I am searching the simplest way for ad hoc MINUS.I do:
SELECT * FROM uam_rss_user_XXXXXXX WHERE host_name IN ('XXX0349', 'XXX0362', 'XXX0363', 'XXX0343', 'XXX0342', 'XXX0499', [code]....
and look in the table which values are missing (values that are in host_name IN but not in actual table).is there a simpler way for doing an ad hoc MINUS? I know to insert values in temp. Table. How are experienced Oracle pros doing this task?
insert into a values(1,3,'Y',5); insert into a values(2,2,'Y',4); insert into a values(3,3,'N',3); insert into a values(4,4,'Y',3); insert into a values(5,1,'N',6); insert into a values(6,2,'N',5); insert into a values(7,2,'Y',4); insert into a values(8,3,'N',2); insert into a values(9,4,'Y',2); insert into a values(10,1,'Y',3); . SQL>select * from v$version; Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
My logic should have the output as follows without 5th column: sourcerowleveldpnqtyremark13Y522Y4This row in main table shouldn't be displayed in the query result as it has
dpn='N'44Y3*3=9In this row qty=9 will bedisplayed.
It will compare the value of level column with its previous row level col,if it is the parent of the current(ex.current is 4 and previous is 3 parent of 4),then it will check the dpn of previous row ,if dpn='N' then qty of parent will be multiplied with qty of current row and displayed under qty column.this row will not be displayed as dpn='N'this row will not be displayed as dpn='N'72Y4*6=24in its previous row level value is same so it will check the previous to previous row where level is 1(parent of current row) and dpn='N' ,then it will multiply the qty of that row with current row and display the value in qty column.this row will not be displayed as dpn='N'94Y2*2=4In this row qty=4 will be displayed.It will compare the value of level column with its previous row level col,if it is the parent of the current(ex.current is 4 and previous is 3 parent of 4),then it will check the dpn of previous row ,if dpn='N' then qty of parent will be multiplied with qty of current row and displayed under qty column.101Y3It will not check for the previous rows as level 1 doesn't have any parent.
I have got a procedure that successfully creates an oracle external table and populates it with the contents of a file. This works fine until I have a situation where one of the fields is a VARCHAR2(2) and I try to insert say, a 5 character value. When this happens the record in question does not get populated in the external table (and rightly so), but I could do with working out if there is a discrepancy in the number of records in the file and the number of records that actually make it into the table so I could inform the user that there is a problem.
I have attached the code that creates the external table and populates it.
is it possible to compare two time values in oracle sql ie there is a column say 'tot' with values 8:29,11:35 etc(8hrs29 mins etc) can i compare this column with 03:00hrs i tried select case tot>=3 then 1 as days end from tablename;
I have an requirement like below and would like to have SQL for that.
Source Table:
EMP_NO EMP_CODE 1 'A' 1 'D' 1 'E' 1 'F'
2 'S' 2 'A' 2 'W' 2 'Q'
3 'A' 3 'T' 3 'D' 3 'E'
4 'D' 4 'A'
I want to load only data which has EMP_CODE as A and doesn't have subsequent 'E' or 'F' in it. In the above source you can see EMP_NO 2 and 4 satisfy the condition and rest wont. So i want the output data like below.
I have two tables which have identical schemas, one table (tbl_store) is used to hold the latest version, and the other table (tbl_store_audit) holds previous versions. When the latest record is updated, it is inserted into the tbl_store_audit table as a revision, and the updated details are used as the latest record.
For example: The latest version is held in tbl_store, however the tbl_store_audit may hold 5 records which are the past records used before changes were made - these are seen as revisions.
I want to be able to compare what has changed between each revision in the tbl_store_audit table. For example: Out of the 10 columns, the change between revision 1 and revision 2 was the size from XL to XXL. The change between revision 3 and revision 4 was the size XS to M and price 4.99 to 10.99, and so on.
Eventually i will create an APEX report that will show the user the revision number and what was changed from and to.
I seen in a previous post i need to note my oracle version: Oracle version 10.2.0.4.0
I have a problem with Between clause used in where statement to compare two string variable.
Query is like this,
select item_code, item_deacrption from itm_master, invoce_det where im_code = item_code AND invd_item_number BETWEEN (:startNum) AND (:endNum)
Here invd_item_number is a DB field and is of type varchar2(41), and (:startNum),(:endNum) are of same type.
now invd_item_number has one value '001003002001' if we give :startNum = '001003001002' and :endNum = '001003004006'
:startNum and :endNum is composed of separate field values (ie, 1st 3 character shows color code, next 3 for catagory, next 3 for size etc). These codes are entered separately and are combined at run time.
it is still fetching the invd_item_number with value '001003002001'. (the last set of character(type code) in the :startNum is greater than invd_item_number's type code value. But it is smaller than the previous code (size code), that's why it is fetching).
But how can i get around this as i don't need that value to be fetched.
We have employee salary table which will have salary of an employee on daily basis (only working days). Below is the table structure:
emp_salary ---------- emp_id NUMBER(15) NOT NULL effective_date DATE NOT NULL salary NUMBER(15) NOT NULL Primary key - emp_id, effective_date This table is yearly partitioned
I have to find out how long the salary is not changed for an employee from given date, and last salary. I am using below query to do this:
WITH salary_tab AS (SELECT effective_date, salary, (CASE WHEN (LAG (salary) OVER (PARTITION BY emp_id ORDER BY effective_date ASC) = salary ) THEN 0 ELSE 1 END ) changed_ind FROM emp_salary WHERE emp_id = 12345 [code]....
The cost of this query is 1677 and it is taking around 60 msec to complete. When I run this query for around 2000 employees in a loop it is taking around 3 minutes to complete.
The main bottleneck of this query is in the with clause where I am processing the entire history instead of stopping after first change.
I have table called test script for table is given below
create table TEST ( col1 Number );
[Code]...
For these values Query is not returning values(3 and 4). So i want generic query to get this result. I am working on it but not able to generate proper query.
When I execute the query, it returns the data (approx - 40,000 rows) in 1 min.But when I try to insert this data into another table (or create a table of this data) it takes me about 2 hours.
Tried using Materialized view, its again the same the refresh takes 2 hours.Basically here, what I am trying to do is the data from the above query is used to update the values in another table.What ever the procedure I am trying it takes 2 hours.
I don't understand why the custid is the same for each customer, and why it's selecting every customer and not just those with more than 150 gallons ordered.
For this one use the oil tables that you set up and use a subquery. Select the minimum average fall use from the house table. Then show all customers whose number of gallons delivered times two is greater than the minimum.
I need to compare columns of two tables in oracle 10g. If columns of both tables match with each other, then i need to create new table dynamically with matched column name and datatype. For example, table1 contains name, ID, Phone_no and address table2 contains name, Id, address, area and pincode. now , i need to create table3 which will contains name, ID,address, Phone_no, area and pincode as columns( I mean matched columns should not be repeated in table3). how to do this..
I want to check whether language is already there in database or not.
i have written the below query
select * from emp where language_known =nesttype('english','hindi');
i am getting the below error
SQL Error: ORA-22901: cannot compare nested table or VARRAY or LOB attributes of an object type 22901. 00000 - "cannot compare nested table or VARRAY or LOB attributes of an object type" *Cause: Comparison of nested table or VARRAY or LOB attributes of an object type was attempted in the absence of a MAP or ORDER method. *Action: define a MAP or ORDER method for the object type.
I am trying to compare records in a table in both Oracle and MSSQL database against a single standard dataset in my test case. However, I'm getting different results for each when I sort using a "order by".
select COL1 from TABLE1 order by COL1
In MSSQL, I get: COL1 ===== A A. A++ A++.
In ORACLE, I get: COL1 ===== A A++ A++. A.
I mean, oracle result some what makes sense, because "." has bigger ascii value than "+". But is there anyway to make the ORACLE sort order look exactly like MSSQL result?
How can I compare two rows from the same table and show the field and the difference?
Example:
select ename, job, mgr, hiredate, sal, deptno from EMP t where t.empno = 7782 or t.empno = 7788
ENAME JOB MGR HIREDATE SAL DEPTNO 1 CLARK MANAGER 7839 6/9/1981 2450.00 10 2 SCOTT ANALYST 7566 6/9/1981 3000.00 20
My report comparing fields should be:
FIELD BASE COMPARE DIFFERENCE ENAME CLARK SCOTT -- JOB MANAGER ANALYST -- MGR 7839 7566 -- SAL 2450 3000 550 --(Show difference only for numbers) DEPTNO 10 20 --
I have written the following PL/SQL block logic tofetch the records from the emp table and compare the records with emp_10 table to perform insert if the records are newelse to perform update the existed records in the emp_10 table.
DECLARE CURSOR tranche_balance_cur IS SELECT empno, ename, sal,
[code]...
Execution scenario 1:
I have commented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records4 Updated Records10
As per the logic it's giving the correct output because the cursor is fetching 14 records in that already 10 records are existed in emp_10 tableand 4 are new records.so that it's showing the count for inserted records as 10 and updated records as 4.
Execution scenario 2: I have uncommented insert and update statements in that case I got the following out put.
Inserted Records13 Updated Records1
As per the logic it's not giving the correct output.
I tried with using TRIM function in the comparision logic to avoid spaces.
TRIM(emp_10.empno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.empno) AND TRIM(emp_10.ename) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.ename) AND TRIM(emp_10.sal) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.sal) AND TRIM(emp_10.deptno) = TRIM(tranche_balance_rec.deptno)
My scenario is to insert values into 'out' column by comparing 's' and 'IP' columns of temp table.The exact situation is at first need to go to ip column,take a value and then go to source column and check for the same value of ip which is taken previously.Then after corresponding ip of that source column should be inserted back in previous source column.
The situation is marked clearly in file which i am attaching with '--' comments at respective places.I am also pasting the code which i tried out,unfortunately it is giving error as exact fetch returns more than requested number of rows since there are duplicates in the table.I tried it using nested for loops.Also implemented using rowid,but it didnt work.
fixing the errors or if there is any new logic that can be implemented.
DECLARE i_e NUMBER(10); BEGIN FOR cur_1 IN(SELECT IP from temp where IP IS NOT NULL) LOOP FOR cur_2 IN(SELECT IP from temp where s=cur_1.IP)
I have a dynamic query stored in a function that returns a customized SQL statement depending on the environment it is running in. I would like to create a Materialized View that uses this dynamic query.
