I got a below error while running a procedure!
ORA-20000: ORU-10027: buffer overflow, limit of 2000 bytes
at that time i am using below parameters in that script:
set serveroutput on size 1000000
DBMS_OUTPUT.ENABLE(1000000);
But still getting same error.. how can i resolve this issue..
I am running script which drop all public synonyms and create private synonyms for all eligible objects. I am passing value to procedure through cursor and I am using dbms_output.
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-20000: ORU-10027: buffer overflow, limit of 999999 bytes
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 32
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 97
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 112
ORA-06512: at line 101
I read that by: SET SERVEROUTPUT ON SIZE unlimited would resolve this problem.
What are the effects?Do I need to check any disk space, or any effect on the memory?
when i am executing the procedure, i am getting the below error.
I have added below lines in the procedure.
DBMS_OUTPUT.ENABLE(100000);
Even though i am getting the error.
ORA-20000: ORU-10027: buffer overflow, limit of 100000 bytes
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 32
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 97
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_OUTPUT", line 112
ORA-06512: at "Procedure name", line 199
ORA-06512: at line 1
20000. 00000 - "%s"
*Cause: The stored procedure 'raise_application_error' was called which causes this error to be generated.
*Action: Correct the problem as described in the error message or contact the application administrator or DBA for more information.
Does cache buffer chain latch and buffer busy wait event are related to one any another.
Latch definition from Google says : Latches are simple, low-level serialization mechanisms to protect shared data structures in the system global area (SGA).
what does it mean my protect. Does this mean protects from aging as per LRU algorithm and getting removed from SGA
or
protect from other processes ,say from example from simultaneously DML operations.
or
both
Does buffer busy wait event occurs , because of the cache buffer chain latch ?
I am writing a query and the query is resulting in Numeric Overflow.
SELECT
(power((Trlg_5Yr_Anl_Ror_Pt/100+1),5)-1)*100 AS Trlg_5Yr_Cum_Ror_Pt
FROM Cdp
where ....
and .....
In this above query,the power function is throwing error. Since the value in the column "Trlg_5Yr_Anl_Ror_Pt" is very big,applying power function is throwing Numeric Error. What can I do to handle this?
IN TABLE Cdp,column "Trlg_5Yr_Anl_Ror_Pt" is defined as NUMBER. Will Changin it to FLOAT resolve the issue.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 begin
2 for i in 3159572060..3159572274 loop
3 insert into recmsisdn(msisdn)
4 values(i);
5 end loop;
6* end;
7 /
begin
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01426: numeric overflow
ORA-06512: at line 2
I have linked all my tables in access 2000 to my oracle 9I database, created an odbc connection and I can open smaller tables, however when I try to open tables that are accessing more data from other tables, i get the error "ODBC -- call failed, [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Function sequence error (#0)" Am I using the wrong ODBC Driver? I installed the Oracle 10g SQL*Plus that should have included the correct driver for this setup.
The strange thing is that I do not think it is a driver issue because I can access the smaller tables in the set.
I would need to translate the Oracle PL/SQL procedure to SQL Server 2000 SP4.
This is a package (body) that needs to be translated into a form that SQL server 2000 can unserstand it.
AS
FUNCTION object_name_fix (sobjectstring IN VARCHAR2)
RETURN VARCHAR2
AS
[Code].....
tips to install the ORACLE 10g,developer 2000 in Windows 7 64 bit.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am working on oracle 10g with developer 2000 . I have a problem while running reports. when i run a report it goes to a particular path in which my database are not there and hence gives a error 'cannot find server'. everytime i have to physically change the path of the database to run the report.
THE PATH WHERE MY APPLICATION AND THE IP ADDRESS OF WINDOWS SYSTEM IS THIS
[URL]...
WHERE AS THE REPORT TAKES ME TO THIS PATH
[URL]...
I had a look at the reports conf file , but couldnt find the path of the database which the report shows for me to change it. It looks like some where the report path has been hardcoded but i am not able to locate it.
There might be some link missing while installing the application and the database.
I am using Developer 2000 Application with Oracle 9i DB(32-bit on Windows) at backend. Now I install a new server with 10g(64-bit on Linux) and load all the data into it. Some of the forms and reports are hanging while it runs against 9i well.
View 4 Replies View RelatedMy oracle version is oracle 9i
I need to commit after every 2000 records.Currently am using the below statement without using the loop.how to do this?
do i need to use rownum?
BEGIN
UPDATE
(SELECT A.SKU,M.TO_SKU,A.TO_STORE FROM
RT_TEMP_IN_CARTON A,
CD_SKU_CONV M
WHERE
[Code].....
I am doing export from Oracle 9.2.0.8 windows 2000 prof.
Exporting command
exp <>/<>@<> file=<> log=<> owner=<>
and get error in export log
. exporting synonyms
. exporting views
. exporting stored procedures
EXP-00056: ORACLE error 1410 encountered
ORA-01410: invalid ROWID
EXP-00000: Export terminated unsuccessfully
Is it possible to install and execute Developer 2000 in a laptop using windows 7 64 bits?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have installed 11g r2 using silent mode. but all the executable like lsnrctl, expdp, sqlldr,impdp etc.... installed with 0 (zero) bytes.
couldn't trace out what the problem is,
How to overcome from the below error.
Database Error-ORA-04031:unable to allocate 76320 bytes of shared memory("shared pool","SELECT/*+Norewrite*/DIST...","sql area","kkmevw:view_txt")
Here I attached that error.
Attached File(s)
Disco_Error_1.jpg ( 49.03K )
Number of downloads: 3
I am working on Tuning a Materialized view. I was getting an error saying ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh path
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P002, instance hrms-stg-db01:HRSTG1 (1)
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 16 in tablespace TEMP1.
so i increased the temp size. I am trying out various hints to get it rectified. But i am not sure if i should go for less cost or less bytes.
When i try to extract create statement of table i get below error message.
SQL>
SQL> set heading off
SQL> set pagesize 0
SQL> set long 1000000
SQL> set feedback off
SQL> select
2 dbms_metadata.get_ddl( 'TABLE','CATALOG_TBL','JACK')
3 from
4 dual
5 /
ERROR:
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 104 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool",
"SELECT
/*+rule*/ SYS_XMLGEN(...","SQLA^fc8f5280","qecsub : qkxrPXformQbc")
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 2625
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 2668
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 2983
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 3897
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 5678
ORA-06512: at line 1
Note:
----
I am executing this command from another user 'DEMO' which has got DBA privilege.
how to fix this error and extract the create table statement.
What is the best way to convert an existing database table set with nls_legnth_semantic=BYTE to CHAR?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm getting the following error when i shutdown or startup the db,
SQL> shutdown immediate;
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 264 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","unknown object","PCUR^18465427","kglob")
I am trying to build an XML document in a CLOB PLSQL variable. We are using Oracle 11gr2 database.
But when I am reaching more than 32767 bytes my code is failing.
Is there anyway we can store more than 32767 bytes of data in a PLSQL variable of type CLOB.
I am capturing the below error message
(ORA-06512: at "SCMSA_HIST.SCMSA_POC_HANDSET_MOBILITY_PKG", line 1480
AND LENGTH OF xmlfile -> 33078
)
I am adding my code also here for further clarification
PROCEDURE GET_HANDSET_DATA_PRC (p_ntlogin_id IN VARCHAR2,
p_handset_data OUT NOCOPY CLOB)
IS
/******************************************************************************
NAME: GET_HANDSET_DATA_PRC
PURPOSE:
Date Ver By Description
---------- --- --- -----------
******************************************************************************/
CURSOR c_region_data
IS
SELECT NVL2 (T.ntlogin, T.ntlogin, pos.ntlogin) AS ntlogin,
NVL2 (T.first_name, T.first_name, pos.first_name)
AS first_name,
[Code]....
I am seeing the following error message in alert.log (ORA-04031: unable to allocate 32 bytes of shared memory ) and my database goes into hung state and wont let any new sessions to connect and old sessions just hung with no response. i have to kill the instance to come out of this problem.
I am running 11.2.0.3 on AIX and have memory_target=35GB. I would like to know what approach to take to find out the root cause of this? btw - does AWR show if memory was under pressure and what SQL's were consuming more memory just before the problem surface?
two columns of dba_data_files (Bytes & user_bytes).
select bytes/1024/1024, maxbytes/1024/1024, user_bytes/1024/1024 from dba_data_files;
1532767.9843754.9375
249032767.984375489.9375
39032767.98437589.9375
453032767.984375529.9375
5204832767.9843752047.9375
6204832767.9843752047.9375
7204802047.9375
If I am log in through crystal reports , I am getting the following error.
ORA-04031 unable to allocate bytes of shared memory("","","","").
If I log in through TOAD from back end I am not getting any error.
I have a stored procedure which uses BULK COLLECT and the table has 16 nested tables within it. When I limit the number of rows processed it works fine, if I let it run with all the 10,000 rows I get this:
ERROR: ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 16408 bytes
(koh-kghu call ,pmuccst: adt/record)
sga_max_size - 12884901888
sga_target - 10737418240
pga_aggregate_target - 838860800
shared_pool_size - 2147483648
I believe the machine has 32GB memory, but there is another Oracle instance running on it.
Let me put my current Environment Info.
Single Laptop Machine of 16GB RAM.
Assigned 13GB to VM.
I have installed Oracle Database 11g. 11.2.00. When I try to access my application many times I received below error
• Error:
“”Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Could not retrieve datasource via JNDI url 'jdbc/oimJMSStoreDS' weblogic.jdbc.extensions.ConnectionDeadSQLExceptio n: weblogic.common.resourcepool.ResourceDeadException : Could not create pool connection. The DBMS driver exception was: ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 3
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 352 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","select /*+ rule */ bucket_cn...","SQLA^337fc737","qertbs:qertbIAlloca te")
[code]......
Even when above error occur I have 7GB free JVM so JVM is not an Issue.
•I have updated Max Capacity of oimOperationsDB =100,oimOperdationDB, oimJMSStoreDS=80,SOADATAStore =80. But still I have error
• ERROR::
• ““Aug 30, 2012 3:24:10 PM EST> <Warning> <oracle.integration.platform.blocks.event.saq> <SOA-31013> <Error handling message (rolling back).
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-04031: unable to allocate 352 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","select /*+ rule */ bucket_cn...","SQLA^337fc737","qertbs:qertbIAlloca te")
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_AQ", line 335
ORA-06512: at "DEV_SOAINFRA.EDN_DEQUEUE_OAOO_DELIVERY", line 14”
[code]......
I have modified Shared_pool_size,large_pool_size. Content of my modified Pfile is as below.
o orcl.__db_cache_size=822083584
o orcl.__java_pool_size=2777216
o orcl.__large_pool_size=56777216
o orcl.__oracle_base='/home/oracle/app/oracle'#ORACLE_BASE set from environment
o orcl.__pga_aggregate_target=805306368
o orcl.__sga_target=1174405120
o orcl.__shared_io_pool_size=0
o orcl.__shared_pool_size=601989888
o orcl.__streams_pool_size=0
What’s value of parameter I need to set for datastore, pfile ? (I have 13GB of memory).
Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition, Service Pack 2. 3.5GB RAM.Two Oracle Databases running on this server, one not heavily used. On the database i am concerned with it is 10.2.0.3.0.
I have just started to look at this database and am seeing various things in the alert log and have had user error messages as well.Initially when i started looking at this server it was running with quite a small SGA (600MB) and the memory_target_advice was saying to take it to 1000MB.(PGA is around 200MB)
In January, before i looked at it, it started to throw:
ORA-04031 unable to allocate 16 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","........", "sql area", "tmp") These would occur regularly and mostly during nightly processes, it seems, and thus not bubbling up to users.Having switched the SGA_MAX_SIZE to 1GB a new set of errors starts to appear in the alert log:
ORA-27301: ..... Not enough storage is available to process this command
ORA-27302: ..... ssthrddcr
At the same time the ORA-04031 errors start to bubble through to the users. Before i could return to the scene of the crime someone else set the SGA back to 600MB and the error messages stopped. However the ORA-04031 message start to reappear in the alert log. My questions are many and, mostly, from a lack of knowledge ;) In particular:
1. Why would increasing the SGA lead to a different memory error? I would assume this would have something to do with the amount of memory a 32bit OS will allow a single process to address but the PGA+SGA is only 1200MB.
2. How does a ORA-273xx error end up with a ORA-04031 being shown to the users? I would look at the listener log but its over 2GB!!!
on 11G R2 on Win 2008,
We had the following error in alertlog repeatedly from 5 PM to 10 PM :
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 32 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","SELECT VERSION FROM PSVERSIO .....Since MEMORY_TARGET is defined in spfile then shared pool is managed automatically.
Then what to do to avoid this error in future ?
Oracle Version: 11gR2: 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit
OS: Linux Fedora Core 17 X86_64
Currently, I'm reading the online book Oracle Concepts, Chapter 3: 3 Indexes and Index-Organized Tables, section: Reverse Key Indexes in order to understand this topic.
As I understand for each pair of (key, rowid) in the index structure, the rowid for each row in the table obviously remains the same but the bytes of the key are reversed before the key is stored. So for example on a 32 bit machine (just an example) a key = 10 AB CD EF will be stored as FE DC BA 01 , am I right?
According to the documentation, this becomes interesting in RAC environments in order to remove a hot spot from the index (when multiple instances repeatedly modify the same block) with the disadvantage that in some cases there cannot be Index Range Scan any more as data in the index is not sorted by column key when it is stored.
I was just curious to see how bytes of each key are reversed and after a bit googling I found an article where Tom Kyte shows with an example by using dump function (which as I understand gives the internal representation of a given expression) the difference in the sequence of bytes. Here is the link
[URL]
So based on his instructions I tried to do my own test, yet I don't get the same result, that is, the bytes are not reversed for me once we rebuild the index by REVERSE key word.
I'm going to write down here the test that I did, where is/are my error(s)
Test Case:
(I use a copy of the employees table in hr sample schema)
SQL> CREATE TABLE emp_test AS SELECT * FROM hr.employees;
Table created.
SQL> CREATE INDEX emp_test_idx ON emp_test(first_name);
[code]...
Now, a test SQL Query using the index we've just defined (just for giving an example)
SQL> SELECT first_name,
2 dump(first_name, 16) as dump_result
3 FROM emp_test
4 WHERE first_name = 'Kelly';
FIRST_NAME DUMP_RESULT
-------------- ----------------------------------
Kelly Typ=1 Len=5: 4b,65,6c,6c,79
[code]...
So, according to the above Execution plan, Oracle does an Index Range Scan using the index that I defined on my table that is, emp_test_idx. According to the output of dump, the key (first_name) in that index is stored (in terms of bytes) as 4b,65,6c,6c,79
SQL> SELECT chr(to_number('4b', 'xx')) ||
2 chr(to_number('65', 'xx')) ||
3 chr(to_number('6c', 'xx')) ||
4 chr(to_number('6c', 'xx')) ||
5 chr(to_number('79', 'xx')) first_name
6 FROM DUAL;
FIRST_NAME
--------------------
Kelly
Which as we can see corresponds to the first name 'Kelly', the first name we specified in the above SQL query.
Now let's rebuild the index
SQL> ALTER INDEX emp_test_idx REBUILD REVERSE;
Index altered.
SQL>
Once the index keys have been reversed, I run the very same query in order to see the difference
SQL> SELECT first_name,
2 dump(first_name, 16) as dump_result
3 FROM emp_test
4 WHERE first_name = 'Kelly';
[code]...
So the second time after the index has been reversed, I still get the very same sequence of bytes, that is, 4b,65,6c,6c,79, whereas I expected to get 79,6c,6c,65,4b (that is, the reversed order of the initial bytes sequence)
i am facing this problem from yesterday i cant able to do any DML operations on my Database i am getting this error every time
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 2
ORA-04031: unable to allocate 3896 bytes of shared memory ("shared pool","select x.inst_id,x.indx+1,ks...","sga heap(1,0)","kglsim
i am giving SHOW parameter SGA or even select statement i am getting the same error message
