If my tablespace goes beyond 80% I should get a email from Unix crontab.
1)Warning for tablespace 80% full.
2)critical for tablespace 90%full..
I need the script for Oracle tablespace with 87% and shell script.
Do I need 2 scripts? Is there anything ready available (Oracle 10g).
Allwasy temp tablespace shows 100% full, even though database bounce temp is not cleared again it shows 100% full.Is their to Tune this issue.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have a situation where both undo tablespaces were almost filled i.e UNDOTBS1 99% and UNDOTBS2 100% filled so i add data files to it and then i found a lot of blocking session and was just killing them through EM then i stop my front end listener and also down the service, now i don't have any blocking session but on EM a big WAIT is coming. alert log shows nothing serious, it was showing deadlock but now it is over as well.
View 8 Replies View RelatedBelow query is degrading the performance of database. As we know that, without where clause, query do full table scan.Now, it is written to generate the sequence no.
SQL> explain plan for
2 SELECT NVL(MAX(P.NUM_SERIAL_NO), 0) + 1 FROM CNFGTR_IRDA_ENVELOPE_DTLS P
3 /
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3345343365
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code].....
Index is not created on the column.
I am posting the below query:
SELECT PEA.INCURRED_BY_PERSON_ID AS PERSON_ID,
PEA.EXPENDITURE_ENDING_DATE AS WEEK_END_DATE,
CASE
[Code].....
The explain is below:
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 48,287 Bytes: 18,428,818 Cardinality: 297,239
3 HASH JOIN Cost: 48,287 Bytes: 18,428,818 Cardinality: 297,239
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PA.PA_EXPENDITURES_ALL Cost: 2,964 Bytes: 3,506,094 Cardinality: 194,783
2 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE PA.PA_EXPENDITURE_ITEMS_ALL Cost: 43,425 Bytes: 26,637,468 Cardinality: 605,397
I have created an non unique index lk_fein on lookup_fein( code,map_id,trash). When I check the explain plan it does a full table scan on lookup_fein. if I force it to use index by it does and the cost also decreases.
SQL> SELECT WORK_FEIN,
2 NON_FEIN ,
3 FI_FEIN ,
4 MFEIN ,
5 TOTAL_FEIN ,
[code]...
i am using 11.2.0.3.0 version of oracle. We are planning to move some ~40 tables/indexes to new encrypted tablespace as a part of TDE(transparent data encryption). Currently three tables are having size ~30GB and one having ~800GB other have <2GB in size. And tables/indexes are altogether placed in different tablespaces.
whether i should create as many no of encrypted table spaces as it was before as unencrypted tablespace? or I should create one encrypted tablespace and move all the tables/indexes into that?
I am getting temp tablespace error "ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP" for the following code.
SELECT /*+ USE_NL ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 ) leading ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 , tvd) */ vd1.vendor_record_seq_no,
tvr.checksum, tvr.rownumber, tvr.transaction_type, 'U'
FROM vendor_data vd1, vendor_data vd2, vendor_data vd3,
(SELECT rownumber, MAX (DECODE (control_column_seq_no, 91150, original_value, NULL)) AS value1,
[code]...
Right now used tables has the following number of records-
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM vendor_data --292890442
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM temp_vendor_data --0
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM temp_vendor_record --0
This query is part of an application, but consuming too much of temporary tablespace (68 GB allocated). I found it out by using query below:
select * from v$session a, v$sql b
where a.sql_id=b.sql_id
and status = 'ACTIVE'
I am not sure, why this problem is occuring.
I am receiving this error in production databases...There are 2 probable extent failures for tablespace
View 14 Replies View RelatedAll the analysis till now on our system proves that our system is clearly I/O bound and db sequential read is the biggest culprit.
We have even identified the index which is being affected by sequential read. I am thinking of creating a new tablespace with 32K blocksize (currently all table spaces are 8k) and migrate this index to the new space. That way, Oracle will have to do less number of reads to get the required data.
But is there anything wrong in having just one tablespace with a differnt block size? Or is there anything that I have to be watchful about while doing it?
One of our customer have problem with following sql statement:
SELECT c.table_name, c.column_name
FROM user_tab_columns c, user_tables t
WHERE c.table_name = t.table_name
AND c.data_type IN ('CLOB', 'BLOB');
During execution it takes all the TEMP tablespace size(8GB).
I gather system stats (dbms_stats.gather_dictionary_stats(estimate_percent=>null)) but it doesn't resolve problem.Above sql statement works fine with RULE hint but I want to know what is the reason of problem with temporary tablespace.
I tried to create an index on a large volume table(approx 9 GB) and I got the below error message:-
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace TEMP
The size of our TEMP tablespace is 3GB and currently it is showing as full.
This tablespace is locally managed and we are not running any other operation on this test database at the moment.
We need to delete data from this table based on a column value, so I was planning to create an index on that column.
I saw on the net that one of the proposed solution is :-
alter tablespace TEMP default storage (pctincrease 1);
alter tablespace TEMP default storage (pctincrease 0);
alter tablespace TEMP coalesce;
but it was mentioned that this does not work with Locally Managed Tablespaces.
We are currently using Oracle 9.2.0.7.0 production release installed on Linux platform(Linux 2.6.9-89.0.25.ELsmp #1 SMP i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux)
I increased the size of TEMP tablespace to 12 GB but the index creation still failed with the same error.
most of the time i am seeing temporary tablespace issues like temp tablespace is 100% full.
do we have any procedure to clean up temporary data from tablespaces.
and does it effects to database anything.
share any link
on my 11.2 DB comes from time to time to situation that the temp tablespace runs full. It longs for only couple of seconds and when the dba notice it, the tablespace is already almost empty. Is it a way somehow to create like a "callback-notifier" that fires f.e. when temp tablespace is for let's say 70% full. That "callback-notifier" will run the sql-statement to look in v$session, v$sort_usage, v$process, v$parameter for the problem sessions.
View 6 Replies View Relatedi have been trying to create a user with full access on default Tablespace so that i can access all the objects without any restrictions for the new user.
View 7 Replies View RelatedTablespace usage alerts are checked every ten minutes. You can request a check every minute when you set the threshold, and confirm that this has been set:
orclz> execute DBMS_SERVER_ALERT.SET_THRESHOLD(-
> metrics_id => DBMS_SERVER_ALERT.TABLESPACE_PCT_FULL,-
> warning_operator => DBMS_SERVER_ALERT.OPERATOR_GT,-
> warning_value => '50',-
> critical_operator => DBMS_SERVER_ALERT.OPERATOR_GT,-
> critical_value => '75',-
[code]....
orclz>but you will still have to wait up to ten minutes for the alert to be raised. know whether this frequency can be changed? And why this particular alert behaves differently from all the others? This is the bahaviour in all releases since server alerts arrived.
We are facing problem as temporary tablespace getting full continuously. During below running query, temporary tablespace getting full continuously and now it is not managable so we had stop the processing but we need to resolve this issue as business impact is there.
MERGE INTO HDFCMPR.MPR_TB_MPRMASTER
USING (SELECT /*+ USE_HASH(A,B) FULL(A) FULL(B) */
MER_TRACKID, TRANID, DECODE (UCAF, 'n', NULL, UCAF) UCAF,
A.ID
[code]....
i'm facing a problem while i'm inserting millions of record from table to table that undo tablespace reach 100% full and execution aborted. , how can free the undo tablespace ??? many of extendes are offline. will it flush automatically ??? or what i should do
View 4 Replies View RelatedLooking to understand the difference between instance tuning and database tuning.
What is the difference between these two tuning exercises? I understand that an instance is memory based structures (logical) where as database consists of physical structures.
However, how does one tune a database the physical structure? Does it have to do with file placements/block sizes etc. Would you agree that a lot of that is taken care by ASM now in 11g? What tools are required/available (third party as well as oracle supplied) for these types of tuning scenarios?
I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.
SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */
INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq
USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid,
detail_rerate_flag_code,
rerate_sel_key,
[code].....
How the length of column width effects index performance?
For example if i had IOT table emp_iot with columns:
(id number,
job varchar2(20),
time date,
plan number)
Table key consist of(id, job, time)
Column JOB has fixed list of distinct values ('ANALYST', 'NIGHT_WORKED', etc...).
What performance increase i could expect if in column "job" i would store not names but concrete numbers identifying job names.
For e.g. i would store "1" instead 'ANALYST' and "2" instead 'NIGHT_WORKED'.
I have a question about database fragmentation.I know that fragmentation can reduce performance in query times. The blocks are distributed in many extents and scans process takes a long time. Oracle engine have to locate the address of the next extent..
I want to know if there is any system view in which you can check if your table or index has high fragmentation. If it's needed I will have to re-create, move or rebulid the table or index, but before I want to know if the degree of fragmentation is high.
Any useful script or query to do this, any interesting oracle system view?
There is a simple way to increase the performance of a query by reducing the row-size of the table it hits. I used it in the past by dividing the table into smaller parts and querying respective smaller table in each query.
what is this method called ? just forgot the method and can't recall it. what this type of row-reduction optimization is called ?
How many records could I have in a single table without performance degradation with Standard Edition without partitioning with cutting-edge server (8 or 12 cores, 72 GB RAM, FC 4 Gbit, etc...) and good storage?
300 Millions in only one table with 500K transactions / day is too much?
Simple database with simple schema.
How many records begin to be too many?
Testing our 9i to 11g upgrade, we've imported the entire DB into the new machine.We've found that certain procedures are really suffering performance problems. BUT, we've also found, that if we check out a production copy of the procedure from our source code control, and reinstall it, the performance issue goes away. Just alter the procedure and recompiling does NOT work.
The new machine where the 11g database exists is slightly different than the source, but it's not like we have this problem with every procedure. It's only a couple.
any possible reason that we'd have to re-install a procedure to correct a performance problem?
I need to check the package performance and need to improve the package performance.
1. how to check the package performance(each and every statement in the package)?
2. In the package using the delete statement to delete all records and observed that delete is taking long time to delete all the records in the table(Table records 7000000). This table is like staging table.Daily need to clean the data before inserting the data into it. what can I use instead of Delete.
Somewhere I read that we should not use hints in Oracle production environments, but we can use hints in the development environment and on achieving the desired execution plan we can adjust the 'statistics' to follow that plan without hints.
Q1. If it is true what statistics do we adjust for influencing the execution plan and how?
For example, I have the following simple query:
select e.empid, e.ename, d.dname
from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno=d.deptno;
emp.empid, emp.deptno and dep.deptno columns have indexes and the tables have the standard structure as found in the basic oracle examples.
If I look at the execution plan of the above query then I see that the driving table is empand the driven table is dept.Also the type of join that is taking place is 'Nested Loop'.
Questions: With respect to the above query,
Q 2. If I want to make dept the driving table and emp the driven table then how can I adjust the statistics to achieve that?
Q 3. If I want to use hash join instead of a nested loop join then then how can I adjust the statistics to achieve that?
I can put the ordered and the use_hash hint to effect this but again I have heard that altering statistics is a more robust way to control an execution plan as compared to hints.
I have an issue with export(expdp).
When i exporting an user using expdp utility, the load the on the server is going up-to 5. The size of the database is 180GB. Below is the command that i use for export.
expdp sys/xxxx directory=dbpdump dumpfile=expdp_trk_backup.dmp logfile=expdp_trk_backup.log exclude=statistics schemas=trk
Do i need any look into any memory parameters for this?
The following query gets input parameter from the Front End application, which User queries to get Reports.There are many drop down boxes like LOB, FAMILY, BRAND etc., The user may or may not select values from drop down boxes.
If the user select any one or more values ( against each drop down box) it has to fetch all matching values from DB. If the user does'nt select any values it has to fetch all the records, in this case application will send a value 'DEFAULT' (which is not a value in DB ) so that the DB will fetch all the records.
For getting this I wrote a query like below using DECODE, which colleague suggested that will hamper performance.From the below query all the variables V_ are defined in procedure which gets the values selected by user as a comma separated string here V_SELLOB and LOB_DESC is column in DB.
DECODE (V_SELLOB, 'DEFAULT', V_SELLOB, LOB_DESC) IN
OPEN v_refcursor FOR
SELECT /*+ FULL(a) PARALLEL(a, 5) */
*
FROM items a
WHERE a.sku_status = 'A'
[code]...
what the principal things to look at when we have for the same query different performance results are?I have 2 different bases: the plan and data are the same but performance results are very differents.
View 10 Replies View Related