I ran this following query and somehow i feel the results are wrong.
SQL> select to_char(starttime,'dd-mm-YYYY hh24:mi:ss') from report where dateofmonth between to_timestamp_tz('22-Apr-2013 12:00:00','dd-mm-YYYY hh24:mi:ss') and to_timestamp_tz ('23-Apr-2013 14:00:00','dd-mm-YYYY hh24:mi:ss');
SQL> select to_timestamp_tz(starttime,'dd-mm-YYYY hh24:mi:ss') from report where dateofmonth between to_timestamp_tz('22-Apr-2013 12:00:00','dd-mm-YYYY hh24:mi:ss') and to_timestamp_tz ('23-Apr-2013 14:00:00','dd-mm-YYYY hh24:mi:ss');
Have a table which has 3 columns id,name,time where time is of datatype timestamp and it stores the time when the row was inserted. Need an query which accepts 2 parameters as input Ex: Start_Time,End_Time and all the rows in between the above mentioned timestamps must be deleted.
I am using apex 4.1. I must hide phone number columns in my IR report, but at the same time the values of that columns should be available to search for using IR Search Field. is there a way to do this ?
if not, that means I have to :
1- Add a text filed P1_PHONE 2- edit my report query to something similar to > Select * from Table where :P1_phone in (mobile1,mobile2) or :p1_phone is null 3- add button to refresh the report.
but the item P1_PHONE should be on the header of the Report region. is there a way to do this. I am using theme 23 page template without sidebars Report template : Reports Region.
how to put the item P1_PHONE on the tab of the page. Just similar to the Search item of in the Application Builder.
I used Region, Process by to search the report which appears as shown above. Then I use Choose Auditors column to select my Auditor and copy paste it into the report under To be Audited By col. Is there a way to automate the process. I am here using a tabular form in APEX. My main aim is to assign auditors based on Region, not equal to Processed by.
How to select the transactions out of the database that occurred within 70 seconds of each other. The toll_date field is a TIMESTAMP field.
Problem is, I seem to only get transactions that occurred within 70 minutes of each other. On the timestamp field I break the math down into the seconds in a day and I add 70. I then subtract that value and add that value to the timestamp and I should get anything between those values right?
view the below select statement..why it's adding extra zero's...
select to_timestamp('2001-05-22 12:00:18.600','YYYY-MM-DD HH:MI:SS.ff3AM') from dual output: 5/22/2001 12:00:18.600000000 PM ---why it's adding extra zeors's my output should be as " 5/22/2001 12:00:18.600 PM"
I have to create the following table. The fields Trend_Date, Price and Trend are already given. I have to calculate the field permanently and to insert the value in this permanent table.
Fields:
The field price belong to the value of a product during the trade. The field trade_date belongs to the moment of the trade. The field trend belongs to the future behavior of the the price. Here, the price of the present moment is compared to the following price (possible characteristics: 'UP', 'DOWN', 'STABLE'). The field permanently belongs to the time (in seconds) how long the value of the field Trend_Date (depending on the price) is still true.
For example:
Row 1: The trend in row 1 is 'UP' and it has a price of '11'. Until row 3 this remains true (the price is greater or equal to 11). In this case, the difference between row 1 and row 3 are 9801 (rounded) seconds.
Row 2: The trend in row 2 is 'DOWN' and it has a price of '12'. This remains true till to the end (the price is never greater than 12) In this case, the difference between row 2 and row 11 are 97346 (rounded) seconds. To calculate the 97346 seconds the field has to consider that between row 2 and row 11 are two days. There will be no trade between 18:00 and 07:00 o'clock. This belongs to 7 hours for each days, in seconds (2*46800) 93600. -> 190945-93600 = 97346s
Row 6: The trend in row 6 is 'UP' and it has a price of '5'. This remains true till to the end (the price is never smaller than 5) In this case, the difference between row 6 and row 11 are 65729 (rounded) seconds. To calculate the 65729 seconds the field has to consider that between row 65729 and row 11 are one days. There will be no trade between 18:00 and 07:00 o'clock. This belongs to 7 hours for each days, in seconds (1*46800) 46800. -> 112528-46800 = 65729s
Row 9: The trend in row 9 is 'STABLE' and it has a price of '8'. Until row 10 this remains true (the price is equal to 8 ). In this case, the difference between row 9 and row 10 is 14418 (rounded) seconds.
Row 11: Is empty because there are no values to compare.
i m creating the dynamic table every month to maintain the particular month data seperately .when the records getting inserted in the table,trigger will automatically insert the records in the dynamic table. only date alone(without timestamp) getting inserted in the dynamic table from staging. so by default ,00:00:00 is getting appended with date instead of actual timestamp. tried select to_date(to_char(:new.ACTN_DATE,'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS'),'YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') INTO v_temp_actn_date from dual; but i am getting only date alone . in my table and dynmaic table datatype for date column is date
I'm trying to generate count of the number of entries in a table for each day.The problem is the date column is of datatype timestamp and looks like this "2006-12-30 18:42:03.0"
How would I generate a report of number of entries in the table for each date (I'm not intrested in the "time" only the "date" i.e YYYY-MM-DD)?
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM my_table_name WHERE my_date_column LIKE '2006-12-30%' GO
It returns zero rows ( and I kno there are rows in the table) I'm using Oracle 10g.
how to caluclate days between two dates of single timestamp filed and with this
query Select * from m_activity_transaction where actn_opp_id in ( Select actn_opp_id from m_activity_transaction where ACTN_ACTV_ID = 218 Group by actn_opp_id
[code]...
and i nedd to caluclate no.of days between two dates like 27-JAN-12 11.06.20.000000 AM and 08-FEB-12 05.32.54.000000 PM where actn_id is unique AND ACTN_OPP_ID IS NOT UNIQUE.
Is there a way to query an oracle database in an automated fashion by a timestamp field based on current timestamp, like: 04/29/08 00:00:00 - 72 hours?
(both these fields a_std and a_time are coming as varchar from the parent table in a cursor.(basically they are time period and actual arrival time respectively)
i was juggling with the attempt to make varchar to timestamp or date..but caught with Round up /Round down)
Formula ->
A = Round down [A_TIME - A_STD] B = Round up [A_TIME) - 10 minute + A_STD]
where
A_TIME VARCHAR2(8) N Time (Format" HH:MM AM/PM") eg "3:50 PM" A_STD VARCHAR2(5) N Standard time (Format" HH:MM") eg "1:00"
Allowed values for A & B after round up/down = multiple of 10 ( 11:00,11:10,11:20 etc.)
I have 3 tables, user_login_event, person and resource_viewed_event. What I want to do have a report for each month, users logged in our application and then show for each month, how many records were created in table person and how many resource views events were logged in resource_viewed_event.
Lets only worry about the timestamp fields in these tables now as I want to use them to join the tables together or at least build correlated subqueries along the months. I have tried several options, all not leading to a desired result:
Left outer join. Works but its incredibly slow:
SELECT distinct to_char(ule.TIMESTAMP,'YYYY-MM') as "YYYY-MM", count(distinct ule.id) as "User Logins", count(distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged on", count(distinct p2.id) as "Existing Users", count(distinct p1.id) as "New Users", count(distinct r1.id) as "Resources created"
[code]....
Tried the same with left outer joins of temporary tables created through select statements:
select distinct ule.month as "Month", count(distinct p1.user_id) as "Users created", count (ule.id) as "Logins", count (distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged in", count(rv.id) as "Resource Views", count(distinct rv.resource_id) as "Resources Viewed"
[code]....
Tried the same with left outer joins of temporary tables created through select statements:
select distinct ule.month as "Month", count(distinct p1.user_id) as "Users created", count (ule.id) as "Logins", count (distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged in", count(rv.id) as "Resource Views", count(distinct rv.resource_id) as "Resources Viewed"
[code]....
another approach is to create my own temporary tables using select statements and create fixed Month values which I can use to directly link the sets together.
select distinct ule.loginday as "Month", count(distinct ule.id) as "Logins", count(distinct ule.user_id) as "Users logged in", count(distinct p1.user_id) as "Users created", count(distinct p2.user_id) as "Existing users1"
[code]....
performance is OK with 2 tables but the example above takes forever to execute.
Tried an approach with union but this creates new rows for each table
SELECT DISTINCT p1.MONTH AS "Month", COUNT(DISTINCT p1.user_id) AS "Users created", NULL AS "Logins", NULL AS "Users Logged in", NULL AS "Resource views", NULL AS "Resources viewed" FROM (SELECT To_char(person.created_on_date, 'YYYY-MM') AS MONTH,
Which is better to use of Views and Materialized views so as to have good performance ? Also I need to search for a particular value in the view. Any function in sql to implement this ?
I'm wanting a query that will look up a named field and return all of the tables that it is held in. I've tried looking through manually but the database has hundreds of tables
i have a text field search_part1 in which i put the item for search another text field i send_by which contains items a single item comes in list many times.i have to find the item one by one.i have make this statement for seraching items
Declare typ varchar2(200); L_NAME VARCHAR2(50) := :BLOCK3.SEARCH_PART1; begin go_block('BLOCK3'); first_record; loop if :BLOCK3.SEND_BY = L_NAME then [code]....
bt the problem is that if a single items comes more than one time then it search only one time and next time it exit.
I would need a SQL script or a command for PLSQL that would search for a keyword %keyword% in all tables of a database instance and in a sepcified schema of a user.
how to do this interactively, without preparing a SQL script with all exisiting tables?
I have an application which deploys the data to Oracle database. It has more than 25 tables and many columns. It does not have any document explaining the deployment, so I am kind of doing reverse engineering here.
I need a script which will fetch the column name or at least table names which will match with either some string or number? I found few examples on net to find out number. But I am struggling to make it work for string.
I can not work on stored proc, as I do not have access to create that on server. So, any script will work.
I have a table emp where empid,employee name,job,salary are three columns.I need to retrieve empid,count of emp,emp name,emp salary of job = manager and total salary of all employees with grouping by job in one query.
i hav a table in database with name TBH.in that table there are 25 to 30 columns.its a material details table.by using add material form i insert all the details of the material in the table.2 colums have primary key(material id and material code).
now iam making search and update form.on material code item i have WHEN-MOUSE-CLICK-TRIGGER and calling LOV and displaying record.
but the problem is when iam making changes in some fields its giving error ...UNABLE TO INSERT....FRM-40508:ORACLE error:unable to insert record.
How can I do a selective search on "description" column for any word that starts with the "$" sign? In the end, this is the resultset that I am expecting:
I'm trying to select from table "A" where value1 and value2 match. If the values are not in table "A", try table "B". If the values exist in BOTH tables - only look at the results from table "A".
Table "A" may or may not have "new" data coming into the system. Table "B" may or may not have "existing" data.
The code I am writing needs to find the "newest" data row for value1 and value2. Eventually the data in table "A" gets "Merged" into table "B" further on in the process.
Supposedly this can be done in a single query using a left outer join and the NVL function, but the person I inherited this from isn't available.
I've been able to get the row back if it exists in "A" or "B", but end up with two rows or no rows if the row exists in both... Arrrg...
