I am using MERGE statement first time in my application but I am facing error.
begin
merge into store.comm_dept a
using factory_data.comm_dept b
on (a.cd_dcode = b.cd_dcode)
when matched then
[code]........
ERROR IS: encountered the symbol 'INTO' when expecting on of the following:
:=.(@%;
I have a merge statement in one procedure , this job runs on daily . It is running successfully since Jan-19-2010 and giving the below error now.
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kcbgcur_9], [4224596], [1],
[4294967250], [2], [], [], []
It is giving error in the beginning of the MERGE statement.
in Toad I am using this Merge statement , working accordingly.I want to use this merge statement in my form where can I use it.
I created a Procedure in Form Named Proc_merge and call it when validate item of :bankcode
PROCEDURE proc_merge IS
BEGIN
declare
v_com varchar2(5000);
BEGIN
V_COM := '
[code]...
when matched then
update set
trg.v_chq = src.cheque_no, trg.v_bankcode = src.bank_code ,trg.v_debit=src.debit, trg.v_credit=src.credit, trg.v_narration=src.narration
when not matched then
insert (trg.v_type, trg.v_no, trg.v_date, trg.v_chq, trg.v_bankcode, trg.v_debit, trg.v_credit, trg.v_narration)
values (src.voucher_type, src.voucher_no, src.voucher_date, src.cheque_no, src.bank_code, src.debit, src.credit, src.narration)
';
FORMS_DDL(V_COM);
end;
END;
no any result.
In the following merge statement in the USINg clause...I am using a select stament of one schema WEDB.But that same select statement should take data from 30 schemeas and then check the condition below condition
ON(source.DNO = target.DNO
AND source.BNO=target.BNO);
I thought that using UNIONALL for select statement of the schemas as below.
SELECT
DNO,
BNO,
c2,
c3,
c4,
c5,
c6,
c7
[code]....
how to update or insert another (third table ) table with merge statement
View 6 Replies View Related how to use the MERGE Statement. actually I've used oracle Merge Statement before and it works very well. However today I tried to use and perform a command like that:
Merge into myTable mt using ( select 'data' field1, 'data2' field2, ect from dual
union
select 'data' field1, 'data2' field2, ect from dual
union
[code]...
This has not worked.What am I doing wrong?What could I do to solve this problem and axecute this statement sucessfully?
Table Name: F_SCENARIO
System : Dataware house
Oracle version : 11g
Record Count : 2 Million records
Correct scenario records
F_Key F_Bridge_key Record_type
1 1 1
2 1 2
3 1 3
Wrong scenario records
F_Key F_Bridge_key Record_type
1 1 1
2 -5 2
3 -6 3
I want to write a Merge statement to update the negative values into 1.
I am using Merge statement to copy data from one table to other,
merge into tabA a
using tabB b
on a.id = b.id
when match
update (
)
when not matched
(insert )
This is working all fine, as SQL, but when there is large volume, it blows out as there are intermediate commits for this ?
I have two tables have almost the same columns, how can I use merge statement to update the target table only when there is difference between source and target table. Is there any easier way not compare each column one by one? I am using Oracle 11.2
Here is the MERGE statement:
Merge into tb_trgt trgt using tb_src src
on (src.id = trgt.id)
when not matched then insert (trgt.id, trgt.nm, trgt.addr) values (src.id, src.nm, src.nm)
when matched then update set trgt.nm = src.nm, trgt.addr = src.addr
where trgt.nm <> src.nm or trgt.addr <> src.addr
;
Is there any easier way to specify the where clause in the NOT MATCHED? I don't want compare each column of the tables. Since I may have many columns in the tables.
{code{
i want to apply merge stmt on single table.
CREATE TABLE TEST11(TNO NUMBER(5), TVAL VARCHAR2(100), TID VARCHAR2(10));
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(1,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(2,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(3,'VIJAYA','TEST');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(4,'VIJAYA','');
INSERT INTO TEST11 VALUES(5,'VIJAYA','');
[Code]....
My requiremen is if record is exists then i wan to update some value, if record not existes the i wan to insert new record
I was reading about merge statement and tried some variations,
create table MERGE_TEST(
C1 number,
C2 varchar2(10 char),
c3 number);
insert into MERGE_TEST values(1, 'Name 3', 300);
insert into MERGE_TEST values(1, 'Name 2', 200);
insert into MERGE_TEST values(1, 'Name 1', 100);
commit;
[code]...
why is result different in this querys?
mbr has 60,000 rows and member has 60,000 rows approx. two tables have indexes on ssn, and citi_no on them.
PK of mbr : mbr_id
PK of member : mbr_id
other columns are not PK, and have no index on it.
I'm wondering why the statment doesn't use index while ssn and citi_no have index.
MERGE INTO mbr t
USING (SELECT mbr_id,citi_no
FROM member) a
ON (t.ssn = a.citi_no)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET t.asis_mbr_id = a.mbr_id
where t.ssn not in(select ssn from mbr group by ssn having count(*) > 1)
I am getting a (PL/SQL: ORA-00903: invalid table name) compile error in a procedure using a merge statement. I have seen many examples using this technique and am at a loss as to why I can't compile.
the pipelined function is:
FUNCTION f_crcli_pipe(pi_source_data IN sys_refcursor,
pi_limit_size IN PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT pkg_crcli_variables.c_cursor_limit_def)
RETURN CRCLI_AA
PIPELINED
PARALLEL_ENABLE(PARTITION pi_source_data BY ANY)
IS
[code].....
the error is pointing to the TABLE function in the USING clause of the merge statement.
Can I have all the rows in a table updated at once in the merge statement?
MERGE INTO providermaster a
using
(
SELECT * FROM PROVIDERMASTER@INGEST) b
ON (b.MASTERPROVIDERID=a.MASTERPROVIDERID)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE ....... I want to update all the other rows at once..
I am writing below MERGE statement. In this cardinality between table_a and table_b is 1:2. I.e. each record in table_b corresponds to 2 records in table_a based on columns in ON clause.
Well this query throws below error.
----Error---
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P011
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
However, the same statement executes successfully when PARALLEL hint is removed altogether. (There are no duplicates in table_b based on unit,group,loc columns.)
-----Query--------
MERGE /*+ PARALLEL(8) */
INTO table_a a
USING table_b b
ON (a.unit = b.unit AND a.group = b.group AND a.loc = b.loc)
[Code]....
How to handle the exception on below MERGE statement?
MERGE INTO COMM_EXSTS_COMIT_AGGR TARGET
USING
(
select * from ABC ) SRC
ON
(
SRC.COMMITMENT_ID = TARGET.COMMITMENT_ID
)
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT ;
When I am executing merge statement I am getting the below error.
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
MERGE INTO TAN_LIST t
USING (SELECT * FROM (SELECT row_number () over (partition by TANNO order by null) rn,
dno,
TANNO,
SOL,
[Code]....
The query is fectching below data.
SELECT dno,TANNO,SOL,DESC,class,ct_dt,tcost
FROM MAT_LIST;
DNOTANNOSOLDESC CLASS CT_DT TCOST
63007565ADclass A A12345 08/28/131
[Code]...
Intially thers is no records in the TAN_LIST table. When I run the merge statemnt I am able to insert all 15 records into that table.
When I run the same merge statemment second time I am getting the below error.
ORA-30926: unable to get a stable set of rows in the source tables
So that I have used partition by cluase in the slect statement and I am able to resolve the error.
But it's inserting only 14 records not all 15. How to process all 15 records without the error..
I am using the below code to update specific sub-partition data using oracle merge statements.
I am getting the sub-partition name and passing this as a string to the sub-partition clause.
The Merge statement is failing stating that the specified sub-partition does not exist. But the sub-partition do exists for the table.
We are using Oracle 11gr2 database.
Below is the code which I am using to populate the data.
declare
ln_min_batchkey PLS_INTEGER;
ln_max_batchkey PLS_INTEGER;
lv_partition_name VARCHAR2 (32767);
lv_subpartition_name VARCHAR2 (32767);
begin
[code]....
I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.
SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */
INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq
USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid,
detail_rerate_flag_code,
rerate_sel_key,
[code].....
I have a problem that i have hard coded the username.tablename in each select statement of all forms of my application. Now i want to use a dynamic variable in place of username in each select statement throughout the application. The example is:
select * from scott.emp
and i want to write it as:
select * from variable.emp
But at compilation of the form the compiler should know the above variable name.
I have tried to use following select statement but it does not work.
select user into :global.username from user_users
I think perhaps my problem would be solved with Dynamic SQL Statement but i have no experience by using this statement.
Using apex 4.1.1 , linux , 11gr2
Basically I have requirement to generate a Word doc (letter to a Word mail merge) from a button/navigation link pressed on Apex page which will gather data from the report and fill in values in appropriate place in Word doc.
Is this even possible with Apex with/o BI Publisher
I have Fop installed and tested , PDF works great but excel and RTF is not reading the encoding on attachment download.I am aware of new PDF feature in 4.2.2 but upgrade is just not the scope right now.
I am getting an error when trying to run this DECLARE statement and I'm not sure why. I'm fairly new to PL/SQL and have looked up how to format a DECLARE statement and this seems right to me.
DECLARE
v_eventstart date;
v_maxhbdate date;
v_6monthPOS date;
[code]...
The error is stating "encountered the symbol "end-of-file" when expecting one of the following... " and is refering to the beginning of this statement.
select iloan_code,inst_due_date,paid_flag,late_fee,case late_fee when sysdate-inst_due_date between 1 and 10 then 10 when sysdate-inst_due_date > 10 and late_fee <>10 then 5 when sysdate-inst_due_date > 10 and late_fee = 10 then 15 else 0 end as new_late_fee from st_il_schedule where paid_flag='N'; i am getting error
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to do is create 4 simple tables. This is my first project using SQL so I'm totally new to it, not just SQL itself but database design/management, including foreign/primary key concepts. I think that's why the errors are being generated due to a duplication of foreign key names (perhaps?) but I really don't where I'm going wrong with the design structure in terms of the FK's and the relationships.
Added the error report in the attachment.
Create Table Hotel
(Hotel_No Char(4 Byte) Not Null,
H_Name VarChar2(20 Byte) Not Null,
H_Address VarChar2(30 Byte),
Constraint Hotel_PK Primary Key (Hotel_No));
Create Table Room
(Room_No VarChar2(4) Not Null,
Hotel_No Char(4) Not Null,
R_Type Char(1),
R_Price Number(5,2),
Constraint Room_PK Primary Key (Room_No, Hotel_No),
Constraint Hotel_No_FK (Hotel_No) References Hotel(Hotel_No));
Create Table Booking
(Hotel_No Char(4) Not Null,
Guest_No Char(4) Not Null,
Date_From Date Not Null,
Date_To Date,
Room_No VarChar2(4),
Constraint Booking_PK Primary Key (Hotel_No, Guest_No, Date_From),
Constraint Guest_No_FK Foreign Key (Guest_No) References Guest(Guest_No),
Constraint Hotel_No_Room_No_FK (Hotel_No, Room_No) References Room(Hotel_No, Room_No),
Constraint Hotel_No_FK (Hotel_No) References Hotel(Hotel_No));
Create Table Guest
(Guest_No Char(4) Not Null,
G_Name VarChar2(30),
G_Address VarChar2(35),
Constraint Guest_PK Primary Key (Guest_No));
I have a question. If i insert some values to a table and then write a create statement. But if the create statement gives me error (eg: table name already exist). And without commiting if i come out the session will the insert commit?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI'm teaching myself to write stored procedures, working in TOAD 10.5 with Oracle 10g. I keep getting error ORA-00900: invalid SQL Statement. Here's the code, cut down to bare minimum sample size. I can't see where I'm doing anything wrong.
If I cut out the cursor (taking it down to just "Begin" and "End"), it does run, but I can't see anything wrong with the cursor.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE IN_PROCESS_CASES_BOS
IS
V_HELLO VARCHAR2(10);
CURSOR C_MAIN IS
SELECT 'HELLO' FROM DUAL;
[code]....
I am creating the following two tables...no issues here:
CODECREATE TABLE COURSE_SECTION
(
Csecid NUMBER(8) CONSTRAINT COURSE_SELECTION_NUMBER_pk PRIMARY Key,
Cid NUMBER(6) NOT NULL CONSTRAINTS COURSE_SELECTION_Cid_fk REFERENCES COURSE,
Termid NUMBER(5) NOT NULL CONSTRAINTS COURSE_SELECTION_Termid_fk REFERENCES TERM,
[code]...
The issue I am having is actually inserting data into the table:
CODEINSERT INTO ENROLLMENT
VALUES (100, 1000, 'A' );
INSERT INTO ENROLLMENT
VALUES (100, 1003, 'A' );
[code]...
But I get an ORACLE error of
ORA-02291- integrity constraint (User1.ENROLLMENT_CSECID_FK) violated - parent key not foundHow can the parent key not be found when I have it declared/created in the above statement?
I have a query regarding the use of rownum inside the insert statement.
For example, I have a sample table as: sample1(aa date, bb number);
Insert
INTO sample1
VALUES (SYSDATE, ROWNUM);
this statement is working fine in Oracle 9i but gives error in Oracle 11.2.0.1. The error is ORA-976 ,
Why this error coming in Oracle 11g and how to resolve it?
Our Environment: UNIX AIX 5.3, Oracle 11.2.0.1 database
Where I run this update query, I get the error:
Error report:
SQL Error: ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row
01427. 00000 - "single-row subquery returns more than one row"
*Cause:
*Action:
UPDATE XXX_CURR_EOM SET ID =
(select CAPITALPLAN.ID from capitalplan, XXX_CURR_EOM
where
XXX_CURR_EOM.ID = CAPITALPLAN_id)
don't know what it means.
My question is on TRUNCATE statement.
So if the truncate syntax goes like
TRUNCATE { TABLE [ schema. ]table
[ { PRESERVE | PURGE } MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ]
| CLUSTER [ schema. ]cluster
}
[ { DROP | REUSE } STORAGE
Where it is really not mandatory to add (DROP STORAGE) to the truncate statement knowing fully well the Watermark is dropped. Lately some of my Truncate statements that are part of Plsql package have been failing randomly with a ORA-03291 error. I iteratively walk through a list to truncate some tables and 1 or 2 out of 10 randomly fail. But work fine when I rerun. Its been a night mare for couple of weeks now. This code was working alright for last several years now in 10g and previously 9i. Do you believe some changes to settings on the Oracle database or to blame for ?
ORA-03291: Invalid truncate option - missing STORAGE keyword
ORA-06512: at "xxxx.xxxxxxxxx", line 35
ORA-06512: at line 2