There is XMLType table with structural storage. Is there a way to make schema validation disabled on some elements of complex type?
It is unpractical to maintain a schema for the element due to high volatility. Ideally it will be stored in CLOB and extracted as is a whole branch without validation, none of the elements under this complex type will be extracted separately.
Is there any way that I can check what are the elements present in a pl sql record type by querying in table?
For example if I want to check what are elements present in oe_order_pub.header_rec_type and I don't want to open the package, then in which table I should query? Is it possible?
i have created one varray whose elements are of record type. Now how can i access those record type elements?
structure of table t1:
select * from t1;
IDDESCRIPTION
1a
2b
3c
select * from t2;
ID1DESCRIPTION1
4aa
5bb
1cc
declare
type r1 is record (id t1.id%type);
type r2 is record (id1 t2.id1%type);
type r3 is record (id1 r1, id2 r2);
type var1 is varray(20) of r3;
[code].......
I'm trying to call a Java function from within a PL/SQL aggregation function with a (array of) complex data type.
a) basic definitions (work and are ok)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE eventtype AS OBJECT
(
relevance NUMBER,
bid1 NUMBER,tid1 NUMBER,prob1 NUMBER,
bid2 NUMBER,tid2 NUMBER,prob2 NUMBER,
bid3 NUMBER,tid3 NUMBER,prob3 NUMBER,
bid4 NUMBER,tid4 NUMBER,prob4 NUMBER,
bid5 NUMBER,tid5 NUMBER,prob5 NUMBER,
bid6 NUMBER,tid6 NUMBER,prob6 NUMBER
);
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE eventtuple IS TABLE OF eventtype;
/
b) The following call works (but is not exactly that what I want):
public class pcompDP {
public static NUMBER probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT pin) throws java.sql.SQLException {
...
}
}
create or replace FUNCTION pcompDPFunc(cin IN eventtype) RETURN NUMBER PARALLEL_ENABLE DETERMINISTIC AS LANGUAGE JAVA NAME 'pcompDP.probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT) return BigDecimal';
/
SELECT pcompDPFunc(eventtype(5, 6, 0.3, 10, 20, 0.45, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)) from dual;
c) The following call doesn't work (but should have the intended semantics):
public class pcompDP {
public static NUMBER probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT[] pin) throws java.sql.SQLException {
...
}
}
create or replace FUNCTION pcompDPFunc(cin IN eventtype) RETURN NUMBER PARALLEL_ENABLE DETERMINISTIC AS LANGUAGE JAVA NAME 'pcompDP.probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT[]) return BigDecimal';
/
SELECT pcompDPFunc(eventtuple(eventtype(2, 3, 0.234, 1, 1, 0.123, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), eventtype(5, 6, 0.3, 10, 20, 0.45, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0))) from dual;
d) What's the error? Do I have to use JPublisher or is it possible without it? I guess an array should be possible without it.
The type of the parameter seems to be wrong. Question is whether in PL/SQL, Java or SQL.
I have one column Value his Datatype is varchar2 and I want to validate it with Type column his values are(Char,Date,Number). If Column Type have value Number then column value should accept number input only. How we 'll achieve this.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a collection of objects built in a PL/SQL program.
I want to keep only the distinct elements of this collection for the rest of the program.
I failed to find the correct way to do it
For instance (the actual object is far more complex containing object attributes itself), with the following types:
drop type t1b
/
drop type t1a
/
create or replace type t1a as object (
v1 integer,
v2 integer
)
/
create or replace type t1b as table of t1a
/
I have the following variable:
v t1b := t1b(t1a(1,2),t1a(1,2));
And I want to get only one "t1a(1,2)" in my collection.
My first idea (actually the second one but it does not matter) was to use DISTINCT:
SQL> declare
2 v t1b := t1b(t1a(1,2),t1a(1,2));
3 begin
4 select distinct t1a(v1,v2) bulk collect into v from table(v);
5 dbms_output.put_line(v.count);
6 end;
7 /
declare
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-22950: cannot ORDER objects without MAP or ORDER method ORA-06512: at line 4
As I said the object is far more complex and builting a MAP function is quite tedious (but I will do it if there is no other way).
The next idea was to use multiset operators:
SQL> declare
2 v t1b := t1b(t1a(1,2),t1a(1,2));
3 begin
4 select v multiset intersect distinct v into v from dual;
5 dbms_output.put_line(v.count);
6 end;
7 /
1
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
This works well but I suspect this is not the correct way and there is one to do it in PL/SQL but currently failed to find it.
I need to count number of elements in the same catagory of an array.. For example, an array consists of {'a','b','c','c','a','d','c'} means, i need to display like a=2, b=2, c=3, d=1.
I have written the below code.
declare
type array_val is varray(10) of varchar2(15000);
counter number:=0;
SMQ_NAME ARRAY_VAL:=ARRAY_VAL();
begin
[code]....
But its not showing exact output as my requirement..
I have a one column table that store lists of elements :
create table test_table (c1 VARCHAR2(4000));
insert into test_table values ('1,23');
insert into test_table values ('1,2');
insert into test_table values ('3,4,5');
[code]...
The output column would be something like that:
output_column
1,2,7,23
6,9,0
3,4,5
I'm grouping columns that have at least one element in common.
(1,23) and (1,2) merge into : (1,2,23)
(1,2,23) and (7,2) merge into : (1,2,7,23) --> Output
(6,9) and (9,0) merge into : (6,9,0) --> Output
(3,4,5) and (5,5) merge into : (3,5,5) --> Output
I have made this logic using only PL/SQL, with loops and nested tables using function memberof, but I suppose that there is a way to improve the performance using only SQL.
PROCEDURE test_data(
)
IS
TYPE test_tab IS TABLE OF NUMBER(15);
t1 test_tab;
BEGIN
I have missing elements in a collection that should be reported to the terminal while running the procedure
IF t1.COUNT > 0 THEN
RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR('Missing Elements: ' || elments from collection t1);
How can I raise an exception with all the missing elements from collection t1 here?
END IF;
END;
I am trying to pass an Optional 'ALL' Parameter to Oracle in the SQL statement below...
USER.STATUS can be either 0 or 1 in the Source-Data (Inactive or Active). However, the :P_STATUS Parameter can be either 0, 1 or 2 (ALL).
I tried an IF/THEN/ELSE statement in the SQL below - but it doesn't work as is.
Gives and "ORA-00920: invalid relational operator" error...
-------------------
SELECT
i.LAST_NAME SURNAME,
i.FIRST_NAME GIVEN_NAME,
DECODE(u.STATUS, 1, 'Active', 0, 'Inactive') STATUS,
u.STATUS STATUS_CODE
[code].......
I need to use funtion optional parameters to construct an update statement in the funtion body. I have two scenarios, either both parameters are not null or the 2nd is null. Do I have to use
IF
(param2 is null)
THEN
udpate using param1 only
ELSE
update using both param1 and param2
END IF;
or is there a shortcut to do this?
I have created a simple function in database that take 2 arguments, the last one is optional.
Now i call the function in Forms 6i PL/SQL Trigger and omitt the default (optional) parameter the form builder crashes when i compile the form (CTRL + SHIFT + K)
i have tried to used both words "DEFAULT" and ":=" in the function's signature for making an optional argument.
I have need to know the best (least expensive) way to create a stored procedure that creates a new records in a table using a sequence and return the primary key (sequence value) for this inserted record:
CREATE TABLE TEST_A (SERIAL NUMBER PRIMARY KEY, NAME VARCHAR2(20));
CREATE SEQUENCE SEQ_TESTA_PK START WITH 1
NOCACHE
NOCYCLE;
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_TESTA_PK
BEFORE INSERT ON TEST_A
[code]....
As there is no boolean datatype in oracle (I wonder why, it exists in ms-sql, and I'm still quite new to oracle) you have several ways to 'simulate' a boolean. (1/0, 'Y'/'N', in german 'J'/'N', or this in small caps...)
Now for a checkbox you have to include the 'true'-value in the LOV. But what, if your database doesn't use '1', as you have implemented, but 'Y', or what, if the 'false'-value is not '0' but null? Each time you would have to adopt your STATIC2:...
So I am wondering about a flexible solution, and I would like to ask if and how it is possible. (Havn't found anything via searching for that yet.)
Instead of writing:
STATIC2: ;Y ... and having only the 'Y/N' implementation working, how about it would look something like that:
STATIC2: ;NOT('0' OR 'N' OR 'n' OR null) ... and a lot of reasonable boolean-implementations are incorporated. You could use a standard LOV for all checkboxes, dealing with different 'booleans'
But just like that, its not working...
So, a) it there a syntax for that at this point? and b) what do you think about that in general, or whats your 'best practice'?
Can we call one or more parameters inside a stored procedure call (like func_get_args in PHP) ? Example :
create or replace PROCEDURE test_proc (
val1 in varchar DEFAULT NULL,
val2 in varchar DEFAULT NULL,
val3 in varchar DEFAULT NULL,
[code]..........
I have a procedure that has a number of "optional" parameters.
procedure get_files(
file_name_in in varchar2 default 'dummy_file',
layout_in in number default 1,
client_in in number default null,
data_supplier_in in number default 99999
);
This procedure can be called with any combination of the input parameters.I can set up program(s) using the DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_PROGRAM procedure using a program_type => 'PLSQL_BLOCK' like this:
begin
sys.dbms_scheduler.create_program(
program_name => 'GET_MY_FILES',
program_action => '
declare
begin
get_files( layout_in => 11111, client_in => 2222 );
end ;',
program_type => 'PLSQL_BLOCK',
number_of_arguments => 0);
end;
My question is: Can I set up programs(s) using the DBMS_SCHEDULER.CREATE_PROGRAM procedure using a program_type => 'STORED_PROCEDURE' when I have "optional" parameters? It appears that ALL of the program input parameters must be defined and there is no way to indicate that a parameters is "optional".
Just to let you know this new section in SQL*Plus FAQ wiki page: How to have optional parameters and default values in SQL*Plus_script.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a table "TSKIDENT" with below structure:
CREATE TABLE TSKIDENT
(
TSKID CHAR(11 BYTE) NOT NULL,
NBRSEQ INTEGER,
IDCODE INTEGER,
FIELDNBR INTEGER,
FIELDVALUE CHAR(50 BYTE) NOT NULL
[code]....
For each TSKID/IDCODE combination there are 4 FIELDNBRS with some values. For each set of 4, there is one NBRSEQ which can change depending on the order in which the a set of same TSKID/IDCODE is entered in the table. For 1st set of 4 for a given taskid, it will be 1. For second set for same Taskid it will be 2 and so on. But if the second set has a different taskid then the number starts from 1 for the new TASKID.
Now I want to Find all the tasks which has same FIELDVALUE for a complete SET of 4. Lets say I want to find a task which meets following criteria:
IDCODE = 97
FLDNBR = 1
FIELDVALUE = 1
IDCODE = 97
FLDNBR = 2
[code]....
I want to know if the query can be restructured to a less complex than this and fetch the same results. In our example it should fetch taskid = T222222222.
I have the following questions you can create a bulk collect in which he has 3 fields and one of them is a type collect failing index or other bulk collect?.If so, how would the procedure for when to insert the first record sub fill the bulk collect. being for example something like this:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
index | codigo | nombre | telefono
| | |-----------------------
| index | telefono
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| | | |
[code]...
I have folliwng table
CREATE TABLE abcd
(
trans_type VARCHAR2(10) nn,
original_tran_no NUMBER,
original_line_item NUMBER(20),
original_trans_dt DATE);
I have to create a constraint when trans_type = 'R'then (original_tran_no and original_trans_dt ) should be not null else can be null able; is the follwing stmt right?
alter table abcd add constraint t1_chk1
check (
( case when trans_type = 'R' then (original_tran_no is not null
and original_trans_dt is not null))
I am having 7 tables consider A,B,C,D,E,F,G. whereas A is master table and others are dependent on table A. columnA is referential key for all tables. Table A is having one DateRange column.I have successfully created range partitioning with partitioning key is DateRange. and Refeernce partitioning on other tables with column referring to ColumnA with foreign key. Also created local indexes on partitioned key DateRange.
Problem is that, while fetching complex queries for reports, it is taking more time as compared to non partitioning structure. Is ref partitioning affecting on complex queries, queries returning more rows?
I need to develop a complex report , i have information in following table.vehicle with two fields number date_of_renewal date
what i need is to generate a calendar that will show all the vehicles that due for renewal based on the date.On the top it will be years , next is months for that year and below vehicles which needs renewal
I use a sequence to generate an alphanumeric code and I need to update all rows of a table with that sequence. The sequence is created with this code:
SELECT (CHR(TRUNC(s.nextval/1000) + ASCII('A')) || LTRIM(TO_CHAR(MOD(s.currval,1000),'099'))
FROM dual;
I have tried many things - most recently
Update t3_temp_table
SET mergecode =
SELECT (CHR(TRUNC(s.nextval/1000) + ASCII('A')) || LTRIM(TO_CHAR(MOD(s.currval,1000),'099'))
FROM dual;
I get missing expression error.
It works fine if I use a straight s.nextval
How Can I delete the returned two rows?
1 select s.reg_no,s.course_code,
2 s.section src_sec,a.section a_sec,a.att_date,a.att_flag
3 from attendance a ,src s
4 where a.semester_code=1
5 and a.semester_year=2013
6 and s.semester_code=1
[code]....
create materialized view ino_crm.MV_IDENTIFICATION_DETAILS REFRESH FAST as SELECT billing_account_id, i.s1 KEYS_ , COALESCE(i.s2, i.b, i.d) VALUES_ FROM ba_personal_details pd , xmltable ( '//entry[string = "identification Details"]//entry' passing xmltype(pd.details) columns s1 VARCHAR2 (255) path 'string[1]' ,s2 VARCHAR2(255) path 'string[2]' ,b VARCHAR2(255) path 'boolean' ,d VARCHAR2(255) path 'date' ) i WHERE pd.mandator_key = 'VSO01' AND pd.valid_to = to_date('01.01.4000', 'DD.MM.YYYY'); and
I get an exception like: SQL Error: ORA-12015: cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query 12015. 00000 - "cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query"
*Cause: Neither ROWIDs and nor primary key constraints are supported for complex queries.
*Action: Reissue the command with the REFRESH FORCE or REFRESH COMPLETE option or create a simple materialized view.
I have found this URL....
I have a case expression as follows:
(CASE WHEN DATEa=DATEb THEN 0
WHEN DATEa> DATEb THEN NETWORKDAYS(DATEb, DATEa)
WHEN DATEa < DATEb THEN NETWORKDAYS(DATEa, DATEb)
WHEN STATUS='PENDING' THEN NULL
ELSE NULL
END) AS RESULTa,
Now what I need to be able to do is place those results in buckets, similar to this:
(CASE WHEN RESULTa < 0 THEN '<0'
WHEN RESULTa between -1 AND 6 THEN '<=5'
WHEN RESULTa >5 THEN '>5'
ELSE ''
END) AS BUCKETa
I understand that I can't call an alias from a previous case expresson to get these desired results and how I could combine the two statements to get the desired bucket.
The data in one of the temporary table has been compiled as below. Number of Days elapsed between two transaction dates is required to be computed and multiplied with the balance. There can be multiple number of same transaction dates. When previous date and the current transaction dates are same the resulting number of day difference should be 0. But when they are different the difference between them is to be computed. On the last day of the Financial Year i.e. '31/03' of any year the difference day should be shown as 1 so as to make 365 or 366 days in a year. Simply deducting d1 from d2 on 31st will not be suffice as the difference is one day less.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------
Transaction Narration DebitCreditBalanceNo of DaysProduct
DateDifference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------
01/04/2009Opening Balance 45020450277346654
17/06/2009ByAmt5044521253424
29/06/2009By Amt1004352156678912
02/12/2009By Amt424310119476000
[code]....
improve the above code and get the desired output result.
1)I have created a complex view, and created an instead of trigger on this view
example:
create or replace trigger tr_x instead of before update on test_view_name for each row
-------
2) I have created an update policy on this view
DBMS_RLS.ADD_POLICY (
object_schema := schema_name,
object_name := name of the view,
policy_name := ploicy name,
function_schema := func schema name,
policy_function := pkg_test.fn_get_where,
statement_types := 'UPDATE',
update_check := TRUE,
policy_type := dbms_rls.dynamic);
3) function pkg_test.fn_get_where, which is used in the policy function always return 1 = 2, so that update should fail.
4) Now I will issue an update statement on the view test_view_name
update test_view_name set test_col = 1;
but still it updates the records, though update policy returns the where cluse 1 = 2
same where clause for select policy works perfectly fine.
I'm trying to create materialized view, successfully create logs for all the tables involved.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON tbJournal
WITH ROWID, SEQUENCE (tabid, companyid, storelocid, tabstatus, linetype)
INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON TBTABS
WITH ROWID, SEQUENCE (TSTAMP, COMPANYID, NUMGUESTS, POSITIONID, STORELOCID, TABSSTATUS)
INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
[code]....
The result is ora-12015: cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query
It does work fine if I remove
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM tbJournal J
WHERE j.tabstatus NOT BETWEEN -6 AND -4
AND j.linetype = 1
AND T.tabid = J.tabid
AND T.companyid = J.companyid
AND T.storelocid = J.storelocid)
from the where clause
I am creating the Dynamic list but when i am compiling the form it gives the compilation error "No list elements defined for the list item".
I can eliminate it by entering the dummy list element but this dummy value will be displayed at form run time.
