The M column is used to count the total number of occurrences of a SLOT. Now, as for the N field, this is used to count the occurrence of the SLOT. In my example for the SLOT TRALTEST43S1, it has three occurrences so M will be 3. Why 3, is because of the WIPDATAVALUE. The WIPDATAVALUE of TRALTEST43S1 is 1-2 and 3. 1-2 WIPDATAVALUE signifies two occurrences (one to two) and 3 signifies only one occurrence. As for N, it should just count the number of occurrence. To further explain, see below:
WIPDATAVALUE SLOT N M 1-2 TRALTEST43S1 1 3 -> First occurrence in the total of 3 1-2 TRALTEST43S1 2 3 -> Second occurrence in the total of 3 3 TRALTEST43S1 3 3 -> Third occurrence in the total of 3 4-6 TRALTEST43S2 1 4 -> First occurrence in the total of 4 4-6 TRALTEST43S2 2 4 -> Second occurrence in the total of 4 4-6 TRALTEST43S2 3 4 -> Third occurrence in the total of 4 7 TRALTEST43S12 4 4 -> Fourth occurrence in the total of 4
This is the query that I have so far:
SELECT DISTINCT WIPDATAVALUE, SLOT , LEVEL AS n , m FROM ( SELECT WIPDATAVALUE , SLOT , (dulo - una) + 1 AS m [code]....
I think that my current query is basing its M and N results on WIPDATAVALUE and not the SLOT that is why I get the wrong output. I have also tried to use the WITH Statement and it works well but unfortunately, our system cant accept subquery factoring.
here on your forum but has been following several threads ever since.So anyway here is the thing, I have a query that should return count the number of rows depending on the value of SLOT. Something like this:
As you can see above, on the SLOT TRALTEST43S1, there are three occurrences so M (Total number of occurrences) should be three and that column N should count it. Same goes with the SLOT TRALTEST43S2. This is the query that I have so far:
SELECT DISTINCT WIPDATAVALUE, SLOT , LEVEL AS n , m FROM ( [code]...
I think that my current query is basing its M and N results on WIPDATAVALUE and not the SLOT that is why I get the wrong output. I have also tried to use the WITH Statement and it works well but unfortunately, our system cant accept subquery factoring.
i have a table in my PD database which have more than 30,000 records .some records in a column say p_code is not tagged with code like '9876543'while other records are tagged in this column with code such as '19022345678'.
Now i want to update these records with tagging 1902 with each one .
I want update col1 whis is null to max(col1) ++ in a row, order by cr_date like 1,1,20110102 2,2,20110101 3,null,20110105 => 3,5,20110105 because this row is after 20110103 4,3,20110104 5,null,20110103 => 5,4,20110103 because this row is before 20110105
update test_table set col1 = (select max(col1) from test_table) + rownum where col1 is null;
We have a front end that is polling the database for some set of data.That set of data is returned by opening a ref cursor and passing it back to the calling environment.Now the problem they also want the count of total number of records that will be fetched by my select statement.One option is execute the select statement once ,get the count and pass it.But in that case i will be executuing the query twice once for count other time while openimng for the ref cursor .
EMP_IDENAME Date Min Hrs 10013Javed Iqbal09/20/2011 00:00:0036.007.00 10013Javed Iqbal09/21/2011 00:00:0027.007.00 10013Javed Iqbal09/22/2011 00:00:0049.007.00 10013Javed Iqbal09/23/2011 00:00:000.000.00 10013Javed Iqbal09/24/2011 00:00:000.000.00
i need the TOtal sum of Minutes and Hrs e.g 7+7+7=21 and also minutes but if minutes total increase from 60 minutes then it should add to hrs .how to get sum.
I am trying to update records in the target table based on the records coming in from source. For instance, if the incoming record is present in the target table I would update them in the target else I would simply insert. I have over one million records in my source while my target has 46 million records. The target table is partitioned based on calendar key. I implement this whole logic using Informatica. Looking at the informatica session log I find that the informatica code is perfectly fine but its in the update part it takes long time (more than 5 days to update one million records). find the TARGET TABLE query and the UPDATE query as below.
TARGET TABLE: CREATE TABLE OPERATIONS.DENIAL_REGRET_FACT ( CALENDAR_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, DAY_TIME_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, SITE_KEY NUMBER NOT NULL, RESERVATION_AGENT_KEY INTEGER NOT NULL, LOSS_CODE VARCHAR2(30) NOT NULL, PROP_ID VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL, [code].....
I am working on form which consist of two block, now i need to know total record in detail block, but in form structure i have multiple details entry aginst 1 master entry and after going for next master entry the details of privious master entry are going for posting that's why i am unable to use the currnt_record function. function to retrive the total number of records in details tab.
Let's say that we have an order entry app and the price and quantity items are already populated. We now want to show the user the extended price (the product of the first two items). the extended price would automatically display after both the quantity and price items are entered. I'm assuming that would require some kind of client-side processing. I imagine server-side processing is simpler, so I'll lean in that direction. I'm sure we've all seen web sites that require you to click a button for the order totals to be updated. I'm okay with that approach, but I haven't quite put all of the pieces together. Here's what I came up with.
A region button was added to trigger the updating of the extended price. The button's "Action When Button Clicked" is to submit the page. Under "Page Processing", a process was created to do the calculation with the recipient of the product being a page item. From debug code in the procedure, I can see that the item containing the extended price was, indeed, modified. But the new value doesn't display in the field and the Session window shows that the value of the item didn't change.
I must be missing something. The debug code says the item value was updated. The Session window says it wasn't updated. What gives? What did I do wrong and what needs to be done to correct this?
I have written the following PL/SQL procedure to delete the records and count the number of records has been deleted.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE Del_emp IS del_records NUMBER:=0; BEGIN DELETE FROM candidate c WHERE empid in (select c.empid from employee e, candidate c where e.empid = c.empid and e.emp_stat = 'TERMINATED' ); [code]....
Below is the statement I am working with. When I get the result the under the Tester column it is a empty space after the total has been done. How can I add the word "Grand Total" under the tester column after the rollup.
SELECT BG_detected_by Tester, CONCAT(Round(count(bg_target_rcyc) / count(bg_status)* 100), '%') Percentage_Compeleted,count(BG_Target_RCYC) Total_Target_Cycle,count(bg_status) Total_Defects From Bug where BG_STATUS = 'Open' GROUP by Rollup(BG_DETECTED_BY,BG_STATUS) having (grouping(bg_detected_by) = grouping(bg_status))
Tester Percentage_completed Target Defects empty space --->Grand Total
How can I Sort Ascending or Descending of Last Total Column of Matrix Report R6i i.e. F_SumsalPerempno, summing total salary of each empno at end of each row.
I need the employee paid highest amount of total salary during the year to appear on first row, while months to display as per original order.
In a classic report, I'm using the Sum functionality and breaks by First Column to get subtotals and report total. I Repeat Headers on Break which works great for the subtotals but I would like for the report to display the column headers above the report total for easier reading. If the last grouping has a lot of data, the user needs to scroll up to read the column headers when looking at the Grand Total.
Is there a way to Repeat Headers prior to report total?
my column type is NUMBER(10,0) ,it accept the input value from text field I using TO_NUMBER(?) to insert value into table, is the a way to handle if the input is 'aaaaaaaaaa' not digit?
I have one hirarchical query which return the parent to child hirarch level data. it has 11 level child data. i want to create column based on number of child in hirarchy. though i know it is 11 but it can change also.Is there any way i can create the column dynamically