SELECT DAY_NBR ||' '||HOUR_NBR ||' '||MINUTE_NBR AS "@TIMEPOINT",
RTRIM ( xmlagg (xmlelement (c, procedure_nm || ', ')).extract ('//text()'), ', ' ) AS "@LABEL",
RTRIM ( xmlagg (xmlelement (c, procedure_id || ', ')).extract ('//text()'), ', ' ) AS "@PROCEDURE_ID",
cursor
(SELECT SUBJECT_NBR AS "@LABEL",TO_CHAR (PSUB.procedure_tm,'HH24:MI') AS "@TIME",
PROCEDURE_ID AS "@PROCEDURE_ID", PROCEDURE_SUB_ID AS "@PROCEDURE_SUB_ID"
FROM PROCEDURE_SUBJECT_TIME PSUB WHERE PSUB.ACTIVE_FLG = 1
AND PSUB.PROCEDURE_ID in pr.PROCEDURE_ID
ORDER BY PSUB.procedure_tm,PROCEDURE_ID
)AS VOLUNTEER
FROM SCHEDULE_PROCEDURE PR
WHERE active_flg = 1 and SCHEDULE_ID = 200900195269 group BY day_nbr,hour_nbr,minute_nbr,procedure_nm;
and the error getting is ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
I have ORacle XE installed on my machine and everything works fine. I can connect to it using forms, run my application etc. Now, I wanted to write a proc which can send email from Oracle XE.So after investigating, I think UTL_SMTP and UTL_MAIL are my options. For which I need to enable the ut_mail package and one more which I have done. But everytime I run a package, I get the error
I am using utl_smtp to send emails. I am getting the below error message.
Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29279: SMTP permanent error: 501 5.5.2 Syntax error in parameters scanning "TO" at - 5150 Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29277: invalid SMTP operation at - 5200 Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29277: invalid SMTP operation at - 5200 Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29277: invalid SMTP operation at - 7200 Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29277: invalid SMTP operation at - 6000 Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29277: invalid SMTP operation at - 7250 Error in XX(Package name) ORA-29277: invalid SMTP operation at - 8450.
I have checked the mail id in the "TO" list and found them to be valid. Is there could be any other reason? I have run this package in test instance and it is working fine. I am able to receive mails. In the test instance, I have put my mail id in the to list.
I am succeeded to send mail (through my comapany mail server) using following pl/sql. But, i am unable to send mails using the same coding, when i connected to smtp.gmail.com. i received the following error :
ERROR at line 1: ORA-29279: SMTP permanent error: 530 5.7.0 Must issue a STARTTLS command first y78sm463148pyg ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_SMTP", line 17 ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_SMTP", line 98
[code]...
Then I received the following error message: ERROR at line 1: ORA-29278: SMTP transient error: 454 TLS not available due to temporary reason ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_SMTP", line 17 ORA-06512: at "SYS.UTL_SMTP", line 96
[code]...
my demo_mail package body coded as
FUNCTION begin_session RETURN utl_smtp.connection IS conn utl_smtp.connection; BEGIN -- open SMTP connection
select t1.c1 as gr1, t2.c1 as gr2, t1.c2 from test_data t1,test_data t2 where t1.c1<>t2.c1 and t1.c2=t2.c2 and (select count(*) from test_data t3 where t3.c1=t1.c1)= (select count(*) from test_data t4 where t4.c1=t2.c1) order by 1 asc, 2 asc
but I don't find the way to refilter to group the data as expected. The idea is find subsets and show the set of data and values in column c1.
?I have the following requirement, the output should be:
Ticket count (sr_number) % of tickets inside DL Number of tickets inside DL Average cycle time (cycle time = closed date - created date) Total cycle time (cycle time = closed date - created date) Number of reassignments (sum)
DL - (deadline) formula is, closed date <= target_date
This should be displayed, grouped by year, then month and then by assignment group. The values should be in descending order(dates) Not sure how group by will work here.I am able to write the basic code for the above, but group by based on year, month and assignment group is pretty confusing to me.
I have a table that cannot be changed with a field called transaction_reference in the transactions table. This field contains any number of some values in a look-up table called codes.
The table codes contains 'AA', 'BB', 'CC'.
A typical transaction_reference field may look like 'CC BB' or 'AA' or 'AA CC' or 'AA CC BB' - any number, any order.My goal is to get a count of records grouped by another field from the transactions table.
Transactions table example: transaction_id | transaction_reference | family --------------------------------------------- 1 | AA BB | foo 2 | BB CC | bar 3 | BB | hello 4 | AA CC BB | foo 5 | BB AA | bar
So the results should look like:
family | code | count foo | AA | 2 foo | BB | 2 foo | CC | 1 bar | AA | 1 bar | BB | 2 bar | CC | 1 hello | AA | 0 hello | BB | 1 hello | CC | 0
If the counts of 0 (like the third to last and last line above) don't show up I'm ok with that.I put together an explode function like this one here but I'm really not sure where to go from here. I can split the transaction_reference, but I'm not sure what to compare it to or how.
I realize that a field in the transactions table for AA, BB, and CC would be ideal, but I can't do that... the powers that be won't let me change the table.
for each exploded segment from transaction_reference look for it in the codes table if it exists, add 1 to the count
My requirement is to concatenate two column values and place them in a new column.I have done it using self join but it limits the purpose,meaning when I have more than 2 values for grouped columns then it won't work.How to make this dynamic,so that for any number of columns grouped,I can concatenate.
SELECT a.co_nm, a.mnfst_nr, a.mnfst_qty, a.mnfst_nr || ':' || a.mnfst_qty || ';' || b.mnfst_nr || ':' || b.mnfst_qty FROM vw_acao_critical a JOIN vw_acao_critical b ON a.co_nm = b.co_nm AND a.mnfst_nr = b.mnfst_nr [code]......
What will be the case when I need to concatenate for more number of values.
like when co_nm has three bahs and manfst_nr and manfst_qty has 3 values for each for bah.and if three are having same_mnfst nr then I should use something dynamic.how to achieve this.
Using Oracle 11g...We have a table in our database of data with the following information:
MASTER_RECORD, MEMBER_RECORD, BUSINESS_UNIT, GENDER, DOB (date), age [at time of month_record], MONTH_RECORD (date) [31-MON-YEAR for recorded active month]
The table has ~55 million records. Existing index is only on MASTER_RECORD.There is now a need to create a view which is an aggregate count of member records, grouped by business_unit,gender, age per year. eg:
business_unit, gender, age, month_record, num_of_members -> for every combination unit5, F, 25, 31-JUN-2011, 622 unit3, M, 18, 31-MAY-2011, 573
The view can be created now, but, is not fast enough to be reasonably considered a view. This table is re-created every month from a procedure, so there is flexibility on how it is created. Use interval partitioning by year( something I have not experienced using), create an index on the month_record,then create view.
I was reading a tutorial for analytical function and i found something like this
sum(princial) keep(dense_rank first order by d_date) over partition by (userid, alias, sec_id, flow, p_date)
How to translate this into simple queries / subquery? i am aware that analytical function are faster but i would like to know how this can translate to using query without analytical function.
I have a database containing the following after entering the following sql command
SELECT TITLES.TITLE_ID AS TITLE_ID, (PRICE * SALES), TITLES.ROYALTY_RATE AS ROYALTLY_RATE, AUTHOR_TITLES.ROYALTY_SHARE AS ROYALTY_SHARE, AUTHORS.FNAME AS FNAME, AUTHORS.LNAME AS LNAME FROM TITLES, AUTHOR_TITLES, AUTHORS WHERE TITLES.TITLE_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.TITLE_ID AND AUTHORS.AU_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.AU_ID
What I need to do is create a subquery and use Aggregation to list the author receiving the greatest royalties on revenue. so i used the command to get the royalties
SELECT TITLES.TITLE_ID AS TITLE_ID, (PRICE * SALES), AUTHORS.FNAME AS FNAME, AUTHORS.LNAME AS LNAME, ((PRICE * SALES) * TITLES.ROYALTY_RATE * AUTHOR_TITLES.ROYALTY_SHARE) AS ROYALTIES FROM TITLES, AUTHOR_TITLES, AUTHORS WHERE TITLES.TITLE_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.TITLE_ID AND AUTHORS.AU_ID = AUTHOR_TITLES.AU_ID
So how do I add up the royalties values associated with each author and find the max? for example I add klee hulls's royalties from each book and get 2,123,336.32(doing it by hand on calculator) what is the sql to find the max royalties for each author? P.S the answer should be KLEE HULL with 2,123,336.32
I am returning the ORA-01427 after running the query below. why I am returning the error and how to address it.
select b.value , b.name, p.value ...... (case when p.value <> 'G2' then null else (select c.oldvalue from ad_changelog c where c.record_id = b.c_bpartner_id and c.ad_table_id = 291 and c.ad_column_id = 4216 ) end) as oldtradeName from c_bpartner b, zz_receipt r, zz_recp_alloc a, m_product p, ad_user us where a.c_bpartner_id = b.c_bpartner_id and a.zz_receipt_id = r.zz_receipt_id and us.ad_user_id = r.createdby and p.m_product_id = a.m_product_id
Just trying to update a table in which the sales amount is inserted when the sales amount is null.
I have
UPDATE ph2_customer_temp SET sales_amount = ( SELECT sl.sales_amount FROM PH2_CUSTOMER_TEMP pct join sales_limit sl on substr(pct.site_code,1,2) = sl.state where pct.credit_limit is null )
restricting a subquery's results to the first record. If I use the following:
SELECT WU.DISCREP, M.PART, M.ETA FROM DB.MICAP M LEFT JOIN DB.WRITEUPS WU ON M.WRITEUPID=WU.WRITEUPID LEFT JOIN DB.WUC WUC ON WU.WUCID=WUC.WUCID WHERE (WU.AIRCRAFTID=205) AND (WU.CORRECTED=0) ORDER BY WU.PACER DESC, WUC.WUCCODE
But I need the highlighted line eliminated. I've tried DISTINCT subqueries in the WHERE M.WRITEUPID IN (SELECT DISTINCT... various experiments with joins, etc.
I can't seem to wrap my head around this problem I'm having with a query. I need to update all rows in my ps_ntsr_gf_stufile tables with the concatenated values from the ps_classes_tbl table where a.CLASS_NBR = b.CLASS_NBR. I tried to limit it to emplid from the ps_stdnt_enrl table but no luck.
UPDATE ps_ntsr_gf_stufile a SET a.CLASS_NAME = (SELECT CONCAT('SUBJECT', 'CATALOG_NBR') FROM PS_CLASS_TBL b WHERE a.CLASS_NBR = b.CLASS_NBR AND a.STRM = '1118' AND a.INSTITUTION = 'NT752') WHERE a.EMPLID IN (SELECT distinct EMPLID FROM PS_STDNT_ENRL);
I'm facing an issue "ORA-00904". Below is the test case. Both the queries are different. I'm only focussed to find out the reason.
CREATE TABLE ACCT ( ACCTNBR NUMBER(10) ) ;
[Code].....
In first query I'm able to refer to table alias A but in second query I'm not able to refer it. The only difference is that in second query I've not used outer table at second level. Is it the desired behaviour?
/* (SELECT A.TOTAL_ALLOCATED_AMT FROM CLS_ALLOCATION_HDR@LAMS_PROD A WHERE A.APPROVAL_DATE BETWEEN BCTH.TRAN_FROM_DATE AND BCTH.TRAN_TO_DATE AND A.CUSTOMER_ID=BCTH.CUSTOMER_ID AND ALLOCATION_ID IN (SELECT ALLOCATION_ID FROM CLS_ALLOCATION_DTL@LAMS_PROD B WHERE ENTITY_TYPE='REC' AND B.ALLOCATION_ID=A.ALLOCATION_ID AND ENTITY_ID IN (SELECT RECEIPT_NO FROM CLS_RECEIPT_DTL@LAMS_PROD C WHERE B.ENTITY_ID=C.RECEIPT_NO AND RECEIPT_STATUS='A'))AND ALLOCATION_STATUS='A')*/
when i am trying to run this query i am getting an error'single row subquery returns more than one row'.
My problem : I Wrote a package(a function), this function just return a varchar2 , but in this function I wrote a cursor , when I call this function in this manner :
I have written the below sql select loc,(select ename from emp where emp.deptno = dept.deptno) from dept
It results in the below error.
[Error] Execution (1: 13): ORA-01427: single-row subquery returns more than one row
I have modified the SQL and got the required output select em.ename,dep.loc from (select loc,deptno from dept) dep , (select ename,deptno from emp) em where dep.deptno=em.deptno(+)
I have written the below sql to fetch all loc for emp which got executed
SELECT ENAME, (SELECT LOC FROM DEPT WHERE DEPT.DEPTNO=EMP.DEPTNO) LOC FROM EMP
But as i need all locations irrespective of any emp in the locaton so i tried to put emp side (+) which resulted in error.
I read in a book that you can't use subquery in an insert statement . E.g:
1)insert into dates (date_col) values (select sysdate fom dual) but when i tried using subquery like this:
2)insert into regions values ((select max(region_id)+1 from regions), 'Oce');
This query worked but 1st query didnt.From my assumptions if we try inserting values in table with the subqueries for a particular column as in 1st query , it will throw error but not while inserting values in all columns as in 2nd query.
The table creation and Data insertion script is attached with the message.Basically I want to sort all the data based on the order by clause and then remove duplicates from the TSKID column and get distinct TSKIDs in the same order.I have below query to sort data:
SELECT * FROM piwingetworkitems_vd ORDER BY profilepriority, authdptpriority, returnpriority ASC, priority DESC, effdate, tskid
But when I add a DISTINCT to the query, it does some kind of random sort and doesn't return the data as per above ORDER BY query and ignoring the SORT order.
SELECT DISTINCT tskid FROM (SELECT * FROM piwingetworkitems_vd ORDER BY profilepriority, authdptpriority, returnpriority ASC, priority DESC, effdate, tskid)
Is there any way to select the DISTINCT taskids ordered as per requirements?
I understand what the message "subquery returning multiple rows" means but I have a case where I'm not 100% sure why it's happening to my update query (which in turn probably means I don't fully understand what's going on behind the scenes)
Here is my query:
Update A set (A.id, A.alt_name, A.min_rank)= (SELECT B.id, B.fullname, MIN(B.nm_rankval) FROM B, A WHERE A.id = B.id AND A.name <> B.fullname AND B.nametyp = 'ON' GROUP BY B.id, B.fullname) ;
The subquery returns 6 rows but they are all unique in terms of the id, name, rankval, etc...I naturally thought that the update statement wouldn't have a problem with this since the subquery is returning rows that are not duplicates and match one for one between table A and B. I used the group by to ensure I return unique values from table B (which does have duplicate id values)
Each of those 6 rows from the subquery of table B can be matched 1-1 with table A...so what am I missing.
