Personally, I don't need the top value(s), but it would be nice.I was trying a few routes with rownum, and I can get it to pull 1 set of pairs with a where location= condition, but I can't seem to successfully combine the two.
In literal terms, I'm interested in two fields, I'll call them Field A and Field B. I want to find all situations where a single unique value of Field A has both values Z AND X in Field B (not either or, but both together).
To go into some detail -
I need to make a query that finds ONLY occurrences where one employee id has a certain set of values together (without going into specifics, I'll say PermissionA, PermissionB, PermissionC). I can easily make a query that returns all user id's and all permissions belonging to them, and I can use criteria to filter the results to Permission A B and C only so as to exclude other permissions from getting returned (since there are hundreds),
however my objective is to get ONLY results where the same employee ID has all of those permissions (not just any one or two of the three). However, I don't want to have any criteria that limits the employee ID (I want to search all employee id's, and get a list of those with permissions a and b and c, not just any combination thereof, but all of them). I'm currently able to organize the output using a pivot table by employee id > role,
so that I can easily look at each employee and the roles they have, but I want to undertake a project that will involve searching a much larger number of employees (a # that makes it impractical for me to look through the list, I need to have a query that limits the results to the combinations that I'm looking for, as in this example - permission a b and c together).
In my form i have a multi record block which is based on a table in which i am performing insertion, deletion, updation.
My requirement is as below,
While saving a records i want to check distinct value of specific item can not be greater than some value say 2. Then only my records should be saved. I am planning to populate those values in a collection table type and take the distinct values from it. How to populate record values in a collection table type.
Using Oracle 11g, below is the table, partitions, unique and non-unique local index:
CREATE TABLE DOCA( DOCA_ID NUMBER NOT NULL , DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID NUMBER NULL , ROW_PURGE_DATE DATE NULL ,)PARTITION BY RANGE(ROW_PURGE_DATE)INTERVAL(NUMTOYMINTERVAL(1, 'MONTH'))( PARTITION P2007 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/01/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')), PARTITION P200801 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01/02/2008', 'dd/mm/yyyy')),) TABLESPACE T0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX XPKDOCA ON DOCA( DOCA_ID ASC, ROW_PURGE_DATE ASC)LOCALREVERSE TABLESPACE I0; ALTER TABLE DOCA ADD CONSTRAINT XPKDOCA PRIMARY KEY (DOCA_ID); CREATE INDEX XFKDOCA_DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ON DOCA( DOCA_BKG_PAX_ID ASC)LOCALREVERSETABLESPACE I0;
I would like to know the difference between the performance of the unique and non-unique local indexes?.
I have a table where i need to update one field values based on another field of the same table , simply as it is.I have done this using one select all check box , on clicking that all check boxes of item_trans table will get selected , then i will un select some of check box and then using one button, i will update the value of the fields which are checked only.
I have put the sample code but when i am updating its taking long time and hanging.I am also attaching the form based on the test case provided.
insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE1',40,NULL); insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE2',20,NULL); insert into item_trans(TRANS_ITEM,TRANS_QTY,TRANS_ACT_QTY) VALUES ('TREE3',20,NULL);
--i want to set the value of trans_Act_qty as trans_qty
--i create one dummy or test block to keep the select all check box. for that table test script is
CREATE TABLE TEST ( C VARCHAR2(2000 BYTE), B NUMBER, A NUMBER );
insert into test (C,B,A) values ('A',1,1);
--code written in select all check box which is created on test.block.
BEGIN GO_BLOCK('item_trans'); FIRST_RECORD; LOOP :M_END_YN := :M_END_ALL; [code].......
--code written in M_END_YN ( actual check boxes where i will uncheck).
IF :M_END_YN = 'N' THEN :M_END_ALL := 'N'; END IF;
--code written on button to update those values which are checked.
BEGIN GO_BLOCK('item_trans'); FIRST_RECORD; LOOP IF :M_END_YN = 'Y' THEN [code]......
I have a table which sees a lot of use for queries
CREATE TABLE CASE_STAGE ( ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL, STAGE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL, CASE_PHASE_ID NUMBER(9) NOT NULL, "CURRENT" NUMBER(1) NOT NULL, --and other columns )
ID is a primary key CASE_PHASE_ID is a foreign key
"CURRENT" should only ever have values of 0 or 1. When it has a value of 1 it is unique for that CASE_PHASE_ID
What I have tried that doesn't work is
create unique index case_stage_F_IDX1 on case_stage("CURRENT", case_Phase_id) which gives me ORA-01452: cannot CREATE UNIQUE INDEX; duplicate keys found
What is the correct syntax, something like ("CURRENT"=1,case_phase_id) seems right but fails with an error about a missing bracket. Do I need to use a CASE statement here?
Let's say we have Table - A and we would like to replicate specific row transaction to Table B.
Here are the rows in *Table A* Time: Lets say 15:00
A1 Just Updated @15:00 A2 Just inserted @15:01 A3
B1 - Daily Delete Row -i.e just deleted a while back - Non scheduled process --executed by application @15:02 B2 - B3 - Daily Delete Row - i.e just deleted a while back -- Non Schduled process --executed by application @15:05 B4 - Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10 B5 - Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10 B6 -Just recently purged (As part of 180 Day purge ) - Scheduled process executed by operations team @15:10
Current Data in Table B (Before Replication) @15:00
A1 (without updates) A3 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6
Expected rows in Table B (via replication/snapshot/materialized view / or any other method)
*Replication at 15:30* Table B - Read Only
Expected rows after replication-
A1 -- Newly updated details A2 -- Newly inserted row A3 B1 - Daily delete row is expected to be replicated B2 B3 - Daily delete row is expected to be replicated
***Note row B4 is not expected to be replicated to table B.
Questions:
1) How can we get updates, inserts and daily deletes replicated while ignore large purges? 2) How can large purge changes be reflected in replicated tables as well without deleting daily deletes?
I used Region, Process by to search the report which appears as shown above. Then I use Choose Auditors column to select my Auditor and copy paste it into the report under To be Audited By col. Is there a way to automate the process. I am here using a tabular form in APEX. My main aim is to assign auditors based on Region, not equal to Processed by.
Objective: I need to compile a final string by concatinating the unique values from different strings.
Here is the script to create tables and data.
Create table temp_acronyms(id number, acronym varchar2(30); insert into temp_acronyms values(1, 'ABC'); insert into temp_acronyms values(2, 'DEC//NOFO'); insert into temp_acronyms values(3, 'CBK//FO TO USA'); insert into temp_acronyms values(4, 'DEC//NO ENTRY'); insert into temp_acronyms values(5, 'ABC//NOFO');
COMMIT;
select * from temp_acronyms;
ID ACRONYM --- -------- 1 ABC 2 DEC//NOFO 3 CBK//FO TO USA 4 DEC//NO ENTRY 5 ABC//NOFO
I need to store all the unique strings from the acronyms for id's 1,2, 3, 4 and 5 into a variable. doesn't matter even if it is through database procedure.
I have a table which stores customer ID and price lists assigned to those customers. Each price list can have multiple customers assigned to them. So for example
Customer APrice_List1 Customer BPrice_List1 Customer C Price_List2 Customer D Price_List3
Now I am trying to write a SQL statement to return just pricelists which contain just ONE customer (so in the above example would just return Price_list2 and Price_List3).
We are using the function dbms_utility.get_hash_value to create a unique identifier, the hash is created based on statement of creating an index. We see that for a different statement is being generated the same value, which in this cause errors because this value must be unique.
The Hash is to be calculated as follows HASH_VALUE = dbms_utility.get_hash_value (sql_text, a 10000)
We are using the correct the hash function or should we use another way to generate unique values?
I don't want to generate row_number for unique values 'C' and 'E' in below query.
SELECT NAME, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY NAME ORDER BY NAME) FROM (SELECT 'A' NAME FROM DUAL UNION ALL SELECT 'A' FROM DUAL UNION ALL SELECT 'A' FROM DUAL
[code].....
Means row_number should be NULL for unique values.
A B ---------- ---------------------------------------- 1 Hello 2 Hello 3 No Hello 4 No Hello 5 Hello 6 Hello 7 Hello
I want to print the output of this table as -->>
A B ---------- ---------------------------------------- 1 2 Hello 3 4 No Hello 5 6 7 Hello
To make it more clear, I just want that whenever the value f column "B" changes then only its value should be printed, else it should be NULL. And if "B" has same value for all the records then the value of "B" should be printed at the last.
I am facing a problem in leave_form report! want to show employee's previous leaves detail (leavedate,leavetype), i don't want to show leavetype 'PPP' repeating frame type is Across/Down, there are 22 records of leavetype 'PPP' and one record of leavetype 'CL'
problem is report is showing 22 records of leavetype 'CL' of same leavedate!
i want that report should show the actual leavedate and leavetype records.using 9i database 6i developer server2003
For leavetype
FUNCTION Cf_1formula RETURN CHAR IS v_leavetype CHAR(40); BEGIN SELECT LT.description INTO v_leavetype FROM hrm_attendance L, hrm_leavetype LT, hrm_employees E [code]....
I have tested it and it is working as the way I expected: select 'to display week no as column' "Week &week_no" from dual;
The output: Week 16 ---------------------------- to display week no as column ...So how do I display Week 15, Week 17 etc based on the calculation of &week_no e.g. &week_no+1?
I have partitioned the table based on field.But when I am selecting by Partition or by the field I am getting Explain plan as Table Access full.I am pasting the sql and Explain Plan here. The table has two partition by BOOKING_DT_WID. One less than 20100801 and other less than 99991231.
CODESELECT * FROM WC_BOOKING_SALESREP_F WHERE BOOKING_DT_WID >= 20100801; SELECT * FROM WC_BOOKING_SALESREP_F PARTITION(SALESREP_LESS1_99991231); Here is the Explain Plan for the same. CODESELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 1,501 Bytes: 293,923,641 Cardinality: 809,707 4 PX COORDINATOR [code]....
How do I know if the sql is doing partition prune.
I am attempting to update a single field in one table based on a select from two tables. However, I am receiving the following error.
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
The sql I am using is as follows:
update PS_TRNS_CRSE_DTL set RQMNT_DESIGNTN = 'TRN' FROM PS_TRNS_CRSE_DTL A, PS_STDNT_CAR_TERM B where (SELECT A.EMPLID, A.ACAD_CAREER, A.INSTITUTION, A.MODEL_NBR, A.ARTICULATION_TERM, A.TRNSFR_EQVLNCY_GRP, A.TRNSFR_EQVLNCY_SEQ, A.TRNSFR_STAT, A.GRADING_BASIS, A.RQMNT_DESIGNTN, B.STUDY_AGREEMENT FROM PS_TRNS_CRSE_DTL A, PS_STDNT_CAR_TERM B [code]......
In the query below, I'm attempting to replace task codes with task descriptions by left joining to a multi-purpose control table.
In our corp, the description for the task code varies based on the value of change_program in each record, so rather than referencing the value of code_index.tabl statically as I do in the query below (201), I need a dyanamic variable to be defined for each record based on the value of work.change_program, which would represent the value for code_index.tabl.
For each record if change_program =1 then v_tabl = 201 elseif change_program =2 then v_tabl = 202 elseif change_program =3 then v_tabl = 203 else v_tabl = 201
how to declare and use variables.
SELECT account, change_program, task_code_01, task_code_02, task1.longdesc, task2.longdesc FROM work
I have a table test with 10,000 records in it and 50 columns.I have to select those rows which contain values as "Sales Dum" in their field..For table with small number of colums i did this
SELECT * FROM tbl_website_dtl WHERE created_by like '%Sales%' or website_name like '%Sales%' or website_code like '%sales%';But should i do for table containing 50 columns.
I have a need to change the LOV of a page item's select list based on the selection in another page item's select list. So in other words, for a page item that is a select list, I need to use one LOV normally, and a different LOV if the value of a different page item is set to X.
A dynamic action would be useful here (on change where Select List 1 = x), but I don't know how to take the action of changing LOVsfor Select List 2 based on that action.
I need to partition a existing table based on varchar2 field (which is actaully date value but storing as character in the table). Using below statement for creating table, but getting error.
I would like to populate a text box based on selection from a LOV. If someone selects a LOV value and then tabs off off of that element, I would like the text box populated from a sql statement based on the LOV value in the predicate.Application Express 4.1.1.00.23
I am having a problem with auto populating different fields based on inventory no. field.. This is a bug giving to me to work on and i not able to figure out how to populate the other fields.
How to set any triggers for the items to auto populate and i am suppose to finish this work today.
I have a data in one table with 6 columns where user may be updating values in all of these 6 columns or he may enter 3 or 4 columns based on that inserts should take place, this is similar to my previous thread , i am using if condition to check column for null if its not null then i will make a insert , but is there any other easier way to do this.
insert into ot_po values ('ss-po',1,ph_sys.nextval); insert into ot_inspect_head values (inh_sys.nextval,'ss-ins',1,'ss-po',1); commit; select * from ot_inspect_item
--Now if the inspection user issues the update statement , it will delete this row --from ot_inspect_item and reinserts the values with values based on --ii_flex_01,ii_flex_02,ii_flex_03 [code]...
