I have created an non unique index lk_fein on lookup_fein( code,map_id,trash). When I check the explain plan it does a full table scan on lookup_fein. if I force it to use index by it does and the cost also decreases.
SQL> SELECT WORK_FEIN,
2 NON_FEIN ,
3 FI_FEIN ,
4 MFEIN ,
5 TOTAL_FEIN ,
[code]...
Below query is degrading the performance of database. As we know that, without where clause, query do full table scan.Now, it is written to generate the sequence no.
SQL> explain plan for
2 SELECT NVL(MAX(P.NUM_SERIAL_NO), 0) + 1 FROM CNFGTR_IRDA_ENVELOPE_DTLS P
3 /
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3345343365
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code].....
Index is not created on the column.
what privilege is require for a user to execute explain plan? I get below error while try to execute explain plan.
SQL> explain plan for SELECT /*+ FULL(t) */ COUNT(*) FROM "DREAM"."CONSUMER.TAB" t WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000000;
explain plan for SELECT /*+ FULL(t) */ COUNT(*) FROM "DREAM"."CONSUMER.TAB" t WHERE ROWNUM <= 1000000
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
I am facing a weird situation wherein the explain plan of same sql in SIT and PROD is different.In fact the explain plan is very costly in Prod.Also the DB version of both SIT and PROD is same.
Below is the sql and corresponding explain plan in Prod and SIT respectively.
Query:
SELECT seq,CCN,ProcessorPart,root_item,comp_path,Item,comp_item,comp_item_type,
lag(comp_item_type,1,'PART') over(PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl)Nxt_comp_item_type,lvl,bom_qty,
ROUND(CASE min(abs(bom_qty)) OVER (PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl)
WHEN 0 THEN 0 ELSE 1 END * EXP (SUM (LN (nullif(abs(bom_qty),0))) OVER (PARTITION BY seq ORDER BY lvl))) Ulti_qty,
'AMER'
[code]...
The tables referred in above query is small tables containing arnd 10k records.The above tables are partitioned on Region and not indexed.
Explain Plan in Prod: COST CARDINALITY BYTES
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS165173613539322883634804
SORT UNIQUE236360
UNION-ALL
PARTITION LIST SINGLE117240
[code]...
Explain Plan in SIT: COST CARDINALITY BYTES
SELECT STATEMENT, GOAL = ALL_ROWS3211689
SORT UNIQUE347240
UNION-ALL
PARTITION LIST SINGLE172120
[code]...
I am not able to attribute why there is a huge change in Cost between SIT and Prod.Apparently the Job is going for 3-5 hours which used to get completed within 20mins in SIT.
however I was able to identify a poorly performing query that seemed to be maxing out our CPU. I have been trying to understand the Explain Plan. The plan below is from our test system which has considerably less information in the tables than our PROD system.
I can see there are a bunch of table scans at the end which may indicate missing indexes, but I am unclear on whether this is actually a problem as the %CPU seems to be worse for the JOIN near the top of the plan.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time | Inst |IN-OUT|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1870M| 3018G| | 677M (1)|999:59:59 | | |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 1870M| 3018G| 3567G| 677M (1)|999:59:59 | | |
[code]...
I need to warn readers that I am not a DBA but am heavily involved in application development. Whatever I know about database tuning is whatever I've managed to pick up via self-learning, and I must admit that the sum total of my knowledge isn't a lot.
Anyway, our "DBAs" recently did an upgrade to our 10g database, going from version 10.2.0.2.0 to 10.2.0.4.0. Immediately after the upgrade, a particular query has started to under-perform. The query itself was not altered in any way during the upgrade.
We have two explain plans for the query, a before and an after plan. The two plans are similar but not identical. The plans are too massive to post here, so I hope the following synopsis of the differences will do.
The 10.2.0.2.0 plan:
shows a HASH GROUP BY
has a TempSpc column in the explain plan
shows a particular table (EMP_HISTORY) as having ~1700 rows
The 10.2.0.4.0 plan:
shows SORT GROUP BY instead of HASH GROUP BY does not show a TempSpc column in the explain plan shows the EMP_HISTORY table as having only 25 rows
Other than these points, no other discernible differences can be noted. I'm wondering what would cause HASH to change to SORT. I'm told that stats are up-to-date.
I have two Oracle instances that are setup identically.When I run a query on one of them, it takes around 3 seconds, on the other it takes around 200 seconds.
I have looked at the explain plans, and it has shown me what I think is the problem. On one instance, it does a join on two tables, then runs the other filter/access predicates. On the other instance it runs the filter/access predicated first, then does the expensice join. The one that does the join first is the one that takes around 200 seconds. How to tell Oracle to make this join after runnning the other predicates?
when i runnung the explain plan syntax , show error :
running --- SELECT * FROM TABLE(dbms_xplan.display) ;
ERROR: an uncaught error in function display has happened;
please contact Oracle support
Please provide also a DMP file of the used plan table
PLAN_TABLE
ORA-00904: "OTHER_TAG": 無效的 ID
since the optimizer (during explain plan) assumes all bind variable to be of varchar type, while checking plan for SQL statement using bind variable of numeric and date type shall we convert (typecast) it as following?
variable n_sal number
variable dt_joining date
exec n_sal:= 1000
exec dt_joining := '12-dec-2005'
select first_name from emp_data where sal=to_number(n_sal) and joining=to_date(dt_joining);
I am rebuilding some UNUSABLE local index partitions on Oracle 8.1.7.4.0 (64bit) database . The platform is a HPUX machine.
The DDL of the partition table/indexes:
=========================
CREATE TABLE TESTME
( INST_NO CHAR(3) NOT NULL,
ACCT_NO CHAR(16) NOT NULL,
REC_NO CHAR(9) NOT NULL,
TRAN_TYPE CHAR(2) DEFAULT ' ',
STAT CHAR(2) DEFAULT ' ',
[code]...
How can i force a sql use index range scan?
View 10 Replies View RelatedIs there any hint to force "Index Unique Scan" over "Index Range Scan".
My query is generating different plans with the above two, and very slow when it uses "Index Range Scan".
In the link below [URL] Thomas kyte has said, use the CBO and select /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ primary_key from table where rownum = 1; it'll read the index and stop at the first row. very fast on a big empty table (as the index is small and empty).
very fast on a big full table as the index is just read to find the first leaf node and then "stop".
It gives faster result if the primary key is used. But what if we have a table with around 1000 million rows and for the predicates there is a index range scan on the table.
What if we have a table say big_table (10000000000 rows) and the sql is something like
select /*+ first_rows */ 1 /* id, attribute_id*/
from big_table
where attribute_name ='Gross Premium'
and value ='10000'
and version_date is null
and rownum=1; --it's taking around 3 min
We observed that in such case there will be a range index scan for the index on the predicates. For a particular id there may be different values for attribute 'Gross Premium' and may have multiple versions.
How I would tune such a query where the purpose is to check if at least 1 records exists in the table for the input?
Let's consider such table that all rows fit into single block:
SQL> create table test as select rownum id, '$'||rownum name from dual connect by level <= 530;
Table created.
SQL> create index i_test on test(id);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> begin
[code].....
why does approach with full scan take longer even if table occupies only one data block? PS. 11gR2
when i am Executing the following statement
SELECT DISTINCT EXPOSURE_REF FROM KBNAS.VW_EXPOSUREDETS_FOR_CCYREVAL
WHERE EXPOSURE_CURRENCY='THB' AND BASE_TXN_CCY='USD' AND BRANCH_CODE='7000'
AND (REVAL_STATUS='O') AND CONV_RATE<>'62' AND (EXPOSURE_AMOUNT<>0)
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT ED.EXPOSURE_REF FROM KBNAS.EXPOSURE_DETAILS ED,
[code].....
I have attached DDL for table EXPOSURE_DETAIL(PARTITION),LEDGERCARD,LEDGERCARDDETAILS, DDL for INDEX on those tables and DDL for Views..
Issue: we have created the Indexes but when we check the explain plain .. full table scan is going on..I have attached the explain plan ..
Can we have same execution plan for a create table statement where the name of the table changes every time as follows:
create table test
as
select * from t1
Here table name changes from test to another table name next time
I have a lot of queries on a table with WHERE clause:
WHERE CR_DATE > :y AND CR_VALUE = :x
Actually, there is an index on (CR_DATE) but much more selective index is on (CR_DATE, CR_VALUE). If I do not UPDATE any records on this table, is there any difference in INSERT operation (or another problem) when I replace actual index with multi-column index?
I have a huge table (about 60 gb) partition over range. The index on this table is global index created on 4 columns together. I have a query which is running very slowly. The explain plan is showing the use of this global index.Explain plan is not showing pstart and pend because the index is global.
View 6 Replies View RelatedHow to force an index if the table not using the index?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI Want to tune the attached query. I have tried by creating the normal indexes and composite indexes on the fields . I feel that , Only normal index is required for this instead of composite index?
11:15:19 SQL> @slot.sql
11:16:03 SQL>
11:16:03 SQL> drop table slot purge;
Table dropped.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
11:16:03 SQL>
11:16:03 SQL> create table slot
11:16:03 2 (
11:16:03 3 id varchar2 (40) not null,
[code]....
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
22 rows selected.
I�m Using Oracle 11.I have a table with 16 million rows and an index (let's call it the employee table with an index on department). I need to select all the employees whose departments are located in the uk. I achieve this by selecting all the department numbers from departments where location = 'UK' in a sub select then plug this into the main query as follows:
SELECT *
FROM employees
WHERE department IN (SELECT department from departments where location = 'UK');
It takes ages, 25 seconds or more, the explain plan shows its doing a full table scan on emplyees. I need it to use the index. The sub query is instant and returns only 5 rows. If I explicitly put the 5 numbers in the IN clause the query uses the index and executes in 0.04 seconds. See below:
SELECT *
FROM employees
WHERE department IN (1,2,3,4,5);
I need it to use the subquery once and then use the index on the main table.
DBMS_STATS.CREATE_STATS_TABLE
DBMS_STATS.EXPORT_SCHEMA_STATS
DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS
I have used the above to get a copy of schema stats and gather new stats for specific tables into a STATS TABLE in my personal schema. What I want to do now is use this stats table to generate plans for queries where I believe stats are off. Is it even possible? To be clear, I do not want to import stats because this replaces the stats currently there. I just want to point the CBO to my stats table for generating plans.
there was a session parameter I could set to tell oracle to use my stats table when generating plans, or an explain plan clause I could use or a DBMS_XPLAN paramter I could provide that would tell these tools to use my stats table when generating a plan, or even some way to tell autotrace. But I have found none of this.
I want to make full table scan of my query so that I can execute it using parallel option & the query will get completed in few mins. Even though I used this hint "/*+ parallel(t2,4) full(t2) */, the query is executing with 8 parallel processes but it is going for "Rowid Range Scan" and it is taking more time to complete. How to make this query to go for full table scan instead of "Rowid Range Scan" so that this query can be tuned.
SELECT /*+ parallel(t2,4) full(t2)*/ID, COUNT (1) FROM acnt_transact t2 GROUP BY ID;
Why the query is behaving differently with the different database.(execution plan)
Whatever the production database is having same database instance replicated to a new schema. I tried both the queries running on both environment.In prod the index has been used but in newdev it is not. This case existing primary key index were not been used.
I am adding condition in color to my existing query but my query taking too long time after that. This condition calculates last 3 month end dates from given COB (20110516).
SUMMARY is my summarized table and COB is my reference table
Without adding condition in query it gives
INDEX (RANGE SCAN)--PK_SUMMARY(INDEX(UNIQUE))
After adding condition in query it gives
INDEX(FAST FULL SCAN)--PK_SUMMARY(INDEX(UNIQUE))
how can i keep RANGE SCAN even after adding my new conditions?
SELECT
distinct
COB.COB_ID_C,
SUMMARY.SUMM_COB_ID_C
FROM
[code]...
How can i check the avg time taken by an execution plan. Actually i have a very big query and it changes its execution plan very often, we would like to lock the best execution plan and to find it , i would like to know the Average Execution Time the query takes when it runs using different different execution plans.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have queries on the execution plan of a sql statement
Following is the example
create table t1 as select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
create table t2 as select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a;
commit;
create index i1 on t1(id);
create index i2 on t2(id);
create index i11 on t1(object_type);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T1',cascade=>true);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T2',cascade=>true);
select count(*) from t1 where object_type='VIEW';
COUNT(*)
----------
8934
set autotrace traceonly explain
Can we say in the following case, that,
(1) First index on object_type is accessed to get rowids - t1.object_type='VIEW'
(2) Then the filter on owner is applied - t1.owner='SYS'
(3) Then the table T1 is accessed to fetch data from the rowids returned by the index I11 and filer application - TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
Though I am unable to understand how filter can be applied to the rowids retrieved from index, we can see from the plan below that The rows accessed have reduced from 8550 to 1221 before we access the table...Thus filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied in between. Right?
another question is
Case 1 - do we retrieve a rowid from index for a given value, then retrieve required values from table for that rowid
Thus row at a time in both ... in loop
OR
Case 2 - we first fetch all rowids from index and then retrieve values from table one row at a time from the collection of rowids fetched?
Suppose Case 1 is what is happening then can we say, both the steps mentioned by IDS 2,3 in plan below are executed exactly equal number of times and the filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied at some later stage? Of course in this case the values in ROWS stand misleading then
select * from t1,t2 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.object_type='VIEW' and t1.owner='SYS';
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 26873579
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1221 | 116K| 381 (1)| 00:00:05 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I11 | 8550 | | 24 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 161K| 15M| 533 (1)| 00:00:07 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
1 - access("T1"."ID"="T2"."ID")
2 - filter("T1"."OWNER"='SYS')
3 - access("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='VIEW')
So the situation is like this
- Database A (20 tables)
- Database B (20 tables)
- Both A and B are Oracle 11gR2
- Both of these databases run on different hardware (A is a VM, B is on a physical host)
- The 20 tables in A and B have exactly same number of rows and after preparing the data, the schemas were analysed using the same DBMS_STATS parameters
Despite this, the execution plans appear to be quite different for the same queries between A and B
I imagine there is something outside of the Oracle table rowcounts, table stats, column stats, index stats that's resulting in the different execution plans.
refere to below 2 queries and their execution plans:
First Query
INSERT INTO temp_vendor(vendor_record_seq_no,checksum,rownumber,transaction_type,iu_flag)
SELECT /*+ USE_NL ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 ) leading ( vd1 ,vd2 ,vd3 , tvd) */
vd1.vendor_record_seq_no, tvr.checksum, tvr.rownumber, tvr.transaction_type, 'U'
FROM vendor_data vd1,
[code]...
Second Query
SELECT vd1.vendor_record_seq_no, tvr.checksum, tvr.rownumber, tvr.transaction_type, 'U'
FROM ( select * from vendor_data vd1
where vd1.study_seq_no = 99903
AND vd1.control_column_seq_no = 435361232
[code]...
Both are to achieve same output but written in different ways. CAn I get same exectuion plan from 1st query as there is for 2nd using hints
I was confused by partitioed table, when i select a partition of table, how does oracle to scan blocks? it scan all blocks of table or scan a single partition blocks only?
SQL> Explain Plan For
2 Select Count(1) From Tb_Hxl_List Partition(p_L3);
Explained.
SQL> Select * From Table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | | |
| 2 | PARTITION LIST SINGLE| | 33115 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TB_HXL_LIST | 33115 | 18 (0)| 00:00:01 |
