I want to execute a DML query with execute immediate statement. That DML query length exceeds 4000 characters. This query has Xquery related conditions, i can not split the query. when i tried execute it is giving "string literal too long". I tried with DBMS_SQL.Parse() and DBMS_SQL.Execute also, but it is giving same error. I have to execute this DML query inside a Procedure. We are using oracle 10g version
I've to create a table which has 650 fields and the total length of CREATE TABLE statement got to be more than 4000 characters.I've to create the table by inserting the CREATE TABLE statment in a variable (V1) then by using EXECUTE IMMEDIATE V1 Since VARCHAR2 only supports upto 4000 characters length string, how can I create such table??
DECLARE V1 VARCHAR2(4000); BEGIN V1 := -- CREATE TALBE STATEMENT WITH LENGTH MORE THAN 4000 EXECUTE IMMEDIATE V1; END;
Quote:got the error -- PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
i want to insert the text lenght containing more than 4000 characters, that column datatype is in CLOB Even though in CLOB we can able to store upto 4GB. Its not allowing me to insert more than 4000 characters at a time , but we can able to insert by splitting the data by 4000 and can append remaining characters But i am receving the text contains more than 4000, that how can i split the data upto 4000
I am using Oracle Version 11.2. Here's an example of what I am trying to do..
-- create table with a clob column create table sr_test (c1 CLOB)
-- load data that is more than 4000 characters into clob declare var1 varchar2(32000); begin var1:= '';
for i in 1..5000 loop var1:= var1||i||',';
end loop; dbms_output.put_line(var1); insert into sr_test(c1) values (var1); end;
-- select table to make sure clob is loaded
select c1, dbms_lob.getlength(c1) from sr_test
-- create procedure to return data from table
create procedure sr_p1(result out sys_refcursor) is begin open result for select c1 from sr_test; end;
-- run the procedure to get data
DECLARE RESULT sys_refcursor;
BEGIN RESULT := NULL;
ACCOUNTING.SR_P1 ( RESULT );
:rc0_RESULT := RESULT;
END;
Everything works as intended. However, this procedure is being called from Webservices. According to what I have been told, webservices adds 18ms for each clob that needs to be converted into char so it can be displayed on the screen. So, I need something like this
create procedure sr_p1(result out sys_refcursor) is begin open result for select dbms_lob.substr(c1,32000,1) from sr_test; end;
Is there an alternate method to send more than 4000 characters in the refcursor?
I need to insert these two records into below tables(NGF_REC_LINK,MDU_19).I got below mentioned result while trying to execute my ctl file (ngf_test.ctl )
For 1st record : I am getting beloe error
Record 1: Rejected - Error on table NGF_REC_LINK, column TABLENAME.Field in data file exceeds maximum length
For 2nd record : Because inputs filed is missing in file,Data is miss arranged into table like
PROCEDURE getrecordsForinspection(i_table_name in varchar2, i_thread_id in varchar2, i_max_count in number default null, o_results out sys_refcursor) AS v_sql varchar2(1000):= null;
begin v_sql := 'update '||'i_table_name||' set status = '||'''IN_PROCESS-'||i_thread_id||''''||' Where final_status = '||''''STATUS_ACCEPTED'''||' and ('||i_max_count||' is null or rownum <= '||i_max_count||');';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE(v_sql); commit; end;
when I execute the above procedure it gives the following error.
ORA-00911: invalid character cause: Identifiers may not start with any ASCII characters other than letters and numbers.$#_ are also allowed after the first character. Identifiers enclosed by double quotes may contain any character other than a double quote. Alternative quotes(q'#....#') can not use spaces, tabs, or carriage returns as delimiters. For all other contexts, consult the SQL language reference Manual.
I think dynamic sql is not executed because of the pipe character in the sql statement.
I have a insert statement where i need to insert data to a column where i need to insert value more than 4000 char into column.
Different approaches and condition: 1. CLOB should not be used 2. Need full value to be stored
Approach: 1.I created few more dummy columns to insert the data , was inserting 4000 char and if exceeded i was inserting to next column, but this will be tedious if we have 35000 char 2.Insert in the same column as different rows
I have error message when running duplicate : FRM-21011: PL/SQL unhandled exception ORA-06502..I'm trying to hold 4000 characters in a variable like what do below:
if s_str is NULL then s_str := eachcol.column_name||'{{'|| name_in(name_in('system.cursor_block')||'.'||eachcol.column_name)||'{{'; else s_str := s_str||eachcol.column_name||'{{'|| name_in(name_in('system.cursor_block')||'.'||eachcol.column_name)||'{{'; end if;
It's simple variable to hold value but still can't get by large string though.
I am struggling with a simple data load using sqlldr
Ref: I am running Oracle 11.2 on Linux 5.7. =========================== Here is my table: SQL> desc ntwkrep.CARD Name Null? Type
[code]...
Looking at the actual data and counting the characters for the "REALIZES" column data, I see that it is roughly slightly over 1000 characters.
So, attempting various ideas to fix the problem, I tried changing nls_length_semantics to "char" and recreating the table, but this still didn't work and still got the same data load errors on the same rows.
Then, I changed nls_length_semantics back to byte and recreated the table again.This time, I altered the table manually as: SQL> ALTER TABLE ntwkrep.CARD MODIFY (REALIZES VARCHAR2(4000 char));
Table altered.
SQL> desc ntwkrep.card Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------------------------------- -------- -------------------------------------------- CIM_DESCRIPTION VARCHAR2(255) CIM_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255) COMPOSEDOF VARCHAR2(4000)
[code]...
Here is a copy of the first row of data which fails to load every time no matter how I change the "REALIZES" column in the table.
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit ProductionPL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - ProductionCORE 11.2.0.3.0 ProductionTNS for Solaris: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - ProductionNLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production I'm trying to load a table, small in size (110 rows, 6 columns). One of the columns, called NOTES is erroring when I run the load. It is saying that the column size exceeds max limit. As you can see here, the table column is set to 4000 Bytes)
CREATE TABLE NRIS.NRN_REPORT_NOTES ( NOTES_CN VARCHAR2(40 BYTE) DEFAULT sys_guid() NOT NULL, REPORT_GROUP VARCHAR2(100 BYTE) NOT NULL, AREACODE VARCHAR2(50 BYTE) NOT NULL, ROUND NUMBER(3) NOT NULL, NOTES VARCHAR2(4000 BYTE),
I'm loading data from text file separated by TAB and i got the error below for some lines. Event the column is CLOB data type is there a limitation of the size of a CLOB data type. The error is:
Record 74: Rejected - Error on table _TEMP, column DEST. Field in data file exceeds maximum length
I'm using SQL Loader and the database is oracle 11g r2 on linux Red hat 5. Here are the line causing the error from my data file and my table description for test:
create table TEMP ( CODE VARCHAR2(100), DESC VARCHAR2(500), RATE FLOAT, INCREASE VARCHAR2(20), COUNTRY VARCHAR2(500), DEST CLOB, [code]........
In current form, i use *pll file to pass Global.<variable name> to the form *.fmb
The problem is that if i copy a string of 4000 characters (which i need to) to Global.<variable name>, it will automatically cut a whole chunk to shorter string (less than 1000).
Is there a better way to that Global.<variable name> can hold 4000 characters?
HOW to use variable P_TMPLID in following statement
TYPE typ_unrecon IS TABLE OF REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON%ROWTYPE index by binary_integer;
because its throwing error while compiling
and also in statement FORALL i IN unrecondata.FIRST .. unrecondata.LAST SAVE EXCEPTIONS --STRSQL := ''; --STRSQL := ' INSERT INTO REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON VALUES ' || unrecondata(i); -- EXECUTE IMMEDIATE STRSQL; INSERT INTO REC_' || P_TMPLID ||'_UNRECON VALUES unrecondata(i);---throwing error on this statement commit; --dbms_output.put_line(unrecondata(2).TRANSID); EXCEPTION
We are getting an error in our web application that is using Oracle.DataAccess.dll v2.111.6.20. When a couple users are using the site everything is fine, but when the load goes up we start getting the error ORA-24373: invalid length specified for statement. We are unable to duplicate this error in Visual Studio and don't know where to turn. We use stored procedure and the .dll to access the database for everything. Also, when this error occurs, it occurs indefenitely for all OracleCommand objects until the web server is rebooted. Also, when I attempt to remote debug with SQL Developer, the process doesn't even make it to the database!
I have a set of sql statements which i have to execute inside a pl/sql block. But i need to know the response of each statement and confirmation whether it is executed successfully.
Practically i need to get info as such in sqlplus status msg for each sql statement
I have queries on the execution plan of a sql statement
Following is the example
create table t1 as select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; create table t2 as select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; insert into t1 select s1.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; insert into t2 select s2.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a; commit;
create index i1 on t1(id); create index i2 on t2(id); create index i11 on t1(object_type);
(1) First index on object_type is accessed to get rowids - t1.object_type='VIEW' (2) Then the filter on owner is applied - t1.owner='SYS' (3) Then the table T1 is accessed to fetch data from the rowids returned by the index I11 and filer application - TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
Though I am unable to understand how filter can be applied to the rowids retrieved from index, we can see from the plan below that The rows accessed have reduced from 8550 to 1221 before we access the table...Thus filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied in between. Right?
another question is
Case 1 - do we retrieve a rowid from index for a given value, then retrieve required values from table for that rowid Thus row at a time in both ... in loop OR Case 2 - we first fetch all rowids from index and then retrieve values from table one row at a time from the collection of rowids fetched?
Suppose Case 1 is what is happening then can we say, both the steps mentioned by IDS 2,3 in plan below are executed exactly equal number of times and the filter "t1.owner='SYS'" is applied at some later stage? Of course in this case the values in ROWS stand misleading then
select * from t1,t2 where t1.id = t2.id and t1.object_type='VIEW' and t1.owner='SYS';
Execution Plan ---------------------------------------------------------- Plan hash value: 26873579 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 | |* 1 | HASH JOIN | | 1221 | 233K| 915 (1)| 00:00:11 | |* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1221 | 116K| 381 (1)| 00:00:05 | |* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I11 | 8550 | | 24 (0)| 00:00:01 | | 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | T2 | 161K| 15M| 533 (1)| 00:00:07 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Predicate Information (identified by operation id): --------------------------------------------------- 1 - access("T1"."ID"="T2"."ID") 2 - filter("T1"."OWNER"='SYS') 3 - access("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='VIEW')
In my code I am using delete statement which is taking too much time to execute.
Statement is as follow:
DELETE FROM TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION T WHERE (ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT) IN (SELECT ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID,NM_ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM,CD_BOOK_KEY,ACTIVITY_DT FROM LOAD_TRADE_ORDER WHERE IND_IS_BAD_RECORD='N');
Every column in "IN" clause and select clause is containing index on it
Every time no of rows which to be deleted is vary (May be in hundred ,thousand or hundred thousand )so that I am Unable to use "BITMAP" index on the table "LOAD_TRADE_ORDER" column "IND_IS_BAD_RECORD" though it is containing distinct record in it.
Even table "TRADE_ORDER_EMP_ALLOCATION" is containing "RANGE" PARTITION over it on the column "ARTEMIS_SOURCE_SYSTEM_ID". With this I am enclosing table scripts with Indexes and Partitions over it.
way for fast execution in of above delete statement?
Session 1 create table tab1 as select * from dba_objects where object_id is not null; alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12'; declare x number; begin for i in 1..4 loop
[code]....
Session 2
after "starting" the above pl/sql block from Session 1, I keep on querying tab2 from Session 2 And as soon as 2 records are inserted in tab2, I create index from Session 2
select * from tab2; select * from tab2; select * from tab2; N ---------- 1 2 create index i on tab1(object_id);
As I have tested from a single session (just before this test) such index is used for the sql statement
select count(1) into x from tab1 where object_id=2331;
However when I checked the trace file I am not geeting results as expected
I am expecting 4 execution plans - 2 FTS and 2 Index Access scans and for this I am issuing following command
SELECT COUNT(1) FROM TAB1 WHERE OBJECT_ID=2331 call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows ------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0 Execute 4 0.00 0.00 0 2 0 0
[code]....
1) Why I am unable to see 4 execution plans - 2 with FTS and 2 with Index access when I mentioned 'aggregate=no'?
2) Whether the index i will be used for last 2 iterations after first 2 iterations of FTS?
If answer to above question 2) is 'No'
By which method I can force an ongoing sql statement in loop to take different execution path? Of course I can't hard parse sql in 'that' current session Will flushing Shared pool work in above case?
Yesterday i got wait event when executed simple select from table.This select was like:
SELECT emp_number from employer where subs_id = 111
I got one row, select is very fast.In our Core Bank System we have package with function which returns such information. I tested this select on test DB, and nothing wrong. But when I executed such select and package on Production DB, DB Admin saw that 88 sessions waits when my session release the resource. But what can happen, it was simple select? I used PL/SQL developer to get information from table:
1) SELECT emp_number from employer where subs_id = 111 then 2) Package with this function
Another users used Oracle Forms screen to execute package. How simple select statement could stop all DB?
BANNER 1Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi 2PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production 3CORE 10.2.0.5.0 Production 4TNS for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production 5NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production [code]...
Forgot to say that after succeful execution on Prod DB I disconnected, and in EM my session was INACTIVE.
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production TNS for Solaris: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
Current written logic for reconciliation:
1. Load data from source_a in a staging table using date filter
2. Load data from a file (Source_B) in temp table
3. Algo for reconciliation:
fetch value from source_B and if an entry exists in source_a then match say 10 columns if they match update reconciliation_oke = TRUE
there is an and written for testing all the 10 columns There is report generated out this which shows non matched columns and the entries which are missing....Now the requirement is to modify the logic in a way which shows which all columns are mismatched on the report in case present.
Since there are around 10 thousand records which would be reconciled on a daily basis, performance also needs to be taken care of...I guess i would be required to use PL/SQl tables...
