i have a table where there are codes of length 6 or length 12 some times, i need to add the summary of amount based on two different types of codes, one is adding the distinct codes which are of 6 char long and other sum will be based on from substr(7) till last.
create table strings ( strings_var varchar2(12),strings_amt number);
insert into strings (strings_var,strings_amt) values ('02.01',10 );
insert into strings (strings_var,strings_amt) values ('02.01_A11111',15);
insert into strings (strings_var,strings_amt) values ('02.02_A11111',15);
insert into strings (strings_var,strings_amt) values ('03.01_B11111',15);
insert into strings (strings_var,strings_amt) values ('03.02_B11111',15);
The data in the table was imported from a csv file and there is a relationship between the rows. Each combination of col1, col2 and col3 describes a full route of a journey. The row with an entry in col6 describes the full route and the other rows describes each leg in the route.
For example, for R1, the route is AA to BB via CC. Another example for R4 the route is FF to SS via XX, PP, and OO.
What i would like to do is missing a route. For example the route for R3 is DD to EE via FF. There is an entry for DD to FF but is missing an entry for FF to EE.
The results should return the following rows which are incomplete
Here is what i have come up with but it doesnt quite returned the correct result.
select * from tableA a Where not exists( select 1 from tableA b where instr(col6,col4,1)>0 and instr(col6,col1,1)>0) And a.col1=b.col1 And a.col2=b.col2 And a.col3=b.col3 )
I have a sets of data in table ow_ship_det , from which i want to group all the records which are having same sl_desc but with the condition that sl_qty is not more than 1000 and sl_wt not more than 50000, i managed to do it but the problem is i want the wieght(sl_wt) and qty(sl_qty) to be evenly distributed among groups or boxes for example take the first four records which have common sl_desc 'H170' Where the qauntities are 15000,15000,10000,10000 as per the condition and loop written in program it will bring the 2 boxes or serial numbers with first 3 weights into 1 box as 40000 and other box as 10000, which i dont want instead i want to have them as 25000 each.
CREATE TABLE OW_SHIP_DET (SL_PM_CODE VARCHAR2(12),SL_DESC VARCHAR2(20), SL_WT NUMBER,SL_QTY NUMBER); insert into ow_ship_det(sl_pm_code,sl_desc,sl_wt,sl_qty) values ('A','H170',15000,300); insert into ow_ship_det(sl_pm_code,sl_desc,sl_wt,sl_qty) values ('B','H170',15000,300); insert into ow_ship_det(sl_pm_code,sl_desc,sl_wt,sl_qty) values ('C','H170',10000,300);
[code]...
--if you see above the weight is not balanced properly in batches 0001 for H170 Desc it should get divided equally as below
ob_batch OB_PM_CODE OB_DESC OB_QTY OB_WT 0001 A H170 300 15000 0001 C H170 300 10000 0002 B H170 300 15000 0002 D H170 300 10000
I have wells that can have multiple statuses (one record for each status). I need to create a column to display a Y or N based on whether or not a given well has only certain types statuses. If all records for a given well are Susp and/or Abd, then I want to display a Y. If the well records include Susp or Abd, but also have other statuses (or do not even have a status of susp or abd) then I want to display a N.
So:
Well Status ident 12345 SUSP Y 12345 SUSP Y 12345 ABD Y 98765 SUSP N 98765 PROD N 98765 ABD N 45678 SUSP Y 45678 SUSP Y ASDFG ABD Y ASDEG ABD Y TTTTT PROD N TTTTT TEMP
I have a result-set which has 4 columns like (Region, PaymentDate, DebitAmt, CreditAmt). This result-set will always have a maximum of one month's records in it.
Suppose, imagine i have data for a month (ex, Mar 1 to Mar 31)...
Now... to aggregate (sum) the amount columns (DebitAmt, CreditAmt) in my resultset based on different date ranges, i wrote a sql like below...
Quote: SELECT REGION, SUM(CASE WHEN PAYMENTDATE BETWEEN MAR 1 AND MAR 15 THEN DebitAmt ELSE 0 END) AS Debit_H1, SUM(CASE WHEN PAYMENTDATE BETWEEN MAR 1 AND MAR 15 THEN CreditAmt ELSE 0 END) AS Credit_H1,
[code]...
My doubt is, in the above query, to aggregate two different columns based on same condition, i am checking the same condition twice...
I got a requirement to check if a particular range of values are present , if few values missing then have to add null for the values. This has to be a SQL statement.
This is the table. the fiscal month id denotes that the values is from month Oct(20101000) to May (20110500). The fiscal year cycle for me is from OCT to SEP. Hence when we select this table, the select should retreive the below data
I need to substr the transaction number which starts with PIT to susbst (trxno,1,12) .. and anything other than PIT i need full number without substr . But when i use the above code :" susbstr(trxno,1,12) ..": it will substr entire column,. Is there any way to substr only PIT and leave others,
have two queries that will return same columns from two different set of tables ( column mapping has been taken care of). The return type is out ref cursor. (P_SUPPLY_REORDER )
Query-2 Xcom -------------------------------------- select null as sMO_NO, xso.created_date as SPLY_ORD_DT, xso.fk_cust_id as cust_id, cust.cust_po_no as cust_PO_NO ,(sta.SHIP_TO_ATTN_FIRST_NAME||''||sta.SHIP_TO_ATTN_LAST_NAME) as attention_name, xsol.CARTONS_ORDERED as SPLY_ORD_QTY, [code].......
Now the requirement is One of four conditions are possible for each Supply Reorder Number:
. Both table queries return no records- Populate all the P_SUPPLY_REORDER output fields with nulls . SUPPLY_ORDER returns a record, but XCOM_ORDER_HEADER returns no records - Populate output fields with values from the join of SUPPLY_ORDER and SUPPLY_ORDER_LINE. . SUPPLY_ORDER returns no records, but XCOM_ORDER_HEADER returns one record - Populate output fields with values from the join of XCOM_ORDER_HEADER and XCOM_ORDER_LINES. . SUPPLY_ORDER returns a record, and XCOM_ORDER_HEADER returns a record; find out the latest order by comapring max(SPLY_ORD_DT) from SUPPLY_ORDER with max(CREATED_DATE) from XCOM_ORDER_HEADER. - If the latest order is in SUPPLY_ORDER, then populate output fields with values from the join of SUPPLY_ORDER and SUPPLY_ORDER_LINE. - If order dates are equal from both join results, then populate output fields with values from the join of SUPPLY_ORDER and SUPPLY_ORDER_LINE. - If the latest order is in XCOM_ORDER_HEADER, then populate output fields with values from the join of XCOM_ORDER_HEADER and XCOM_ORDER_LINES.
Question is how can we switch over the queries to pull respective dataset based on these conditions ( checking that which table join is going to return a row and then based upon latest order if both tables return a row) and all this logic as part of single SQL statement that is returned as OUT Ref Cursor.
ct_id and limit_id is match column used for mapping.
now i want the total count of no of records in test_master in which test_master column value not exceed limit master column limit value if any one column exceeds its limit then the same row will be in my count criteria.
i have a list of 500 tables. I want to delete data from those tables based on a condition. (Data before 2008 year needs to be deleted). Each table has a column based on which data needs to be deleted. Provide a code which does this efficiently and fast. Bulk collect is preferable.
CREATE TABLE test1 (strt_num NUMBER , end_num NUMBER , des VARCHAR2(5), CONSTRAINT pk_strt_num PRIMARY KEY (strt_num) ); INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (5, 8, 'GC'); INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (10, 25, 'AB'); INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (12, 35, 'PC'); INSERT INTO test1 VALUES (22, 65, 'LJ');
SELECT * FROM test1
STRT_NUM END_NUM DES -------------- ------------ ------------- 5 8 GC 10 25 AB 12 35 PC 22 65 LJ
The requirement is the records should be split based on below conditions
1. Split only those records WHERE (end_num - strt_num) > 10 2. If TRUNC((end_num - strt_num)/10) = n, then n + 1 number of rows should be created for that record 3. While splitting the records, -> For first record , START_NUM = Original STRT_NUM and END_NUM = START_NUM + 10 -> Second record , STRT_NUM = previous END_NUM + 1 and END_NUM = previous END_NUM + 10 And this should continue for all records except the last record -> For last record, STRT_NUM = previous END_NUM + 1 AND END_NUM = Original END_NUM
This table has 5 million records. Only for 2000 records (end_num - strt_num) > 10.
Expected Output.
STRT_NUM END_NUM DES ------------- -------- --------- 5 8 GC -- No chage, END_NUM - STRT_NUM < 10
,i have a table called travel detail from which i have retrieved few rows based on 1 condition by using LOV and on next few rows modification is allowed. The rows are getting modified but it is also allowing me to enter in next blank row and insert any data in that row.how can i retrieve only that data which is based on the given condition. Further blank rows should not b displayed.
I want to increment a counter in a loop based on a condition.
Here is how my xml looks like
<result> <resultset id=1> <value>
[Code]....
I need to look at each and every resultset and check if the value is >400 and if it is then display some text. Something like this
<outputvalue> Yes, there is a value greater than 400 </outputvalue>
In my XSL, I declared a variable called count with value 0. I created a for-loop which goes through these results. Then inside the loop there is a condition to cehck if the value is > 400. If the value is >400, then the counter is incremented.
while replicating form mssql 2005 it is entering space for null in oracle clob col.so i wanted to know.
1)can check constaint modify the content of column on which it is defined?
like i want to enter null in a column , if entered date is greater than current date else the entered date.i do not want to use triggers or client side script.
The above 8 are the possible ways to key in the data using a form.The logic is like based on a particular condition the message should display in the report.If they specify a particular USER and RESP_NAME and FUNC_NAME then it should display AAAAAAAAAAA (This should take priority first). The priority is in order the default should be the last one.
Oracle 11g databaseidval1val2100a110b120c200a220b WITH input AS (SELECT 1 id
[Code].....
input; Output:idval1val2assigned_number100a0110b0120c2200a0220b1 The dense numbering sequence should be assigned to each row based on id and val1 column. For a given Id, the numbering only starts after val1 > 1 till then the assigned_number will be zero.
I have more than 100 records in CSV format. I have to import these records to a particular table which already contains data. I have to do a multiple update at a time, based on the condition . ie., if field1 is '1' then update field2 as 'A0001' and if field1 is '5' then update field2 as 'A0007' . The values are not in an order. Is it possible.
Table LEAVE Column Type Null Description APP_NO Number(6,0) Not Null PK Leave Application Number ECN Number(6,0) Not Null FK Employee Code Number APP_Date Date Not Null Date of Application From_Date Date Not Null Date from which the leave starts TO_Date Date Not Null Date upto which the current application leave remains i.e. end of leave applied for date NO_OF_Days Number(2,0) Not Null Difference between TO_Date and From_date LEAVE_TYPE VARCHAR2(3) Not Null Can be one of SL, CL, LWP or LTA Status VARCHAR2(25) Not Null Can be one of Saved, Rejected or Approved Remark VARCHAR2(100) Nullable Reason to be put if status is rejected [code]....
What I really want to do is that when a record is inserted in the LEAVES table (an application for leave is submitted by any employee and if it is approved) then I want to update the _USED values of the corresponding LEAVE_TYPE in the LEAVEENTITLE table which holds values of types of leaves entitled to employee.
For example if 3 rows are inserted in the LEAVES table as INSERT INTO LEAVES (APP_NO,ECN,FROM_DATE,TO_DATE,APP_DATE,NO_OF_DAYS,LEAVE_TYPE,STATUS,REMARK) (1,1234,'2012-01-01','2012-01-05','2012- 01-01',5,'SL','APPROVED',null); INSERT INTO LEAVES (APP_NO,ECN,FROM_DATE,TO_DATE,APP_DATE,NO_OF_DAYS,LEAVE_TYPE,STATUS,REMARK) (2,1235,'2012-01-01','2012-01-05','2012- 01-01',5,'CL','SAVED',null); INSERT INTO LEAVES (APP_NO,ECN,FROM_DATE,TO_DATE,APP_DATE,NO_OF_DAYS,LEAVE_TYPE,STATUS,REMARK) (3,1236,'2012-01-01','2012-01-05','2012- 01-01',5,'LTA','REJECTED','Clash with the annual meet, revise dates');
Then the value of SL_USED in the LEAVEENTITLE table of record corresponding to the ECN = 1234 should be updated with +5 and naturally the SL_ UNUSED value of the record should be updated as SL_ENTITLED - SL_USED. For the APP_NO 2 and 3 none of the values in LEAVEENTITLE should be updated as the STATUS is not 'APPROVED'
I tried with the following trigger, but is compiling with a warning (not showing what the warning is)
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER leaveentitle AFTER INSERT ON LEAVES FOR EACH ROW BEGIN UPDATE LEAVEENTITLE LVE SET LVE.SL_USED = SL_USED+(CASE WHEN :NEW.LEAVE_TYPE = 'SL'&& NEW.STATUS='APPROVED' THEN :NEW.NO_OF_DAYS SL_UNUSED=SL_ENTITLED - SL_USED ELSE 0 END), [code]....
The attachment contains the table info. The condition is that when there are childer for the master ,the master record shd be negated . Excuse me if this very easy. Example -DEL HAS children so the record with DEL and DEL SHD not be in the result query. Example -RAG HAS NO children. so the MASTER record should be taken.
i have used radio button under dynamic conditions for an interactive report.eg: radio button values are like a) front end b)middlware c)back end.so based on the selected value of the radio button, interactive report appears. and each fields in radio button have separate set of users. now my issue is,based on the user logging in, the default value should set up while the page is loaded...[i.e... if a front end user logs in, the default value of tat radio button shd be front end...]
I have made a travel booking system which comprises of 3 forms
1)Travel Booking form 2)Reservation Form 3)Cancellation Form
Under one booking number i can add multiple users in which they can have there multiple travels.
Users can cancel there individual travels under a prescribe booking number which on doing the Cancel flag turns to 'Y'.
What i want is, If a user is cancelling his/her travel under any booking number then while retriving the records in Travel Booking form, the travels which are cancelled should not be in enable mode.
For one user there can be 4 travels out of which 2 are cancelled, how can i track only those records whoes cancel flag is set to Y. some logic to find it out. Else can i use :system.cursor_record. If yes, How to use it for this system.
i'm trying to do an export/import process using command prompt and the idea is export a records based on the date condition. and the date will be the parameter. my code is like this:
exp <username>/<password>@<database> file=<table_name>.dmp tables=<source_table> query="where <date> between &start_date AND &end_date";
is it possible to do like this, that it should prompt you to enter the start and end date?
I have a requirement to get the records group wise.Ex: For each departments, i need to get the employee details as a coma seperated.It means that the output must have the department name in first column and the second column must contain all the employees in that particular department (As a coma seperated).
In the below data, a container is moving from one city to another. 1,2 ,3 can be any number which i want to generate and use as keys to group the cities. Eg: AUH, JEB, CIW belong to the same key=2; SIN, IKT belong to a new group 4. The City where difference between the Seq# is greater than 1 (eg between S8W and AUH), a new group starts.
Name Hours date a810/11/2011 a 510/12/2011 a610/13/2011 a710/14/2011 a710/15/2011 a810/16/2011 a710/17/2011 a810/18/2011 a810/19/2011 a710/20/2011 a710/21/2011
If i want the sum of hours for 3 days range ,how should i do it.
E.g. say
name hrs startdate enddate
a 19 10/11/2011 10/13/2011 a 22 10/14/201110/16/2011 a 23 10/17/2011 10/19/2011
How can I get the grp_id for unique combination of manager and department, grp_id should be created on asc order of manager_id. In this example manager_id 100 is minimum, so it should be grp 1 and all the employees with that manager_id should be in grp_id 1, for manager_id 114 grp_id should be 2.
If, there is manager_id 117, it should create grp_id 3.
To get grp_num ,I can use row_number() over (partition by department_id,manager_id order by employee_id) grp_num
I am looking for an update statement for this issue.
