAT_CREATION" DATE, "STR_USER_CREATION" VARCHAR2(30 CHAR), "DAT_LAST_UPDATE"
[Code]...
Data is first moved to table in schema3.OTW. and then we are deleting all the rows in otw from original table. below is the explain plan for delete
SQL> explain plan for 2 delete from schema1.mon_txns where id_txn in (select id_txn from schema3.OTW);
Explained. SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2798378986
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 2520 | 233K| 87 (2)| 00:00:02 || 1 | DELETE | MON_TXNS | | | | ||* 2 | HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI | | 2520 | 233K| 87 (2)| 00:00:02 || 3 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| OTW_ID_TXN | 2520 | 15120 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 || 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MON_TXNS | 14260 | 1239K| 83 (0)| 00:00:02 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2010
We were trying to insert approx 76 million records worth of approx 4 GB in a table when the insert operation failed with the archive log error.
The database was hanged, we re-started the database and currently there are no records in the table but when we are firing a select
select count(*)
from table
It's taking approx 2 mins to come out with the result.
We checked and found that there are no locks on the table currently.
what do we need to do to get the performance back
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2012
I've a query like
update tab1
set col1 = ( select col2 from
tab2
where tab1.id = tab2.id) table 1 has arnd 10,000 rows
table 2 has arnd 1,700,000 rows and has a primary key on column id.This query is taking around 20 secs to execute. I checked the x-plan and most of time taken for table access by index rowid.I checked the stats for the tab2, its just three days old.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2012
I am working on 10.2.0.4 oracle version database of my production,
when executed a simple drop command , the total time it took is 26 secs. on Avg. the table is holding only 20 records. this is happening for the last few weeks , prior to that it took less than 0 secs.
05:22:58 SQL> drop table C$_100GL_INTERFACE ;
Table dropped.
Elapsed: 00:00:26.67
but on successive executions the elapsed time falls to 10-15secs.
And on the same test env, we are achieving the expected results less than 0 secs.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2011
I want to use a function in join clause. so i go for pipelined function(using for loop to get record & 1 more loop to fetch in table type variable). i achieved what i required. but problem is it takes much time to fetch data. is there any other approach which returns table records without pipelined function.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2011
How can we tune our RMAN Duplicate as it was taking 10+ hours to finish. Current production database size is 800GB. Approx duration of rman online backup (FULL, including archived logs) is 4 to 5 hours.
Here's the rman backup script we used:
sql 'alter system archive log current';
list archivelog all;
run
{
show all;
report schema;
backup database plus archivelog delete all input;
}
exit
Here's the rman duplicate command we used:
run
{
set until time "to_date(to_char(sysdate,'Mon DD YYYY') || ' 02:30:00', 'Mon DD YYYY HH24:MI:SS')";
allocate auxiliary channel ch1 type disk;
duplicate target database to testdb;
}
exit
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2012
MY DB Version: 10.2.o
OS: Windows Server 2003
I am trying to import on table which i have the export dump file which i take using expdp previously when i load that table on the same host
by using below command:
expdp scott/tiger@db10g tables=EMP,DEPT directory=TEST_DIR dumpfile=EMP_DEPT.dmp logfile=expdpEMP_DEPT.log
after that i zip that dump and move it to external usb and now i need that table i copy that table and unzip that that dump
Command i am using to do the import is :
impdp scott/tiger@db10g tables=EMP,DEPT directory=TEST_DIR dumpfile=EMP_DEPT.dmp logfile=impdpEMP_DEPT.log
But the query of import is still runing even not showing any amount of rows to be imported.
i already make the tablespace in which the table was previosuly before dropping but when i check the sapce of tablespace that is also not consuming one error i got preiviously while performing this task is:
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.1.0.2.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Master table "CDR"."SYS_IMPORT_TABLE_03" successfully loaded/unloaded
Starting "CDR"."SYS_IMPORT_TABLE_03": cdr/********@tsiindia directory=TEST_DIR dumpfile=CAT_IN_DATA_042012.DMP tables=CAT_IN_DATA_042012 logfile=impdpCAT_IN_DATA_042012.log
[code]....
i check streams_pool_size it will show zero and then i make it to 48M and after that
SQL> show parameter streams_pool_size;
NAME TYPE VALUE
-----------
streams_pool_size big integer 48M
But still it takes time
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2013
I have a session on a system here that has been stuck on a DELETE statement for a very long time and the session is pegging the CPU. Using TOAD here is the "current statement":
DELETE FROM WORKFLOW
WHERE ID = :B1
ID is the primary key of the table.Here are some relevant stats, also from TOAD's session browser:
Elapsed time = 35507986900
CPU time = 35531815481
Buffer gets = 972040769
Disk reads = 951289273
Executions = 71462
I'm not sure I understand "executions" because from the information I have from the people who initiated this, this particular delete should only be occurring 30 times... maybe that stat means something other than what I think it does.I also ran a trace for 30 seconds using:
CODESQL> begin dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable(session_id=>97, serial_num=>15, wai
ts=>true, binds=>true); end;
2
3 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> begin dbms_monitor.session_trace_disable(session_id=>97, serial_num=>15); e
nd;
2 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
I ran tkprof over the resulting trc file:
CODE[root@localhost trace]# /oradb/devmain/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/bin/tkprof ltw35qa1_ora_19558.trc
output = delete_scattered2.txt
TKPROF: Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Development on Wed Feb 27 04:04:50 2013
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
[root@localhost trace]#
The resulting file is attached. Now the offending query in the tkprof, based on my interpretation, is the select from the CMTE00 table, which contains 2344482 rows and no index on the workflow_id column. The relationship between CMTE00 and WORKFLOW tables are 1 to 1. There is a foreign key on CMTE00 pointing to the primary key of WORKFLOW which is what I assume initiated this query - I assume this is oracle checking the referential integrity since our code is not executing that statement. Also of interest, prior to this delete statement, the corresponding entry in CMTE00 was deleted in the same transaction. Google searching "db scattered file read" lead me to one of your (Don - if you read this) articles and appears to indicate that individual blocks are being fetched off the disk and this is what is taking up all the time.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2012
We are on a GRID DB and using Oracle 11g.
A external reporting application ( SQL SERVER REPORT SERVICES) sends in some comma separated parameter values, which has to be queried against a table with 6-10 million records.
Length of the comma separated value can go upto 5000-6000 in length based on user input in the front end application. This application sends this value in comma separated. i.e., like
'AA1-11101,AA2-34346,AA4-534399,.....' like this at a time the application can send upto 500 values each of length 10. i.e, maximum length can be upto 5000. I used CLOB to handle this because since the length can be 5000 and varchar2 can handle only 4000 long literals.
But the time taken by the CLOB to verify against the table using INSTR is more compared to VARCHAR2.
I found that VARCHAR2 does'nt take much time. Is it a good idea to have VARCHAR2 in the PLSQL procedure as parameter instead of CLOB, since PLSQL VARCHAR2 can handle upto 32000 long values.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2013
How to find time log for query or any procedure like start time and end time and total time.
So that I can tune that queries properly.
Also how can we find estimated query running time.?
View -1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2011
I want to know how I can find which query is taking more time , for example some query's are run from unix, java and from toad,sqlplus. and one query is taking much more time to execute, so how i can get that query and all the details.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2013
I have a query which is executing fast in dev env,but very long time in qa env.What is the criteria when this behaviour occurs.Though qa is having more data than dev.But still it is taking long time for 1 rows also.When I am using the query rownum<=1.So What to check for this.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2010
I have one query in my production which is taking more CPU time. when that statement executing the CUP is taking more than 90%
I am attaching the sql query and indexes on the table.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2011
I have one big form where the first canvas (content) is taking nearly 20 seconds to display. this is in web mode using forms 10g.
i have tried using SHOW_VIEW(find_view('SAMPLE')) but still no improvement.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2011
I have connected to the database from two sessions
Box 1 : i have executed a procedure.it took few seconds to get executed
Box 2 : I have executed a block of procedure.It is taking 1 min 40 secs to get executed.
why it is taking much time from Box2(for executing a block from procedure) , as the same code executed successfully in a procedure from Box 1.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2013
My oracle database version is 11.2.0.3.0 where i am having one schema in that schema i am having 3 same tables with same structure same data but with different name.
but problem is in first table when i perform select query it takes 5 sec, in another table it is taking 0 sec and in third table it is taking 10 sec.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2010
Some of my forms taking to much time while loading on some machines but same forms working fine on other machines with same configuration.
Forms, version: 10.1.2.0.2, Clients: Win_XP_Pro, App Server: Window 2003 Server, IE7, Jinit 1.3.1.26
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2013
My Database version as followsOracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64biPL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionCORE 10.2.0.4.0 ProductionTNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - ProductionNLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production We have datagaurd setup as well - Huge archive logs are generating in our primary database - Archive logs are shipping to standby with no dealy - But applying the archive logs are taking more in our physical standby database -why it was taking more time to apply archivlogs (sync) in standby ? - What could be possible reasons..? Note : Size of standby redo logs are same as redo log file of primary database - Also standby by redo one or more than online redo log primary. Since i need to report my higer leve stating this is cause for delay in applying archive logs.
View 32 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2011
After Migrating from 11.1 to 11.2 SQL Statements are running for a long time. Our DBA told that they don't have any execution plans for the SQL Statements in 11.1
I don't want to rewrite the SQl Statement as this is working fine in 11.1. Our DBA conveyed us that they are using DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE for Schema Level.
But we have planned to generate DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS Estimate Percentage ==> 100 for only the tables that are used in SQl Statements.
Of course we can change the parameters.. But we are afraid it may have some side effects.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2011
We are inserting data using JDBC (Java program) in Oracle 11gR2 DB and Timesten to oracle (using AWT cache group) . In reality insertion in oracle is faster than Timesten Cache DB.
Timesten version - TimesTen Release 11.2.1.7.0 (64 bit Linux/x86_64)
1. It is Client/Server Model.
2. Cpu has 4 core and we are using 3 core for insert the Data.
3. Perm and Temp size is big enough compare to Data Size
4. auto commit=0
5. durable commit=0
6. PassThrough=1
7. LogBufParallelism=3
8. LogPurge=1
9. LockWait = 0.1
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2010
For an query, cost was 16Lakhs and was taking 30min, I brought down the cost to 1.5lakhs, but still it is taking 30min.
There were many outer joins and same table has been Used(FROM clause) 5 times in the query. I have introduced WITH clause, and brought down the cost.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2013
I am working on oracle 11g...I have one normal insert proc
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE test2
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO first_table
(citiversion, financialcollectionid,
dataitemid, dataitemvalue,
[code]....
I am processing 1 lakh rows.tell me the reason why bulk collect is taking more time. ? According to my knowledge it should take less time. do i need to check any parameter?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2012
in one short i want to drop more than one user?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2010
I have an issue with rather complicated function.Basically it is using DBMS_SQL to execute a very long statement with many parameters (~6000 of them) and binding them with DBMS_SQL.BIND_VARIABLE. Variables are called :1,:2,...,:6000.
When this arguments set is too large - I am receiving error "ORA-00939: too many arguments for function".
Currently I am thinking about dividing the query into subqueries and executing them all with performance decrease.
View 10 Replies
View Related
