SQL & PL/SQL :: Not Updating All Records In 1st Commit
Nov 22, 2011
I have made a correlated update statement using rowid. Find my attachment. Its updating all columns which i wanted but issue is that its not updating in 1st commit.
Suppose 6 rows is to be updated, then in 1st commit its updating 1 record, then in 2nd commit its updating 2nd record and so on. And in Toad its showing 6 rows updated in 1st commit, then 5 rows updated in 2nd commit and 1 rows updated in last record. I want that all records to be updated in first commit only.
What would be the best way to Commit after every 10 000 records inserted from one table to the other using the following script :
DECLARE l_max_repa_id x_received_p.repa_id%TYPE; l_max_rept_id x_received_p_trans.rept_id%TYPE; BEGIN SELECT MAX (repa_id) INTO l_max_repa_id [code].........
I have to optimize a batch job which returns > 1 lakh records . I have a commit limit being passed . I am planning to divide the cursor records for processing as follows. If the cursor suppose returns 1000 rows and the commit limit passed is 200 , then i want to fetch 200 records first , bulk collect them into associative arrays and then bulk insert into target table.
After this is done, i will fetch the next 200 records from the cursor and repeat the processing. I would like to know how i can divide the cursor records, and fetch "limit" number of records at a time and also be able to go to the next 200 recs of the cursor next time.
Oracle DB Version - 11g XE I scheduled a job using dbms_scheduler which will insert a record into table T for each minute. I didnt mention COMMIT inside my procedure but records are being commited after each successful execution. How come it is possible. Here is my code.
SQL> create table t ( empno number, creation_date date); Table created SQL> create or replace procedure test_proc 2 is 3 4 begin 5 6 insert into t values (1,sysdate); 7 8 end; 9 / Procedure created
and I would like insert the same gross and net column values of ids 7 to 16 into columns with the ids 40 to 49 in the same order. therefore I would like to obtain the result that I describe below:
I have a form with two data blocks, one parent, one child block.
The parent is holds mineral lease info while the child holds the mineral owner info, such as addresses and phone numbers. One owner can be in the owner block multiple times (different owner types). The form only displays one owner at a time.
We have a separate master owner table which holds owner address. (We set it up this way because we get electronic info from mineral companies that we have to load each year).
As you tab through the owner block, it checks the FEIN against the master table and pulls updated address info from the master table.
I have a problem in which if an owner is on the lease multiple times, when you tab through the first instance, it pulls in the new address info, but when you go to the next instance, it won't update. If you requery, it seems that the first update actually updated all the owner records on that lease. How can I turn this off?
I have a situation where there are multiple records for a join criteria. I am trying to find a way to update a particular column for all the records returned by the join criteria. Example :
I am trying to bulk update records in oracle using XML , front end is vb.net.Now the problem when i updating for 1000 - 5000 records on my development server. Its getting updated.
But when we are updating on the production server for 100000-200000 records , we receive error
"ORA-01460: unimplemented or unreasonable conversion requested "
I need to find the identical rows in the below table based on ID column and update the previous identical record's end_date with latest record's start_date-1.
When I run the code below It runs very Long. It updates SUSR5 in the TEMPTABLE3 that has 112000 records. If I Change it when c>m to 2 to test. It runs very fast. The value for m is always between 10000 and 12000. That How many times it must loop to update the correct records.
I've created a system for managing football within APEX and it is at a stage now whereby the user can view any number of the tables through Reports and insert data into these tables through Tabular Forms. Its using triggers and sequences to allow for new primary keys to be generated each time within these Tabular Forms so I'm at a stage now where I'm really quite pleased with it..
The last thing I'm needing to do now is have it update certain fields when certain records are entered.
club1 (clubId foreign key from clubs table) club2 (clubId foreign key from clubs table) club1goals (the amount of goals, type Number) club2goals (the amount of goals, type Number) club1points (points earned, Type Number) club2points (points earned, Type Number)
When filling out a result, the user will enter the following (as an example):
club1 - 1 (club with ID, 1) club2 - 12 (club with ID, 12) club1goals - 2 (the first club scored 2 goals) club2goals - 0 (the second club scored 0 goals) club1points - 3 (the first club picked up 3 points) club2points - 0 (the second club picked up 0 points)
The result is then entered into the results table and what I am hoping to achieve at this stage is the following:
1) in the clubs table, the gamesplayed is incremented by 1 for both clubs as a result of playing this fixture
2) club1 has however many goals club1 scored added to its current clubtotalgoals field (in this case, it is of course 2)
3) club1 has however many points club1 earned to its current clubPoints field. (In this case it would be 3)
I have a multi record block based on a view. All records in the view are displayed in the block by use of Post-Query trigger when entering the form.
The block has 5 items as follows:
1) RECORD_STATUS = a non-base table column which is a checkbox. 2) ITEM_TYPE = a text-item which has an LOV attached. 3) ITEM_TEXT = a text-item which is free format text. 4) LAST_UPDATE_DATE a date column 5) STATUS = a text item either 'Open' or 'Closed'
The LOV is based on a table of Item Types with values say, 'Type1', upto 'Type9'.
I have a Wnen-New-Record-Instance trigger which 'Posts' changes to the database. This has been included as i want to limit the values of the ITEM_TYPE column to values which have not been previously used.
Consider this scenario...
The block has 3 records.
record 1 has 'Closed' status so no updates are allowed. record 2 has 'Open' status so updating of Item_Text is allowed. record 3 has 'Open' status so updating of Item_Text is allowed.
I check the RECORD_STATUS checkbox on record2.
(This sets the RECORD_STATUS checkbox to a checked value and changes the STATUS column to 'Closed' by When-Checkbox-Changed trigger.) At this point the record has not been saved so if you uncheck the checkbox , then the STATUS column will go back to 'Open'. However at this point i will leave it as Checked (Closed).
I then insert a new record, only values Item4 to Item 9 are correctly shown in the LOV. I select Item4.
I then go back to the previous record and uncheck the Checkbox to say that i wish to leave it 'Open' after all (in effect no changes have occurred), then the STATUS column correctly reverts back to 'Open' by my WCC trigger. If i then SAVE the changes, the new record has been inserted on the database correctly, however the LAST_UPDATED_DATE from the record which was checked and then unchecked has also been updated incorrectly even though no net changes have actually occurred.
(because i am using WNRI trigger to limit the List of Values on the LOV column, this has incorrectly set the previous records LAST_UPDATED_DATE column to be Sysdate.)
Table 1Name Item DateJon Apples 06/11/2013 00:30:00 hrsSam OrangesNish Apples Table 2 - Net countName Item CountNish Apples 10Nish Oranges 17Nish BananaSam Apples 10Sam Oranges 1Sam Bananas 1Jon Apples 8
I need to create a job that checks Table 1 for new records added after last run and then add the count in Table 2 accordingly.how to achieve this using PL/SQl or something similar
create or replace procedure inserta_en_B (numregistros in integer) as ultimo_año_nuevo date := trunc (sysdate,'year'); dias_transcurridos number(3) := sysdate - ultimo_año_nuevo; begin [code]........
First i insert into b 400000 rows using:
execute inserta_en_b(400000)); commit;
But then i need to insert 100000 rows more using the stored procedure and without removing the 400000 rows stored before. I think i need to use the commit clause, but i dont know where.
Tell me restriction on commit means where this keyword is not used....like i somewhere read in trigger we can't used commit...instead of that we use pragma autonomous_transaction..
but my confusion arise when i see commit used in trigger in our database table....
is commit used in trigger , if not then what will be use...
Another one is commit used while creating procedure or function?
I have written a purge package that would delete records older than 10 years. Since the data is huge, the purging was taking 14 hours plus. To improve performance, I disabled constraints , deleted records and then reanabled them. This was quite quick but the only problem is rollback. Say for some reason if enabling constraints fails there is no way to rollback as enabling and disabling constraints does an implicit rollback.
create or replace trigger comt after insert on tbl_city declare pragma autonomous_transaction; begin commit; dbms_output.put_line('Value is committed'); end;
Now when I perform an insert in tbl_city---->trigger fires properly and gives output stream. But If I perform rollback now --->there are the data rollbacked in table.
why?I think after commit(which is in trigger associated at insert to table)there should no any rollback in table.
I am using the SQL-Developer to access and manipulate a database. I am not very sure about the format of the database (I'm new to databases), but I had to setup the TNS-folder.
Anyway, I guess the problem is the same for any database.
I am having a table with the BOM (bill of material) positions of certain articles and I want to change the BOM quantities of some of the articles. What happens is that I can only change some of the rows. For other rows I get the message like (it is in German, so I try to translate it):
"data was commited in another/the same session already. row cannot be updated"
This error message looks like there is somebody else locked on the database and manipulating it, correct? Is that possible to see somewhere which processes/people are currently accessing to the database?
I saw that there is one process/another database, which is having the authorization to access to the database. But where can I check if this process is accessing to the database?
BTW: I used to do this process before, and it worked. I had been able to manipulate arbitrary entries on the database. I guess that the process or the person, mentioned above, hasn't been accessing to the database at that time.
