I was reading about merge statement and tried some variations,
create table MERGE_TEST(
C1 number,
C2 varchar2(10 char),
c3 number);
insert into MERGE_TEST values(1, 'Name 3', 300);
insert into MERGE_TEST values(1, 'Name 2', 200);
insert into MERGE_TEST values(1, 'Name 1', 100);
commit;
[code]...
why is result different in this querys?
In the following merge statement in the USINg clause...I am using a select stament of one schema WEDB.But that same select statement should take data from 30 schemeas and then check the condition below condition
ON(source.DNO = target.DNO
AND source.BNO=target.BNO);
I thought that using UNIONALL for select statement of the schemas as below.
SELECT
DNO,
BNO,
c2,
c3,
c4,
c5,
c6,
c7
[code]....
I am using the below code to update specific sub-partition data using oracle merge statements.
I am getting the sub-partition name and passing this as a string to the sub-partition clause.
The Merge statement is failing stating that the specified sub-partition does not exist. But the sub-partition do exists for the table.
We are using Oracle 11gr2 database.
Below is the code which I am using to populate the data.
declare
ln_min_batchkey PLS_INTEGER;
ln_max_batchkey PLS_INTEGER;
lv_partition_name VARCHAR2 (32767);
lv_subpartition_name VARCHAR2 (32767);
begin
[code]....
Does the Oracle 11g supports 'RETURNING INTO' clause in MERGE statement? if it was not available is there any alternate to achieve the same ?
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow to update or insert another (third table ) table with merge statement
View 6 Replies View Related how to use the MERGE Statement. actually I've used oracle Merge Statement before and it works very well. However today I tried to use and perform a command like that:
Merge into myTable mt using ( select 'data' field1, 'data2' field2, ect from dual
union
select 'data' field1, 'data2' field2, ect from dual
union
[code]...
This has not worked.What am I doing wrong?What could I do to solve this problem and axecute this statement sucessfully?
in Toad I am using this Merge statement , working accordingly.I want to use this merge statement in my form where can I use it.
I created a Procedure in Form Named Proc_merge and call it when validate item of :bankcode
PROCEDURE proc_merge IS
BEGIN
declare
v_com varchar2(5000);
BEGIN
V_COM := '
[code]...
when matched then
update set
trg.v_chq = src.cheque_no, trg.v_bankcode = src.bank_code ,trg.v_debit=src.debit, trg.v_credit=src.credit, trg.v_narration=src.narration
when not matched then
insert (trg.v_type, trg.v_no, trg.v_date, trg.v_chq, trg.v_bankcode, trg.v_debit, trg.v_credit, trg.v_narration)
values (src.voucher_type, src.voucher_no, src.voucher_date, src.cheque_no, src.bank_code, src.debit, src.credit, src.narration)
';
FORMS_DDL(V_COM);
end;
END;
no any result.
Table Name: F_SCENARIO
System : Dataware house
Oracle version : 11g
Record Count : 2 Million records
Correct scenario records
F_Key F_Bridge_key Record_type
1 1 1
2 1 2
3 1 3
Wrong scenario records
F_Key F_Bridge_key Record_type
1 1 1
2 -5 2
3 -6 3
I want to write a Merge statement to update the negative values into 1.
I am using Merge statement to copy data from one table to other,
merge into tabA a
using tabB b
on a.id = b.id
when match
update (
)
when not matched
(insert )
This is working all fine, as SQL, but when there is large volume, it blows out as there are intermediate commits for this ?
I have two tables have almost the same columns, how can I use merge statement to update the target table only when there is difference between source and target table. Is there any easier way not compare each column one by one? I am using Oracle 11.2
Here is the MERGE statement:
Merge into tb_trgt trgt using tb_src src
on (src.id = trgt.id)
when not matched then insert (trgt.id, trgt.nm, trgt.addr) values (src.id, src.nm, src.nm)
when matched then update set trgt.nm = src.nm, trgt.addr = src.addr
where trgt.nm <> src.nm or trgt.addr <> src.addr
;
Is there any easier way to specify the where clause in the NOT MATCHED? I don't want compare each column of the tables. Since I may have many columns in the tables.
{code{
i want to apply merge stmt on single table.
CREATE TABLE TEST11(TNO NUMBER(5), TVAL VARCHAR2(100), TID VARCHAR2(10));
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(1,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(2,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(3,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(4,'VIJAYA','');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(5,'VIJAYA','');
[Code]....
My requiremen is if record is exists then i wan to update some value, if record not existes the i wan to insert new record
I am using JDBC to run a few queries from my Java program (multi-threaded one).I am facing an issue where a select statement is blocking a delete statement. From the java code point of view, there are 2 different threads accessing the same tables (whith different DB connection objects).
When the block occurs (which i was able to find out from the java thread dump that there is a lock on oracle), the below is the output:
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR(sysdate, 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
2 || ' User '||s1.username || '@' || s1.machine
3 || ' ( SID= ' || s1.sid || ' ) with the statement: ' || sqlt2.sql_text
||' is blocking the SQL statement on '|| s2.username || '@'
4 5 || s2.machine || ' ( SID=' || s2.sid || ' ) blocked SQL -> '
6 ||sqlt1.sql_text AS blocking_status FROM v$lock l1, v$session s1, v$lock l2 ,
7 v$session s2,v$sql sqlt1, v$sql sqlt2
8 WHERE s1.sid =l1.sid
9 AND s2.sid =l2.sid AND sqlt1.sql_id= s2.sql_id
AND sqlt2.sql_id= s1.prev_sql_id AND l1.BLOCK =1
10 AND l2.request > 0 AND l1.id1 = l2.id1 AND l2.id2 = l2.id2;
[code]...
From the above it can be seen that a select statement is blocking a delete. Unless the select is select for Update, it should not block other statements is not it ?
mbr has 60,000 rows and member has 60,000 rows approx. two tables have indexes on ssn, and citi_no on them.
PK of mbr : mbr_id
PK of member : mbr_id
other columns are not PK, and have no index on it.
I'm wondering why the statment doesn't use index while ssn and citi_no have index.
MERGE INTO mbr t
USING (SELECT mbr_id,citi_no
FROM member) a
ON (t.ssn = a.citi_no)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET t.asis_mbr_id = a.mbr_id
where t.ssn not in(select ssn from mbr group by ssn having count(*) > 1)
I am getting a (PL/SQL: ORA-00903: invalid table name) compile error in a procedure using a merge statement. I have seen many examples using this technique and am at a loss as to why I can't compile.
the pipelined function is:
FUNCTION f_crcli_pipe(pi_source_data IN sys_refcursor,
pi_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT pkg_crcli_variables.c_cursor_limit_def)
RETURN CRCLI_AA
PIPELINED
PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION pi_source_data BY ANY)
IS
[code].....
the error is pointing to the TABLE function in the USING clause of the merge statement.
Can I have all the rows in a table updated at once in the merge statement?
MERGE INTO providermaster a
using
(
SELECT * FROM PROVIDERMASTER@INGEST) b
ON (b.MASTERPROVIDERID=a.MASTERPROVIDERID)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE ....... I want to update all the other rows at once..
I am using MERGE statement first time in my application but I am facing error.
begin
merge into store.comm_dept a
using factory_data.comm_dept b
on (a.cd_dcode = b.cd_dcode)
when matched then
[code]........
ERROR IS: encountered the symbol 'INTO' when expecting on of the following:
:=.(@%;
I am writing below MERGE statement. In this cardinality between table_a and table_b is 1:2. I.e. each record in table_b corresponds to 2 records in table_a based on columns in ON clause.
Well this query throws below error.
----Error---
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P011
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
However, the same statement executes successfully when PARALLEL hint is removed altogether. (There are no duplicates in table_b based on unit,group,loc columns.)
-----Query--------
MERGE /*+ PARALLEL(8) */
INTO table_a a
USING table_b b
ON (a.unit = b.unit AND a.group = b.group AND a.loc = b.loc)
[Code]....
I have a merge statement in one procedure , this job runs on daily . It is running successfully since Jan-19-2010 and giving the below error now.
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcbgcur_9], [4224596], [1],
[4294967250], [2], [], [], []
It is giving error in the beginning of the MERGE statement.
How to handle the exception on below MERGE statement?
MERGE INTO COMM_EXSTS_COMIT_AGGR TARGET
USING
(
select * from ABC ) SRC
ON
(
SRC.COMMITMENT_ID = TARGET.COMMITMENT_ID
)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT ;
When I am executing merge statement I am getting the below error.
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
MERGE INTO TAN_LIST t
USING (SELECT * FROM (SELECT row_number () over (partition by TANNO order by null) rn,
dno,
TANNO,
SOL,
[Code]....
The query is fectching below data.
SELECT dno,TANNO,SOL,DESC,class,ct_dt,tcost
FROM MAT_LIST;
DNOTANNOSOLDESC CLASS CT_DT TCOST
63007565ADclass A A12345 08/28/131
[Code]...
Intially thers is no records in the TAN_LIST table. When I run the merge statemnt I am able to insert all 15 records into that table.
When I run the same merge statemment second time I am getting the below error.
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
So that I have used partition by cluase in the slect statement and I am able to resolve the error.
But it's inserting only 14 records not all 15. How to process all 15 records without the error..
Depending on which month the user is running this select the TAG_YEAR needs to be calculated differently. I have a feeling that I'm over thinking it.
SELECT DOG_MASTER.DOG_MASTER_ID,
DOG_NAME,
TAG_YEAR,
TAG_NUMBER AS PREVIOUSTAGNUMBER,
ISSUE_DATE
FROM DOG_OWNER
[code].......
I have 2 sql's statement below, and just wondering if their is difference between the two sql's.
FIELDS data type:
--------------------
a.field is DATE
b.field is also a DATE
SQL1:
-------
SELECT a.*, b.*
FROM table a
INNER JOIN table b
ON a.field = b.field
WHERE a.field between b.field AND b.field + 2
;
SQL2:
-------
SELECT a.*, b.*
FROM table a
INNER JOIN table b
ON a.field between b.field AND b.field + 2
;
OR
SELECT a.*, b.*
FROM table a
INNER JOIN table b
ON a.field >= b.field AND
a.field <= (b.field + 2)
;
which ever is correct between the two sql.
QUESTION: would be the two sql's generate same result set.
select empno,ename,deptno,employee_status from emp,dept where emp.deptno=dept.deptno and
( employee_status in(Case employee_status when {?Status}=1 then 'A'
when {?Status}= 2 then 'T'
When {?Status}= 3 then 'A'||','||'T'))
OR ( end_date >= {?START_DATE}
AND end_date <= {?END_DATE}
)
)
Since when i pass employee_status as input 1 it have given me 4 records. When I pass employee_status as input 2 it have given me 3 records. When I pass employee_status as input 3 it should give me 4 records + 3 records=7 records.
4 records for employee_status 'A'
3 RECORDS for employee_status 'T'
7 records for employee_status 'A' AND 'T'
How I should write a query to get 7 records.
How to use CASE stmt in WHERE clause?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am trying to use the following case statement in my where clause. My problem here is, I get no rows.
tab1.col1 =
case
when (tab1.col1 = 'VAR') and (tab1.col2 is null or tab1.col2 >= tab2.datecol) then
tab1.col1
else
null
end
I'm using pivot query feature of oracle 11g and came across a strange situation where i need to pass a "select statement" in a "in clause" of pivot query.
SQL> CREATE TABLE TEST1
2 (
3 UIN NUMBER(8) NOT NULL,
4 TESTING_ID NUMBER(4),
5 PFA_RESULT VARCHAR2(30 BYTE)
6 );
[code]....
I have tried with pivot xml but it not giving desired output in sql*plus session.It is giving unreadable output.
select * from
(select uin,testing_id,pfa_result from test1)
pivot xml (max(pfa_result) as result
for (testing_id) in (select distinct testing_id from test1));
[code]....
Here actually i want to use "select distinct id from test1" instead of "in (11,12,13,14,15)". Because i don't know how many id's will be there and of which values. e.g. 11 or 21 or 25.
Want to filter a data using CASE statement in WHERE clause for the following scenario.
Need to Filter tb1.fallback_keyword if the fallback_flag is "Y' or 'N' and pg_number is null.Else no partial search of keyword.
where CASE WHEN (fallback_flg = 'Y' OR fallback_flg = 'N') and (pg_number is NULL )
THEN tb1.fallback_keyword = SUBSTR(key_word,1, INSTR(key_word,'#',-2))
ELSE (tb1.keyword = key_word ) AND (tb1.keyword like regexp_replace(key_word, '[*]+', '%'))
END
currently i m going through some dumps for my OCA-11g prep.I came across one sentence :A view cannot have an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT statement.well this statement is false and the explanation given was :
Query operations containing ORDER BY clause are also permitted, so long as the ORDER BY clause appears outside the parentheses.
The following is an example of what I mean: CREATE VIEW my_view AS (SELECT*FROM emp) ORDER BYempno.
but when i tried running the query like this :CREATE VIEW my_view AS SELECT*FROM emp ORDER BYempno ,it worked w/o giving parentheses.
Are some posibilities to exclude duplicate values do not using sql aggregate functions in main select statement? Priview SQL statement
SELECT * FROM
(
select id,hin_id,name,code,valid_date_from,valid_date_to
from diaries
)
[Code]....
In this case i got duplicate of entry TT2 id 50513 In main select statement cant use agregate functions are even posible to exclude this value from result modifying only the QLRST WHERE clause (TRUNC need to be here)
I am trying to run following sql query,but it is throwing following error.
SQL> delete from b$gc_count_temp a INNER JOIN COMPLEMENTS ON b$gc_count_temp.CON
NECTION_ID_TEMP=COMPLEMENTS.feature_conn_id
2 WHERE a.current_designation is null and a.current_low is null and a.current
_high is null;
delete from b$gc_count_temp a INNER JOIN COMPLEMENTS ON b$gc_count_temp.CONNECTI
ON_ID_TEMP=COMPLEMENTS.feature_conn_id
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended