SQL & PL/SQL :: Bitmap Index Rebuild - Getting ORA-00054

Nov 15, 2012

oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
"CORE 11.1.0.6.0 Production"

I have a procedure that is run weekly to load the data, for which it calls another procedure. This weekly procedure, disables the index, load the data, and rebuilds the index. During rebuilding of index, its giving ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT error. I dont have privileges to look for session id, and kill the session. How to avoid this error.

create or replace
PROCEDURE "WCL_WEEKLY_UPLOAD" (
p_event_id IN NUMBER
)
[code]....

As you can see, after the procedure wc_upload, COMMIT is issued, and then the rebuilding of the index is starting. So dont know what is causing the table to lock.

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Performance Tuning :: Difference Between Index Rebuild And Index Rebuild Online?

Jan 10, 2011

What is the difference between index rebuild and index rebuild online.

View 3 Replies View Related

Bitmap Index Not Getting Used

Oct 20, 2012

I am using ORACLE 11gR1.

I was running a test on a huge table with a bitmap index on one of the columns. But bitmap index is not getting used. Below are the test details.

create table test (col1 number, col2 number);

begin
for i in 1..1000000
loop
if mod(i,2) = 0 then
insert into test values(i, 'Y');
else
insert into test values(i, 'N');
end if;
end loop;
end;
COMMIT;

The intention here is to have only two distinct values in the entire table. Based on these values I will not build BITMAP index on col2.

CREATE BITMAP INDEX BITMAP_TEST on TEST(col2) COMPUTE STATISTICS;

Now when I run the below query, it doesn't uses BITMAP index. Instead the explain plan shows a full table scan.

select * from test where col2 = 'Y';

Now when I force ORACLE to use index through hint, the cost is too high while using the bitmap index(probably why the ORACLE chose not to use the index at the first stage).

I have read somewhere, that BITMAP index is useful when we have more than 1 or 2 bitmap indexes on other columns of the same table as well And the query should be like

select * from table where col1 = 'Y' and sex = 'F';

In this case oracle will use BITMAP but not in the case where there is only one column that has BITMAP index.

Considering all the factors stated above, is there any way I can fine tune my original query?

select * from test where col2 = 'Y';

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Bitmap Or B-Tree Index?

Apr 9, 2010

I was executing following query and it was taking about 20 sec's to execute before i decided to create B-Tree(Normal) index on column DeliVery.

Select
DeliVery,Code,Sum(Units),Sum(Loads),Count(units),
Count(Loads)
Where

[code]...

After creating B-Tree index on Column Delivery the execution time has been reduced to one second ,thats what i wanted. But If i create Bitmap index on the same column then execution time is not getting reduced and is still same around 20 sec.I think theoratically "Delivery" column is the right candidate for Bitmap index? whether should i create bitmap index or stick with B-Tree index?

View 14 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Create Bitmap Index?

Jan 27, 2013

i want to create a bitmap index,but getting the error shown below..i created primary key on column dname of dept and unique constraint on empno of emp.

SQL> create bitmap index bindx on dept d(d.dname) from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno;
create bitmap index bindx on dept d(d.dname) from emp e,dept d where e.deptno=d.deptno
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-25954: missing primary key or unique constraint on dimension

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: What Is Cluster / Bitmap And Functional Index

Dec 26, 2011

index types like cluster,bitmap,binary tree,functional. Specify the differences between these types

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: To Create A Bitmap Index On Partition Key

Dec 3, 2012

I have an IOT table with partitioned on list. I have p1,p2 and p3 partitions. Now I would like to create a bitmap index on partition key.

I gave ALTER TABLE .. MOVE MAPPING TABLE;

But getting the below error,

ORA-28660: Partitioned Index-Organized table may not be Moved as a whole.

View 1 Replies View Related

ORA-00439 Feature Not Enabled - Bitmap Index

Jul 11, 2012

I am using Oracle 10g XE (express edition). If I try to create a bitmap index, I get an error

ORA-00439 feature not enabled: Bit mapped Indexes

How do I solve this problem and create a bitmap index?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Analyze And Rebuild The Index?

Apr 11, 2011

I need to Analyze and Rebuild the indexes with a script at once for a schema.

View 30 Replies View Related

Oracle Sys Index Rebuild?

May 28, 2012

Below Table Index are rebuild,This table are relation with sys user or not?after rebuild index, getting error in alert log file

ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [psdnop-1], [1410], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-01410: invalid ROWID

when trying to select * from dba_network_acls getting error massage Rowid invalid

ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003684 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003683 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003682 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003681 REBUILD;

[code]...

It is possible to recreate this index again.......

View 1 Replies View Related

Select Statement Gives Different Results Using Bitmap Or Normal Index

Jan 10, 2012

we have a strange symptom in a database Oracle 11.2.0.2 EE. Following question comes from our application developers.

The following SQL statement:

SELECT
v.reporting_month,
sum(v.f_s) "REV_S",
sum(v.f_f) "REV_F",
sum(v.f_c) "REV_C",
[code].......

gives different result when we exchange the index ksr_valid_until_i on table kreditkarten_sets_rs. For some reasons we changed the index from bitmap to normal and are getting different results. Switching back gives us the same results as before. When we avoid the usage of this index in the statement than we are getting the same results as when we are using the normal index.

View 4 Replies View Related

Index Rebuild Partition Not Completing?

Nov 20, 2012

Index with following PARTITIONS. Index rebuild is extremely slow. Below 2 Alter index ..rebuild... took 10 hours to complete. Because of this queries which based on this index are really slow.

SYS@DB AS SYSDBA> select partition_name,tablespace_name,bytes/1024 KB from dba_segments where segment_name='KSTN';
PARTITION_NAME    TABLESPACE_NAME           KB
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ----------
REB_IDX_1            TS_REB                     64
REB_IDX_2            TS_REB                     64
REB_IDX_3            INDEX                        64
REB_IDX_4            TS_REB                     64

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

How To Rebuild Local Partitioned Index

Jan 29, 2013

2day i was dropping few unwanted index from the data base, By mistake i removed the local partitioned index , So i want to recreate that index.i create the index, will the partitioned index updates when we add partitioned to the tables.

View 2 Replies View Related

Oracle Sys Index Rebuild After Getting Invalid Error Ora-01410

May 26, 2012

Oracle 11.1 version

Oracle sys Index rebuild list
CTXSYS
EXFSYS
FLOWS_030000
FLOWS_FILES
MDSYS
OLAPSYS
ORDSYS
OWBSYS
SI_INFORMTN_SCHEMA
TSMSYS
WKSYS
MDSYS

After rebuild above index im getting error while inserting,update,delete table rows

Error like 'INVALID ROWID'

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Create Versus Rebuild Index

Jan 27, 2011

I was comparing cost of rebuild vs create index...I carried out the following test

SQL> create table t4 as select * from t1;

Table created.

SQL> create table t5 as select * from t1 where 1=2;

Table created.

SQL> create index i5 on t5(id);

Index created. SQL> select bytes,extents,blocks from user_segments where segment_name='I5';

BYTES EXTENTS BLOCKS
---------- ---------- ----------
65536 1 8

SQL> alter index i5 unusable;

Index altered.

SQL> alter table t5 nologging;

Table altered.

SQL> Alter session set skip_unusable_indexes=True;

Session altered.

SQL> insert /*+ append */ into t5 select * from t1;

563904 rows created.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

Now I compared the cost (elapsed time, logical I/O) of the operations

create index i4 on t4(id);
Vs
alter index i5 rebuild online;

Following is the related trace of above 2 steps

create index i4 on t4(id)

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0
Execute 1 1.17 3.38 9497 7869 335 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 2 1.17 3.38 9497 7870 335 0

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer goal: CHOOSE
Parsing user id: 5
[code]....

So which option we shall pick in such cases? {Of course I haven't set 'nologging' for the indices but it is same for both indices we are comparing}

View 2 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: Identify Condition To Rebuild Index

May 27, 2012

In which condition it is required to rebuild the index and how can identified it?

View 12 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: Index And Table Rebuild Method

Jan 17, 2012

The best way to rebuild index and table and also give the reason as why we need to use this method?

View 10 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Oracle Coalesce Vs Index Rebuild?

Dec 30, 2010

We have large tables 60-70 GB having 120 million records. We have to perform index rebuild frequently which takes significant time to complete and effects database performance too. how we can use index Coalesce? what are its benefits, coalesce results in performance gain?

View 10 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: Recover Space After Index Rebuild?

Apr 26, 2011

We have separate tablespaces for Tables and Indexes. Also Temp is in different temporary tablespace and UNDO also in UNDO tablespace and Index tablespace contains only Indexes. The tablespace usage for tables is 80% and Index is 91%.There is not enough disk space to allocate for the datafile on our system. I ran a rebuild on one of the Index but now notice the Index tablespace is 98% used soon after the rebuild finished.

How can i free up space for Index tablespace and why does the size of Index tablespace increased after the rebuild.

View 8 Replies View Related

Rebuild Local Index Partition Is Using Full Table Scan

Apr 23, 2012

I am rebuilding some UNUSABLE local index partitions on Oracle 8.1.7.4.0 (64bit) database . The platform is a HPUX machine.

The DDL of the partition table/indexes:
=========================
CREATE TABLE TESTME
( INST_NO CHAR(3) NOT NULL,
ACCT_NO CHAR(16) NOT NULL,
REC_NO CHAR(9) NOT NULL,
TRAN_TYPE CHAR(2) DEFAULT ' ',
STAT CHAR(2) DEFAULT ' ',
[code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: Index Rebuild Grows Database Size

Oct 29, 2010

Our database size is 100GB and i removed few records from a table and rebuild the index.The size of Index reduced considerably after Index rebuild but now i see our database size increased to 115GB.I know online rebuild creates second index which is also removed after the build is finished then why the increase in database size?Is there a way so it shows up more space ?

select sum(bytes) from dba_segments where owner='abc' and segment_name='abc_index_1';
8GB

ALTER INDEX abc_index_1 REBUILD ONLINE ;

select sum(bytes) from dba_segments where owner='abc' and segment_name='abc_index_1';
2GB

View 6 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: How To Verify If Rebuild Index Required In Database

Mar 26, 2012

How to verify if rebuild an index is required in database.

View 9 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Bitmap Index On Number Column X Char Column?

Jul 23, 2013

is there some performance/access difference between a bitmap index on a number column and char(1) column? Both columns are not null with a default value.My application has a querie like this:  

select ass.column20,  ass.column30from table_a pucinner join table_b asson ass.column1 = puc.column1where pc.column_char = 'S'and ass.column_char02 = 'P'    

If I create a bitmap index on column "column_char", the access plan is not changed. But changing the column datatype to number(1) and obviously the values, the index is accessed and the cost decreases.This table has 4.000.000 rows. Oracle 11.2.0.2SO

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Truncating Table In Oracle 10g - ORA-00054?

Nov 7, 2012

I would like to resolve my problem about truncating table in oracle 10g, i have a table with more than 2 millions of data and i tr to delete data using delete statement but it take many time and i tried with truncate it's ok but when i want to insert data into the table it give me this error ORA-00054 ORA-00054: ressource occupée et acquisition avec NOWAIT

View 30 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: ORA-00054 - Drop MATERIALIZED View Log?

Jan 17, 2013

SQL> drop MATERIALIZED view log on afccv.tbl_voicechat;
drop MATERIALIZED view log on afccv.tbl_voicechat
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00054: resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified or timeout expired

i dont want to kill the sessions or anything is there any way to set prority to do this task?

View 2 Replies View Related

Server Administration :: ORA-00054 / Resource Busy And Acquire With NOWAIT Specified Or Timed Expired

Jan 31, 2012

i want to drop a table by applying fol

SQL> drop table table1 purge;

and i get ORA-00054 resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified or timed expired

This table is of 600 Gb in size and no more used and not involved in any logical and physical backup and do not referenced by application but still i am getting this error.i search for this error and found which is to "Wait and retry" but i waited and then apply but still no progress.

View 12 Replies View Related

BITMAP AND Is Not Being Used

Jul 1, 2011

I have 2 sets of phone number ranges and need to find the ranges that intersect.

create table rng1
(
rng_start varchar2(10),
rng_end varchar2(10)
);
[code]....

When I try to find the ranges matching (intersecting) a certain range (e.g. '21112'-'2111299999'), optimizer does a FULL TABLE SCAN, which is not opimal in my opinion. I use the hint to force the optimizer use the indexes.

select /*+ index_combine(rng2 x_rng2_start, x_rng2_end) */ *
from rng2
where
rng2.rng_start <= '2111999999'
and rng2.rng_end >= '2111';
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 60 Bytes: 17,344 Cardinality: 1,084
7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE LUMAMIPA.RNG2 Cost: 60 Bytes: 17,344 Cardinality: 1,084
6 BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS
5 BITMAP AND
2 BITMAP MERGE
1 BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (BITMAP) LUMAMIPA.X_RNG2_START
4 BITMAP MERGE
3 BITMAP INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX (BITMAP) LUMAMIPA.X_RNG2_END

However, when I try to join the 2 sets of ranges by matching the intersecting ranges, then the range scan and "BITMAP AND" of the 2 indexes is not done, even though the hint is specified:

select /*+ index_combine(rng2 x_rng2_start, x_rng2_end) */
count(*) cnt
from rng1
join rng2 on
rng1.rng_start <= rng2.rng_end
and rng1.rng_end >= rng2.rng_start;
[code]...

How to make the optimizer use the range scan of both indexes? Is there a better way to match the ranges?

View 4 Replies View Related

What Does Bitmap Block Represent In Oracle9i

Aug 1, 2007

what does a bitmaped block represent in oracle9i.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Which Constraint For Bitmap Join Indexes

Jul 18, 2013

I have a few dimension tables with surrogate keys and a fact table with foreign keys on columns referring to the dimension table. I want to create primary keys on the dimension tables and foreign keys on the fact table, but with minimal overhead of constraint validation when loading the data.

Other than bitmap indexes on the FK columns on the fact table, I also want to create a bitmap join index on the fact table joined to the dimension table on a handful of dimension columns.

Which is the best suited constraint definition? Only RELY, or RELY + DISABLE, or RELY + DISABLE + NOVALIDATE, or RELY + NOVALIDATE, or any other?

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL & PL/SQL :: Are NULLs Indexed In BITMAP Indexes

Jul 24, 2012

Are NULLs get indexed in bitmap indexes? How can I verify that.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved