Get Table RowID Of Session That Is Locking In RAC Database
Jun 11, 2012
I am a developer and not a DBA and I need to find th correct query to find the exact rowid of the record locked on a table. This is for a RAC database and locked record can be from the web form in oracle application server. When I try to get the correct row id, I get the following error:
ORA-01410 - Invalid row id For the criteria, the output is Dbms_Rowid.rowid_create(1, -1, 36, 7845, 0), why I get a -1 for the ROW_WAIT_OBJ#?
Additional Information: The lock type is DML and the lock mode is: Row Exclusive, the table is locked and the program is web oracle forms executing.
I am executing the query in Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0
How to accomplish getting the correct rowid? Below is the selection criteria I have:
I used to find out locked table and session from database....query with SYS user but i want to hand over the user session kill role to location level IT person so i have created one user in database named as rab and i have given "select any table,alter session and Grant dba to that rab user,but with that user they will drop and delete any table also
col owner format a12 col object_name format a25 col ORACLE_USERNAME format a15 col OS_USER_NAME format a15 col OBJECT_TYPE format a15 set lines 140 [code]....
11.2.0.1 I am still resolving the locking issues in our database Often the delete is blocked by some transaction. The operations said that it is intermittent. Last night they were able to delete the 1M transactions without the locking.But the past days lock often occurred, and they have to bounced the database to release the locks.
I there a way I can compare what happened last night why the batch was able to delete smoothly , and compare it against the other night where the delete was blocked?By using ASH, AWR, ADDM? I also run now this procedure, to identify the blocking sql statement:
I've a table TXN1 transaction and has FKs to 3 different tables Account, customer, country and currency. ALL FKs are indexed (bitmap). I am updating TXN1 of amount column about 10,000 rows. (SID 1) As expected, it has taken lock type 3 SX on TXN1. But it has taken on lock type 4 (share) on Account, customer and country. Committing every 10k rows.
At the same time sid 2 is inserting into another TXN2 table which has FK to the same dimensions account, customer and currency. Only FK on ac_id is bitmap indexed. The inserts have taken SX lock(type 3) on tXN2 table (expected). But it is trying to take SX type 3 lock on account, customer, currency tables. typ3 lock taken on CCY but waiting on CST. But It is blocked by sid 1. It has resulted into Enque-TM contention and resulted into anywhere 60-300 secs wait time..
I understand update/delete in parent table results into locking of SX of child tables and need the FKs to be indexed to avoid etc.
1. Why is SID1 taking shared lock on the parent tables Account,customer,country and currency tables? The update statement is not updating any of those FK columns nor referring them in where clause(if it matters!). Is it to ensure that the parent rows are not deleted?
2. Why is SID2 taking SX lock on the dimension tables? Why is it not taking RS lock type 2 on parent rows? Why is SID1 taking shared lock type 4, but not 2?
Among Hibernate optimistic locking & Database Isolation levels, which one to use? Which gives the better consistency, concurrency and scalability. I read in couple of links that Isolation level will suffer if there is a huge load on the application with multiple users access the appliation at the same time, moreover in islation levels normally we need to look for READ_COMITTED and NON_REPEATABLE_READ to get a better performance? Whether these are true? Whether we can use both Hibernate optimistic locking(version & timestamp) & Database Isolation levels in the same application? What are the implications using these? Which one will be preferred over the other and when?
I have a "select ... into" in my PL/SQL and it doesn't retreive any data(I suppose just certain columns because if it doesn't retreive a row then the PL/SQL should throw an error) when there are many users accessing this table. It shouldn't be some table locking right? Because if it is, it should wait until the table is available then it will retreive data. Currently it just proceeds with the PL/SQL and selecting nothing in that query. what details should I look at to trace the cause of this problem.
I am trying to delete duplicates from table without using rowid.
here is data:-
create table test(col1 number(3),col2 varchar2(20)); insert into test values(100,'rocky'); insert into test values(100,'rocky');
[Code]....
I know i am perfoming dml on view. IT wont allow me to perform DML on view which contain columns with expression. IS there any way to delete duplicates without using rowid?
At the moment, we were loading the file in our system serially. This is a very old and established system.We would like to incorporate parallel loading for our loaders to load data into the database.
Most of the issues would be due to multiple inserts happening due to the files being loaded in parallel. For some reasons, we cannot give regular commits untill the entire batch of items is processed in case the process needs to rollback. A file can contain different set of batch of items clubbed together for loading.
The issue here is untill the first file finishes loading and commits, the second file would just hang. In fact, mulitiple files might hang for the first file to finish. what can I do to overcome this?I tried to used "lock table t1 in SHARE ROW EXCLUSIVE mode nowait". When the leading process is doing inserts, the failing process will fail with a resource busy and acquire with NOWAIT specified. We would catch this exception and redirect that batch to an error file to be reloaded at a later date.
I observed logical corruption in one of the database, while running select on some tables observed ORA-01410: invalid ROWID error. These errors or errors related to this logical corruption are not reported in alert log file.
Since our database is in NOARCHIVELOG mode and regular backups are not happening through RMAN (weekly cold mount point backup to tape), i was not able to use RMAN to investigate block corruption.
So used DBVERIFY on all datafiles of database to check the consistency of datafiles, and found DBV gives error for one of the datafile - 'Completely zero block found during dbv:' As i mentioned earlier, we are not taking regular backups using RMAN and database is in NOARCHIVE mode.
update tab1 set col1 = ( select col2 from tab2 where tab1.id = tab2.id) table 1 has arnd 10,000 rows
table 2 has arnd 1,700,000 rows and has a primary key on column id.This query is taking around 20 secs to execute. I checked the x-plan and most of time taken for table access by index rowid.I checked the stats for the tab2, its just three days old.
I am exporting using query parameter. I am trying to export subset of table using rowid.
SQL> select rowid , name from tab1;
ROWID NAME ------------------ --------------- AAAM0rAAEAAAAGMAAA sam AAAM0rAAEAAAAGMAAB sona AAAM0rAAEAAAAGMAAC rose AAAM0rAAEAAAAGMAAD chris AAAM0rAAEAAAAGMAAE san .................. .... .................. ....
how to select 1st record from duplicate vales in a table.
If we created one table with out primary key column In form in search block have uwi value and top_depth value when i enter uwi and top_depth value then when i click search button then it will display all values in master block.
but here duplicate values r there.
SQL> select rownum,uwi,top_depth,base_depth,test_start_date from well_pre_header;
Let's consider such table that all rows fit into single block:
SQL> create table test as select rownum id, '$'||rownum name from dual connect by level <= 530; Table created. SQL> create index i_test on test(id); Index created. SQL> SQL> begin
[code].....
why does approach with full scan take longer even if table occupies only one data block? PS. 11gR2
I am installing oracle 11g R2 (Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production) on linux box, by the time the SID provided was 9 characters like oimdbdevd. The completion of installation showing as oimdbdevd for sid. But the init.ora file and database table v$database are showing only oimdbdev.
I have an urgent requirement to kill an existing session if a new session starts for the same user. I have been reading lot of blogs and posts on the above topic, but could clearly tell me how to do it.
I thought of putting a process in 101 page when login button is pressed to catch this and kill the old session.
i want to control our session in database oracle10g which means that:x is not allowed to connect to the database, if x try to connect to the database his session will be blocked and a message must be sent to the administrator.
We are using Apex 4.0/Oracle 10gR2/ Hp-Ux, We noticed that there is a process Running in Two Sessions that seems running since 3 Hours using 60% CPU,** 30% given below sql it executes in two Sessions!
declare function x return boolean is begin -- if instr(upper(:F4000_P4651_PLUG_SOURCE),'ORDER BY')>0 then declare l_position number := 0; begin loop l_position := instr(upper(:F4000_P4651_PLUG_SOURCE),'ORDER BY ',l_position + 1) ; exit when instr(upper(:F4000_P4651_PLUG_SOURCE),'ORDER BY ',l_position + 1) = 0 ;
I have an application in Form 6i and I have implemented expiration of Session-level database of profiles, the problem I have is that I do not know in which time expired the session because it shows me no message and the application is open, try to do something and begin to get errors .
Three databases: A, R1, R2. Database A is local and the other two databases are remote. Database A has one db link to each remote database (dblinkR1 and dblinkR2).
In some of my queries I need to get data from the remote databases, but the remote database to use depends on the application user, so, I would like to dynamically use one of the database links.
Something like this:
1 � user logs into the application; 2 � based on the user credentials the application defines the db link to use; 3 � query data using the defined db link.
(for example)
SELECT a.col1, a.col2 FROM table_A@dyndblink a ORDER BY a.col1;
@dyndblink would be a "pointer" to dblinkR1 or dblinkR1.
Is there a way to dynamically define the database link to use (at a session level)?
One issue happens frequently in My database,Logwr process blocking other session,when i checked blocked session in v$session wait_class was commit and event was logfile sync,
As per this we predicate Logbuffer Might be full so i just to reboot server,Note server was 32 Bit i can allocate only 1GB of SGA SYStem not allows me to increase SGA further. Server reboot is proper solution?
Server: Windows 2008 R2 x64 Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.1.0 Standard Edition
I recently applied the Oracle® Database Server Version 11.2.0.1 Patch 16 I have several databases running on this box with the same application.Since then I've had lots of customers complaining about slow systems. The server has plenty of RAM availableI also have several other servers all on the same versions, same patch, running the same application with no issues.
Looking at v$session there are often lots of active sessions that have a sql_address of "00". I've never seen this before and I regularly look at v$session, as you can see for below these have been running for a while. The sessions do drop off but I am at a loss as to what is happening.
select username, last_call_et, sid, serial#, user#, status, sql_address, sql_hash_value from v$session where username is not null and status = 'ACTIVE' order by last_call_et desc, sid
