DROP TABLE test ;
CREATE TABLE test (id NUMBER, cnt_str VARCHAR2(200));
INSERT INTO test (id, cnt_str) VALUES
(1,'AKRN000002,1451-1473,00000A,74,AKRN000002,1475-14791000000A,8010AKRN000002,1481-1492,00000A,9310AKRN000002,1494-1500')
[code]...
The requirement is in each of the string where there is comma after the number and the number is prefixed by "-" character,
the comma after the number should be replaced by '10'.
For example in the second record where ID = 2,
CNT_STR is '00000B,1-251000000D,26-32,ADTW000301,2858-2875'.
In this string -32, should become -3210 and resulting string should be '00000B,1-251000000D,26-3210ADTW000301,2858-2875'
Expected Result.
ID CNT_STR
-------- -------------------------------------
1 AKRN000002,1451-14731000000A,7410AKRN000002,1475-14791000000A,8010AKRN000002,1481-14921000000A,9310AKRN000002,1494-1500
2 00000B,1-251000000D,26-3210ADTW000301,2858-2875
3 AKRN000001,1126-12001000000B,501-525
Here is what i have in ms-sql, how to convert this into t-sql ?
@MortgagePurposeID is parameter with comma seperated values ('1,2,3,4') if(substring(@MortgagePurposeID, LEN(@MortgagePurposeID)-1,1)<>'','') Set @MortgagePurposeID = @MortgagePurposeID + '','' Set @pos=0
I have a few questions about querying using ranges and comma separated lists. The basic situation is a request comes in with part numbers that can be formatted in a range, comma separated lists or both. For an example, the request contains the following part numbers:
<pnum> 1-10, 14, 17, 11, 21-24 </pnum>
I can muster a basic SQL statement to query for this by hand (more then one way to do this)-
SELECT * FROM part_table WHERE pnum BETWEEN '1' AND '10' OR pnum BETWEEN '21' AND '24' OR pnum IN (14, 17, 11);
is there a way to create the BETWEEN statement so that the dash doesnt need to be parsed out of the request? (like BETWEEN '1-10') or something that functions to that extent? Is it also possible to nest the BETWEEN statements (or the functionality of the BETWEEN) in the IN statement?
Outside of convoluted loop using the SUBSTR() function, is there an easy way to extract each element from a comma-sepearted list that's passed in to a stored proc?
This I want TO separate TO different COLUMNS based ON comma.
THE RULE IS LIKE out OF total five fields FIRST 3 comma will be FIRST 3 addresses AND rest will be address4 AND LAST NUMBER should appear IN pincode field IF found.
The trouble is for reading reverse to get the number.
WITH address AS (SELECT 'Avenue Supermarts Pvt Ltd,Anjaneya, Opp Hiranandani Foundation School, Powai, Mumbai,Pin Code 400076' addr1 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'Plot No. J-I, Block B-I, Mohan Co-operative Industrial Area, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110044' addr1 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'Padmashree Arcade, NH 5, Chinagantiyda Main Road, Gajuwaka, Vishakhapatnam' addr1 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT 'The Icon, 2nd 3rd Floor, #8, 80 Feet Road, HAL III Stage, Indiranagar, Banglore-560075' addr1 FROM dual UNION ALL SELECT '13/1, International Airport Road, Bettahalasur Post, Bengaluru-562157' addr1 FROM dual) SELECT addr1 FROM address;
providing sql statement to strip commas from a number/numeric field in the BI repository logical column? I do not want to use cast function to convert to character because we need to keep that field as numeric. I could only find string expressions to remove commas.
I am trying to split comma separated string. My table has more than 5 lacks data. I have tried the following SQL but its taking more than 5 minutes. Any Alternative solution to return data quickly ?
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR(order_id, '[^,]+', 1, LEVEL) order_id FROM order_detail CONNECT BY REGEXP_SUBSTR(order_id,'[^,]+',1,LEVEL) IS NOT NULL
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR(order_id, '[^,]+', 1, LEVEL) order_id FROM order_detail CONNECT BY LEVEL <= LENGTH(order_id) - LENGTH(REPLACE(order_id, ',')) + 1
No err-----------------------------1 rishi,rahul2 rishi,ak I want output like:
No ERR1 rishi1 rahul2 rishi2 ak i am using the below query for this:
select no,regexp_substr(err,'[^,]+', 1, level) from abcd connect by regexp_substr(err, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null but this query is giving me output:
1rishi1rahul2ak2rishi1rahul2ak if i am using distinct then only desired output is coming. select distinct no,regexp_substr(err,'[^,]+', 1, level) from abcd connect by regexp_substr(err, '[^,]+', 1, level) is not null but i don't want to use distinct because my table has millions of rows and err contains comma separated varchar(6000);
I have a requirement to sort a comma seperated string. For example if I pass '1234,432,123,45322,56786' as string, then it should return '123,432,1234,45322,56786', after sorting the numbers inside the string.
I have done it creating Global Temporary table. Is there a way without creating the Temp table. I understand I can write the whole logic to sort and append the string, but if there is any direct way.
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE TEMP_TAB(COL1 VARCHAR2(100)) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS; CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION func_sort_string(pi_string IN VARCHAR2, pi_delimiter IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT ',') RETURN VARCHAR2 IS PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION; l_str VARCHAR2(2000) DEFAULT pi_string || ',';
I am using sqlloader for loading the data into database by using csv file.My csv file is delimited by comma in that i am having a column which is having the , and line feeds targeted to load into a long data type.for example as below
descri,dfdfdfd,dfdfdf, sdfsdf, dfsdfd,
i want to move this column data into a single table column.But due to because of delimited "," it is splitting into number of columns
The Text is displayed correctly when there is no "Arabic comma" ، , otherwise the text will be reversed, How can I avoid the issue, why we have such problem only when we add the comma. The screenshot: s10.postimage.org/8qw1l8621/Arabic_comma.png
select 1 as id, 'role1,role2,role3' as roles from dual union all select 2 as id, 'role1' as roles from dual
to
select 1 as id, 'role1' as roles from dual union all select 1 as id, 'role2' as roles from dual union all select 1 as id, 'role3' as roles from dual union all select 2 as id, 'role1' as roles from dual
?
I would prefer sql then plsql. Script for creating a test table:
create table CONVERT_LIST(id integer, roles varchar2(100)); insert into CONVERT_LIST values(1,'role1,role2,role3'); insert into CONVERT_LIST values(2,'role1');
I am building a search for use in one of our major applications. I have written a PL/SQL package that deals with it. I would like to present the requirement list to the group and see what, if anything, you may have done differently than I have.
1.) The search interface must have a single box, like google.
2.) Multiple search terms will be separated by a comma.
3.) The table has the following columns: -- Name -- Title -- addr -- addr2 -- city -- state -- zip -- phone -- email
4.) Number of Search Terms per query will be unlimited. (for now, as practicality dictates)
5.) Each search term will be checked against various columns.
6.) Search terms must not have a preference in order. Name, Address = Address, Name
7.) Records will be returned only for the rows where all search terms are found.
I have two page , from first page to second page I am passing some values using url parameter passing but some values contains comma ex :- P1_ NATION text field contains INDIA,USA,UK
but apex treated that as these are separate values and assign it to separate items
suppose my intention is like P2_NATION,P2_EMPLOYEE,P2_EMPID :INDIA,USA,UK,SAGAR ,123
but apex treating it as P2_NATION = INDIA :P2_EMPLOYEE=USA :P2_EMPID = UK
I searched the forum but could not find an answer. I am creating an extract via SPOOL that will send the output to a CSV file. I am comfortable concatenating commas in between the fields, the problem lies in text fields such as last_name which may contain a comma. The requirements of my client state to put double quotes around text fields ONLY if they contain a comma (so as not to throw off the CSV file obviously).
The only thing I could think of was a nested DECODE checked every character of every text field for a , and if it finds one to put " and if not to put nothing. This would get very tedious to program it as there are many text fields and they can be very long. I may even run out of nested DECODE statements (I forget what the limit is now).
