For each TSKID/IDCODE combination there are 4 FIELDNBRS with some values. For each set of 4, there is one NBRSEQ which can change depending on the order in which the a set of same TSKID/IDCODE is entered in the table. For 1st set of 4 for a given taskid, it will be 1. For second set for same Taskid it will be 2 and so on. But if the second set has a different taskid then the number starts from 1 for the new TASKID.
Now I want to Find all the tasks which has same FIELDVALUE for a complete SET of 4. Lets say I want to find a task which meets following criteria:
I want to know if the query can be restructured to a less complex than this and fetch the same results. In our example it should fetch taskid = T222222222.
1 select s.reg_no,s.course_code, 2 s.section src_sec,a.section a_sec,a.att_date,a.att_flag 3 from attendance a ,src s 4 where a.semester_code=1 5 and a.semester_year=2013 6 and s.semester_code=1 [code]....
create materialized view ino_crm.MV_IDENTIFICATION_DETAILS REFRESH FAST as SELECT billing_account_id, i.s1 KEYS_ , COALESCE(i.s2, i.b, i.d) VALUES_ FROM ba_personal_details pd , xmltable ( '//entry[string = "identification Details"]//entry' passing xmltype(pd.details) columns s1 VARCHAR2 (255) path 'string[1]' ,s2 VARCHAR2(255) path 'string[2]' ,b VARCHAR2(255) path 'boolean' ,d VARCHAR2(255) path 'date' ) i WHERE pd.mandator_key = 'VSO01' AND pd.valid_to = to_date('01.01.4000', 'DD.MM.YYYY'); and
I get an exception like: SQL Error: ORA-12015: cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query 12015. 00000 - "cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query"
*Cause: Neither ROWIDs and nor primary key constraints are supported for complex queries. *Action: Reissue the command with the REFRESH FORCE or REFRESH COMPLETE option or create a simple materialized view.
I'm trying to create materialized view, successfully create logs for all the tables involved.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON tbJournal WITH ROWID, SEQUENCE (tabid, companyid, storelocid, tabstatus, linetype) INCLUDING NEW VALUES; CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON TBTABS WITH ROWID, SEQUENCE (TSTAMP, COMPANYID, NUMGUESTS, POSITIONID, STORELOCID, TABSSTATUS) INCLUDING NEW VALUES;
[code]....
The result is ora-12015: cannot create a fast refresh materialized view from a complex query
It does work fine if I remove
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM tbJournal J WHERE j.tabstatus NOT BETWEEN -6 AND -4 AND j.linetype = 1 AND T.tabid = J.tabid AND T.companyid = J.companyid AND T.storelocid = J.storelocid) from the where clause
I have the following questions you can create a bulk collect in which he has 3 fields and one of them is a type collect failing index or other bulk collect?.If so, how would the procedure for when to insert the first record sub fill the bulk collect. being for example something like this:
----------------------------------------------------------------- index | codigo | nombre | telefono | | |----------------------- | index | telefono ----------------------------------------------------------------- | | | |
I have folliwng table CREATE TABLE abcd ( trans_type VARCHAR2(10) nn, original_tran_no NUMBER, original_line_item NUMBER(20), original_trans_dt DATE);
I have to create a constraint when trans_type = 'R'then (original_tran_no and original_trans_dt ) should be not null else can be null able; is the follwing stmt right?
alter table abcd add constraint t1_chk1 check ( ( case when trans_type = 'R' then (original_tran_no is not null and original_trans_dt is not null))
I am having 7 tables consider A,B,C,D,E,F,G. whereas A is master table and others are dependent on table A. columnA is referential key for all tables. Table A is having one DateRange column.I have successfully created range partitioning with partitioning key is DateRange. and Refeernce partitioning on other tables with column referring to ColumnA with foreign key. Also created local indexes on partitioned key DateRange.
Problem is that, while fetching complex queries for reports, it is taking more time as compared to non partitioning structure. Is ref partitioning affecting on complex queries, queries returning more rows?
I need to develop a complex report , i have information in following table.vehicle with two fields number date_of_renewal date what i need is to generate a calendar that will show all the vehicles that due for renewal based on the date.On the top it will be years , next is months for that year and below vehicles which needs renewal
There is XMLType table with structural storage. Is there a way to make schema validation disabled on some elements of complex type?
It is unpractical to maintain a schema for the element due to high volatility. Ideally it will be stored in CLOB and extracted as is a whole branch without validation, none of the elements under this complex type will be extracted separately.
(CASE WHEN DATEa=DATEb THEN 0 WHEN DATEa> DATEb THEN NETWORKDAYS(DATEb, DATEa) WHEN DATEa < DATEb THEN NETWORKDAYS(DATEa, DATEb) WHEN STATUS='PENDING' THEN NULL ELSE NULL END) AS RESULTa,
Now what I need to be able to do is place those results in buckets, similar to this:
(CASE WHEN RESULTa < 0 THEN '<0' WHEN RESULTa between -1 AND 6 THEN '<=5' WHEN RESULTa >5 THEN '>5' ELSE '' END) AS BUCKETa
I understand that I can't call an alias from a previous case expresson to get these desired results and how I could combine the two statements to get the desired bucket.
The data in one of the temporary table has been compiled as below. Number of Days elapsed between two transaction dates is required to be computed and multiplied with the balance. There can be multiple number of same transaction dates. When previous date and the current transaction dates are same the resulting number of day difference should be 0. But when they are different the difference between them is to be computed. On the last day of the Financial Year i.e. '31/03' of any year the difference day should be shown as 1 so as to make 365 or 366 days in a year. Simply deducting d1 from d2 on 31st will not be suffice as the difference is one day less.
I'm trying to call a Java function from within a PL/SQL aggregation function with a (array of) complex data type.
a) basic definitions (work and are ok)
CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE eventtype AS OBJECT ( relevance NUMBER, bid1 NUMBER,tid1 NUMBER,prob1 NUMBER, bid2 NUMBER,tid2 NUMBER,prob2 NUMBER, bid3 NUMBER,tid3 NUMBER,prob3 NUMBER, bid4 NUMBER,tid4 NUMBER,prob4 NUMBER, bid5 NUMBER,tid5 NUMBER,prob5 NUMBER, bid6 NUMBER,tid6 NUMBER,prob6 NUMBER ); CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE eventtuple IS TABLE OF eventtype; /
b) The following call works (but is not exactly that what I want):
public class pcompDP { public static NUMBER probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT pin) throws java.sql.SQLException { ... } } create or replace FUNCTION pcompDPFunc(cin IN eventtype) RETURN NUMBER PARALLEL_ENABLE DETERMINISTIC AS LANGUAGE JAVA NAME 'pcompDP.probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT) return BigDecimal'; / SELECT pcompDPFunc(eventtype(5, 6, 0.3, 10, 20, 0.45, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0)) from dual;
c) The following call doesn't work (but should have the intended semantics):
public class pcompDP { public static NUMBER probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT[] pin) throws java.sql.SQLException { ... } } create or replace FUNCTION pcompDPFunc(cin IN eventtype) RETURN NUMBER PARALLEL_ENABLE DETERMINISTIC AS LANGUAGE JAVA NAME 'pcompDP.probComputation(oracle.sql.STRUCT[]) return BigDecimal'; / SELECT pcompDPFunc(eventtuple(eventtype(2, 3, 0.234, 1, 1, 0.123, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0), eventtype(5, 6, 0.3, 10, 20, 0.45, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0))) from dual;
d) What's the error? Do I have to use JPublisher or is it possible without it? I guess an array should be possible without it.
The type of the parameter seems to be wrong. Question is whether in PL/SQL, Java or SQL.
I have inherited a query that union alls 2 select statements, I added a further field to one of the select statements ( a date field). However I need to add another dummy field to the 2nd select statement so the union query marries up I have tried to do this by simply adding a
select 'date_on' to add a field called date on populated by 'date_on' (the name of the column in the first query)
however when I run the union query i get the error Ora-01790 expression must have same datatype as corresponding expression.
I have a dynamic query stored in a function that returns a customized SQL statement depending on the environment it is running in. I would like to create a Materialized View that uses this dynamic query.
I have data in a table and another in XML file,I used SQL query to retrive the data placed on the table, and link this query with XML query that retrieves the data stored in the xml file. The data stored in the table and xml file sharing a key field, but the xml contents are less than what in the table.I want to show only the data shared between the two queries, how can I do that?
e.g.:
Table emp:
e_id | e_name | e_sal 023 | John | 6000 143 | Tom | 9000 876 | Chi | 4000 987 | Alen | 7800
I have the following four tables with the following structures Table A
ColA1 ColA2 ColA3 ColA4 ColA5 AA 100 CC DD EE
Table B
ColB1 ColB2 ColB3 ColB4 ColB5 AA 100 40452 A9 CDE
when these two tables were joined like the following:
Select colA1,ColA2, ColA3, ColA4, ColB3,ColB4, ColB5 from table A Left outer join (select ColB3, ColB4, ColB5 from table B where colB3 = (select max(colB3) from table B ) on (colA1 = colB1 and ColA2 = col B2)
I have a query that is pulling back more rows when I use the dblink than when I hit the linked database directly.
For example:
select x,y,z from mytable@dblink
returns 788,324 rows
while select x,y,z from mytable
returns 712,102 rows
It's the exact same query, with the only difference being the dblink. It's not pulling the data into a cursor or array, it's a simple, straightforward query on a remote database.
Is there a technique to getting a Top-N query to work as a sub-select in a larger query -or- is there another way to generate Top-N like results that works as a sub-select?
Background:
We have a large query that is being used to build an export from a legacy HR system to a new one. Amount the data needed in the export is the employees primary phone number.
The legacy HR system allows multiple phone numbers to be stored in a simple table structure:
SELECT emp_id, phone_type, phone_number FROM employee_phones
The new HR system does allow for multiple phone numbers, however they need a primary phone number identified and stored with the employee master information. (Subsequent phone numbers get stored in alternate table.)
From a business perspective, we have decided that if they have a HOME phone in the legacy system that should be the primary in the new system, if no HOME phone, then WORK, if no WORK then CELL.
That can be represented as:
SELECT * FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = '46021' ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')
SELECT * FROM (SELECT * FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = '46021' ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results WHERE ROWNUM = 1
SELECT phone_number FROM (SELECT phone_number FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = '46021' ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results WHERE ROWNUM = 1
phone_number ------------------- 1111111111
However, when the Top-N query is added as a sub-select in a larger query using the employee id from the larger query (WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id), it fails saying that �export.emp_id� is not a valid id.
(SELECT phone_number FROM (SELECT phone_number FROM employee_people_phones WHERE emp_id = export.emp_id ORDER BY decode(phone_type, 'HOME', 'a', 'WORK', 'b', 'CELL', 'c', 'z')) results WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
1.Any way around this? Is it possible to put a Top-N (with a WHERE clause using data from the main query) in a sub-select?
2.Any alternatives (other than Top-N) to delivering a ROWNUM=1 result with a �custom� ORDER BY statement?
Other Notes: Yes, we know we could do two queries in the data conversion first deliver the bulk data to the target table, and then update with the phone numbers. However, for multiple reasons, that is less than desirable.
I am having a Select query(below Query1) and I want to use one column(sum(col4)) from this Select query to be displayed in another Select query(Query 2). how to display this.
Query 1 :- select a.col1,a.col2,b.col3,sum(b.col4) from tab a, tab b where a.key1=b.key1 and a.key2=b.key2 group by a.col1,a.col2,b.col3
Query 2 :- select a.col1,a.col2,b.col3,sum(b.col6) from tab a, tab b where a.key1=b.key1 and a.key2=b.key2 group by a.col1,a.col2,b.col3,b.col5
I am facing problem with a select query in oracle 10g database from vb.net.It was working for oracle 9. The select statement I have written is as follows
I have one table in database that contains 3 foreign keys to another tables(this three tables name are: manager,worker and employee). in each row only one foreign key is filled.I need to write one query that with attention which column of fk is filled in where clause specified condition is performed. I write simple query in jpa but doesn't work properly
select b from allEmployees b where b.manager.name= :name OR b.worker.name = :name OR b.employee.name= :name
